During dynamic similitude model experiments, it is generally difficult to assure the same damping ratio of the scaled model with its original structure. As a result, the measured dynamic response of the scaled model with damping errors cannot be used directly to predict the response of the structural prototype. An updating method of the time history response for dynamic similitude models with dissimilar damping ratios is proposed to solve the problem. It is assumed that the damping of the actual and ideal scaled models can be expressed as a classical damping model, and then based on the linear superposition principle and modal superposition method, the updating equations to solve the updating value are deduced from the forced vibration equations of the practical and ideal scaled models. These updating equations show that the calculation of the updating value can be transformed into a dynamic response solution of the ideal scaled model forced by an equivalent additional exciting force. Considering that response measurement points in a practical experiment are usually limited, a reduced order modal method is proposed to reconstruct the responses of those non-measured points. For the proposed updating method, just modal damping ratios, mass and stiffness matrices of the structural prototype and the actual scaled model are needed, and these required conditions are easy to satisfy. Finally, this updating method is used to update the dynamic response of a scaled model of a fighter wing beam structure. The updating results show that the updated displacement power spectrum density (PSD) and root mean square (RMS) values are consistent with real measured responses, which verifies the feasibility and validity of the proposed updating method.
LI Bin
,
ZHANG Yujie
,
YANG Zhichun
. Updating Method of the Time History Response for Dynamic Similitude Models with Dissimilar Damping Ratios[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2012
, (3)
: 463
-469
.
DOI: CNKI:11-1929/V.20111031.1057.004
[1] Zeng D, Yan Y, Liu B S, et al. Design of low-velocity wing tunnel flutter model of aircraft composite structure. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2006, 27(2): 232-235. (in Chinese) 曾东, 燕瑛, 刘兵山, 等. 复合材料飞机结构低速风洞颤振模型的设计. 航空学报, 2006, 27(2): 232-235.
[2] Anderson W D, Patel S R, Black C L. Low-speed wind tunnel buffet testing on the F-22. Journal of Aircraft, 2006, 43(4): 879-885.
[3] Yang J J. Similitude theory and structural model tests. Wuhan: Wuhan University of Technology Press, 2005: 209-221. (in Chinese) 杨俊杰. 相似理论与结构模型试验. 武汉: 武汉理工大学出版社, 2005: 209-221 .
[4] Lin G, Zhu T, Lin B. Similarity technique for dynamic structural model test. Journal of Dalian University of Technology, 2000, 40(1): 1-8. (in Chinese) 林皋, 朱彤, 林蓓. 结构动力模型试验的相似技巧. 大连理工大学学报, 2000, 40(1): 1-8.
[5] Huang X, Gu M. Correction for damping ratio of wind-induced dynamic response for structural aeroelastic model. Journal of Tongji University: Natural Science, 2004, 32(1): 1433-1436. (in Chinese) 黄翔, 顾明. 大跨度结构气弹模型风振响应的阻尼修正系数. 同济大学学报: 自然科学版,2004, 32(1): 1433-1436.
[6] Li H, Ding H. Progress in model updating for structural dynamics. Advances in Mechanics, 2005, 35(2): 170-180. (in Chinese) 李辉, 丁桦. 结构动力模型修正方法研究进展. 力学进展, 2005, 35(2): 170-180.
[7] Burnham J K. Predicted dynamic buffet loads from limited response measurements: T-45A horizontal tail. AIAA-1995-1338, 1995.
[8] Ouyang J, Nie Y F, Che G M, et al. Numerical analysis. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2009: 182-184.(in Chinese) 欧阳洁, 聂玉峰, 车刚明, 等. 数值分析. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2009: 182-184.