[1]LI J P, ZENG F Z, JIANG Z H, et al.Investigations on Turbulence Model Uncertainty for Hypersonic[J].AIAA Journal, 2022, 60(8):4509-4522
[2]WANG Y X, ZHANG L L, LIU W, et al.Efficient parallel implementation of large scale 3D structured grid CFD applications on the Tianhe-1A supercomputer[J]. Computers and Fluids, 2013, 80: 244-250.
[3]AFZAL A, ANSARI Z, RIMAZ A, et al.Parallelization strategies for computational fluid dynamics software: state of the art review[J].Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, 2017, 24(2):337-363
[4]BRUNTON S L, KUTZ J N.Promising directions of machine learning for partial differential equations[J].Nature Computational Science, 2024, 4(7):483-494
[5]ZHANG W, XIA M, KOU J.A scientometric investigation of artificial intelligence for fluid mechanics: emerging topics and active groups[J]. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 2025, 157: 101130.
[6]VINUESA R, BRUNTON S L.Enhancing computational fluid dynamics with machine learning[J].Nature Computational Science, 2022, 2(6):358-366
[7]杨卫.数智力学——驾驭数智时代的力学[J].力学进展, 2024, 54(4):629-638
[8]YANG W.Digintel mechanics?Governing the digintel era[J].Advances in Mechanics, 2024, 54(4):629-638
[9]CHEN X, WANG Z, DENG L, et al.Towards a new paradigm in intelligence-driven computational fluid dynamics simulations[J]. Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics, 2024, 18: 1.
[10]LI J, DU X, MARTINS J R R A.Machine learning in aerodynamic shape optimization[J]. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 2022, 134: 100849.
[11]唐志共, 朱林阳, 向星皓, 等.智能空气动力学若干研究进展及展望[J].空气动力学学报, 2023, 41(7):1-35
[12]TANG Z, ZHU L, XIANG X, et al.Some research progress and prospect of Intelligent Aerodynamics[J].Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2023, 41(7):1-35
[13]KUIK G A M van, S?RENSEN J N, OKULOV V L.Rotor theories by Professor Joukowsky: Momentum theories[J]. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 2015, 73: 1-18.
[14]OKULOV V L, S?RENSEN J N, WOOD D H.The rotor theories by Professor Joukowsky: Vortex theories[J]. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 2015, 73: 19-46.
[15]DEVINANT P, GALLOIS T.Swept and curved wings?: a numerical approach based on generalized lifting-line theory[J]. Computational Mechanics, 2002, 29: 322-331.
[16]LOCK R C, BRIDGEWATER J.Theory of aerodynamic design for swept-winged aircraft at transonic and supersonic speeds[J]. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 1967, 8: 139-228.
[17]PETERSON V L.Impact of computers on aerodynamics research and development[J].Proceedings of the IEEE, 1983, 72(1):68-79
[18]FU Y, SHEN W, CUI J, et al.Towards exascale computation for turbomachinery flows[C]//International Conference for High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Analysis, SC’23. 2023.
[19]符松, 王亮.湍流模式理论[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2023.
[20]FU S, WANG L.Theory of turbulence modelling[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2023 (in Chinese).
[21]SPALART P R.Detached-eddy simulation[J]. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 2008, 41: 181-202.
[22]STALKER R J.Hypervelocity aerodynamics with chemical nonequilibrium[J]. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 1989, 21: 37-60.
[23]SHU C W.Essentially non-oscillatory and weighted essentially non-oscillatory schemes for hyperbolic conservation laws[M]. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1998.
[24]LIOU M S, STEFFEN C J J.A new flux splitting scheme[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 1993: 23-39.
[25]ROE P L.Approximate Riemann solvers, parameter vectors, and difference schemes[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 1981, 43: 357-372.
[26]WAN Y, HE L, ZHANG Y, et al.An efficient communication strategy for massively parallel computation in CFD[J]. The Journal of Supercomputing, 2023, 79: 7560-7583.
[27]KULFAN B M, BUSSOLETTI J E.“Fundamental” parametric geometry representations for aircraft component shapes[C]//11th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference. Portsmouth, Virginia, 2006: 1-45.
[28]RAJNARAYAN D, NING A, MEHR J.Universal airfoil parametrization using B-Splines[C]//AIAA Aviation Forum，Applied Aerodynamics Conference. Atlanta, Georgia, 2018.
[29]ECONOMON T D, PALACIOS F, COPELAND S R, et al.SU2: An open-source suite for multiphysics simulation and design[J]. AIAA Journal, 2016, 54(3).
