As an innovative configuration, the Blended-Wing-Body (BWB) configuration has become a worldwide research focus in civil aircrafts development. Compared to the conventional configuration, the BWB shows integrative benefits and becomes the most promising candidate for a safe, economical, comfortable, and environmentally friendly large aircraft. This paper emphasizes the fact that the present BWB designs focus on the high speed transonic performance but pay less attention to the low speed characteristics, which leads to the design challenge that the low speed characteristics of BWB configuration can hardly satisfy the severe requirement of "green aviation" for the next generation of aircrafts. To solve this problem, a tradeoff design method for high and low speed performance has been put forward. By analyzing the effects of conceptual design parameters, the wing loading is chosen as the primary parameter to coordinate low and high speed performance. Based on previous studies, a tradeoff design principle consisting of three main technological components has been proposed to balance the conflict between high and low speed performance. A multi-disciplinary design optimization platform is applied to obtain a tradeoff design for both cruise performance and low speed requirements. The CFD and wind tunnel results show significant improvement of low speed performance while maintaining high speed performance. This result is suitable for relieving the pressure of high-lift devices and control surface design, achieving both the cruise efficiency and the required high lift. The methods proposed in this study provides new designs and methods for improving BWB low speed performance, which can be applied to the further study of the BWB civil aircrafts and provide useful information for other applications.
[1] GREEN J E. Greener by design:The technology challenge[J]. The Aeronautical Journal, 2002, 106(1056):57-113.
[2] GRAHAMN W R, HALL C A, MORALES M V. The potential of future aircraft technology for noise and pollutant emissions reduction[J]. Transport Policy, 2014, 34:36-51.
[3] BOMBURY J B. IATA technology roadmap 2013[M]. Montreal:International Air Transport Association, 2013.
[4] KALLAS S, GEOGHEGAN-QUINN M. Flightpath 2050-Europe's vision for aviation[R]. Luxembourg:Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 2011.
[5] Advisory Council for Aviation Research and innovation in Europe (ACARE). Strategic Research and Innovation Agenda (SRIA):Volume 2[R]. Brussels:ACARE, 2012.
[6] United States Congress. Open congress, American clean energy and security act of 2009[EB/OL]. (2009-07-20)[2019-03-15].http://www.opencongress.org/bill.111-h2454/text.
[7] SCHUTTE J, KESTNER B, JIMENEZ H, et al. Updates and modeling enhancements to the assessment of NASA environmentally responsible aviation technologies and vehicle concepts:AIAA-2012-0336[R]. Reston, VA:AIAA, 2012.
[8] MODY P, SATO S, HALL D, et al. Conceptual design of an N+3 hybrid wing body subsonic transport:AIAA-2010-4812[R]. Reston, VA:AIAA, 2010.
[9] LIEBECK R H. Design of the blended wing body sub-sonic transport[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2004, 41(1):10-25.
[10] 朱自强, 王晓璐, 吴宗成,等. 民机的一种新型布局形式——翼身融合体飞机[J].航空学报, 2008, 29(1):49-59. ZHU Z Q, WANG X L, WU Z C, et al. A new type of transport-Blended wing body aircraft[J]. Acta Aero-nautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2008, 29(1):49-59(in Chinese).
[11] MORRIS A. MOB a European distributed multi-disciplinary design and optimizaiton project:AIAA-2002-5444[R]. Reston, VA:AIAA, 2002.
[12] 张彬乾, 陈真利, 李杰. 亚音速大型民机气动布局发展趋势[C]//大型飞机关键技术高层论坛暨中国航空学会2007年学术年会, 2007:1-6. ZHANG B Q, CHEN Z L, LI J. Development trend of aerodynamic layout for subsonic large-scale civil aircraft[C]//High Level Forum on Key Technologies for Large Aircraft and 2007 Annual Meeting of Chinese Society of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2007:1-6(in Chinese).
[13] LI P F, ZHANG B Q, CHEN Y C, et al. Aerodynamic design methodology for blended wing body transport[J]. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2012, 25(4):508-516.
[14] QIN N, VAVALLE A, MOIGNE A, et al. Aerodynamic considerations of blended wing body aircraft[J]. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 2004, 40(6):321-343.
[15] PAUL O, HOWARD S. Review of evolving trends in blended wing body aircraft design[J]. Progress in Aero-space Sciences, 2016, 82(1):1-23.
[16] HILL G, THOMAS R. Challenges and opportunities for noise reduction through advanced aircraft propulsion airframe integration and configurations[C]//8th CEAS Workshop:Aeroacoustics of New Aircraft and Engine Configurations, 2004:1-13.
[17] BONET J, SCHELLENGER H, RAWDON B, et al. Environmentally Responsible Aviation(ERA) project-N+2 advanced vehicle concepts study and conceptual design of Subscale Test Vehicle(STV) final report:NASA/CR-2011-216519[R]. Washington, D.C.:NASA, 2011.
