Solid Mechanics and Vehicle Conceptual Design

Multiobjective Multidisciplinary Design Optimization of Missile

  • ZHENG Anbo ,
  • MA Handong ,
  • LUO Xiaoyun
Expand
  • Graduate School, China Academy of Aerospace Aerodynamics, Beijing 100074, China

Received date: 2012-12-14

  Revised date: 2013-02-24

  Online published: 2013-04-08

Abstract

In order to design missiles with multidisciplinary design optimization (MDO), multidisciplinary analysis models are established which involve such diverse fields as aerodynamics, propulsion, mass, control and trajectory. Collaborative optimization is adopted to formulate the MDO of a missile. Due to the computational complexity of the MDO problem, a new method dealing with constrained multiobjective optimization is proposed, which is multiobjective Kriging based genetic algorithm (MOKGA). Physical programming is used in the method to convert the multiobjective to a single objective, and then EI (Expected Improvement) is made for the single objective taking into consideration the various constraints. Genetic algorithm is used to optimize the EI. Comparison between the multiobjective genetic algorithm NSGA-Ⅱ and MOKGA is made. The results show that the optimized results of both methods are improved as compared with the initial design, but that MOKGA reduces by 40% the number of exact analyses as compared with NSGA-Ⅱ, which reduces remarkably the computational complexity of multidisciplinary design optimization.

Cite this article

ZHENG Anbo , MA Handong , LUO Xiaoyun . Multiobjective Multidisciplinary Design Optimization of Missile[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2013 , 34(11) : 2557 -2564 . DOI: 10.7527/S1000-6893.2013.0128

References

[1] Wang Z G,Chen X Q,Luo W C.Research on the theory and application of multidisciplinary design optimization of flight vehicles.Beijing: National Defense Industry Press,2006: 43-44.(in Chinese) 王振国,陈小前,罗文彩.飞行器多学科设计优化理论与应用研究.北京: 国防工业出版社,2006: 43-44.

[2] Perez R E,Liu H H T.Evaluation of multidisciplinary optimization approaches for aircraft conceptual design.AIAA-2004-4537,2004.

[3] Brown N F,Olds D J.Evaluation of multidisciplinary optimization (MDO) techniques applied to a reusable launch vehicle.AIAA-2005-707,2005.

[4] Weck O,Agte J,Arendsen P,et al.Sate-of-the-art and future trends in multidisciplinary design optimization.AIAA-2007-1905,2007.

[5] Yu X Q,Ding Y L.Multidisciplinary design optimization a survey of its algorithms and applications to aircraft design.Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica,2000,21(1): 1-6.(in Chinese) 余雄庆,丁运量.多学科设计优化算法及其在飞行器设计中应用.航空学报,2000,21(1): 1-6.

[6] Wang X Q,Wang X J.Algorithm of multidiscipline optimization design.Missile and Space Vehicle,2007(1): 23-26.(in Chinese) 王晓青,王小军.多学科优化技术及其算法.导弹与航天运载技术,2007(1): 23-26.

[7] Chen G,Kang W X,Yan G R,et al.Multi-objective pareto collaborative optimization for RLV reentry trajectory design.Journal of Astronautics,2008,29(4): 1211-1215.(in Chinese) 陈刚,康无兴,闫桂荣,等.基于多目标多学科设计优化方法的再入弹道设计研究.宇航学报,2008,29(4): 1211-1215.

[8] Zheng A B,Luo X Y,Ma H D,et al.An application of collaborative optimization to the conceptual design of UAV.Aeronautical Computing Technique,2010,40(2): 37-39.(in Chinese) 郑安波,罗小云,马汉东,等.协作优化在无人机概念设计中的应用.航空计算技术,2010,40(2): 37-39.

[9] Lan W B,Luo X Y,Zheng A B.Research of RSM in missile multidisciplinary design optimization.Computing Technology and Automation,2009,28(3): 111-115.(in Chinese) 兰文博,罗小云,郑安波.导弹多学科设计优化中响应面方法研究.计算技术与自动化,2009,28(3): 111-115.

[10] Giunta A,Balabanov V,Haim D.Wing design for a high-speed civil transport using a design of experiments methodology.AIAA-1996-392,1996.

[11] Keane A J.Wing optimization using design of experiment,response surface,and data fusion methods.Journal of Aircraft,2003,40(4): 741-750.

[12] Chung H S,Alonso J J.Multiobjective optimization using approximation model-based genetic algorithms.AIAA-2004-4325,2004.

[13] Jeong S,Murayama M,Yamamoto K.Efficient optimization design method using Kriging model.AIAA-2004-118,2004.

[14] Jeong S,Yamamoto K.Obayashi S.Kriging-based probabilistic method for constrained multi-objective optimization problem.AIAA-2004-6437,2004.

[15] Kanazaki M,Tanaka K,Jeong S,et al.Multi-objective aerodynamic optimization of elements' setting for high-lift airfoil using Kriging model.AIAA-2006-1471,2006.

[16] Kumano T,Jeong S,Obayashi S,et al.Multidisciplinary design optimization of wing shape for a small jet aircraft using kriging model.AIAA-2006-932,2006.

[17] Yang H,Song W P,Han Z H.Multi-objective and multi-constrained optimization design for a helicopter rotor airfoil.Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica,2012,33(7): 1218-1226.(in Chinese) 杨慧,宋文萍,韩忠华,等.旋翼翼型多目标多约束气动优化设计.航空学报,2012,33(7): 1218-1226.

[18] Deb K,Pratap A,Agarwals,et al.A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-Ⅱ.IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation,2002,6(2): 182-197.

[19] Jones D R,Schonlau M,Welch W J.Efficient global optimization of expensive black-box functions.Journal of Global Optimization,1998,13(4): 455-492.

[20] Messac A,Gupta S M,Akbulut B.Linear physical programming: a new approach to multiple objective optimization.Transactions on Operational Research,1996,15(8): 39-59.

[21] Chen G,Xu M,Wang Z M,et al.RLV reentry trajectory multi-objective optimization design based on NSGA-Ⅱ Algorithm.AIAA-2005-6131,2005.

[22] Tang C Y,Gee K,Lawrence S L.Generation of aerodynamic data using a design of experiment and data fusion approach.AIAA-2005-1137,2005.

[23] Blake W B.Missile datcom: 1997 status and future plans.AIAA-1997-2280,1997.

Outlines

/