[30]OSUSKY L, BUCKLEY H, REIST T, et al.Drag minimization based on the Navier-Stokes equations using a Newton-Krylov approach[J].AIAA Journal, 2015, 53(6):1555-1577
[31]MARTINS J R R A.Aerodynamic design optimization: Challenges and perspectives[J]. Computers and Fluids, 2022, 239: 105391.
[32]HORNIK K, STINCHCOMBE M, WHITE H.Multilayer feedforward networks are universal approximators[J].Neural networks, 1989, 2(5):359-366
[33]CHEN T, CHEN H.Universal approximation to nonlinear operators by neural networks with arbitrary activation functions and its application to dynamical systems[J].IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 1995, 6(4):911-917
[34]GUO D, YANG D, ZHANG H, et al.DeepSeek-R1 incentivizes reasoning in LLMs through reinforcement learning[J]. Nature, 2025, 645: 633-638.
[35]LECUN Y, BOTTOU L, BENGIO Y, et al.Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition[J].Proceedings of the IEEE, 1998, 86(11):2278-2324
[36]SCARSELLI F, GORI M, TSOI A C, et al.The graph neural network model[J].IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 2009, 20(1):61-80
[37]RONNEBERGER O, FISCHER P, BROX T.U-Net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation[C]//International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention. 2015.
[38]KIPF T N, WELLING M.Semi-supervised classification with graph convolutional networks[C]//International Conference on Learning Representations. 2017.
[39]HOCHREITER S, SCHMIDHUBER J.Long short-term memory[J].Neural Computation, 1997, 9(8):1735-1780
[40]VASWANI A, SHAZEER N, PARMAR N, et al.Attention is all you need[C]//proceedings of Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. 2017.
[41]KARNIADAKIS G E, KEVREKIDIS I G, LU L, et al.Physics-informed machine learning[J].Nature Reviews Physics, 2021, 3(6):422-440
[42]KINGMA D P, WELLING M.Auto-encoding variational Bayes[DB/OL]. arXiv preprint: 1312.6114, 2013.
[43]GOODFELLOW I, POUGET-ABADIE J, MIRZA M, et al.Generative adversarial networks[J].Communications of the ACM, 2020, 63(11):139-144
[44]SCHULMAN J, MORITZ P, LEVINE S, et al.High-dimensional continuous control using generalized advantage estimation[C]//International Conference on Learning Representations. 2016.
[45]SCHULMAN J, WOLSKI F, DHARIWAL P, et al.Proximal policy optimization algorithms[DB/OL]. arXiv preprint: 1707.06347, 2017.
[46]WU H, HU T, LUO H, et al.Solving high-dimensional PDEs with latent spectral models[C]//Proceedings of the 40th International Conference on Machine Learning. Honolulu, Hawaii, USA, 2023.
[47]SECCO N R, MATTOS B S De.Artificial neural networks to predict aerodynamic coefficients of transport airplanes[J].Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology: An International Journal, 2017, 89(2):211-230
[48]ZHAO J, ZENG L, LIN A, et al.Deep learning prediction method for aerodynamic forces on morphing aircraft considering physical monotonicity[J]. Advances in Aerodynamics, 2025, 7: 7.
[49]ZHAO T, CHEN G, WANG X, et al.Aerodynamic modeling using an end-to-end learning attitude dynamics network for flight control[J].Acta Mechanica Sinica, 2021, 37(12):1799-1811
[50]LIN J, CHEN S sheng, YANG H, et al.A physics-informed neural network-based aerodynamic parameter identification method for aircraft[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2025, 37: 027200.
[51]MICHEK N E, MEHTA P M, HUEBSCH W W.Flight dynamics modeling using physics-informed neural networks[J]. AIAA Journal, 2025: Article in Advance.
[52]CHEN H, HE L, QIAN W, et al.Multiple aerodynamic coefficient prediction of airfoils using a convolutional neural network[J]. Symmetry, 2020, 12: 544.
[53]CAI Z, FAN Z, LIU T, et al.Neural network model for predicting aerodynamic parameters of airfoils[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2025.
[54]ZHAO T, QIAN W, LIN J, et al.Learning mappings from iced airfoils to aerodynamic coefficients using a deep operator network[J].Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 2023, 36(5):04023035-
[55]蔺佳哲, 周岭, 武频, 等.基于 模型的导弹气动特性快速预测技术[J].北京航空航天大学学报, 2023, 49(10):2669-2678
[56]LIN J Z，ZHOU L，WU P，et al.Rapid prediction technology of missile aerodynamic characteristics based on PINN model[J].Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2023, 49(10):2669-2678
[57]HUO Y, CHE X, WANG Y, et al.Rapid and accurate airfoil aerodynamic prediction using a multi-fidelity transfer learning approach[J]. Applied Sciences, 2025, 15: 10820.
