Solid Mechanics and Vehicle Conceptual Design

Equivalent multi-case optimization architecture for modular aircraft structures

  • ZHANG Lifeng ,
  • YAO Weixing ,
  • ZOU Jun
Expand
  • 1. Key Laboratory of Fundamental Science for National Defense-Advanced Design Technology of Flight Vehicle, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 210016, China;
    2. State Key Laboratory of Mechanics and Control of Mechanical Structures, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 210016, China

Received date: 2014-02-19

  Revised date: 2014-05-20

  Online published: 2015-03-31

Supported by

Supported by State Key Laboratory of Mechanics and Control of Mechanical Structures (Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics) (0213G02)

Abstract

With the development of technology in aviation, aircraft that can be used for a wider variety of missions and have lower lifecycle costs become more prevalent. The design of the modular aircraft has a practical significance in the multi-purpose design and economic benefit. According to the features of modular aircraft structure design, an equivalent multi-case optimization (EMCO) architecture is proposed, which divides the modular optimization problem into the optimization of common module and individual modules. The common module is transferred to a structure under multiple loading conditions, and then is optimized under minimum weight objective. The individual modules in each structure are then optimized separately. The common module and the individual module are optimized alternately until the criterion of convergence is satisfied. The method is verified by a modular truss structure and a modular wing structure example, respectively. The comparision with the results of individual design and weighted single objective design method shows that the new method reduces the calculation scale and improves the convergence efficiency.

Cite this article

ZHANG Lifeng , YAO Weixing , ZOU Jun . Equivalent multi-case optimization architecture for modular aircraft structures[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2015 , 36(3) : 834 -839 . DOI: 10.7527/S1000-6893.2014.0104

References

[1] McMasters J H, Cummings R M. From farther, faster, higher to leaner, meaner, greener: further directions in aeronautics[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2004, 41(1): 51-61.

[2] Fan L, Wang Z. Application of modularization technology at each development stage of aircraft[J]. Aeronautical Science & Technology, 2010(3): 19-21 (in Chinese). 范林, 王哲. 模块化技术在飞机研制中的应用[J]. 航空科学技术, 2010(3): 19-21.

[3] Brown R B. Low cost innovative design for new commercial transport family, AIAA-2002-5830[R]. Reston:AIAA, 2002.

[4] Funk J E, Harber J R, Morin L. Future military common aircraft development opportunities, AIAA-2006-1514 [R]. Reston: AIAA, 2006.

[5] de Weck O L, Nadir W D, Wong J G, et al. Modular structures for manned space exploration: the truncated octahedron as a building block, AIAA-2005-2764[R]. Reston: AIAA, 2005.

[6] Gonzalez-Zugasti J P, Otto K N, Baker J D. A method for architecting product platforms[J]. Research in Engineering Design, 2000, 12(2): 61-72.

[7] Yong M P,Yu X Q. A structural optimization method for aircraft family[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2008, 29(3): 664-669 (in Chinese). 雍明培, 余雄庆. 一种面向飞机族的结构优化方法[J]. 航空学报, 2008, 29(3): 664-669.

[8] Hou L, Tang R Z, Xu Y S. Progress in design theory, technology and application research of modular pro-duct[J]. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2004, 40(1): 56-61 (in Chinese). 侯亮, 唐任仲, 徐燕申. 产品模块化设计理论、技术与应用研究进展[J]. 机械工程学报, 2004, 40(1): 56-61.

[9] Simpson T W, Marion T, de Weck O L, et al. Platform-based design and development: current trends and needs in industry[C]//ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conference. 2006: 1-12.

[10] Duray R, Ward P T, Milligan G W, et al. Approaches to mass customization: configurations and empirical validation[J]. Journal of Operations Management, 2000,18(6): 605-625.

[11] Cetin O L, Saitou K. Decomposition-based assembly synthesis for structural modularity [J]. Journal of Mechanical Design, 2004, 126(2): 234-243.

[12] Cetin O L. Decomposition-based assembly synthesis of family of structures[D]. Michigan:The University of Michigan, 2003.

[13] Pate D J, Patterson M D, German B J. Methods for optimizing a family of reconfigurable aircraft, AIAA-2011-6850[R]. Reston: AIAA, 2011.

[14] Allison J T, Roth B, Kokkolaras I, et al. Aircraft family design using decomposition-based methods[C]//Proceedings of the 11th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference. 2006: 1-12.

[15] Roth B. Aircraft family design using enhanced collaborative optimization[D]. Pale Alto: Stanford University, 2008.

[16] Willcox K, Wakayama S. Simultaneous optimization of a multiple-aircraft family[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2003, 40(4): 616-622.

Outlines

/