Special Issue: Key Technologies for Supersonic Civil Aircraft

Multidisciplinary optimization with low-boom design for supersonic civil aircraft conceptual design

  • Chao YANG ,
  • Yuting TAN ,
  • Wei WANG ,
  • Yan ZHAO ,
  • Xiongqing YU
Expand
  • 1.College of Aerospace Engineering,Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics,Nanjing 210016,China
    2.AVIC The First Aircraft Design Institute,Xi’an 710089,China
E-mail: yxq@nuaa.edu.cn

Received date: 2024-10-29

  Revised date: 2024-12-03

  Accepted date: 2025-02-19

  Online published: 2025-02-28

Abstract

To meet the demand for rapid analysis and optimization in conceptual design of supersonic civil aircraft, we present a multidisciplinary analysis optimization method integrated with low-boom design. The method consists of three main steps. Determining the target reversed equivalent area, which aims to provide a low-boom reversed equivalent area distribution target for multidisciplinary optimization. Optimizing the aircraft configuration within the multidisciplinary optimization framework, the overall parameters of the wing and tail are used as design variables to obtain a multi-objective optimal solution set for minimizing maximum takeoff weight and matching equivalent reversed area. Fine-tuning fuselage shape and tailplane parameters based on the results of multidisciplinary optimization, making minor adjustments to further match the target reversed equivalent area distribution. In this multidisciplinary approach, sonic boom characteristics are analyzed exclusively through the calculation of reversed equivalent area, which significantly reduces the computational expense. This enables the application of high-fidelity sonic boom prediction methods during the conceptual design. The method is compatible with existing multidisciplinary optimization frameworks for civil aircraft design, facilitating seamless implementation. The method is applied to the optimization of the medium-sized supersonic civil aircraft conceptual design.Results show that an optimal solution set for the multiple objectives is obtained with less computational expense. An optimal design that has less maximum takeoff weight and highly matches the reversed equivalent area, is selected from the optimal solution set. Compared to the baseline design, the maximum takeoff weight is reduced by 3.6% and sonic boom is reduced by 6.62 PLdB.

Cite this article

Chao YANG , Yuting TAN , Wei WANG , Yan ZHAO , Xiongqing YU . Multidisciplinary optimization with low-boom design for supersonic civil aircraft conceptual design[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2025 , 46(20) : 531457 -531457 . DOI: 10.7527/S1000-6893.2025.31457