[58]ZHANG X, XIE F, JI T, et al.Multi-fidelity deep neural network surrogate model for aerodynamic shape optimization[J]. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2021, 373: 113485.
[59]LIU Y, LIU Z T, GUO S Q, et al.Manifold-preserving guided aerodynamic modeling for heterogeneous data[J]. AIAA Journal, 2025: Article in Advance.
[60]SABATER C, STüRMER P, BEKEMEYER P.Fast predictions of aircraft aerodynamics using deep-learning techniques[J].AIAA Journal, 2022, 60(9):5249-5261
[61]CATALANI G, AGARWAL S, BERTRAND X, et al.Neural fields for rapid aircraft aerodynamics simulations[J]. Scientific Reports, 2024, 14: 25496.
[62]ZUO K, YE Z, ZHANG W, et al.Fast aerodynamics prediction of laminar airfoils based on deep attention network[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2023, 35: 037127.
[63]WANG Y, DENG L, WAN Y, et al.An intelligent method for predicting the pressure coefficient curve of airfoil-based conditional generative adversarial networks[J].IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 2023, 34(7):3538-3552
[64]CHEN Y, ZHANG L, DENG Y, et al.A hybrid CNN-Cheby-KAN framework for efficient prediction of two-dimensional airfoil pressure distribution[DB/OL]. arXiv preprint: 2511.03223, 2025.
[65]QI C R, SU H, MO K, et al.PointNet: Deep learning on point sets for 3D classification and segmentation[C]//Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 2017: 652-660.
[66]KASHEFI A, MUKERJI T.Physics-informed PointNet: A deep learning solver for steady-state incompressible flows and thermal fields on multiple sets of irregular geometries[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2022, 468: 111510.
[67]ZENG C, ZHANG Y, ZHOU J, et al.Point cloud neural operator for parametric PDEs on complex and variable geometries[J]. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2025, 443: 118022.
[68]HAGNBERGER J, NIEPERT M.SMART: Scalable mesh-free aerodynamic simulations from raw geometries using a transformer-based surrogate model[DB/OL]. arXiv preprint: 2601.18707, 2026.
[69]LI Z, KOVACHKI N B, CHOY C, et al.Geometry-informed neural operator for large-scale 3D PDEs[C]//Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. 2024: 36.
[70]DENG J, LI X, XIONG H, et al.Geometry-guided conditional adaptation for surrogate models of large-scale 3D PDEs on arbitrary geometries[C]//Proceedings of the Thirty-Third International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 2024: 5790-5798.
[71]WU H, LUO H, WANG H, et al.Transolver: A fast transformer solver for PDEs on general geometries[C]//Proceedings of the 41st International Conference on Machine Learning. Vienna, Austria, 2024.
[72]LIU P, WANG P, REN X, et al.AeroGTO: An efficient graph-transformer operator for learning large-scale aerodynamics of 3D vehicle geometries[C]//The Thirty-Ninth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-25). 2025.
[73]ZHONG W, LIU Q, ABUEIDDA D, et al.A comprehensive comparision of neural operaters for 3D industry-scale engineering designs[DB/OL]. arXiv preprint: 2510.05995, 2025.
[74]LI X, LI Z, KOVACHKI N, et al.Geometric operator learning with optimal transport[DB/OL]. arXiv preprint: 2507.20065, 2025.
[75]UDRESCU S M, TEGMARK M.AI Feynman: A physics-inspired method for symbolic regression[J]. Science Advances, 2020, 6: eaay2631.
[76]DING D, WANG Q, CHEN Q, et al.Symbolic regression-based modeling for aerodynamic ground-to-flight deviation laws of aerospace vehicles[J]. Aerospace, 2025, 12: 455.
[77]BRUNTON S L, PROCTOR J L, KUTZ J N.Discovering governing equations from data by sparse identification of nonlinear dynamical systems[J].PNAS, 2016, 113(15):3932-3937
[78]RUDY S H, BRUNTON S L, PROCTOR J L, et al.Data-driven discovery of partial differential equations[J].Science Advances, 2017, 3(4):1-6
[79]许鹏程, 何磊, 李川, 等.基于 的深度符号回归方法[J].计算机应用, 2025, 45(5):1455-1463
[80]XU P, HE L, LI C, et al.Deep symbolic regression method based on Transformer[J].Journal of Computer Applications, 2025, 45(5):1455-1463
[81]DURAISAMY K, IACCARINO G, XIAO H.Turbulence modeling in the age of data[J].Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 2019, 51(1):357-377
[82]WEATHERITT J, SANDBERG R.A novel evolutionary algorithm applied to algebraic modifications of the RANS stress-strain relationship[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2016, 325: 22-37.
