Solid Mechanics and Vehicle Conceptual Design

Crack growth model based on average growth rate

  • DUI Hongna ,
  • LIU Xiaodong ,
  • WANG Fan ,
  • DONG Jiang
Expand
  • Department of Strength, AVIC Chengdu Aircraft Design&Research Institute, Chengdu 610091, China

Received date: 2020-02-20

  Revised date: 2020-06-16

  Online published: 2020-07-06

Abstract

Different from crack growth models based on classical Linear-Elastic Fracture Mechanics (LEFM), the average growth rate based model describes the average crack propagation per flight hour under a random load spectrum using a simple empirical formula. The model treats the random spectrum as an equivalent constant amplitude spectrum with only two characteristic parameters reflecting all the complex load-sequence effects and other effects. A growth rate scaling method is adopted to adjust the average growth rate obtained under one test load spectrum to predict the crack growth rate under another untested load spectrum. First, the definition and parameter derivation procedures of average growth rate models based on the Frost & Dugdale formula and Paris formula are introduced. Then, representative coupon fatigue test data of a typical bulkhead critical location under different random spectra is reviewed and the average growth rate model and growth rate scaling method have been comprehensively validated. After comparative analysis, the Paris equation based average growth rate model is recommended. It has been demonstrated that significant prediction accuracy gains of the crack growth rate and life span under variable amplitude loading spectra are achieved when the Paris equation based model is combined with the growth rate scaling method. Meanwhile, the accuracy of the growth rate scaling method is related to the classical LEFM model selected in the derivation of theoretical parameters. Thus, the average growth rate based crack growth model in conjunction with the growth rate scaling method is anticipated to provide a reliable option for the individual aircraft tracking program to better assess the aircraft structural service life.

Cite this article

DUI Hongna , LIU Xiaodong , WANG Fan , DONG Jiang . Crack growth model based on average growth rate[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2020 , 41(11) : 223887 -223887 . DOI: 10.7527/S1000-6893.2020.23887

References

[1] MOLENT L, AKTEPE B.Review of fatigue monitoring of agile military aircraft[J]. Journal of Fatigue and Fracture of Engineering Materials and Structures, 2000, 23:767-785.
[2] HU W,TONG Y C,WALKER K F, et al. A review and assessment of current airframe lifing methodologies and tools in air vehicles division:DSTO-RR-0321[R].Fishermans Bend:Defence Science and Technology Organisation, 2006.
[3] SWANTON G. A critical review of the METLIFE software in support of the RAAF F-111 Durability and Damage Tolerance Analysis (DADTA) program:DSTO-TR-1713[R]. Fishermans Bend:Defence Science and Technology Organisation, 2005.
[4] ZHUANG W, MOLENT L. Block-by-block approaches for s fatigue crack growth prediction[J]. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2008, 75(17):4933-4947.
[5] MOLENT L, MCDONALD M, BARTER S,et al. Evaluation of spectrum fatigue crack growth using variable amplitude data[J]. International Journal of Fatigue, 2008, 30(1):119-137.
[6] ZHUANG W Z, MCDONALD M,PHILLILS M,et al. Effective block approach for aircraft damage tolerance analyses[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2009,46(5):1660-1666.
[7] FROST N E, DUGDALE D S.The propagation of fatigue cracks in sheet specimens[J]. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 1958, 6(2):92-110.
[8] PARIS P C, ERDOGAN F. A critical analysis of crack propagation laws[J]. Journal of Basic Engineering, Transactions of ASME, 1963, 85:528-534.
[9] NASA.Nasgro reference manual, Ver.4.02[M]. Washington,D.C.:NASA Johnson Space Center and Southwest Research Inst., 2002.
[10] Afgrow reference manual, Ver.4.0011.14[M].Wright-Patterson AFB:Air Force Research Lab., 2007.
[11] HBM.Ncode technical reference book, Ver.5.4[M].HBM, 2013.
Outlines

/