A Bayesian Approach for Damage Monitoring in Plate Structures Based on the Inverse Finite Element Method

  • CHEN Bing-Yu ,
  • HUANG Tian-Xiang ,
  • YUAN Shen-Fang
Expand
  • 1. Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics
    2.

Received date: 2026-04-13

  Revised date: 2026-08-15

  Online published: 2026-08-21

Abstract

To address the challenge that traditional damage monitoring methods based on the inverse Finite Element Method (iFEM) are difficult to achieving quantitative assessment, this paper proposes a probabilistic damage monitoring method for plate structures that combines iFEM with a Bayesian framework. This method uses the strain extrapolation capability of iFEM to reconstruct the extrapolated strain field near the damage under different damage hypotheses. By constructing a likelihood function between the extrapolated and measured strains, it achieves a posterior probability of the damage parameters, thereby achieving Bayesian damage monitoring without a healthy baseline. Simulation analyses were performed on rectangular plates and trapezoidal stiffened plates. The results show that the average errors of displacement and strain reconstruction using iFEM are below 1.0%, and the damage monitoring error is below 7.8%. The simulation results indicate that both the damage radius and the stiffness reduction factor influence the accuracy of damage monitoring.Furthermore, based on the variation of the strain field near damages of different sizes, the influence of mesh discretization on the accuracy of the method was investigated. A test platform for a trapezoidal stiffened plate was built to verify the effectiveness of the method under practical working. The damage monitoring error below 6.5%, achieving identification, localization, and probabilistic assessment of the damage.

Cite this article

CHEN Bing-Yu , HUANG Tian-Xiang , YUAN Shen-Fang . A Bayesian Approach for Damage Monitoring in Plate Structures Based on the Inverse Finite Element Method[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 0 : 1 -0 . DOI: 10.7527/S1000-6893.2026.33716