[83]ZHAO Y, AKOLEKAR H D, WEATHERITT J, et al.RANS turbulence model development using CFD-driven machine learning[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2020, 411: 109413.
[84]NOVATI G, LAROUSSILHE H L, KOUMOUTSAKOS P.Automating turbulence modelling by multi-agent reinforcement learning[J]. Nature Machine Intelligence, 2021, 3: 87-96.
[85]KURZ M, OFFENH?USER P, BECK A.Deep reinforcement learning for turbulence modeling in large eddy simulations[J]. International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow, 2023, 99: 109094.
[86]YIN Y, YANG P, ZHANG Y, et al.Feature selection and processing of turbulence modeling based on an artificial neural network[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2025, 32: 105117.
[87]LIST B, CHEN L W, THUEREY N.Learned turbulence modelling with differentiable fluid solvers: physics-based loss functions and optimisation horizons[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2022, 949: A25.
[88]LING J, JONES R, TEMPLETON J.Machine learning strategies for systems with invariance properties[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2016, 318: 22-35.
[89]LING J, KURZAWSKI A, TEMPLETON J.Reynolds averaged turbulence modelling using deep neural networks with embedded invariance[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2016, 807: 155-166.
[90]POPE S B.A more general effective-viscosity hypothesis[J].Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1975, 72(2):331-340
[91]STR?FER C A M, XIAO H.End-to-end differentiable learning of turbulence models from indirect observations[J]. Theoretical and Applied Mechanics Letters, 2021, 11: 100280.
[92]LIU F, GAO C, CHAI J, et al.Tropical volcanism enhanced the East Asian summer monsoon during the last millennium[J]. Nature Communications, 2022, 13: 3429.
[93]JIANG C, VINUESA R, CHEN R, et al.An interpretable framework of data-driven turbulence modeling using deep neural networks[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2021, 33: 055133.
[94]ZHU L, ZHANG W, KOU J, et al.Machine learning methods for turbulence modeling in subsonic flows around airfoils[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2023, 31: 015105.
[95]ZHOU X H, HAN J, XIAO H.Frame-independent vector-cloud neural network for nonlocal constitutive modeling on arbitrary grids[J]. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2022, 388: 114211.
[96]HAN J, ZHOU X H, XIAO H.An equivariant neural operator for developing nonlocal tensorial constitutive models[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2023, 488: 112243.
[97]CAPEL-JORQUERA J, CHáVEZ-MODENA M, VALERO E, et al.Deep learning for inverse-problem-based calibration of the γ transition model[J].AIAA Journal, 2025, 63(11):4620-4638
[98]郑天韵, 王圣业, 王光学, 等.基于深度残差网络的高精度自然转捩模拟方法[J].物理学报, 2020, 69(20):204701-
[99]ZHENG T-Y, WANG S-Y, WANG G-X, et al.High-order natural transition simulation method based on deep residual network[J]. Acta Physica Sinica, 2020, 69(20), 204701 (in Chinese).
[100]WU L, CUI B, XIAO Z.Artificial neural network-based one-equation model for simulation of laminar-turbulent transitional flow[J]. Theoretical and Applied Mechanics Letters, 2023, 13: 100387.
[101]BLASCO J A, FUEYO N, DOPAZO C, et al.Modelling the temporal evolution of a reduced combustion chemical system with an artificial neural network[J]. Combustion and Flame, 1998, 113: 38-52.
[102]CASTELLANOS L, FREITAS R S M, PARENTE A, et al.Deep learning dynamical latencies for the analysis and reduction of combustion chemistry kinetics[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2025, 35: 107143.
[103]GOSWAMI S, JAGTAP A D, BABAEE H, et al.Learning stiff chemical kinetics using extended deep neural operators[J]. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2024, 419: 116674.
[104]ZHANG T, YI Y, XU Y, et al.A multi-scale sampling method for accurate and robust deep neural network to predict combustion chemical kinetics[J]. Combustion and Flame, 2022, 245: 112319.
[105]MAO R, LIN M, ZHANG Y, et al.DeepFlame: A deep learning empowered open-source platform for reacting flow simulations[J]. Computer Physics Communications, 2023, 291: 108842.
[106]RUBINI D, ROSIC B.ChemZIP: A data-driven accelerated modeling framework for complex aerothermochemical interactions in novel turbomachinery reactors[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2025, 515: 163240.
