ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA >
Generalization of three-dimensional flight vehicle shape representation using generative models
Received date: 2024-11-08
Revised date: 2024-12-23
Accepted date: 2025-02-17
Online published: 2025-03-06
Supported by
CALT-University Joint Innovation Fund(CALT2023-09);Science and Technology on Space Physics Laboratory(SPL2024006)
The increasingly complex and dynamic design requirements of future hypersonic vehicle have heightened the call for enhanced flexibility and efficacy in aerodynamic shape parameterization methods. This research addresses the constraints imposed by conventional geometric parameterization methods in hypersonic vehicle design, which tend to confine aerodynamic shapes excessively, limiting design optimization and culminating in the “dimensional disaster”. To tackle these challenges, the study introduces a novel approach centered on generative models to generalize the depiction of three-dimensional hypersonic vehicle aerodynamic profiles. This innovative method entails extracting geometric attributes from aerodynamic profile images and imposing constraints on global and local point cloud diffusion models to facilitate the creation of three-dimensional point cloud representations, catering to the intricate demands of three-dimensional shape reduction and adaptable design in engineering contexts. The method achieves a comprehensive multi-view generalized representation pipeline from cross-sectional images to point cloud geometry and surface meshes through three core modules: a geometric feature extraction and dimensionality reduction reconstruction model for cross-sectional images based on Variational Autoencoder (VAE) and residual networks; a 3D geometric point cloud generation model integrating point cloud variational autoencoder networks with conditionally controllable generative diffusion models; a surface mesh reconstruction model employing a differentiable Poisson solver. In the context of the three-dimensional blended wing-body configuration, manipulating generalized shape parameters within latent variable spaces enables rapid generation of single profile images in 3 s and three-dimensional aerodynamic mesh files in 80 s. The reconstructed shapes maintain an average geometric error within 1 mm compared to the initial design, demonstrating efficient and accurate generalization of complex aircraft shapes. Furthermore, the generated surface meshes were directly imported into Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) software to predict flow fields and aerodynamic characteristics under different angles of attack. The results highlight the potential of this method as an intelligent and flexible aerodynamic shape generalization tool for optimizing complex aircraft designs.
Youtao XUE , Shaobo YAO , Yuxin YANG , Yi DUAN , Wenwen ZHAO , Haoge LI . Generalization of three-dimensional flight vehicle shape representation using generative models[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2025 , 46(10) : 631511 -631511 . DOI: 10.7527/S1000-6893.2025.31511
1 | 关晓辉, 李占科, 宋笔锋. CST气动外形参数化方法研究[J]. 航空学报, 2012, 33(4): 625-633. |
GUAN X H, LI Z K, SONG B F. A study on CST aerodynamic shape parameterization method[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2012, 33(4): 625-633 (in Chinese). | |
2 | SAMAREH J. Aerodynamic shape optimization based on free-form deformation[C]?∥10th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference. Reston: AIAA, 2004. |
3 | LIU R L, HUA Y, ZHOU Z F, et al. Prediction and optimization of airfoil aerodynamic performance using deep neural network coupled Bayesian method[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2022, 34(11): 117116. |
4 | SEKAR V, JIANG Q H, SHU C, et al. Fast flow field prediction over airfoils using deep learning approach[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2019, 31(5): 057103. |
