ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA >
Unsteady aerodynamic reduced-order modeling method for parameter changeable structure
Received date: 2016-10-01
Revised date: 2017-01-05
Online published: 2017-01-09
Supported by
National Natural Science Foundation for Excellent Young Scholar (11622220);Seed Foundation of Innovation and Creation for Graduate Students in Northwestern Polytechnical University (z2016002)
Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) based unsteady aerodynamic reduced-order model (ROM) can make significant improvement of efficiency of transonic aeroelastic analysis. However, the existing ROM is applicable only to structures with fixed parameters, namely prescribed model shapes (ROM-PMS). When structural parameters should be altered such as structure optimization and uncertainty analysis, ROM-PMS is no longer feasible. To settle the problem, a new unsteady aerodynamic modeling method for arbitrary model shapes is developed based on Ref.[20]. Parametric sampling and modal analysis are conducted on the structure to be designed and analyzed. The basic mode shapes are then obtained through principal component analysis (PCA). Real model shapes of arbitrary structure in the sample space can be synthesized by linearly superimposing basic mode shapes with correct coefficients. The coefficients of superposition change with the alteration of structure parameters. The analysis shows that just small number of basic modes can reach desirable accuracy. Classical modeling method can be used to construct ROM in basic mode shape coordinate. The ROM applicable for various structures can be developed from ROM in basic mode coordinate, which means that structural parameters can be arbitrarily altered in the sample space, while ROM is universal. This method can be widely applied to aeroelastic optimization design and uncertainty analysis, with great improvement in computational efficiency.
WANG Ziyi , ZHANG Weiwei . Unsteady aerodynamic reduced-order modeling method for parameter changeable structure[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2017 , 38(6) : 220829 -220829 . DOI: 10.7527/S1000-6893.2017.120829
[1] DOWELL E H, HALL K C. Modeling of fluid-structure interaction[J]. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 2001, 33(1): 445-490.
[2] LUCIA D J, BERAN P S, SILVA W A. Reduced-order modeling: New approaches for computational physics[J]. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 2004, 40(1-2): 51-117.
[3] 张伟伟, 叶正寅. 基于CFD的气动力建模及其在气动弹性中的应用[J]. 力学进展, 2008, 38(1): 77-86. ZHANG W W, YE Z Y. On unsteady aerodynamic modeling based on CFD technique and its applications on aeroelastic analysis[J]. Advances in Mechanics, 2008, 38(1): 77-86 (in Chinese).
[4] 陈刚, 李跃明. 非定常流场降阶模型及其应用研究进展与展望[J]. 力学进展, 2011, 41(6): 686-701. CHEN G, LI Y M. Advances and prospects of the reduced order model for unsteady flow and its application[J]. Advances in Mechanics, 2011, 41(6): 686-701 (in Chinese).
[5] 张伟伟, 叶正寅. 操纵面对跨声速机翼气动弹性特性的影响[J]. 航空学报, 2010, 66(7): 999-1007. ZHANG W W, YE Z Y. Effect of control surface on airfoil flutter in transonic flow[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2010, 66(7): 999-1007 (in Chinese).
[6] ZHANG W W, YE Z Y. Reduced-order-model-based flutter analysis at high angle of attack[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2007, 44(6): 2086-2089.
[7] ZHANG W W, YE Z Y. Control law design for transonic aeroservoelastic[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2007, 11(2-3): 136-145.
[8] DOWELL E H, THOMAS J P, HALL K C. Transonic limit cycle oscillation analysis using reduced order aerodynamic models[J]. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 2004, 19(1): 17-27.
[9] BERAN P S, LUCIA D J, PETTIT C L. Reduced-order modeling of limit-cycle oscillation for aeroelastic systems[J]. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 2004, 19(5): 575-590.
[10] JONES D P, ROBERTS I, GAITONDE A L. Identification of limit cycles for piecewise nonlinear aeroelastic systems[J]. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 2007, 23(7): 1012-1028.
[11] ZHANG W W, WANG B B, YE Z Y, et al. Efficient method for limit cycle flutter analysis by nonlinear aerodynamic reduced-order models[J]. AIAA Journal, 2012, 50(5): 1019-1028.
[12] MANNARINO A, MANTEGAZZA P. Nonlinear aeroelastic reduced order modeling by recurrent neural networks[J]. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 2014, 48: 103-121.
[13] 寇家庆, 张伟伟, 叶正寅. 基于分层思路的动态非线性气动力建模方法[J]. 航空学报, 2015, 36(12): 3785-3797. KOU J Q, ZHANG W W, YE Z Y. Dynamic nonlinear aerodynamics modeling method based on layered model[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2015, 36(12): 3785-3797 (in Chinese).
[14] KOU J Q, ZHANG W W. An approach to enhance the generalization capability of nonlinear aerodynamic reduced-order models[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2016, 49: 197-208.
[15] ZHANG W W, KOU J Q, WANG Z Y. Nonlinear aerodynamic reduced-order model for limit-cycle oscillation and flutter[J]. AIAA Journal, 2016, 54(10): 3302-3310.
[16] WANG Z C, ZHANG Z C, LEE D H, et al. Flutter analysis with structural uncertainty by using CFD-based aerodynamic ROM[C]//49th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference. Reston: AIAA, 2008.
[17] SONG S F, LU Z Z, ZHANG W W, et al. Uncertainty importance measure by fast fourier transform for wing transonic flutter[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2011, 48(2): 449-455.
[18] MARQUE S, BADCOCK K J, KHODAPARAST H H, et al. Transonic aeroelastic stability predictions under the influence of structural variability[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2010, 47(4): 1229-1239.
[19] MARQUE S, BADCOCK K J, KHODAPARAST H H, et al. How structural model variability influences transonic aeroelastic stability[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2012, 49(5): 1189-1199.
[20] ZHANG W W, CHEN K J, YE Z Y. Unsteady aerodynamic reduced-order modeling of an aeroelastic wing using arbitrary mode shapes[J]. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 2015, 58: 254-270.
[21] SCHAIRER E T, HAND L A. Measurements of unsteady aeroelastic model deformation by stereo photogrammetry[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 1999, 36(6): 1033-1040.
[22] GORDNIER R E. Computation of limit-cycle oscillations of a delta wing[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2003, 40(6): 1206-1208.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
CJA