折叠翼变体垂直起降飞行器模型预测控制研究

  • 都东岳 ,
  • 杨崇阳 ,
  • 吴佳雪 ,
  • 昌敏 ,
  • 白俊强
展开
  • 1. 西北工业大学
    2. 西北工业大学无人系统技术研究院
    3. 空基信息感知与融合全国重点实验室

收稿日期: 2026-06-17

  修回日期: 2026-09-08

  网络出版日期: 2026-09-10

Research on a model predictive control for a foldable-wing morphing VTOL aircraft

  • DU Dong-Yue ,
  • YANG Chong-Yang ,
  • WU Jia-Xue ,
  • CHANG Min ,
  • BAI Jun-Qiang
Expand

Received date: 2026-06-17

  Revised date: 2026-09-08

  Online published: 2026-09-10

摘要

针对折叠翼变体垂直起降飞行器在多模态飞行中气动参数剧烈变化与转动惯量强耦合导致的建模困难和控制精度下降问题,提出了一种融合神经网络气动力预测与非线性模型预测控制(Nonlinear Model Predictive Control, NMPC)的飞行控制方法。基于片条理论建立了耦合旋翼滑流效应的全迎角气动模型及变折叠角多刚体动力学模型,描绘了折叠角动态变化时的飞行器气动力与动力学变化机理。为降低优化求解中模型复杂度对实时控制的影响,采用神经网络对全飞行包线内气动力/力矩进行离线辨识与预测,并嵌入NMPC预测模型。构建机翼折叠角影响下的控制分配方法,通过求解NMPC最优控制序列,实现在预设飞行轨迹下的闭环轨迹跟踪控制。仿真结果表明,所提出的方法在气动模型偏置和传感器噪声下在预设参考飞行轨迹下平稳的姿态过渡与高精度轨迹跟踪,验证了该方法应对系统强非线性和参数时变问题的有效性,展示了其在复杂任务场景中的工程应用潜力。

本文引用格式

都东岳 , 杨崇阳 , 吴佳雪 , 昌敏 , 白俊强 . 折叠翼变体垂直起降飞行器模型预测控制研究[J]. 航空学报, 0 : 1 -0 . DOI: 10.7527/S1000-6893.2026.34139

Abstract

To address the modeling challenges and loss of control accuracy caused by pronounced aerodynamic variations and strong coupling induced by changes in rotational inertia during multi-mode flight, this paper proposes a flight control method that integrates neural-network-based aerodynamic prediction with nonlinear model predictive control (NMPC) for a foldable-wing morphing vertical take-off and landing aircraft. An all-angle-of-attack aerodynamic model incorporating rotor slipstream effects is established based on strip theory, together with a multi-rigid-body dynamic model parameterized by the wing-folding angle. These models characterize the evolution of the aerodynamic forces and flight dynamics during wing morphing. To reduce the computational burden imposed by model complexity on online optimization, a neural network is trained offline to approximate the aerodynamic forces and moments over the prescribed flight envelope and is subsequently embedded in the NMPC prediction model. A control allocation strategy that accounts for the wing-folding angle is also developed, and closed-loop trajectory tracking is achieved by solving the NMPC optimal control sequence. Simulation results demonstrate that the proposed method maintains smooth attitude transitions and accurate trajectory tracking along the prescribed reference trajectory in the presence of aerodynamic model bias and sensor noise. These results confirm its effectiveness in handling strong nonlinearities and time-varying parameters, while also indicating its potential for engineering applications in complex mission scenarios.

