ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA >
Intelligent detection and correction of time/space coupling error for space-air MEMS sensors based on dual dynamic saturation mechanism
Received date: 2025-12-01
Revised date: 2026-01-04
Accepted date: 2026-01-12
Online published: 2026-01-21
Supported by
National Natural Science Foundation of China(U2230206);Sichuan Science and Technology Program(2025ZDZX0073)
As one of the most important tools for space and aerial information collection， Micro-Electro-Mechanical Systems （MEMS） sensors require real-time and rapid detection and correction of their time/space coupling errors to ensure the security of sensor information and the reliability of data processing. Among the existing sensor error detection and correction algorithms， the methods based on traditional Kalman Filtering （KF） have good real-time performance and low computational cost， but lack robustness in the presence of nonlinearity， non-Gaussian noise， and strong signal interference. Although the methods based on deep learning have better error detection and correction effects， they suffer from high computational cost and poor real-time performance. To address these issues， this paper innovatively combines the above two types of methods and proposes an intelligent detection and correction algorithm for time/space coupling errors of space and aerial MEMS sensors based on a dual dynamic saturation mechanism. Firstly， by leveraging the idea of KF filtering， an innovation saturation-based error detection algorithm is designed to dynamically detect errors. Secondly， a genetic algorithm is introduced to adaptively optimize the nonlinear parameters in the core formula for determining the dynamic saturation threshold， thereby enhancing the algorithm's generalization performance across different datasets. Then， to address the low optimization efficiency and high number of iterations of the genetic algorithm， a novel dual dynamic saturation mechanism is proposed to reduce the time/space coupling relationship between nonlinear parameters， thereby improving the parameter optimization efficiency and accelerating convergence. Finally， an experimental platform is built to collect MEMS sensor data. The algorithm verification based on the measured data shows that， compared with the traditional KF detection framework and neural network detection framework， the proposed intelligent error detection and correction algorithm has significant performance improvements in terms of detection and correction efficiency and accuracy.
Hang GENG , Yu SUN , Xuan GOU , Jingfei JIANG , Kai CHEN , Jie GU . Intelligent detection and correction of time/space coupling error for space-air MEMS sensors based on dual dynamic saturation mechanism[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2026 , 47(S1) : 733170 -733170 . DOI: 10.7527/S1000-6893.2026.33170
| [1] | HAWKINS D M. Identification of outliers［M］. Dordrecht： Springer Netherlands， 1980： 63-65. |
| [2] | TING J A， THEODOROU E， SCHAAL S. A Kalman filter for robust outlier detection［C］∥2007 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Piscataway： IEEE Press， 2007： 1514-1519. |
| [3] | ZHANG Y， MERATNIA N， HAVINGA P. Outlier detection techniques for wireless sensor networks： A survey［J］. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials， 2010， 12（2）： 159-170. |
| [4] | HAILE M A， RIDDICK J C， ASSEFA A H. Robust particle filters for fatigue crack growth estimation in rotorcraft structures［J］. IEEE Transactions on Reliability， 2016， 65（3）： 1438-1448. |
| [5] | SINOPOLI B， SCHENATO L， FRANCESCHETTI M， et al. Kalman filtering with intermittent observations［J］. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control， 2004， 49（9）： 1453-1464. |
| [6] | JIA B， XIN M. Vision-based spacecraft relative navigation using sparse-grid quadrature filter［J］. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology， 2013， 21（5）： 1595-1606. |
| [7] | LI Y Z， SHI L， CHEN T W. Detection against linear deception attacks on multi-sensor remote state estimation［J］. IEEE Transactions on Control of Network Systems， 2018， 5（3）： 846-856. |
| [8] | 赵海燕， 陈子盟， 曹健， 等. 基于少样本深度学习的异常检测方法： 综述与展望［J］. 小型微型计算机系统， 2024， 45（10）： 2514-2521. |
| ZHAO H Y， CHEN Z M， CAO J， et al. Survey on few-shot deep learning based anomaly detection［J］. Journal of Chinese Computer Systems， 2024， 45（10）： 2514-2521 （in Chinese）. | |
| [9] | KIM S， CHOI K， CHOI H S， et al. Towards a rigorous evaluation of time-series anomaly detection［J］. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence， 2022， 36（7）： 7194-7201. |
| [10] | MASRELIEZ C. Approximate non-Gaussian filtering with linear state and observation relations［J］. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control， 1975， 20（1）： 107-110. |
| [11] | SORENSON H W， ALSPACH D L. Recursive Bayesian estimation using Gaussian sums［J］. Automatica， 1971， 7（4）： 465-479. |
| [12] | CHANG G B. Kalman filter with both adaptivity and robustness［J］. Journal of Process Control， 2014， 24（3）： 81-87. |
| [13] | AGAMENNONI G， NIETO J I， NEBOT E M. An outlier-robust Kalman filter［C］∥2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. Piscataway： IEEE Press， 2011： 1551-1558. |
| [14] | GANDHI M A， MILI L. Robust Kalman filter based on a generalized maximum-likelihood-type estimator［J］. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing， 2010， 58（5）： 2509-2520. |
| [15] | DE PALMA D， INDIVERI G. Output outlier robust state estimation［J］. International Journal of Adaptive Control and Signal Processing， 2017， 31（4）： 581-607. |
| [16] | KELLER J Y， DAROUACH M. Optimal two-stage Kalman filter in the presence of random bias［J］. Automatica， 1997， 33（9）： 1745-1748. |
| [17] | HSIEH C S. Robust two-stage Kalman filters for systems with unknown inputs［J］. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control， 2000， 45（12）： 2374-2378. |
| [18] | GILLIJNS S， DE MOOR B. Unbiased minimum-variance input and state estimation for linear discrete-time systems［J］. Automatica， 2007， 43（1）： 111-116. |
| [19] | FANG H Z， SHI Y， YI J G. On stable simultaneous input and state estimation for discrete-time linear systems［J］. International Journal of Adaptive Control and Signal Processing， 2011， 25（8）： 671-686. |
| [20] | YONG S Z， ZHU M H， FRAZZOLI E. A unified filter for simultaneous input and state estimation of linear discrete-time stochastic systems［J］. Automatica， 2016， 63： 321-329. |
| [21] | SHI D W， CHEN T W， DAROUACH M. Event-based state estimation of linear dynamic systems with unknown exogenous inputs［J］. Automatica， 2016， 69： 275-288. |
| [22] | FANG H Z， HAILE M A， WANG Y B. Robustifying the Kalman filter against measurement outliers： An innovation saturation mechanism［C］∥2018 IEEE Conference on Decision and Control （CDC）. Piscataway： IEEE Press， 2019： 6390-6395. |
| [23] | BARRETT T， MISHRA A K. Statistical study of sensor data and investigation of ML-based calibration algorithms for inexpensive sensor modules： Experiments from cape point［J］. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement， 2024， 73： 1003310. |
| [24] | BELADJINE D E， BOUDANA D， MOUALDIA A， et al. Contribution to a new algorithm to perform an automatic self-calibration of current sensors［J］. Power Electronics and Drives， 2024， 9（1）： 446-462. |
| [25] | 曹慧亮. 硅微机械陀螺仪静电补偿与控制技术研究和实验［D］. 南京： 东南大学， 2014. |
| CAO H L. Research and experiments on electrostatic compensation and control technology for silicon micromachined gyroscopes［D］. Nanjing： Southeast University， 2014 （in Chinese）. | |
| [26] | FANG H Z， HAILE M A， WANG Y B. Robust extended Kalman filtering for systems with measurement outliers［J］. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology， 2022， 30（2）： 795-802. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
CJA