航空学报 > 2025, Vol. 46 Issue (8): 631042-631042   doi: 10.7527/S1000-6893.2024.31042

桨扇发动机进气道/对转桨扇气动干扰影响

赵海宇1,2, 周莉1,2(), 邓文剑1,2, 王占学1,2   

  1. 1.西北工业大学 动力与能源学院,西安 710129
    2.轻型涡轮动力全国重点实验室,西安 710129 3.先进航空发动机协同创新中心,北京 100191
  • 收稿日期:2024-08-06 修回日期:2024-09-12 接受日期:2024-10-10 出版日期:2024-10-25 发布日期:2024-10-15
  • 通讯作者: 周莉 E-mail:zhouli@nwpu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(52376032);国家科技重大专项(J2019-Ⅱ-0015-0036,J2022-Ⅰ-0002-0002)

Aerodynamic interference effects of propfan engine inlet and contra-rotating propfan

Haiyu ZHAO1,2, Li ZHOU1,2(), Wenjian DENG1,2, Zhanxue WANG1,2   

  1. 1.School of Power and Energy,Northwestern Polytechnical University,Xi’an  710129,China
    2.National Key Laboratory of Science and Technology on Advanced Light-duty Gas-turbine,Xi’an  710129,China
    3.Collaborative Innovation Center for Advanced Aero-Engine,Beijing  100191,China
  • Received:2024-08-06 Revised:2024-09-12 Accepted:2024-10-10 Online:2024-10-25 Published:2024-10-15
  • Contact: Li ZHOU E-mail:zhouli@nwpu.edu.cn
  • Supported by:
    National Natural Science Foundation of China(52376032);National Science and Technology Major Project (J2019-Ⅱ-0015-0036, J2022-Ⅰ-0002-0002)

摘要:

针对桨扇发动机全环形进气道,开展8×8对转桨扇与进气道的耦合气动影响研究。采用滑移网格进行非定常流场计算,对比分析了高空巡航状态和地面起飞状态两种典型工况下对转桨扇/进气道的耦合气动影响,归纳总结了不同工况下的滑流影响机理、定量影响结果以及对转桨扇耦合进气道前后的气动性能差异。研究结果表明,对转桨扇产生的桨毂涡是影响进气道内流特性的主要因素,巡航工况下后排尾迹涡是进气道内涡系结构的主导,是造成流动不均匀的主要因素,地面工况下前后排尾迹耦合增强,常以对涡形式存在,共同影响进气道内流流场。尾迹涡在进气道内从前向后周期性运动带来气动参数的周期性振荡,当进气道内涡系结构以桨扇尾迹涡为主时,进气道沿程参数振荡幅值逐渐衰减。但振荡频率保持不变,相位角也保持等间距落后,当壁面分离涡脱体后,进气道涡系结构发生变化,参数振荡幅值、频率以及相位角均因分离涡的掺混发生扰动。滑流使得进气道总压水平提升,但复杂的尾迹涡导致进气道出口总压畸变和旋流畸变急剧恶化,内流出现严重不均匀分布,内流流动损失在巡航时增大2.85倍,起飞时增大1.09倍。此外,耦合进气道后,改变了对转桨扇后排叶片通道内部流场结构,使得通道内速度降低,叶片吸力面激波位置前移;且改变了不同高度叶素的工作特性,提高了桨扇推力性能。在设计工况下,前排桨叶推力系数提高了5.9%,后排推力系数提高了27%,桨扇整体效率提高了5.2%。

关键词: 桨扇发动机, 全环形进气道, 对转桨扇, 进气道性能, 滑流

Abstract:

A study was conducted on the aerodynamic interference effects of Contra-Rotating Propfan (CRP) and propfan engine inlet. Unsteady numerical calculation was carried out by the sliding grid method, and the coupled aerodynamic effects of the 8X8 CRP and inlet were compared and analyzed under two typical operating conditions: the high-altitude cruising state and ground takeoff state. The mechanism and quantitative results of slipstream effects on inlet under different conditions, and differences of CRP aerodynamic performance before and after coupled inlet were summarized. Results indicate that the hub vortex produced by the CRP is the primary factor influencing the flow characteristics within the intake duct. Under the cruise condition, wake vortices of the rear row dominated the vortex structure of the inlet and cause non-uniform flowfield. Under the takeoff condition, the coupling of wake vortices of both front and rear rows was enhanced, leading to the presence of vortices in pairs. These paired vortices collectively impacted the flow field within the inlet. The periodic movement of wake vortices within the inlet induced periodic fluctuations in aerodynamic parameters. When propfan wake vortices dominated the vortex structure, the amplitude of parameter oscillations diminished along the duct, yet the oscillation frequency remained constant and the phase angle maintained a uniform lag. Following the detachment of wall-separated vortices, the duct’s vortex structure underwent changes, disrupting the amplitude, frequency, and phase angle of parameter oscillations due to the mixing of these separated vortices. The slipstream enhanced the total pressure of inlet; however, intricate trailing vortices significantly exacerbated the total pressure and swirl distortions at the duct's exit, leading to pronounced uneven internal flow distributions. Internal flow losses increased by 2.85 times during cruising and 1.09 times during takeoff. In addition, integration of the intake duct altered the internal flow field structure of the rear blade channel of the counter-rotating propfan. This results in a decrease in velocity within the channel, a forward shift in the position of the shock wave on the blade suction surface, and a modification of the operational characteristics of blade elements at varying heights. Consequently, this improved the thrust performance of the propeller fan. Under the design condition, the thrust coefficient of the front row blades rose by 5.9%, that of the rear row blades increased by 27%, and the overall efficiency of the propfan improved by 5.2%.

Key words: propfan engine, annular inlet, Contra-Rotating Propfan (CRP), inlet performance, slipstream

中图分类号: