基于数据增强扩散模型的倾转旋翼机气弹稳定性预测-AFC2026

  • 郑礼雄 ,
  • 王鑫 ,
  • 陈喆 ,
  • 招启军
展开
  • 南京航空航天大学

收稿日期: 2026-05-20

  修回日期: 2026-07-23

  网络出版日期: 2026-07-24

基金资助

国家自然科学基金;空天飞行空气动力科学与技术全国重点实验室基金;江苏省研究生科研与实践创新计划项目;江苏高校优势学科建设工程资助项目

Aeroelastic stability prediction of tiltrotor aircraft based on a data-augmented diffusion model

  • ZHENG Li-Xiong ,
  • WANG Xin ,
  • CHEN Zhe ,
  • ZHAO Qi-Jun
Expand

Received date: 2026-05-20

  Revised date: 2026-07-23

  Online published: 2026-07-24

Supported by

National Natural Science Foundation of China;Foundation of State Key Laboratory of Aerodynamics;Postgraduate Research & Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province;the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions

摘要

倾转旋翼机多体系统的模态阻尼比与瞬态响应是表征其稳定性的核心指标,然而多工况下阻尼比与响应的快速精准求解面临显著挑战,制约了回转颤振机理的深度探究。针对这一局限,提出了一种基于去噪扩散概率模型(DDPM)的倾转旋翼机气弹稳定性快速预测框架。该框架创新地融入动力学参数与来流标签、数据增强和注意力机制模块,实现了系统模态阻尼比与气弹响应的一体化预测,旨在提升多体系统稳定性预测的效率与精度,同时有效应对传统生成式模型处理高度非线性问题时训练不稳定、结果保真度低的挑战。首先,基于Hamilton原理和多体动力学方法推导多模态耦合气弹动力学方程并验证其有效性;其次,构建涵盖不同动力学参数组合与来流速度工况的高保真模态阻尼比及响应数据集;最后,完成预测模型超参数设置与训练,并开展性能测试。结果表明,所提预测模型对倾转旋翼机多体系统的稳定性预测精度高,且模型具备优异的泛化能力,相较于传统数值计算模型,预测效率提升3~4个数量级,为回转颤振机理研究与工程设计优化提供了高效技术支撑。

本文引用格式

郑礼雄 , 王鑫 , 陈喆 , 招启军 . 基于数据增强扩散模型的倾转旋翼机气弹稳定性预测-AFC2026[J]. 航空学报, 0 : 1 -0 . DOI: 10.7527/S1000-6893.2026.33893

Abstract

The modal damping ratio and transient response are critical indicators for characterizing the stability of tiltrotor multi-body systems. However, achieving both rapid and accurate predictions of these indicators under multiple operating conditions remains a significant challenge, impeding a comprehensive exploration of the whirl flutter mechanism. To address this gap, this paper proposes a fast prediction framework for tiltrotor aeroelastic stability based on a Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Model (DDPM). By innovatively integrating dynamic parameters and inflow conditions as conditional inputs, incorporating data augmentation strategies, and embedding an attention mechanism, the framework achieves the unified prediction of the system's modal damping ratio and aeroelastic response. This approach aims to enhance both the efficiency and accuracy of stability predictions for multi-body systems while effectively mitigating the issues of unstable training and low-fidelity results often encountered when traditional generative models handle highly nonlinear problems. First, multi-modal coupled aeroelastic dynamic equations are derived using Hamilton's principle and multi-body dynamics methods, and their validity is verified. Second, a high-fidelity dataset of modal damping ratios and responses is constructed, covering a comprehensive range of dynamic parameter combinations and inflow velocities. Finally, the prediction model is trained with optimized hyperparameters and subjected to performance evaluations. The results demonstrate that the proposed model achieves high accuracy in predicting the stability of tiltrotor multi-body systems and exhibits excellent generalization capability. Compared to traditional numerical calculation models, the prediction efficiency is improved by three to four orders of magnitude, thereby providing robust technical support for research on the whirl flutter mechanism and for the optimization of engineering design.

