基于密度权重的可靠性灵敏度分析方法

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2013.0259

固体力学与飞行器总体设计

本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索

前一篇 | 后一篇

基于密度权重的可靠性灵敏度分析方法

吕召燕, 吕震宙, 李贵杰, 唐樟春

西北工业大学航空学院, 陕西西安 710072

收稿日期:2013-03-28 修回日期:2013-05-17 出版日期:2014-01-25 发布日期:2013-05-20
通讯作者: 吕震宙，Tel.：029-88460480 E-mail：zhenzhoulu@nwpu.edu.cn E-mail:zhenzhoulu@nwpu.edu.cn
作者简介:吕召燕女，硕士研究生。主要研究方向：飞行器设计及可靠性工程。E-mail：zhaoyanlv@mail.nwpu.edu.cn；吕震宙女，博士，教授，博士生导师。主要研究方向：飞行器设计及可靠性工程。Tel：029-88460480 E-mail：zhenzhoulu@nwpu.edu.cn
基金资助:
航空科学基金（2011ZA53015）

Reliability Sensitivity Analysis Method Based on Weight Index of Density

LV Zhaoyan, LV Zhenzhou, LI Guijie, TANG Zhangchun

School of Aeronautics, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an 710072, China

Received:2013-03-28 Revised:2013-05-17 Online:2014-01-25 Published:2013-05-20
Supported by:
Aeronautical Science Foundation of China(2011ZA53015)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为了提高可靠性灵敏度求解数字模拟法的效率，提出了一种变量空间确定性低偏差均匀抽样与样本点处联合概率密度函数构造权重相结合的方法，来估计可靠性灵敏度。该方法通过均匀样本点处联合概率密度函数的权重保证了可靠性灵敏度的估计值收敛于真值，而由低偏差抽样代替原问题中的联合概率密度抽样则可以保证更低的误差阶以及在小失效概率条件下抽得的样本有更高的可能性落入失效域，从而保证了所提方法具有更高的收敛速度。另外，所提方法可以采用与独立变量相同的步骤来估计相关变量情况下的可靠性灵敏度，计算简便，适用范围广。算例充分证明了所提方法的优越性。

关键词: 低偏差抽样, 可靠性灵敏度, 联合概率密度函数, 权重, 小失效概率

Abstract:

In order to improve the efficiency of digital simulation in approximating reliability sensitivity, a method is proposed which works by generating deterministic and low-discrepancy samples uniformly in the design space and applying the value of joint probability density function as a weight index at any sample. The weight indexes ensure the estimated values of the reliability sensitivity are converged to the true values. This way of getting points by low-discrepancy sampling instead of depending on a variable's probability density can ensure smaller error bounds and a higher possibility for the samples to fall into failure domain, so that the convergence speed becomes much higher for small failure probability events. Additionally, the steps to calculate the reliability sensitivity with related variables are the same as those with independent variables, which is another advantage that makes the method simpler and easily applicable. Several examples in this paper demonstrate the advantages of the proposed method sufficiently.

Key words: low-discrepancy sampling, reliability sensitivity, joint probability density function, weight index, small failure probability

中图分类号:

吕召燕, 吕震宙, 李贵杰, 唐樟春. 基于密度权重的可靠性灵敏度分析方法[J]. 航空学报, 2014, 35(1): 179-186.

LV Zhaoyan, LV Zhenzhou, LI Guijie, TANG Zhangchun. Reliability Sensitivity Analysis Method Based on Weight Index of Density[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2014, 35(1): 179-186.

参考文献

[1] Wu Y T, Monhant Y S. Variable screening and ranking using sampling based sensitivity measures[J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2006, 91(6): 634-647.

[2] Wu Y T. Computational methods for efficient structural reliability and reliability sensitivity analysis[J]. AIAA Journal, 1994, 32(8): 1717-1723.