参考文献

[1]张淑静.垂直起降飞行器的建模与控制算法研究[D]. 北京: 北京理工大学, 2018: 1-1.
[2]KAYACAN E, MASLIM R.Type-2 Fuzzy Logic Trajectory Tracking Control of Quadrotor VTOL Aircraft With Elliptic Membership Functions[J].IEEEASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 2017, 22(1):339-348
[3]PRACH A, KAYACAN E.An MPC‐based Position Controller for a Tilt‐rotor Tricopter VTOL UAV[J].Optimal Control Applications and Methods, 2018, 39(1):343-356
[4]WANG X, FEI Z, YU J, et al.Passivity-Based Event-Triggered Fault Tolerant Control for VTOL with Actuator Failure and Parameter Uncertainties[J].International Journal of Systems Science, 2019, 50(4):817-828
[5]ZOU Y, MENG Z.Coordinated Trajectory Tracking of Multiple Vertical Take-off and Landing UAVs[J].Automatica, 2019, 99:33-40
[6]REHAN M, AKRAM F, SHAHZA A, et al.Vertical Take-off and Landing Hybrid Unmanned Aerial Vehicles: An Overview[J].The Aeronautical Journal, 2022, 126(1306):2017-2057
[7]李人澍.联结翼垂直起降无人机总体设计与研究[D]. 南京: 南京航空航天大学, 2021: 1-2.
[8]FINGER D F, BRAUN C, BIL C.A Review of Configuration Design for Distributed Propulsion Transitioning VTOL Aircraft [C]. 2017 Asia-Pacific International Symposium on Aerospace Technology (APISAT 2017). Seoul: APISAT 2017, 2017: 1782-1796.
[9]HEGDE N T, GEORGE V I, NAYAK C G, et al.Design,Dynamic Modelling and Control of Tilt-Rotor UAVs: A Review[J].International Journal of Intelligent Unmanned Systems, 2019, 8(3):143-161
[10]王波.混合型可垂直起降飞行器技术研究[D]. 长沙: 国防科学技术大学, 2016: 14-15.
[11]刘德元, 刘昊.尾座式无人飞行器鲁棒容错编队控制[J].航空学报, 2021, 42(2):303-311
[12]李博.小型尾座式可折叠翼无人机设计[D]. 北京: 北京交通大学, 2020: 1-2.
[13]CHU L, LI Q, GU F, et al.Design,Modeling,and Control of Morphing Aircraft: A Review[J].Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2022, 35(5):220-246
[14]ZHU J, YANG J, ZHANG W, et al.Design and Applications of Morphing Aircraft and Their Structures[J].Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering, 2023, 18(3):34-
[15]甄子洋, 刘攀, 陆宇平.变体飞行器智能变形与飞行控制技术研究进展[J].南京航空航天大学学报, 2022, 54(6):995-1006
[16]陈其昌, 史志伟, 张维源, 等.展开式变体垂直起降飞行器气动布局与控制策略设计及飞行验证[J].航空学报, 2024, 45(06):155-172
[17]PATEL T, KUMAR M, Abdallah S.Control of Hybrid Transitioning Morphing-Wing VTOL UAV[J].IFAC-PapersOnLine, 2022, 55(37):554-559
[18]LIN Z, YAN B, ZHANG T, et al.Multi-Level Switching Control Scheme for Folding Wing VTOL UAV Based on Dynamic Allocation[J].Drones, 2024, 8(7):303-
[19]CATALANO F M.On the Effects of an Installed Propeller Slipstream on Wing Aerodynamic Characteristics[J].Acta Polytechnica, 2004, 44(3):8-14
[20]ZHANG Z, XIE C, HUANG K, et al.Influence of Aerodynamic Interaction on Performance of Contrarotating PropellerWing System[J].Aerospace, 2022, 9(12):813-
[21]MCCORMICK B W.Aerodynamics, Aeronautics and Flight Mechanics[M]. New York: Wiley, 1995: 82-146.
[22]POLHAMUS E C.Predictions of Vortex-Lift Characteristics by a Leading-Edge Suctionanalogy[J].Journal of Aircraft, 1971, 8(4):193-199
[23]LAMAR J E.Extension of Leading-Edge-Suction Analogy to Wings with Separated Flow around the Side Edges at Subsonic Speeds: Vol. 428[M]. Washington, D.C.: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 1974: 1-8.
[24]TORRES G E.Aerodynamics of Low Aspect Ratio Wings at Low Reynolds Numbers With Applications to Micro Air Vehicle Design[D]. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame, 2002: 117–141.
[25]NAYLER J L.Aerodynamics of VSTOL FlightBarnes W. McCormickJr.,Academic Press,London. 1967. 323 Pp. Diagrams. 517.[J].The Journal of the Royal Aeronautical Society, 1967, 71(681):659-659
[26]OKAMOTO M, AZUMA A.Aerodynamic Characteristics at Low Reynolds Numbers for Wings of Various Planforms[J].AIAA Journal, 2011, 49(6):1135-1150
[27]GOMAN M, KHRABROV A.State-Space Representation of Aerodynamic Characteristics of an Aircraft at High Angles of Attack[J].Journal of Aircraft, 1994, 31(5):1109-1115
[28]FISCHENBERG D, JATEGAONKAR R.Identification of Aircraft Stall Behavior from Flight Test Data[A]. RTO SCI Symposium on System Identification for Integrated Aircraft Development and Flight Testing[C]. NATO Neuilly-Sur-Seine Cedex, France, 1998.
[29]HOERNER S F, BORST H V.Fluid-Dynamic Lift: Practical Information on Aerodynamic and Hydrodynamic Lift[M]. 2nd ed. Brick Town, N.J.: L.A. Hoerner, 1985.
[30]Lindenburg C.Stall Coefficients: Aerodynamic Airfoil Coefficients at Large Angles of Attack: ECN-RX-01-004[R]. Energy Research Centre of the Netherlands (ECN), 2001
[31]KHAN W, NAHON M.Modeling Dynamics of Agile Fixed-Wing UAVs for Real-Time Applications[A]. Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Unmanned Aircraft Systems (ICUAS)[C]. Arlington, VA, USA: IEEE, 2016.
[32]王宇, 祝小平, 周洲.多体飞行器展开过程动力学特性研究[J].西北工业大学学报, 2023, 41(3):490-499
[33]MONTALVO C, COSTELLO M.Meta Aircraft Flight Dynamics[J].Journal of Aircraft, 2015, 52(1):107-115
[34]DORNHEIM J, MORAND L, NALLANI H J, et al.Neural Networks for Constitutive Modeling: From Universal Function Approximators to Advanced Models and the Integration of Physics[J].Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, 2024, 31:1097-1127
[35]STACHIW T, CRAIN A, RICCIARDI J.A Physics-Based Neural Network for Flight Dynamics Modelling and Simulation[J].Advanced Modeling and Simulation in Engineering Sciences, 2022, 9(1):13-
[36]LU L, JIN P, KARNIADAKIS G E.DeepONet: Learning Nonlinear Operators for Identifying Differential Equations Based on the Universal Approximation Theorem of Operators[J].arXiv preprint, 2019, 1910.03193:-
Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