Fluid Mechanics and Flight Mechanics

A resolvent-analysis-based optimization design method for airfoils at low Reynolds number

  • Hao YUAN ,
  • Jiaqing KOU ,
  • Weiwei ZHANG
Expand
  • 1.School of Aeronautics,Northwestern Polytechnical University,Xi’an 710072,China
    2.International Joint Institute of Artificial Intelligence on Fluid Mechanics,Northwestern Polytechnical University,Xi’an 710072,China
    3.National Key Laboratory of Aircraft Configuration Design,Xi’an 710072,China
E-mail: jqkou@nwpu.edu.cn

Received date: 2025-06-20

  Revised date: 2025-09-15

  Accepted date: 2025-10-26

  Online published: 2025-11-03

Supported by

National Key Research and Development Program of China(2024YFB3310401);Natural Science Basic Research Program of Shaanxi(2025JC-YBQN-087);Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities(G2024KY05101)

Abstract

Control of flow separation at high angles of attack plays a crucial role in enhancing the aerodynamic performance of airfoils at low Reynolds number, as well as in reducing flow-induced structural vibrations and noise. To address the inefficiency of current empirical trial-and-error and a posteriori based flow control methods, we propose a novel approach that integrates resolvent analysis with airfoil optimization design to achieve passive surface deformation control of unsteady flows. First, we construct an input-output dynamical model of the flow system. The excitation with the strongest response (i.e., forcing modes), the states with the highest receptivity (i.e., response modes) and the amplification between them (i.e., resolvent gains) under harmonic inputs at varying frequencies can be identified through resolvent analysis. Second, a quantitative correlation between the resolvent gain and flow stability is established. When the flow system satisfies the rank-1 approximation condition, a reduction in the maximum resolvent gain directly corresponds to an improvement in flow stability. Finally, an efficient shape optimization framework is developed, with the objective function defined as the minimization of the maximum gain, and the optimization process combining a penalty function approach with the nonlinear conjugate gradient method. The NACA0012 airfoil under the design condition Ma=0.1, Re=200,angle of attack 18° is selected as the test case, and the two optimized airfoils are obtained by varying the penalty parameters. The computational results demonstrate that, under the condition of no loss or even an improvement in aerodynamic performance at small angles of attack, the maximum resolvent gain of the two airfoils is reduced by 63.49% and 54.44%, respectively. The flow stability at supercritical angles of attack is significantly enhanced, with the amplitude of lift fluctuations attenuating by an average of 16.20% and 13.79%. Additionally, the time-averaged drag coefficient decreases by 2.44% and 1.84%, respectively. Analysis of the flow field evolution reveals that the alternating generation and shedding of leading-edge and trailing-edge separation vortices at high angles of attack lead to significant lift oscillations. The shape optimization effectively suppresses flow separation, achieving a synergistic improvement in both the aerodynamic performance and flow stability of the optimized airfoils. This study provides new theoretical guidance for airfoil separation flow control and establishes a resolvent-analysis-based shape optimization design method that is anticipated to be applicable to separation flow problems involving various types of flow instabilities.

Cite this article

Hao YUAN , Jiaqing KOU , Weiwei ZHANG . A resolvent-analysis-based optimization design method for airfoils at low Reynolds number[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2026 , 47(5) : 132452 -132452 . DOI: 10.7527/S1000-6893.2025.32452

