ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA >
Safety risk assessment of UAVs operations in airport controlled airspace
Received date: 2024-09-27
Revised date: 2024-10-31
Accepted date: 2025-02-10
Online published: 2025-02-21
Supported by
National Natural Science Foundation of China(52272333)
Aiming at the scenario of the integrated operation of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles （UAVs） and transport aviation in the airport controlled airspace under the concept of urban air mobility， this paper proposes an airspace operation safety risk assessment method. Firstly， considering the maneuverability of UAVs and the position error of aircraft， a double-layer collision protection volume model is proposed； then， the Monte Carlo simulation method is used to simulate the aircraft error and calculate the collision probability. Furthermore， an improved Reich model suitable for the collision risk assessment of UAV routes and take-off and landing routes is proposed. Based on the improved Reich model， a risk assessment of UAV routes around a domestic hub airport is carried out. The results show that the collision risk between the Runway 33 landing route of the airport and the UAV operation route does not meet the Target Level of Safety （TLS） requirements. The study found that reducing the altitude and flight speed of the UAV route can reduce the collision risk， while changing the UAV route flow will not affect the collision risk.
Jin YANG , Xu HANG , Yanjun WANG . Safety risk assessment of UAVs operations in airport controlled airspace[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2025 , 46(11) : 531276 -531276 . DOI: 10.7527/S1000-6893.2024.31276
| [1] | ZOU Y Y， ZHANG H H， ZHONG G， et al. Collision probability estimation for small unmanned aircraft systems?［J］. Reliability Engineering & System Safety， 2021， 213： 107619. |
| [2] | ZHONG G， DU S， ZHANG H H， et al. Demarcation method of safety separations for sUAV based on collision risk estimation?［J］. Reliability Engineering & System Safety， 2024， 242： 109738. |
| [3] | XUE M， KUO V， DE ALVEAR CARDENAS J I， et al. A method of compliance for achieving target collision risk in UTM operations： AIAA-2024-4457?［R］. Reston： AIAA， 2024. |
| [4] | 郭悦翔， 司海强， 刘鸿仪， 等. 基于Event模型的无人机垂直碰撞风险研究［J］. 现代信息科技， 2022， 6（20）： 152-154， 158. |
| GUO Y X， SI H Q， LIU H Y， et al. Research on UAV vertical collision risk based on event model［J］. Modern Information Technology， 2022， 6（20）： 152-154， 158 （in Chinese）. | |
| [5] | 岳睿媛， 苏彬， 朱新平， 等. 基于改进Event模型的航路飞行过程垂直碰撞风险研究［J］. 航空工程进展， 2022， 13（1）： 129-134. |
| YUE R Y， SU B， ZHU X P， et al. Research on vertical collision risk of air route flight based on improved event model［J］. Advances in Aeronautical Science and Engineering， 2022， 13（1）： 129-134 （in Chinese）. | |
| [6] | JOHN WANG C H， TAN S K， LOW K H. Three-dimensional （3D） Monte-Carlo modeling for UAS collision risk management in restricted airport airspace?［J］. Aerospace Science and Technology， 2020， 105： 105964. |
| [7] | FITRIKANANDA B P， JENIE Y I， SASONGKO R A， et al. Risk assessment method for UAV’s sense and avoid system based on multi-parameter quantification and Monte Carlo simulation?［J］. Aerospace， 2023， 10（9）： 781. |
| [8] | BANERJEE P， GOROSPE G， ANCEL E. 3D representation of UAV-obstacle collision risk under off-nominal conditions?［C］?∥2021 IEEE Aerospace Conference （50100）. Piscataway： IEEE Press， 2021： 1-7. |
| [9] | 童亮， 甘旭升， 张宏宏， 等. 考虑多因素影响的无人机碰撞风险评估［J］. 兵器装备工程学报， 2023， 44（4）： 282-289. |
| TONG L， GAN X S， ZHANG H H， et al. Risk assessment of UAV collision considering multiple factors?［J］. Journal of Ordnance Equipment Engineering， 2023， 44（4）： 282-289 （in Chinese）. | |