[3] Schueller G I, Stix R. A critical appraisal of methods to determine failure probabilities[J]. Structural Safety, 1987, 4(4): 293-309.

[4] Melchers R E. Importance sampling in structural system[J]. Structural Safety, 1989, 6(1): 3-10.

[5] Ibrahim Y. Observations on applications of importance sampling in structural reliability analysis[J]. Structural Safety, 1991, 9(4): 269-281.

[6] Au S K, Beck J L. Estimation of small failure probabilities in high dimensions by subset simulation[J]. Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, 2001, 16(4): 263-277.

[7] Au S K. On the solution of first excursion problems by simulation with applications to probabilistic seismic performance assessment[D]. California: California Institute of Technology, 2001.

[8] Au S K. Reliability-based design sensitivity by efficient simulation[J]. Computers & Structures, 2005, 83(14): 1048-1061.

[9] Schuller G I, Pradlwarter H J, Koutsourelakis P S. A critical appraisal of reliability estimation procedures for high dimensions[J]. Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, 2004, 19(4): 463-473.

[10] Schuller G I, Pradlwarter H J, Koutsourelakis P S. A comparative study of reliability estimation procedures for high dimension[C]//16th ASCE Engineering Mechanics Conference, 2003.

[11] Ditlevsen O, Olesen R, Mohr G. Solution of a class of load combination problems by directional simulation[J]. Structural Safety, 1987, 4(2): 95-109.

[12] Ditlevsen O, Melchers R E, Gluver H. General multi-dimensional probability integration by directional simulation[J]. Computers & Structures, 1990, 36(2): 355-368.

[13] Jinsuo N, Ellingwood B R. Directional methods for structural reliability analysis[J]. Structural Safety, 2000, 22(3): 233-249.

[14] Dai H Z, Wang W. Quasi-Monte Carlo method for structural reliability analysis[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2009, 30(4): 666-671. (in Chinese) 戴鸿哲, 王伟. 结构可靠性分析的拟蒙特卡罗方法[J]. 航空学报, 2009, 30(4): 666-671.

[15] Feng M, Ghosn M. Modified subset simulation method for reliability analysis of structural systems[J]. Structural Safety, 2011, 33(4): 251-260.

[16] Fang G C, Lu Z Z, Wei P P. Modified subset simulation method for reliability and reliability sensitivity analysis of structural system[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2012, 33(8): 1440-1447. (in Chinese) 房冠成, 吕震宙, 魏鹏飞. 结构系统可靠性及可靠性灵敏度分析的改进子集模拟法[J]. 航空学报, 2012, 33(8): 1440-1447.

[17] Hao W R, Lu Z Z, Tian L F. A novel method for analyzing variance based importance measure of correlated input variables[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2011, 32(9): 1637-1643. (in Chinese) 郝文锐, 吕震宙, 田龙飞. 基于方差的相关输入变量重要性测度分析新方法[J]. 航空学报, 2011, 32(9): 1637-1643.

[18] Echard B, Gayton N, Lemaire M, et al. A combined importance sampling and Kriging reliability method for small failure probabilities with time-demanding numerical models[J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2013, 111: 232-240.

[19] Li G J, Lu Z Z, Wang P. Sensitivity analysis of non-probability reliability of uncertain structures[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2012, 33(3): 501-507. (in Chinese) 李贵杰, 吕震宙, 王攀. 结构非概率可靠性灵敏度分析方法[J]. 航空学报, 2012, 33(3): 501-507.

[20] Mohsen R, Mahmoud M, Mehdi A M. A new efficient simulation method to approximate the probability of failure and most probable point[J]. Structural Safety, 2012, 39: 22-29.

[21] Yuan X K, Lu Z Z, Yue Z F. Bootstrap confidence interval of quantile function estimation for small samples[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2012, 33(10): 1842-1849. (in Chinese) 袁修开, 吕震宙, 岳珠峰. 小样本下分位数函数的Bootstrap置信区间估计[J]. 航空学报, 2012, 33(10): 1842-1849.