[107]YIN B, ZHU Y, CHEN X, et al.Temperature plasma chemistry[J]. Physics of Plasmas, 2024, 31: 063504.
[108]BALDI P, HORNIK K.Neural networks and principal component analysis: Learning from examples without local minima[J]. Neural Networks, 1989, 2: 53-58.
[109]MURATA T, FUKAMI K, FUKAGATA K.Nonlinear mode decomposition with convolutional neural networks for fluid dynamics[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2020, 882: A13.
[110]LEE K, CARLBERG K T.Model reduction of dynamical systems on nonlinear manifolds using deep convolutional autoencoders[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2020, 404: 108973.
[111]GUPTA R, JAIMAN R.A hybrid partitioned deep learning methodology for moving interface and fluid-structure interaction[J]. Computers and Fluids, 2022, 233: 105239.
[112]SOLERA-RICO A, VILA C S, GóMEZ-LóPEZ M, et al.β-Variational autoencoders and transformers for reduced-order modelling of fluid flows[J]. Nature Communications, 2024, 15: 1361.
[113]MENG Y, CHEN Y, GAO Z, et al.Deep learning-based reduced-order modeling for parameterized convection-dominated partial differential equations[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2025, 37: 027139.
[114]BAR-SINAI Y, HOYER S, HICKEY J, et al.Learning data-driven discretizations for partial differential equations[J].PNAS, 2019, 116(31):15344-15349
[115]KOCHKOV D, SMITH J A, ALIEVA A, et al.Machine learning–accelerated computational fluid dynamics[J].PNAS, 2021, 118(21):e2101784118-
[116]STEVENS B, COLONIUS T.Enhancement of shock-capturing methods via machine[J]. Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics, 2020, 34: 483-496.
[117]BEZGIN D A, SCHMIDT S J, ADAMS N A.WENO3-NN: A maximum-order three-point data-driven weighted essentially non-oscillatory scheme[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2022, 452: 110920.
[118]FAN S, QIN J, DONG Y, et al.WCNS3-MR-NN: A machine learning-based shock-capturing scheme with accuracy-preserving and high-resolution properties[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2025, 532: 113973.
[119]CHEN R T Q, RUBANOVA Y, BETTENCOURT J, et al.Neural ordinary differential equations[C]//32nd Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. Montréal, Canada, 2018.
[120]CHEN C, WU J long.Neural dynamical operator: Continuous spatial-temporal model with gradient-based and derivative-free optimization methods[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2025, 520: 113480.
[121]ZHOU A, FARIMANI A B.Predicting change, not states: An alternate framework for neural PDE surrogates[J]. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2025, 441: 117990.
[122]FUKAMI K, NABAE Y, KAWAI K, et al.Synthetic turbulent inflow generator using machine learning[J].Physical Review Fluids, 2019, 4(6):064603-
[123]KIM J, LEE C.Deep unsupervised learning of turbulence for inflow generation at various Reynolds numbers[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2020, 406: 109216.
[124]YOUSIF M Z, YU L, LIM H.Physics-guided deep learning for generating turbulent inflow conditions[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2022, 936: A21.
[125]YOUSIF M Z, ZHANG M, YU L, et al.A transformer-based synthetic-inflow generator for spatially developing turbulent boundary layers[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2023, 957: A6.
[126]DU P, PARIKH M H, FAN X, et al.Conditional neural field latent diffusion model for generating spatiotemporal turbulence[J]. Nature Communications, 2024, 15: 10416.
[127]OBIOLS-SALES O, VISHNU A, MALAYA N, et al.CFDNet: A deep learning-based accelerator for fluid simulations[C]//International Conference on Supercomputing (ICS’20). Barcelona, Spain, 2020.
[128]ZHANG X, SUN G, LIN J, et al.A residual graph convolutional network for setting initial flow field in computational fluid dynamics simulations[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2024, 36: 037150.
[129]ZHOU X H, HAN J, ZAFAR M I, et al.Neural operator-based supe-fidelity: A warm-start approach for accelerating steady-state simulations[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2025, 529: 113871.
[130]ZHANG E, KAHANA A, KOPANICAKOVA A, et al.Blending neural operators and relaxation methods in PDE numerical solvers[J].Nature Machine Intelligence, 2024, 6(11):1303-1313
[131]SHARPE P, RANADE R, TANGSALI K, et al.Accelerating transient CFD through machine learning-based flow initialization[DB/OL]. arXiv preprint: 2503.15766, 2025.
[132]MARGENBERG N, HARTMANN D, LESSIG C, et al.A neural network multigrid solver for the Navier-Stokes equations[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2022, 460: 110983.