[18] 王元元. 波音考虑恢复X-48的试验研究[EB/OL]. (2016-02-03)[2018-11-03].http://www.aeroinfo.com.cn/Item/8431.aspx. WANG Y Y. Boeing ponders reviving X-48 for new tests[EB/OL]. (2016-02-03)[2018-11-03].http://www.aeroinfo.com.cn/Item/8431.aspx (in Chinese).
[19] 王元元. 波音持续深化BWB布局研究[EB/OL]. (2018-03-28)[2018-11-03].http://www.aeroinfo.com.cn/Item/22455.aspx. WANG Y Y. Boeing continues to refine the BWB layout[EB/OL]. (2018-03-28)[2018-11-03].http://www.aeroinfo.com.cn/Item/22455.aspx (in Chinese).
[20] HOOKER J R, WICK A. Design of the hybrid wing body for fuel efficient air mobility operations:AIAA-2014-1285[R]. Reston, VA:AIAA, 2014.
[21] ROSKAM J. Airplane design-Part 6:Preliminary calculation of aerodynamic, thrust and power characteristic[M]. Ottawa, KS:Roskam Aviation and Engineering Corporation, 1985:355-360.
[22] MARTIN WB, JEAN-YVES T, CHRISTOPHE T, et al. Conceptual design framework for blended wing body aircraft:AIAA-2012-5649[R]. Reston, VA:AIAA, 2012.
[23] MULYANTO T, NURHAKIM M L I. Conceptual design of blended wing body business jet aircraft[J]. Journal of KONES, 2013, 20(4):299-304.
[24] DOMMELEN J, VOS R. Conceptual design and analy-sis of blended-wing-body aircraft[J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G:Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 2014, 228(13):2452-2474.
[25] GREITZER E M, BONNEFOY P A, BLANCO E, et al. N+3 aircraft concept designs and trade studies. Volume 1:NASA/CR-2010-216794/VOL1[R]. Washington, D.C.:NASA, 2010.
[26] ROMAN D, ALLEN J, LIEBECK R. Aerodynamic design challenges of the blended-wing-body subsonic transport:AIAA-2000-4335[R]. Reston, VA:AIAA, 2000.
[27] BOLSUNOVSKY A L, BUZOVERYA N P, GUREVICH B I, et al. Flying wing-Problems and decisions[J]. Aircraft Design, 2001, 4(4):193-219.
[28] HILEMAN J, REYNOLDS TOM, BLANCO E, et al. SAX-40 development of approach procedures for si-lent aircraft:AIAA-2007-0451[R]. Reston, VA:AIAA, 2007.
[29] GATLIN G, VICROY D, CARTER M. Experimental investigation of the low-speed aerodynamic characteristics of a 5.8-percent scale hybrid wing body configuration:AIAA-2012-2669[R]. Reston, VA:AIAA, 2012.
[30] DEERE K A, LUCKRING J M, MCMILLIN S N, et al. CFD predictions for transonic performance of the ERA hybrid wing-body configuration:AIAA-2016-0266[R]. Reston, VA:AIAA, 2016.
[31] NICKOL C L. Hybrid wing body configuration scaling study:AIAA-2012-0337[R]. Reston, VA:AIAA, 2012.
[32] 李沛峰, 张彬乾, 陈真利,等. 一种采用混合翼身的飞行器气动外形:CN102730181A[P]. 2012-10-17. LI P F, ZHANG B Q, CHEN Z L, et al. Aerobat aero-dynamic configuration adopting mixing wing body:CN102730181A[P]. 2012-10-17(in Chinese).
[33] ZHANG M H, CHEN Z L, ZHANG B Q. A conceptual design platform for blended wing-body trans-ports[C]//30th Congress of the International Council of the Aeronautical Science. Bonn:ICAS, 2016:1-9.
[34] GU W T, CHEN Z L, ZHANG B Q. Physically-based multidisciplinary design optimization framework coupling airframe and propulsion[C]//30th Congress of the International Council of the Aeronautical Science. Bonn:ICAS, 2016:1-9.
[35] DANIEL P R. Aircraft design:A conceptual approach[M]. Reston, VA:AIAA, 1989.
[36] BRADLEY K R. A sizing methodology for the concep-tual design of blended-wing-body transports:NASA CR-2004-213016[R]. Washington, D.C.:NASA, 2004.
[37] GREITZER E M, BONNEFOY P A, BLANCO E, et al. N+3 aircraft concept designs and trade studies. Volume 2; Appendices-Doesign methodologies for aerodynamics, structures, weight, and thermodynamic cycles:NASA/CR-2010-216794/VOL2[R]. Washington, D.C.:NASA, 2010.
[38] GARMENDIA D, CHAKRABORTY I, TRAWICK D. Assessment of electrically actuated redundant control surface layouts for a hybrid wing body concept:AIAA-2014-2428[R]. Reston, VA:AIAA, 2014.
CJA