References

[1] LISSAMAN P S. Low-Reynolds-number airfoils[J]. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics198315: 223-239.
[2] 白鹏, 崔尔杰, 李锋, 等. 对称翼型低雷诺数小攻角升力系数非线性现象研究[J]. 力学学报200638(1): 1-8.
  BAI P, CUI E J, LI F, et al. Study of the nonlinear lift coefficient of the symmetrical airfoil at low Reynolds number near the 0° angle of attack[J]. Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics200638(1): 1-8 (in Chinese).
[3] KOJIMA Y, YEH C A, TAIRA K, et al. Resolvent analysis on the origin of two-dimensional transonic buffet[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics2020885: R1.
[4] 李锋, 白鹏, 刘强. 飞行器低Reynolds数层流分离理论探讨[J]. 气体物理20172(5): 1-10.
  LI F, BAI P, LIU Q. Discussion about the laminar separation theory at low Reynolds numbers[J]. Physics of Gases20172(5): 1-10 (in Chinese).
[5] 朱志斌, 尚庆, 白鹏, 等. 翼型低雷诺数层流分离现象随雷诺数的演化特征[J]. 航空学报201940(5): 122528.
  ZHU Z B, SHANG Q, BAI P, et al. Evolution of laminar separation phenomenon on low Reynolds number airfoil at different Reynolds numbers[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica201940(5): 122528 (in Chinese).
[6] ROSSI E, COLAGROSSI A, OGER G, et al. Multiple bifurcations of the flow over stalled airfoils when changing the Reynolds number[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics2018846: 356-391.
[7] CHOI H, JEON W P, KIM J. Control of flow over a bluff body[J]. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics200840: 113-139.
[8] 周子杰, 罗振兵, 邓雄, 等. 基于合成双射流的简单襟翼流动分离控制[J]. 航空学报202546(14): 131512.
  ZHOU Z J, LUO Z B, DENG X, et al. Flow separation control of simple flaps based on dual synthetic jets[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica202546(14): 131512 (in Chinese).
[9] HEINE B, MULLENERS K, JOUBERT G, et al. Dynamic stall control by passive disturbance generators[J]. AIAA Journal201351(9): 2086-2097.
[10] GROSS A, FASEL H F. Numerical investigation of passive separation control for an airfoil at low-Reynolds-number conditions[J]. AIAA Journal201351(7): 1553-1565.
[11] MAYER R, LUTZ T, KR?MER E. Numerical study on the ability of shock control bumps for buffet control[J]. AIAA Journal201856(5): 1978-1987.
[12] WANG J J, LI Y C, CHOI K S. Gurney flap: Lift enhancement, mechanisms and applications[J]. Progress in Aerospace Sciences200844(1): 22-47.
[13] NIELSEN E J, ANDERSON W K. Aerodynamic design optimization on unstructured meshes using the Navier-Stokes equations[J]. AIAA Journal199937(11): 1411-1419.
[14] 周铸, 黄江涛, 高正红, 等. 民用飞机气动外形数值优化设计面临的挑战与展望[J]. 航空学报201940(1): 522370.
  ZHOU Z, HUANG J T, GAO Z H, et al. Challenges and prospects of numerical optimization design for large civil aircraft aerodynamic shape[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica201940(1): 522370 (in Chinese).
[15] 赵轲, 邓俊, 黄江涛, 等. 飞翼布局高低速一体化气动优化设计[J]. 航空学报202445(15): 129367.
  ZHAO K, DENG J, HUANG J T, et al. Aerodynamic optimization design of high and low speed integration for flying wing layout[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica202445(15): 129367 (in Chinese).
[16] 陈树生, 冯聪, 张兆康, 等. 基于全局/梯度优化方法的宽速域乘波-机翼布局气动设计[J]. 航空学报202445(6): 629596.
  CHEN S S, FENG C, ZHANG Z K, et al. Aerodynamic design of wide-speed-range waverider-wing configuration based on global & gradient optimization method[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica202445(6): 629596 (in Chinese).
[17] 姜璐璐, 潘鑫, 蒋伟, 等. 基于融合代理策略的超声速降落伞气动优化设计[J]. 航空学报202546(1): 630471.
  JIANG L L, PAN X, JIANG W, et al. Optimization shape design of capsule-supersonic parachute system based on fusion surrogate strategy[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica202546(1): 630471 (in Chinese).
[18] SRINATH D N, MITTAL S. An adjoint method for shape optimization in unsteady viscous flows[J]. Journal of Computational Physics2010229(6): 1994-2008.
[19] SRINATH D N, MITTAL S. Optimal aerodynamic design of airfoils in unsteady viscous flows[J]. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering2010199(29-32): 1976-1991.
[20] CHEN W G, GAO C Q, ZHANG W W, et al. Adjoint-based unsteady shape optimization to suppress transonic buffet[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology2022127: 107668.
[21] THEOFILIS V. Global linear instability[J]. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics201143: 319-352.
[22] TAIRA K, BRUNTON S L, DAWSON S T M, et al. Modal analysis of fluid flows: An overview[J]. AIAA Journal201755(12): 4013-4041.
[23] 白鹏, 李锋, 詹慧玲, 等. 翼型低Re数小攻角非线性非定常层流分离现象研究[J]. 中国科学: 物理学 力学 天文学201545(2): 46-57.
  BAI P, LI F, ZHAN H L, et al. Study about the non-linear and unsteady laminar separation phenomena around the airfoil at low Reynolds number with low incidence[J]. Scientia Sinica (Physica, Mechanica & Astronomica), 201545(2): 46-57 (in Chinese).
[24] KITSIOS V, RODRíGUEZ D, THEOFILIS V, et al. BiGlobal stability analysis in curvilinear coordinates of massively separated lifting bodies[J]. Journal of Computational Physics2009228(19): 7181-7196.
[25] IORIO M C, GONZáLEZ L M, MARTíNEZ-CAVA A. Global stability analysis of a compressible turbulent flow around a high-lift configuration[J]. AIAA Journal201554(2): 373-385.
[26] GONG Y M, GAO C Q, ZHANG W W. Transonic buffet suppression by airfoil optimization[J]. Aerospace202411(2): 121.