References

[1] 王超凡,周焕林,王选.基于RBF增强直接概率积分法的板壳结构随机屈曲分析[J].航空学报,2026,47(03):206-215.
[2] 王博,郝鹏,田阔,等.航空航天结构轻量化设计与实验方法研究进展[J].宇航学报,2023,44(04):596-606.
[3] 卢文书,马元春,梁伟,等.机身复合材料加筋板壳的稳定性及强度分析系统[J].航空学报,2009,30(05):895-900.
[4] Belur M Y, Kefal A, Abdollahzadeh M A, et al. Damage diagnosis of plates and shells through modal parameters reconstruction using inverse finite-element method[J]. Structural Health Monitoring, 2024:14759217241249678. DOI: 10.1177/14759217241249678.
[5] Kefal A, Diyaroglu C, Yildiz M, et al. Coupling of peridynamics and inverse finite element method for shape sensing and crack propagation monitoring of plate structures[J]. Computer methods in applied mechanics and engineering, 2022, 391:114520. DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2021.114520.
[6] 孙侠生,肖迎春.飞机结构健康监测技术的机遇与挑战[J].航空学报,2014,35(12):3199-3212.
[7] 田童,李建乐,邓德双,等.飞行器结构健康监测技术研究进展[J].航空制造技术,2024,67(13):41-67+98.DOI:10.16080/j.issn1671-833x.2024.13.041.
[8] SAE. Guidelines for implementation of structural healthmonitoring on fixed wing aircraft:SAE ARP6461A[R].W arrendale:SAE International,2021.
[9] 袁慎芳,徐秋慧,陈健.可靠性评价:从无损检测到结构健康监测[J].航空学报,2025,46(05):342-362.
[10] 袁慎芳.结构健康监控.北京:国防工业出版社,2007.
[11] Giurgiutiu V, Cuc A, Goodman P. Review of vibration-based helicopters health and usage monitoring methods[J]. 2001.
[12] 耿荣生,景鹏,雷洪,等.飞机主梁疲劳裂纹萌生声发射信号的识别方法[J].航空学报,1996,(03):368-372.
[13] Yang S, Yuan F G. Transient wave propagation of isotropic plates using a higher-order plate theory[J]. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 2005, 42(14): 4115-4153.
[14] 黄尚廉,陈伟民,饶云江,等.光纤应变传感器及其在结构健康监测中的应用[J].测控技术,2004,(05):1-4+8.DOI:10.19708/j.ckjs.2004.05.001.
[15] 王彬文,聂小华,万春华,等.全机静强度虚拟试验技术研究及应用[J].航空学报,2022,43(06):171-183.
[16] 姚卫星,孙文,薛济坤.基于物理原型的结构疲劳寿命评估方法[J].南京航空航天大学学报,2014,46(03):335-340.DOI:10.16356/j.1005-2615.2014.03.003.
[17] 芦吉云,梁大开,潘晓文.基于准分布式光纤光栅传感器的机翼盒段载荷监测[J].南京航空航天大学学报,2009,41(02):217-221.DOI:10.16356/j.1005-2615.2009.02.026.
[18] Tessler A,Spangler J L. A least-squares variational method for full-field reconstruction of elastic deformations in shear-deformable plates and shells[J]. Com-puter Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering,2005,194(2/3/4/5):327-339. DOI:10.1016/jcma.2004.03.015.
[19] Kefal, A.; Emami, I.; Yildiz, M.; Tessler, A. A Smoothed IFEM Approach for Efficient Shape-Sensing Applications: Numerical and Experimental Validation on Composite Structures. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 2021, 152, 107486.
[20] Kefal A ,Oterkus E ,Tessler A , et al.A quadrilateral inverse-shell element with drilling degrees of freedom for shape sensing and structural health monitoring[J].Engineering Science and Technology, an International Journal,2016,19(3):1299-1313.DOI:10.1016/j.jestch.2016.03.006.
[21] Kefal A .An efficient curved inverse-shell element for shape sensing and structural health monitoring of cylindrical marine structures[J].Ocean Engineering,2019,188106262-106262.DOI:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.106262.
[22] Khalid I, Qureshi Z A, Ali Y, et al. Structural health monitoring of shell structures with preexisting cracks[J]. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2025, 231:112663. DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2025.112663.
[23] 张科,袁慎芳,任元强,等.基于逆向有限元法的变形机翼鱼骨的变形重构[J].航空学报,2020,41(08):250-260.
[24] 顾叶青,操卫忠,袁慎芳,等.热载荷下星载天线逆有限元变形重构方法[J].东南大学学报(自然科学版),2024,54(04):997-1004.
[25] 付书山,孙广开,何彦霖,等.基于逆有限元的机翼蒙皮变形监测方法仿真研究[J].航空制造技术,2022,65(06):107-114.DOI:10.16080/j.issn1671-833x.2022.06.107.
[26] Quach C, Vazquez S, Tessler A, et al. Structural Anomaly Detection Using Fiber Optic Sensors and Inverse Finite Element Method[R]:NASA, 2005.
[27] Colombo L, Sbarufatti C, Giglio M. Definition of a load adaptive baseline by inverse finite element method for structural damage identification[J]. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2019, 120:584–607. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0888327018307179. DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2018.10.041.
[28] Li M ,Kefal A ,Cerik C B , et al.Dent damage identification in stiffened cylindrical structures using inverse Finite Element Method[J].Ocean Engineering,2020,198106944-106944.DOI:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2020.106944.
[29] Ghasemzadeh M, Mokhtari M, Bilgin M H, et al. Pitting corrosion identification approach based on inverse finite element method for marine structure applications[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2023, 273:113953. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0029801823003372. DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.113953.
[30] Oboe D, Poloni D, Sbarufatti C, et al. Towards Automatic Crack Size Estimation with iFEM for Structural Health Monitoring[J]. Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023, 23(7). DOI: 10.3390/s23073406.
[31] Zhao L, You R, Ren L. Inverse finite element method and support vector regression for automated crack detection with OFDR-Distributed fiber optic sensors[J]. Measurement, 2024, 234:114916.https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0263224124008017. DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2024.114916.
[32] Zhao L, Zhang J, You R, et al. Automatic detection of crack depth and width combining inverse finite-element and PSO-optimized SVR method with OFDR fiber-optic sensors[J]. Structural Health Monitoring, 2025:14759217251327728. DOI: 10.1177/14759217251327728.
[33] Belur M Y, Kefal A, Abdollahzadeh M A, et al. Damage diagnosis of plates and shells through modal parameters reconstruction using inverse finite-element method[J]. Structural Health Monitoring, 2024:14759217241249678. DOI: 10.1177/14759217241249678.
[34] Huang T ,Schr?der K .A Bayesian probabilistic approach for damage identification in plate structures using responses at vibration nodes[J].Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing,2021,146DOI:10.1016/j.ymssp.2020.106998.
Options
Outlines

/