References

[1] SUN Y C, SMITH H. Review and prospect of supersonic business jet design[J]. Progress in Aerospace Sciences201790: 12-38.
[2] 余雄庆. 飞机总体多学科设计优化的现状与发展方向[J]. 南京航空航天大学学报200840(4): 417-426.
  YU X Q. Multidisciplinary design optimization for aircraft conceptual and preliminary design: Status and directions[J]. Journal of Nanjing University of Aeronautics & Astronautics200840(4): 417-426 (in Chinese).
[3] WALSH J, TOWNSEND J, SALAS A, et al. Multidisciplinary high-fidelity analysis and optimization of aerospace vehicles, Part 1: Formulation[C]∥38th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit. Reston: AIAA, 2000.
[4] WALSH J, WESTON R, SAMAREH J, et al. Multidisciplinary high-fidelity analysis and optimization of aerospace vehicles, Part 2: Preliminary results[C]∥38th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit. Reston: AIAA, 2000.
[5] KROO I, MANNING V. Collaborative optimization-status and directions[C]∥8th Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization. Reston: AIAA, 2000.
[6] MANNING V M. Large-scale design of supersonic aircraft via collaborative optimization[D]. Stanford: Stanford University, 1999: 22-32.
[7] MACMILLIN P, GOLOVIDOV O, MASON W, et al. An MDO investigation of the impact of practical constraints on an HSCT configuration[C]∥35th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit. Reston: AIAA, 1997.
[8] HOSDER S, WATSON L T, GROSSMAN B, et al. Polynomial response surface approximations for the multidisciplinary design optimization of a high speed civil transport[J]. Optimization and Engineering20012(4): 431-452.
[9] FENWICK S, HARRIS J, DEAN S. Multi-disciplinary optimisation to assess the impact of cruise speed on HSCT performance[C]∥10th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference. Reston: AIAA, 2004.
[10] LABAN M, HERRMANN U. Multi-disciplinary analysis and optimisation applied to supersonic aircraft part 1: analysis tools[C]∥48th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference. Reston: AIAA, 2007.
[11] SCHUERMANN M, GAFFURI M, HORST P. Multidisciplinary pre-design of supersonic aircraft[J]. CEAS Aeronautical Journal20156(2): 207-216.
[12] CHOI S, ALONSO J J, KROO I M, et al. Multifidelity design optimization of low-boom supersonic jets[J]. Journal of Aircraft200845(1): 106-118.
[13] BREZILLON J, CARRIER G, LABAN M. Multidisciplinary optimization of supersonic aircraft including low-boom considerations[J]. Journal of Mechanical Design2011133(10): 105001.
[14] SUN Y C, SMITH H. Low-boom low-drag optimization in a multidisciplinary design analysis optimization environment[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology201994: 105387.
[15] LI W, RALLABHANDI S. Inverse design of low-boom supersonic concepts using reversed equivalent-area targets[J]. Journal of Aircraft201451(1): 29-36.
[16] LI W, GEISELHART K. Multidisciplinary design optimization of low-boom supersonic aircraft with mission constraints[J]. AIAA Journal202059(1): 165-179.
[17] LI W, GEISELHART K. Multi-objective, multidisciplinary optimization of low-boom supersonic transports using multifidelity models[J]. Journal of Aircraft202259(5): 1137-1151.
[18] 丁玉临, 韩忠华, 乔建领, 等. 超声速民机总体气动布局设计关键技术研究进展[J]. 航空学报202344(2): 626310.
  DING Y L, HAN Z H, QIAO J L, et al. Research progress in key technologies for conceptual-aerodynamic configuration design of supersonic transport aircraft[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica202344(2): 626310 (in Chinese).
[19] 张力文, 宋文萍, 韩忠华, 等. 声爆产生、传播和抑制机理研究进展[J]. 航空学报202243(12): 025649.
  ZHANG L W, SONG W P, HAN Z H, et al. Recent progress of sonic boom generation, propagation, and mitigation mechanism[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica202243(12): 025649 (in Chinese).
[20] DING Y L, HAN Z H, QIAO J L, et al. Inverse design method for low-boom supersonic transport with lift constraint[J]. AIAA Journal202361(7): 2840-2853.
[21] CASTNER R. Analysis of exhaust plume effects on sonic boom for a 59-degree wing body model[C]∥49th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition. Reston: AIAA, 2011.
[22] KIRZ J. DLR TAU simulations for the third AIAA sonic boom prediction workshop near-field cases[C]∥AIAA Scitech 2021 Forum. Reston: AIAA, 2021.
[23] PARK M A, NEMEC M. Nearfield summary and statistical analysis of the second AIAA sonic boom prediction workshop[J]. Journal of Aircraft201856(3): 851-875.
[24] ANDERSON G R, AFTOSMIS M J, NEMEC M. Cart3D simulations for the second AIAA sonic boom prediction workshop[J]. Journal of Aircraft201856(3): 896-911.
