Solid Mechanics and Vehicle Conceptual Design

Simulation Modeling for Condition Based Maintenance Optimization of Multi-component Systems with Dependencies

  • GE Xiaokai ,
  • HU Jianbo ,
  • ZHANG Bofeng
Expand
  • 1. Equipment Management and Safety Engineering College, Air Force University of Engineering, Xi'an 710051, China;
    2. Computer College, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200072, China;
    3. Unit 93050 of PLA, Dandong 118008, China

Received date: 2012-10-08

  Revised date: 2012-11-09

  Online published: 2012-11-20

Supported by

Scientific Research Innovation Funds of Air Force University of Engineering (XS1101020);Shanghai Leading Academic Discipline Project (J50103);State Key Laboratory of Industrial Control Technology Open Issue (ICT1327)

Abstract

In view of the deficiencies of present condition based maintenance modeling methods of multi-component systems and their difficulty of practical application, this paper presents a simulation model and an optimization method for these systems with economic, structural and stochastic dependencies. First, a Gamma process and parameters estimation method is used to describe the degradation of components. Then, economic dependency strength matrix, structural dependency reachable matrix and stochastic dependence dependency probability matrix are constructed respectively to model these three dependencies based on maintenance workflow, composition relationships and fault information. Finally, considering decision variables of the system and unit level at the same time, a simulation model to obtain the expected cycle costs of the system is presented, and a genetic algorithm (GA) solving process improved by Nelder Mead algorithm (NMA) is given according to the characteristics of the model. Numerical simulation results of a wire flight control system pitching channel subsystem demonstrate that the influence of dependencies on maintenance decision cannot be neglected. Cost saving and decision optimization results are achieved when dependencies and multi-component group maintenance are considered, which verifies the effectiveness and practicability of the models and methods presented above.

Cite this article

GE Xiaokai , HU Jianbo , ZHANG Bofeng . Simulation Modeling for Condition Based Maintenance Optimization of Multi-component Systems with Dependencies[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2013 , 34(8) : 1854 -1863 . DOI: 10.7527/S1000-6893.2013.0321

References

[1] Berg M. General trigger-off replacement procedures for two-unit systems. Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, 1978, 25(1): 15-29.
[2] Cho D I, Parlar M. A survey of maintenance models for multi-unit systems. European Journal of Operational Research, 1991, 51(1): 1-23.
[3] Dekker R. Applications of maintenance optimization models: a review and analysis. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 1997, 51(3): 229-240.
[4] Nicolai R P, Dekker R. Optimal maintenance of multi-component systems: a review. London: Springer, 2008: 263-286.
[5] Sung H J. Optimal maintenance of a multi-unit system under dependences. Georgia: School of Aerospace Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, 2008.
[6] Cai J, Zuo H F, Wang H W. A study on preventive maintenance optimization model for multi-unit system. Systems Engineering-theory and Practice, 2007, 27 (2):133-138. (in Chinese) 蔡景, 左洪福, 王华伟. 多部件系统的预防性维修优化模型研究. 系统工程理论与实践, 2007, 27 (2): 133-138.
[7] Pham H, Wang H Z. Optimal opportunistic maintenance of a k-out-of n: G system with imperfect PM and partial failure. Naval Research Logistics, 2000, 47(3): 223-239.
[8] Vergin R C, Scriabin M. Maintenance scheduling for multi-component equipment. AIIE Transactions, 1977, 9(3): 297-305.
[9] Pham H, Wang H Z. A quasi-renewal process for software reliability and testing costs. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetic, Part A: Systems and Humans, 2001, 31(6): 623-631.
[10] Gertsbakh I. Optimal dynamic opportunistic replacement with random resupply of spare parts. Communications in Statistics, Stochastic Models, 1989, 5(2): 315-326.
[11] Castanier B, Grall A, Berenguer C. A condition based maintenance policy with non-periodic inspections for a two-unit series system. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2005, 87(1): 109-120.
[12] Marseguerra M, Zio E, Podofillini L. Condition based maintenance optimization by means of genetic algorithms and Monte Carlo simulation. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2002, 77(2): 151-165.
[13] Albin S L, Chao S. Preventive replacement in systems with dependent components. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 1992, 41(2): 230-238.
[14] Barbera F, Schneider H, Watson E. A condition based maintenance model for a two-unit series system. European Journal of Operational Research, 1999, 116(2): 281-290.
[15] Gurler U, Kaya A. Amaintenance policy for a system with multi-state components: an approximate solution. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2002, 76(2): 117-127.
[16] Wang H Z, Pham H. Reliability and optimal maintenance. London: Springer Series in Reliability Engineering Series, 2006: 171-203.
[17] van Noortwijk J M. A survey of the application of gamma processes in maintenance. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2009, 94(1): 2-21.
[18] Hirmer C M, Rboulet G, Sourget F, et al. Maintenance optimization for a system with a gamma deterioration process and intervention delay: application to track maintenance. Journal of Risk and Reliability, 2009, 223(3): 189-198.
[19] Yu Y L, Zhu X D, Hao J P. System maintainability modeling theory and method. Beijing: National Defense Industry Press, 2007: 40-50. (in Chinese) 于永利, 朱小冬, 郝建平. 系统维修性建模理论与方法. 北京: 国防工业出版社, 2007: 40-50.
[20] Wu B J. Fault diagnosis technology on flight control system of UAV. Xi'an: College of Automation, Northwestern Polytechnical University, 2007. (in Chinese) 武宝军. 无人机飞行控制系统故障检测技术研究. 西安: 西北工业大学自动化学院, 2007.
Outlines

/