Electronics and Control

Optimization Approach for Collaborative Operating Modes of Multi-runway Systems

  • YIN Jia'nan ,
  • HU Minghua ,
  • ZHANG Honghai ,
  • MA Yuanyuan
Expand
  • 1. College of Civil Aviation, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 211106, China;
    2. National Key Laboratory of Air Traffic Flow Management, Nanjing 211106, China

Received date: 2013-05-21

  Revised date: 2013-07-23

  Online published: 2013-08-08

Supported by

Funding of Jiangsu Innovation Program for Graduate Education (CXZZ12_0165); National Key Technology Research and Development Program of China (2011BAH24B09); National Natural Science Foundation of China (61104159); Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities

Abstract

Low service ability of an airfield area causes frequent air traffic congestion and flight delays at busy airports. The airport system calls for capacity and efficiency improvements urgently to relieve the current congested situation. In this work, an optimization approach for the collaborative operating modes of multi-runway systems is proposed to balance the demand and capacity. Runway operating modes are classified in detail taking into consideration the airport layout, air traffic characteristics, weather conditions and other factors comprehensively. Based on the theory of runway capacity envelope, a corresponding optimization model is established by introducing the capacity loss coefficient which objectively reflects the mode switching characteristics. Then an elitist non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm is designed combined with the multi-objective optimization theory, and applied to solve the problem of multi-runway operating mode configuration. Simulation results show that the above model and algorithm can achieve optimized multi-runway configuration and improve demand-capacity balancing. Compared with the single runway mode, the combined runway modes bring about a striking optimization effect which results in a 38.1% reduction in the cost of flight delays and a 46.4% decrease in the quantity of adjusted flights. The approach provided can significantly enhance collaborative operating efficiency of a multi-runway system, and effectively improve air traffic punctuality.

Cite this article

YIN Jia'nan , HU Minghua , ZHANG Honghai , MA Yuanyuan . Optimization Approach for Collaborative Operating Modes of Multi-runway Systems[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2014 , 35(3) : 795 -806 . DOI: 10.7527/S1000-6893.2013.0350

References

[1] Beasley J E, Krishnamoorthy M, Sharaiha Y M, et al. Scheduling aircaft landings-the static case[J]. Transportation Science, 2000, 34(2): 180-197.

[2] Romano E, Santillo L C, Zoppoli P. A static algorithm to solve the air traffic sequencing problem[J]. WSEAS Transactions on Systems, 2008, 7(6): 682-695.

[3] Bojanowski L, Harikiopoulo D, Neogi N. Multi-runway aircraft sequencing at congested airports[C]//Proceedings of American Control Conference, 2011: 2752-2758.

[4] Brinton C, Provan C, Lent S, et al. Collaborative departure queue management[C]//Proceedings of 9th USA/Europe Air Traffic Management Research and Development Seminar, 2011.

[5] Czerny A I. Airport congestion management under uncertainty[J]. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 2010, 44 (3): 371-380.

[6] Schank J L. Solving airside airport congestion: why peak runway pricing is not working [J]. Journal of Air Transport Management, 2005, 11 (6): 417-425.

[7] Yin J N, Hu M H, Zhao Z. Simulation model and algorithm of multi-runway airport gate assignment[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2010, 10(5): 71-76. (in Chinese) 尹嘉男, 胡明华, 赵征. 多跑道机场停机位分配仿真模型及算法[J]. 交通运输工程学报, 2010, 10(5): 71-76.

[8] Australian Government. Runway allocator: interactive runway use analysis tool[R]. Canberra: Department of Transport and Regional Services, 2006.

[9] Gluchshenko O. Dynamic usage of capacity for arrivals and departures in queue minimization[C]//Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Control Applications, 2011: 139-146.

[10] Solak S, Clarke J P B, Johnson E L. Airport terminal capacity planning [J]. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 2009, 43 (6): 659-676.

[11] Bertsimas D, Frankovich M, Odoni A. Optimal selection of airport runway configurations [J]. Operations Research, 2011, 59 (6): 1407-1419.

[12] Gilbo E P, Howard K W. Collaborative optimization of airport arrival and departure traffic flow management strategies for CDM[C]//Proceedings of 3rd USA/Europe Air Traffic Management Research and Development Seminar, 2000: 13-16.

[13] Gluchshenko O. Optimization of runway capacity utilization in the case of general pareto curve[C]//Proceedings of 28th International Congress of the Aeronautical Sciences. Brisbane, 2012: 4183-4199.

[14] Barrer J N, Kuzminski P, Swedish W J. Analyzing the runway capacity of complex airports [C]//Proceedings of 5th AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration and Operations Conference, 2005.

[15] Gilbo E P. Airport capacity: representation, estimation, optimization[J]. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 1993, 1 (3): 144-154.

[16] Federal Aviation Administration. Airport capacity and delay, No.150/5060-5[R]. Washington, DC: FAA, 1983.

[17] Srinivas N, Deb K. Multiobjective optimization using nondominated sorting in genetic algorithms[J]. Journal of Evolutionary Computation, 1994, 2(3): 221-248.

[18] Deb K, Pratap A, Agarwal S, et al. A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-Ⅱ [J]. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 2002, 6(2): 182-197.

[19] Srinivas M, Patnaik L M. Adaptive probabilities of crossover and mutation in genetic algorithms [J]. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 1994, 24(4): 656-667.

[20] Bingul Z. Adaptive genetic algorithms applied to dynamic multiobjective problems [J]. Applied Soft Computing, 2007, 7 (3): 791-799.

Outlines

/