[27] WANG Y, FERRER E, MARTíNEZ-CAVA A, et al. Enhanced stability of flows through contraction channels: Combining shape optimization and linear stability analysis[J]. Physics of Fluids201931(7): 074109.
[28] SCHMID P J, BRANDT L. Analysis of fluid systems: stability, receptivity, sensitivity[J]. Applied Mechanics Reviews201466(2): 024803.
[29] 袁昊, 寇家庆, 张伟伟. 流体力学预解分析方法研究进展[J]. 力学学报202456(10): 2799-2814.
  YUAN H, KOU J Q, ZHANG W W. Research progress of resolvent analysis in fluid mechanics[J]. Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics202456(10): 2799-2814 (in Chinese).
[30] TREFETHEN L N, TREFETHEN A E, REDDY S C, et al. Hydrodynamic stability without eigenvalues[J]. Science1993261(5121): 578-584.
[31] SCHMID P J. Nonmodal stability theory[J]. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics200739: 129-162.
[32] MCKEON B J, SHARMA A S. A critical-layer framework for turbulent pipe flow[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics2010658: 336-382.
[33] ROLANDI L V, RIBEIRO J H M, YEH C A, et al. An invitation to resolvent analysis[J]. Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics202438(5): 603-639.
[34] JOVANOVI? M R. From bypass transition to flow control and data-driven turbulence modeling: An input-output viewpoint[J]. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics202153: 311-345.
[35] YEH C A, TAIRA K. Resolvent-analysis-based design of airfoil separation control[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics2019867: 572-610.
[36] LIU Q, SUN Y Y, YEH C A, et al. Unsteady control of supersonic turbulent cavity flow based on resolvent analysis[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics2021925: A5.
[37] GROSS A, MARKS C, SONDERGAARD R. Laminar separation control for eppler 387 airfoil based on resolvent analysis[J]. AIAA Journal202462(4): 1487-1502.
[38] NAKASHIMA S, FUKAGATA K, LUHAR M. Assessment of suboptimal control for turbulent skin friction reduction via resolvent analysis[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics2017828: 496-526.
[39] LUHAR M, SHARMA A S, MCKEON B J. Opposition control within the resolvent analysis framework[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics2014749: 597-626.
[40] KAWAGOE A, NAKASHIMA S, LUHAR M, et al. Proposal of control laws for turbulent skin friction reduction based on resolvent analysis[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics2019866: 810-840.
[41] CHAVARIN A, LUHAR M. Resolvent analysis for turbulent channel flow with riblets[J]. AIAA Journal201958(2): 589-599.
[42] CHAVARIN A, LUHAR M.Optimization of riblet geometry via the resolvent framework[C]∥AIAA SCITECH 2022 Forum. Reston: AIAA, 2022: AIAA 2022-1037.
[43] SIPP D, MARQUET O, MELIGA P, et al. Dynamics and control of global instabilities in open-flows: A linearized approach[J]. Applied Mechanics Reviews201063(3): 030801.
[44] YUAN H, KOU J, ZHENG S, et al. Resolvent-based shape optimisation for a two-dimensional cylinder at low reynolds numbers[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics20251012: A10.
[45] YUAN H, KOU J Q, GAO C Q, et al. Resolvent and dynamic mode analysis of flow past a square cylinder at subcritical Reynolds numbers[J]. Physics of Fluids202335(7): 071706.
[46] MA R C, GAO C Q, REN K, et al. Suppression of oscillatory fluid forces in cylinder wake: Optimal jet control position designed through resolvent analysis[J]. Physics of Fluids202436(7): 073622.
[47] HERRMANN B, BADDOO P J, SEMAAN R, et al. Data-driven resolvent analysis[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics2021918: A10.
[48] SYMON S, ROSENBERG K, DAWSON S T M, et al. Non-normality and classification of amplification mechanisms in stability and resolvent analysis[J]. Physical Review Fluids20183(5): 053902.
[49] HUERRE P, MONKEWITZ P A. Local and global instabilities in spatially developing flows[J]. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics199022: 473-537.
[50] ZHANG W W, LI X T, YE Z Y, et al. Mechanism of frequency lock-in in vortex-induced vibrations at low Reynolds numbers[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics2015783: 72-102.
[51] LI X T, LYU Z, KOU J Q, et al. Mode competition in galloping of a square cylinder at low Reynolds number[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics2019867: 516-555.
[52] KURTULUS D F. On the unsteady behavior of the flow around NACA 0012 airfoil with steady external conditions at Re=1 000[J]. International Journal of Micro Air Vehicles20157(3): 301-326.
[53] DI ILIO G, CHIAPPINI D, UBERTINI S, et al. Fluid flow around NACA 0012 airfoil at low-Reynolds numbers with hybrid lattice Boltzmann method[J]. Computers & Fluids2018166: 200-208.
[54] KARBASIAN H R, VERMEIRE B C. Application of physics-constrained data-driven reduced-order models to shape optimization[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics2022934: A32.
[55] HE W, GIORIA R S, PéREZ J M, et al. Linear instability of low Reynolds number massively separated flow around three NACA airfoils[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics2017811: 701-741.
[56] KULFAN B M. Universal parametric geometry representation method[J]. Journal of Aircraft200845(1): 142-158.
Outlines

/