[133]PSICHOGIOS D C, UNGAR L H.A hybrid neural network-first principles approach to process modeling[J].AIChE Journal, 1992, 38(10):1499-1511
[134]LAGARIS I E, LIKAS A, FOTIADIS D I.Artificial neural networks for solving ordinary and partial differential equations[J].IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 1998, 9(5):987-1000
[135]RAISSI M, PERDIKARIS P, KARNIADAKIS G E.Physics-informed neural networks: a deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear partial differential equations[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2019, 378: 686-707.
[136]RAISSI M, YAZDANI A, KARNIADAKIS G E.Hidden fluid mechanics: Learning velocity and pressure fields from flow visualizations[J]. Science, 2020, 367: 1026-1030.
[137]WEINAN E, YU B.The deep Ritz method: a deep learning-based numerical algorithm for solving variational problems[J]. Communications in Mathematics and Statistics, 2018, 6: 1-12.
[138]SIRIGNANO J, SPILIOPOULOS K.DGM: A deep learning algorithm for solving partial differential equations[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2018, 375: 1339-1364.
[139]KHARAZMI E, ZHANG Z, KARNIADAKIS G E.Hp-VPINNs: Variational physics-informed neural networks with domain decomposition[J]. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2021, 374: 113547.
[140]ZHANG R, LIU Y, SUN H.Physics-informed multi-LSTM networks for metamodeling of nonlinear structures[J]. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2020, 369: 113226.
[141]GAO H, ZAHR M J, WANG J X.Physics-informed graph neural Galerkin networks: A unified framework for solving PDE-governed forward and inverse problems[J]. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2022, 390: 114502.
[142]WANG S, SANKARAN S, PERDIKARIS P.Respecting causality for training physics-informed neural networks[J]. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2024, 421: 116813.
[143]XIANG Z, PENG W, LIU X, et al.Self-adaptive loss balanced physics-informed neural networks[J]. Neurocomputing, 2022, 496: 11-34.
[144]JAGTAP A D, KAWAGUCHI K, KARNIADAKIS G E.Adaptive activation functions accelerate convergence in deep and physics-informed neural networks[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2020, 404: 109136.
[145]WANG T, LIU G, LI E, et al.Adaptive deep physics-informed neural network with dual-nested activation for solving complex partial differential equations[J]. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2025, 444: 118125.
[146]NABIAN M A, GLADSTONE R J, MEIDANI H.Efficient training of physics-informed neural networks via importance sampling[J].Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 2021, 36(8):962-977
[147]GROSSMANN T G, KOMOROWSKA U J, LATZ J, et al.Can physics-informed neural networks beat the finite element method?[J]. IMA Journal of Applied Mathematics, 2024: hxae011.
[148]AZIZZADENESHELI K, KOVACHKI N, LI Z, et al.Neural operators for accelerating scientific simulations and design[J]. Nature Reviews Physics, 2024, 6: 320-328.
[149]LI Z, KOVACHKI N, AZIZZADENESHELI K, et al.Fourier neural operator for parametric partial differential equations[C]//The International Conference on Learning Representations. 2021: 2010.08895.
[150]LU L, JIN P, PANG G, et al.Learning nonlinear operators via DeepONet based on the universal approximation theorem of operators[J]. Nature Machine Intelligence, 2021, 3: 218-229.
[151]KOVACHKI N, LI Z, LIU B, et al.Neural operator: learning maps between function spaces[J].Journal of Machine Learning Research, 2023, 24(89):1-97
[152]HIGGINS I.Generalizing universal function approximators[J]. Nature Machine Intelligence, 2021, 3: 192-193.
[153]WANG T, WANG C.Latent neural operator for solving forward and inverse PDE problems[C]//38th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. 2024.
[154]KONTOLATI K, GOSWAMI S, KARNIADAKIS G E, et al.Learning nonlinear operators in latent spaces for real-time predictions of complex dynamics in physical systems[J]. Nature Communications, 2024, 15: 5101.
[155]INGEBRAND T, THORPE A J, GOSWAMI S, et al.Basis-to-basis operator learning using function encoders[J]. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2025, 435: 117646.
[156]WANG Y, LI Z, YUAN Z, et al.Prediction of turbulent channel flow using Fourier neural operator-based machine-learning strategy[J].Physical Review Fluids, 2024, 9(8):084604-
[157]LIU X Y, ZHU M, LU L, et al.Multi-resolution partial differential equations preserved learning framework for spatiotemporal dynamics[J]. Communications Physics, 2024, 7: 31.
[158]GU J, WEN L, CHEN Y, et al.An explainable operator approximation framework under the guideline of Green’s function[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2025, 539: 114244.