[25] SEEBASS R. Minimum sonic boom shock strengths and overpressures[J]. Nature1969221(5181): 651-653.
[26] 顾奕然, 黄江涛, 陈树生, 等. 基于逆向增广Burgers方程的声爆反演技术[J]. 航空学报202344(2): 626258.
  GU Y R, HUANG J T, CHEN S S, et al. Sonic boom inversion technology based on inverse augmented Burgers equation[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica202344(2): 626258 (in Chinese).
[27] WHITHAM G B. The flow pattern of a supersonic projectile[J]. Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics19525(3): 301-348.
[28] JONES L B. Lower bounds for sonic bangs[J]. The Aeronautical Journal196165(606): 433-436.
[29] GEORGE A R. Lower bounds for sonic booms in the midfield[J]. AIAA Journal19697(8): 1542-1545.
[30] DARDEN C M. Sonic-boom minimization with nose bluntness relaxation: NASA TP-1348[R]. Washington, D. C.: NASA, 1979.
[31] PLOTKIN K, RALLABHANDI S, LI W. Generalized formulation and extension of sonic boom minimization theory for front and aft shaping[C]∥47th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including The New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition. Reston: AIAA, 2009.
[32] CLEVELAND R O. Propagation of sonic booms through a real, stratified atmosphere[D]. Austin: The University of Texas at Austin, 1995: 75-117.
[33] STEVENS S S. Perceived level of noise by mark Ⅶ and decibels(E)[J]. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America197251(2B): 575-601.
[34] RALLABHANDI S K. Advanced sonic boom prediction using the augmented Burgers equation[J]. Journal of Aircraft201148(4): 1245-1253.
[35] FORRESTER A, SOBESTER A, KEANE A. Engineering design via surrogate modelling: A practical guide[M]. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 2008: 33-59.
[36] BOOKER A J, DENNIS J E, FRANK P D, et al. A rigorous framework for optimization of expensive functions by surrogates[J]. Structural Optimization199917(1): 1-13.
[37] JONES D R, SCHONLAU M, WELCH W J. Efficient global optimization of expensive black-box functions[J]. Journal of Global Optimization199813(4): 455-492.
[38] DEB K, PRATAP A, AGARWAL S, et al. A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-Ⅱ[J]. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation20026(2): 182-197.
[39] 范周伟. 基于模型的客机需求定义与概念设计一体化研究[D]. 南京: 南京航空航天大学, 2022: 99-100.
  FAN Z W. Model-based integration of requirements definition and conceptual design for commercial aircraft[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2022: 99-100 (in Chinese).
[40] MATTINGLY J D, HEISER W H, DALEY D H. Air-craft engine design[M]. 2nd ed. Reston: AIAA, 2002: 38-39.
[41] 高永, 朱飞翔, 李冰, 等. 改进CST方法在翼型优化设计中的应用[J]. 海军航空工程学院学报201732(5): 426-430.
  GAO Y, ZHU F X, LI B, et al. Application of improved CST parametric method in airfoil design[J]. Journal of Naval Aeronautical and Astronautical University201732(5): 426-430 (in Chinese).
[42] RAYMER D P. Aircraft design: A conceptual approach [M]. 6th ed. Reston: AIAA, 2018: 389-452.
[43] JONES R T. Theory of Wing-Body Drag at Supersonic Speeds: NACA-TR-1284[R]. Washington, D. C.: NASA, 1956.
[44] 韩阳, 冷岩, 杨龙, 等. 一类超声速长航程民用客机的气动设计和性能评估[J]. 航空科学技术201930(9): 25-32.
  HAN Y, LENG Y, YANG L, et al. Aerodynamic design and evaluation of a type of supersonic long-range civil transport[J]. Aeronautical Science & Technology201930(9): 25-32 (in Chinese).
[45] HOWE D. Aircraft conceptual design synthesis[M]. London: Professional Engineering Pub, 2000: 153-164.
[46] WELGE H R, BONET J, MAGEE T, et al. N+3 Ad-vanced Concept Studies for Supersonic Commercial Transport Aircraft Entering Service in the 2030-2035 Period: NASA/CR-2011-217084[R]. Reston AIAA, 2011.
[47] JENKINSON L R, SIMPKIN P, RHODES D. Civil jet aircraft design[M]. Washington, D. C.: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 1999: 147-148.
[48] 张帅, 余雄庆. 客机航线性能分析的分段解析方法[J]. 飞行力学201230(6): 502-506.
  ZHANG S, YU X Q. Piecewise analytic model for en-route performance of airliners[J]. Flight Dynamics201230(6): 502-506 (in Chinese).
[49] SCHULTE P, SCHLAGER H, ZIEREIS H, et al. NO x emission indices of subsonic long-range jet aircraft at cruise altitude: In situ measurements and predictions[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres1997102(D17): 21431-21442.
[50] FUSARO R, VIOLA N, GALASSINI D. Sustainable supersonic fuel flow method: An evolution of the Boeing fuel flow method for supersonic aircraft using sustainable aviation fuels[J]. Aerospace20218(11): 331.
Outlines

/