| [10] | 韩鹏， 赵嶷飞. 基于飞行环境建模的UAV地面撞击风险研究［J］. 中国安全科学学报， 2020， 30（1）： 142-147. |
| HAN P， ZHAO Y F. Study on ground impact risk of UAV based on flight environment［J］. China Safety Science Journal， 2020， 30（1）： 142-147 （in Chinese）. | |
| [11] | NOH S， SHORTLE J. Dynamic event tree framework to assess collision risk between various aircraft types［C］?∥2020 Integrated Communications Navigation and Surveillance Conference （ICNS）. Piscataway： IEEE Press， 2020： 2F1-1-2F1-13. |
| [12] | KIM J， NAM G， MIN D C， et al. Safety risk assessment based minimum separation boundary for UAM operations?［C］?∥2023 IEEE/AIAA 42nd Digital Avionics Systems Conference （DASC）. Piscataway： IEEE Press， 2023. |
| [13] | GIGANTE G， BERNARD M， PALUMBO R， et al. Current approaches in UAV operational risk assessment and practical considerations［J］. Journal of Physics： Conference Series， 2024， 2716（1）： 012055. |
| [14] | HAN P， YANG X Y， ZHAO Y F， et al. Quantitative ground risk assessment for urban logistical unmanned aerial vehicle （UAV） based on Bayesian network?［J］. Sustainability， 2022， 14（9）： 5733. |
| [15] | ZHANG H H， GAN X S， LIU Y， et al. Risk assessment framework for low-altitude UAV traffic management［J］. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems， 2022， 42（3）： 2775-2792. |
| [16] | SUN X T， HU Y， QIN Y C， et al. Risk assessment of unmanned aerial vehicle accidents based on data-driven Bayesian networks［J］. Reliability Engineering & System Safety， 2024， 248： 110185. |
| [17] | 李航， 聂芳艺. 基于贝叶斯网络的物流无人机碰撞风险评估［J］. 科学技术与工程， 2023， 23（15）： 6700-6706. |
| LI H， NIE F Y. Collision risk assessment of logistics UAV based on Bayesian network［J］. Science Technology and Engineering， 2023， 23（15）： 6700-6706 （in Chinese）. | |
| [18] | International Civil Aviation Organization. Manual on monitoring the application of performance-based horizontal separation minima： Doc 10063 ［S］. Montreal： ICAO， 2017： 65-81. |
| [19] | International Civil Aviation Organization. A unified framework for collision risk modelling in support of the manual on airspace planning methodology for the determination of separation minima （Doc 9689）： Cir 319 AN/181 ［S］. Montreal： ICAO， 2009： 17-43. |
| [20] | MCFADYEN A， MARTIN T. Understanding vertical collision risk and navigation performance for unmanned aircraft［C］?∥2018 IEEE/AIAA 37th Digital Avionics Systems Conference （DASC）. Piscataway： IEEE Press， 2018. |
| [21] | WANG L， ZHAO M， HAO W， et al. Collision risk sssessment between manned aircraft and uavs in multitype operational scenarios based on space-time overlap?［J］. Available at SSRN 4836037. |
| [22] | KALLINEN V， MCFADYEN A. Collision risk modeling and analysis for lateral separation to support unmanned traffic management［J］. Risk Analysis， 2022， 42（4）： 854-881. |
| [23] | 韩鹏， 周斌， 张恩宇. 终端区多场景有人机/无人机空中碰撞风险研究［J］. 西华大学学报（自然科学版）， 2022， 41（2）： 8-11， 50. |
| HAN P， ZHOU B， ZHANG E Y. Air collision risk of manned drones in multiple scenarios in the terminal area［J］. Journal of Xihua University （Natural Science Edition）， 2022， 41（2）： 8-11， 50 （in Chinese）. | |
| [24] | 潘卫军， 陈佳炀， 张智巍， 等. 管制空域内无人机与有人机侧向碰撞风险研究［J］. 计算机与现代化， 2020（3）： 1-5. |
| PAN W J， CHEN J Y， ZHANG Z W， et al. Lateral collision risk evaluation between unmanned aerial vehicle and manned aircraft in controlled airspace［J］. Computer and Modernization， 2020（3）： 1-5 （in Chinese）. | |
| [25] | LIN X， FULTON N， WESTCOTT M. Target level of safety measures in air transportation-Review， validation and recommendations?［C］?∥Proceedings Of The IASTED International Conference. Beijing： ACTA Press， 2009. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
CJA