[159]WU H, WANG C, XU F, et al.PURE: Prompt evolution with graph ODE for out-of-distribution fluid dynamics modeling[C]//38th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. 2024.
[160]ADCOCK B, DEXTER N, MORAGA S.Optimal deep learning of holomorphic operators between Banach spaces[C]//38th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. 2024.
[161]MORA C, YOUSEFPOUR A, HOSSEINMARDI S, et al.Operator learning with Gaussian processes[J]. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2025, 434: 117581.
[162]QIN S, LYU F, PENG W, et al.Toward a better understanding of Fourier neural operators from a spectral perspective[DB/OL]. arXiv preprint: 2404.07200, 2024.
[163]CHEN G, LIU X, MENG Q, et al.Learning neural operators on Riemannian manifolds[J].National Science Open, 2024, 3(6):2024001-
[164]SERRANO L, BOUDEC L Le, KOUPAI A K, et al.Operator learning with neural fields: Tackling PDEs on general geometries[C]//37th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. 2023.
[165]ZHONG W, MEIDANI H.Physics-informed geometry-aware neural operator[J]. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2025, 434: 117540.
[166]LI Z, HUANG D Z, LIU B, et al.Fourier neural operator with learned deformations for PDEs on general geometries[J]. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 2023, 24:1-26.
[167]ZHAO Z, LIU C, LI Y, et al.Diffeomorphism neural operator for various domains and parameters of partial differential equations[J]. Communications Physics, 2025, 8: 15.
[168]YIN M, CHARON N, BRODY R, et al.A scalable framework for learning the geometry-dependent solution operators of partial differential equations[J]. Nature Computational Science, 2024, 4: 928–940.
[169]LI H, YE X, JIANG P, et al.Local neural operator for solving transient partial differential equations on varied domains[J]. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2024, 427: 117062.
[170]YE X, LI H, HUANG J, et al.On the locality of local neural operator in learning fluid dynamics[J]. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2024, 427: 117035.
[171]LI H, YE X, HE L, et al.Generalizability of local neural operator: Example for elastodynamic problems[J]. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2025, 445: 118151.
[172]YE X, LI H, YAN Z G.Virtual domain extension for imposing boundary conditions in flow simulation of pre-trained local neural operator[DB/OL]. arXiv preprint: 2504.09807, 2025.
[173]YE X, LI H, QIN G.Solving flows across rotor and stator cascades with local neural operator for computational fluid dynamics[C]//Proceedings of the ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition Congress and Exposition. 2023.
[174]LIU-SCHIAFFINI M, BERNER J, BONEV B, et al.Neural operators with localized integral and differential kernels[C]//Proceedings of the 41st International Conference on Machine Learning. 2024.
[175]LU L, HE H, KASIMBEG P, et al.One-shot learning for solution operators of partial differential equations[C]//International Conference on Learning Representations, SimDL Workshop. 2021.
[176]HE H, JIAO A, RANADE R, et al.One-shot learning for solution operators of partial differential equations[J]. Nature Communications, 2025, 16: 8386.
[177]WELSCHINGER L, LIU Y, WANG Z, et al.Learning to solve PDEs on neural shape representations[DB/OL]. arXiv preprint: 2512.21311, 2025.
[178]MCCABE M, BRUNO R, PARKER L, et al.Multiple physics pretraining for spatiotemporal surrogate models[C]//38th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. 2024.
[179]CHEN T, ZHOU H, LI Y, et al.OmniArch: Building foundation model for scientific computing[C]//Proceedings of the 42nd International Conference on Machine Learning. Vancouver, Canada, 2025.
[180]ZHU M, SUN J, ZHANG Z, et al.PI-MFM: Physics-informed multimodal foundation model for solving partial differential equations[DB/OL]. arXiv preprint: 2512.23056, 2025.
[181]WIESNER F, WESSLING M, BAEK S.Towards a physics foundation model[DB/OL]. arXiv preprint: 2509.13805, 2025.
[182]BAO J, BOULLE N, LIU T J B, et al.Text-trained LLMs can zero-shot extrapolate PDE dynamics, revealing a three-stage in-context learning mechanism[DB/OL]. arXiv preprint: 2509.06322, 2025.
[183]CHEN W, CHIU K, FUGE M D.Aerodynamic design optimization and shape exploration using generative adversarial networks[C]//AIAA SciTech Forum. San Diego, California, 2019.
[184]CHEN W, RAMAMURTHY A.Deep generative model for efficient 3D airfoil parameterization and generation[C]//AIAA SciTech Forum. 2021.
