Solid Mechanics and Vehicle Conceptual Design

Residual strength prediction of welded stiffened thin-walled structures made of Al 6156-T4 alloy based on CTOD method

  • HAO Yanguang ,
  • LIU Jianzhong ,
  • GUO Xiang ,
  • LIU Hu ,
  • SHANG Deguang
Expand
  • 1. Beijing Institute of Aeronautical Materials, Aviation Industry Corporation of China, Beijing 100095, China;
    2. College of Mechanical Engineering and Applied Electronics Technology, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China

Received date: 2014-02-28

  Revised date: 2014-04-24

  Online published: 2015-03-31

Supported by

National Natural Science Foundation of China (11272019); Major Program for International Cooperation of National Natural Science Foundation of China (51010006)

Abstract

In order to ensure that aircraft performance satisfies the damage tolerance design requirements, it is necessary to assess its residual strength. This paper deals with the R-curve and residual strength analysis of welded thin-walled structures for aircraft fuselage applications made of Al 6156-T4 alloy. The experimental results have been used to verify the proposed analysis route for the residual strength prediction. In addition, the crack propagation paths are detected when the crack through the stringer and the crack growth rates are measured in two directions. The residual strength is predicted for one-bay and two-bay thin-walled structure with variety initial crack length using different criteria. The results show that crack branching (into skin and stringer) when crack growing approached to the stringer in a perpendicular form. It is found that the residual strength is underestimated using the net section yield criteria for the residual strength prediction. In particular, the prediction based on SINTAP-FITNET evaluation system using parameters CTOD-δ5 is more accurate than using K curve method.

Cite this article

HAO Yanguang , LIU Jianzhong , GUO Xiang , LIU Hu , SHANG Deguang . Residual strength prediction of welded stiffened thin-walled structures made of Al 6156-T4 alloy based on CTOD method[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2015 , 36(3) : 827 -833 . DOI: 10.7527/S1000-6893.2014.0069

References

[1] Hjelen J, Ørsund R, Nes E. On the origin of recrystallization textures in aluminium[J]. Acta Metallurgica et Materialia, 1991, 39(7): 1377-1404.



[2] Zhang J M, Nie H, Xue C J, et al. Properties and prediction of pre-corrosion strength of aluminum alloy welded joints[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2013, 34(9): 2161-2168 (in Chinese). 张俊苗, 聂宏, 薛彩军, 等. 铝合金焊接接头预腐蚀强度特性及预测[J]. 航空学报, 2013, 34(9): 2161-2168.



[3] Wu X R. Handbook of mechanical properties of aircraft structural metals: static strength fatigue/durability[M]. Beijing: Aviation Industry Press, 1996: 25-42 (in Chinese). 吴学仁. 飞机结构金属材料力学性能手册:静强度疲劳/耐久性[M]. 北京: 航空工业出版社, 1996: 25-42.



[4] Broek D. Elementary engineering fracture mechanics [M]. Hague: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1974: 71-97.



[5] Vlieger H. The residual strength characteristics of stiffened panels containing fatigue cracks[J]. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 1973, 5(2): 447-477.



[6] Feddersen C. Evaluation and prediction of the residual strength of center cracked tension panels[J]. Damage Tolerance in Aircraft Structures, 1971, 486(71): 50-78.



[7] Krafft J, Sullivan A, Boyle R. Effect of dimensions on fast fracture instability of notched sheets[C]//Proceedings of the Crack Propagation Symposium, 1961: 8-26.



[8] Zerbst U, Schǒdel M, Webster S, et al. Fitness-for-service fracture assessment of structures containing cracks[M]. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2007: 137-151.



[9] Schwalbe K H. Introduction of δ5 as an operational definition of the CTOD and its practical use[S]. West Conshohocken: American Society for Testing and Materials, 1995.



[10] Zerbst U, Heinimann M, Donne C D, et al. Feacture and damage mechanics modelling of thin-walled structures—an overview [J]. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2009, 76(1): 5-43.



[11] Kocak M. FITNET fitness-for-service procedure: an overview [J]. Welding in the World, 2007, 51(5-6):94-105.



[12] Zhang Y H, Lyu G Z, Li Z, et al. Investigation on corrosion fatigue crack growth and residual strength of aluminum alloy structure[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2007, 28(2): 332-335 (in Chinese). 张有宏, 吕国志, 李仲, 等. 铝合金结构腐蚀疲劳裂纹扩展与剩余强度研究[J]. 航空学报, 2007 , 28(2): 332-335.



[13] Schwalbe K H, Newman J C Jr, Shannon J L Jr. Fracture mechanics testing on specimens with low constraint—standardization activities within ISO and ASTM[J]. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2005, 72(4): 557-576.



[14] China Iron and Steel Association. GB/T 24522—2009 Metallic materials-Method of test for the determination of resistance to stable crack extension using specimens of low constraint[S]. Beijing: Standards Press of China, 2009 (in Chinese). 中国钢铁工业协会. GB/T 24522—2009 金属材料 低拘束试样测定稳定裂纹扩展阻力的试验方法[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2009.



[15] Seib E, Uz M V, Kocak M. Fracture analysis of thin walled laser beam and friction stir welded Al-alloys using FITNET procedure[C]//International Conference of Fitness-for-Service, 2006: 229-239.



[16] Jones R, Krishnapillai M, Cairns K, et al. Application of infrared thermography to study crack growth and fatigue life extension procedures[J]. Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures, 2010, 33(12): 871-884.

Outlines

/