5 | DU Q W, LIU T Y, YANG L K, et al. Airfoil design and surrogate modeling for performance prediction based on deep learning method[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2022, 34(1): 015111. |
6 | SEO J, YOON H S, KIM M I. Establishment of CNN and encoder-decoder models for the prediction of characteristics of flow and heat transfer around NACA sections[J]. Energies, 2022, 15(23): 9204. |
7 | CHEN D W, SUN Z X, YAO S B, et al. Data-driven rapid prediction model for aerodynamic force of high-speed train with arbitrary streamlined head[J]. Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics, 2022, 16(1): 2191-2206. |
8 | LI J C, DU X S, MARTINS J R R A. Machine learning in aerodynamic shape optimization[J]. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 2022, 134: 100849. |
9 | MASTERS D A, TAYLOR N J, RENDALL T C S, et al. Geometric comparison of aerofoil shape parameterization methods[J]. AIAA Journal, 2017, 55(5): 1575-1589. |
10 | CHANG I C, TORRES F J, TUNG C. Geometric analysis of wing sections[R]. Washington, D.C.: NASA, 1997. |
11 | ROBINSON G M, KEANE A J. Concise orthogonal representation of supercritical airfoils[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2001, 38(3): 580-583. |
12 | 刘南, 白俊强, 邱亚松, 等. 基于本征正交分解的气动外形设计空间重构方法研究[J]. 西北工业大学学报, 2015, 33(2): 171-177. |
LIU N, BAI J Q, QIU Y S, et al. Investigating aerodynamic shape design space reconstruction using proper orthogonal decomposition(POD)[J]. Journal of Northwestern Polytechnical University, 2015, 33(2): 171-177 (in Chinese). | |
13 | WU X J, ZHANG W W, PENG X H, et al. Benchmark aerodynamic shape optimization with the POD-based CST airfoil parametric method?[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2019, 84: 632-640. |
14 | LI J L, ZHANG Y, ZHU B B, et al. The aerodynamic optimization of hypersonic vehicles with the proper-orthogonal-decomposition-based CST method[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2024, 151: 109295. |
15 | YANG Y X, XUE Y T, ZHAO W W, et al. Aerodynamic shape optimization based on proper orthogonal decomposition reparameterization under small training sets[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2024, 147: 109072. |
16 | LI J C, ZHANG M Q, MARTINS J R R A, et al. Efficient aerodynamic shape optimization with deep-learning-based geometric filtering[J]. AIAA Journal, 2020, 58(10): 4243-4259. |
17 | CHEN W, CHIU K, FUGE M D. Airfoil design parameterization and optimization using Bézier generative adversarial networks[J]. AIAA Journal, 2020, 58(11): 4723-4735. |
18 | WANG Y Y, SHIMADA K, BARATI FARIMANI A. Airfoil GAN: encoding and synthesizing airfoils for aerodynamic shape optimization[J]. Journal of Computational Design and Engineering, 2023, 10(4): 1350-1362. |
19 | VISWANATH A, FORRESTER A I J, KEANE A J. Constrained design optimization using generative topographic mapping[J]. AIAA Journal, 2014, 52(5): 1010-1023. |
20 | DORONINA O A, GREY Z J, GLAWS A. Grassmannian shape representations for aerodynamic applications[DB/OL]. arXiv preprint: 2201.04649, 2022. |
21 | ZENG X H, VAHDAT A, WILLIAMS F, et al. LION: Latent point diffusion models for 3D Shape Generation[DB/OL]. arXiv preprint: 2210.06978, 2022. |
22 | LIU Z J, TANG H T, LIN Y J, et al. Point-voxel CNN for efficient 3D deep learning[DB/OL]. arXiv preprint: 1907.03739, 2019. |
23 | PENG S Y, JIANG C, LIAO Y Y, et al. Shape as points: A differentiable Poisson solver[DB/OL]. arXiv preprint: 2106.03452, 2021. |
24 | 陈小庆, 侯中喜, 刘建霞, 等. 边缘钝化对乘波构型性能影响分析[J]. 宇航学报, 2009, 30(4): 1334-1339. |
CHEN X Q, HOU Z X, LIU J X, et al. The blunt leading edge’s influence to the performance of waverider[J]. Journal of Astronautics, 2009, 30(4): 1334-1339 (in Chinese). | |
25 | 刘建霞, 侯中喜, 陈小庆, 等. 高超声速滑翔飞行器气动性能的数值模拟研究[J]. 国防科技大学学报, 2012, 34(4): 22-27. |
LIU J X, HOU Z X, CHEN X Q, et al. Numerical simulation on the aerodynamic performance of hypersonic glide vehicle[J]. Journal of National University of Defense Technology, 2012, 34(4): 22-27 (in Chinese). |
/
〈 |
|
〉 |