[22] Niederreiter H. Random number generation and quasi-Monte Carlo methods[M]. Philadelphia: SIAM, 1992.

[23] Halton J H. On the efficiency of certain quasi-random sequences of points in evaluation multi-dimensional integrals[J]. Nurnerische Mathematik, 1960, 2(1): 84-90.

编辑推荐

Metrics

阅读次数

全文

520

HTML			PDF

最新录用	在线预览	正式出版	最新录用	在线预览	正式出版
0	0	1	0	0	519

来源	本网站	其他网站

次数	166	354
比例	32%	68%

摘要

2851

最新录用	在线预览	正式出版

0	0	2851

来源	本网站	其他网站

次数	1675	1176
比例	59%	41%

本文评价

地址：北京市海淀区北四环中路辅路238号柏彦大厦

邮政编码：100083

E-mail：hkxb@buaa.edu.cn

关于我们

期刊社服务

专业学科

封面文章

友情链接

主管单位：中国科学技术协会主办单位：中国航空学会北京航空航天大学

基于密度权重的可靠性灵敏度分析方法

Reliability Sensitivity Analysis Method Based on Weight Index of Density

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	张絮涵, 曹祎, 孙静楠, 潘舜智. 民机座舱空气环境参数权重分析方法对比研究[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(20): 228480-228480.
[2]	陈志远, 李璐祎. 参数不确定性下高效的可靠性灵敏度分析方法[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(9): 325881-325881.
[3]	韩淞宇, 邵海东, 姜洪开, 张笑阳. 基于提升卷积神经网络的航空发动机高速轴承智能故障诊断[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(9): 625479-625479.
[4]	颜黎明, 郭鑫, 赵冬冬. 基于新型权重解析法的永磁电机预测转矩控制[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(12): 327785-327785.
[5]	何华锋, 王依繁, 何耀民, 苏敬, 韩晓斐. 导弹武器系统时间同步网的综合性能评估方法[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(6): 324564-324564.
[6]	费伦, 段海滨, 徐小斌, 鲍瑞, 孙永斌. 基于变权重变异鸽群优化的无人机空中加油自抗扰控制器设计[J]. 航空学报, 2020, 41(1): 323490-323490.
[7]	赵翔, 李洪双. 基于交叉熵和空间分割的全局可靠性灵敏度分析[J]. 航空学报, 2018, 39(2): 221570-221570.
[8]	姚裕盛, 徐开俊. 基于BP神经网络的飞行训练品质评估[J]. 航空学报, 2017, 38(S1): 721513-721513.
[9]	柳诗雨, 吕震宙, 员婉莹, 肖思男. 小失效概率情况下的全局可靠性灵敏度分析的高效方法[J]. 航空学报, 2016, 37(9): 2766-2774.
[10]	戴鸿哲;王伟. 结构可靠性分析的拟蒙特卡罗方法[J]. 航空学报, 2009, 30(4): 666-671.
[11]	陈磊;吕震宙. 相关变量模糊可靠性灵敏度分析的线抽样方法[J]. 航空学报, 2008, 29(5): 1186-1195.
[12]	王礼沅;张恒喜;徐浩军. 基于粗糙集的空战效能多指标综合评估模型[J]. 航空学报, 2008, 29(4): 880-885.
[13]	李银霞;袁修干;杨春信;王黎静;杜俊敏. 歼击机座舱工效学评价指标权重系数的确定[J]. 航空学报, 2006, 27(3): 370-373.
[14]	李寿安;张恒喜;李曙林;孟科. 飞机生存力评估与综合权衡方法研究[J]. 航空学报, 2005, 26(1): 23-26.
[15]	王珉;朱剑英;张幼桢. 金属切削加工状态的模糊（Fuzzy）模式识别（一）——模糊等价矩阵聚类分析法[J]. 航空学报, 1985, 6(1): 83-90.