参考文献

[1]张卫国, 唐敏, 武杰, 等.倾转旋翼机风洞试验综述[J].航空学报, 2024, 45(9):530114-
[2]徐敏.倾转旋翼机的发展与关键技术综述[J].直升机技术, 2003, 2(2):40-44
[3]邓景辉.高速直升机关键技术与发展[J].航空学报, 2024, 45(9):529085-
[4]KVATERNIK R G.Experimental and analytical studies in tilt rotor aeroelasticity[C]//Presented at AHS/NASA Ames Specialists Meeting on Rotorcraft Dynamics. 1974.
[5]YOUNG M I, LYTWYN R T.The influence of blade flapping restraint on the dynamic stability of low disk loading propeller-rotors[J].Journal of the American Helicopter Society, 1967, 12(4):38-54
[6]JOHNSON W.Dynamics of tilting proprotor aircraft in cruise flight: NASA-TN-D-7677[R]. Moffett Field: Ames Research Center and U.S. Army Air Mobility R& D Laboratory Moffett Field, 1974.
[7]SETTLE T B, KIDD, D.L. Evolution and test history of the V-22 0.2-scale aeroelastic model[C]//Presented at the American Helicopter Society National Specialists’ Meet-ing on Rotorcraft Dynamics. 1989.
[8]WILLIAM T Y, JR, RAYMOND G K.A historical overview of aeroelasticity branch and transonic dynamics tunnel contributions to rotorcraft technology and development: NASA/TM 2001 211054[R]. Hampton: NASA Langley Research Center, 2001.
[9]NIXON M W.Aeroelastic response and stability of tiltrotors with elastically coupled composite rotor blades[D]. College Park: University of Maryland, 1993.
[10]LI H X, QU X J, WANG W J.Multi-body motion mod-eling and simulation for tilt rotor aircraft[J].Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2010, 23(04):415-422
[11]李治权, 夏品奇.一种改进的前飞时倾转旋翼机非定常气弹动力学模型[J].中国科学: 技术科学, 2018, 48(8):901-907
[12]LI Z Q, XIA P Q.Aeroelastic stability of full-span tiltrotor aircraft model in forward flight[J].Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2017, 30(6):1885-1894
[13]邓旭东, 胡和平.倾转旋翼机螺旋颤振稳定性研究[J].空气动力学学报, 2018, 36(6):1041-1046
[14]JOHNSON S C.Design and testing of a small, semi-span, prop-rotor model for whirl flutter stability[D]. State College: Pennsylvania State University, 2014: 31-65.
[15]IVANCO T G, KANG H, KRESHOCK A R, et al.Gen-eralized predictive control for active stability aug-mentation and vibration reduction on an aeroelastic tiltrotor model[C]//AIAA Scitech 2022 Forum. Reston: AIAA, 2022.
[16]DONG L H, LI Q Y.Whirl flutter suppression of tiltrotor aircraft using actively controlled aileron[J].Aerospace, 2022, 9(12):795-
[17]TAESEONG K, LIMB J, SHINC S J, et al.Structural design optimization of a tiltrotor aircraft composite wing to enhance whirl flutter stability[J].Composite Structures, 2013, 95:283-294
[18]KAMBAMPATI S, SMITH E.Aeroelastic optimization of high-speed tiltrotor wings with wing extensions and winglets[J].Journal of Aircraft, 2017, 54(5):1-10
[19]刘玉鹏, 刘勇, 李云珠, 等.基于多种深度学习模型的压气机弯掠叶片颤振特性预测[J].航空动力学报, 2025, 40(4):20240538-
[20]YUAN H, KOU J Q, GAO C Q, et al.Resolvent analy-sis for flutter boundary prediction in transonic flow[J].AIAA Journal, 2024, 62(8):3191-3195
[21]DUAN S Q, ZHENG H, LIU J H.A novel classification method for flutter signals based on the CNN and STFT[J].International Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 2019, 2019:9375437-
[22]RISO C, GHADAMI A, CESNIK C E S, et al.Data-driven forecasting of post-flutter responses of geometrically nonlinear wings[J].AIAA Journal, 2020, 58(6):2726-2736
[23]ZHENG H, WU Z L, DUAN S Q, et al.Research on feature extracted method for flutter test based on EMD and CNN[J].International Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 2021, 2021:6620368-
[24]LI W C, GAO X M, LIU H J.Efficient prediction of transonic flutter boundaries for varying Mach number and angle of attack via LSTM network[J].Aerospace Science and Technology, 2021, 110:106451-
[25]QI H, YU J M, JIANG J J, et al.Linear and nonlinear combined aerodynamic reduced order model based on re-sidual network framework[J].Europhysics Letters, 2022, 138(6):63002-
[26]CHEN Z, SHI Z W, CHEN S N, et al.Active flutter suppression for a flexible wing model with trailing-edge circulation control via reinforcement learning[J].AIP Advances, 2023, 13(1):015317-
[27]郑礼雄, 陈喆, 王鑫, 等.融合数据自适应BPNN的倾转旋翼机回转颤振边界预测[J].航空学报, 2025, 46(S1):732159-
[28]郑礼雄, 王博, 招启军, 等.倾转旋翼机多模态耦合动力学建模和气弹稳定性参数影响[J].航空动力学报, 2025, 40(3):20230445-
[29]贾大伟.倾转旋翼机气弹响应及稳定性若干问题研究[D]. 南京: 南京航空航天大学, 2007: 25-30.
[30]白靖宜, 黄桥高, 高鹏骋, 等.基于去噪概率扩散模型的蝠鲼流场智能化预测[J].物理学报, 2025, 74(10):104701-
[31]徐志昂, 骆嘉晨, 丁相贵, 等.基于扩散模型的高阶拓扑绝缘体实时设计[J].力学学报, 2024, 56(07):1840-1848
[32]楼锦华, 陈荣钱, 柳家齐, 等.基于门控扩散模型的飞行器气动性能预测与反设计研究[J].航空学报, 2025, 46(10):631183-
[33]HO J, JAIN A, ABBEEL P.Denoising diffusion proba-bilistic models[J].Advances in neural information processing systems, 2020, 33:6840-6851
[34]韩阳, 朱军鹏, 郭春雨, 等.基于扩散模型的流场超分辨率重建方法[J].力学学报, 2023, 55(10):2309-2320
[35]ZHENG L X, WANG X, ZHAO Q J, et al.A dual-network framework integrating adaptive data refinement BPNN for aeroelastic stability prediction and inverse de-sign in tilt rotor/wing system[J].Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2026, :-
Options
文章导航

/