[185]WANG Y, SHIMADA K, FARIMANI A B.Airfoil GAN: encoding and synthesizing airfoils for aerodynamic shape optimization[J]. Journal of Computational Design and Engineering, 2023, 10: 1350-1362.
[186]WU P, YUAN W, JI L, et al.Missile aerodynamic shape optimization design using deep neural networks[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2022, 126: 107640.
[187]LI J, ZHANG M, MARTINS J R R A, et al.Efficient aerodynamic shape optimization with deep-learning-based geometric filtering[J].AIAA Journal, 2020, 58(10):4243-4259
[188]LI J, ZHANG M.On deep-learning-based geometric filtering in aerodynamic shape optimization[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2021, 112: 106603.
[189]ACHOUR G, SUNG W J, PINON O J, et al.Development of a conditional generative adversarial network for airfoil shape optimization[C]//AIAA SciTech Forum. Orlando, FL, 2020.
[190]ZEILER M D, TAYLOR G W, FERGUS R.Adaptive deconvolutional networks for mid and high level feature learning[C]//International Conference on Computer Vision. IEEE, 2011: 2018-2025.
[191]WANG X, QIAN W, ZHAO T, et al.A generative design method of airfoil based on conditional variational autoencoder[J]. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 2025, 139: 109461.
[192]WEI Z, DUFOUR E, PELLETIER C, et al.DiffAirfoil: An efficient novel airfoil sampler based on latent space diffusion model for aerodynamic shape optimization[C]//AIAA Aviation Forum and Ascend co-located Conference Proceedings. Las Vegas, Nevada, 2024.
[193]LIN J H, CHEN S S, JIN S Y, et al.Multi-point aerodynamic inverse design of flying wing using the conditional diffusion model[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2025, 37: 077116.
[194]YANG A, ZHANG J, LI J, et al.Data-driven aerodynamic shape optimization and multi-fidelity design exploration using conditional diffusion-based geometry sampling method[C]//34th Congress of the International Council of the Aeronautical Sciences. Florence, Italy, 2024.
[195]GRAVES R, FARIMANI A B.Airfoil diffusion: Denoising diffusion model for conditional airfoil generation[DB/OL]. arXiv preprint: 2408.15898, 2024.
[196]唐志共, 钱炜祺, 何磊, 等.空气动力学领域大模型研究思考与展望[J].空气动力学学报, 2024, 42(12):1-11
[197]TANG Z, QIAN W, HE L, et al.Thoughts and prospects on large model research in aerodynamics[J].Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2024, 42(12):1-11
[198]CHEN W, CHIU K, FUGE M D.Airfoil design parameterization and optimization using Bézier generative adversarial networks[J].AIAA Journal, 2020, 58(11):4723-4735
[199]DU X, HE P, MARTINS J R R A.Rapid airfoil design optimization via neural networks-based parameterization and surrogate modeling[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2021, 113: 106701.
[200]WEI Z, YANG A, LI J, et al.Automated parameterization for aerodynamic shape optimization via deep geometric learning[J]. AIAA Journal, 2025: Article in Advance.
[201]VIQUERAT J, RABAULT J, KUHNLE A, et al.Direct shape optimization through deep reinforcement learning[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2021, 428: 110080.
[202]SCAVELLA P, PAOLILLO G, GRECO C S.Deep reinforcement learning-based airfoil design and optimization: An aerodynamic analysis[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2025, 167: 110638.
[203]KIM S, KIM I, YOU D.Multi-condition multi-objective optimization using deep reinforcement learning[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2022, 462: 111263.
[204]DUSSAUGE T P, SUNG W J, FISCHER O J P, et al.A reinforcement learning approach to airfoil shape optimization[J]. Scientific Reports, 2023, 13: 9753.
[205]YAN X, ZHU J, KUANG M, et al.Aerodynamic shape optimization using a novel optimizer based on machine learning techniques[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2019, 86: 826-835.
[206]LI R, ZHANG Y, CHEN H.Learning the aerodynamic design of supercritical airfoils[J].AIAA Journal, 2021, 59(10):3988-4001
[207]LIU Z, ZHANG M, SUN D, et al.A deep reinforcement learning optimization framework for supercritical airfoil aerodynamic shape design[J]. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2024, 67: 34.
[208]LOU J, CHEN R, LIU J, et al.Aerodynamic optimization of airfoil based on deep reinforcement learning[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2023, 35: 037128.
[209]SEKAR V, ZHANG M, SHU C, et al.Inverse design of airfoil using a deep convolutional neural network[J].AIAA Journal, 2019, 57(3):993-1003
[210]SHIRVANI A, NILI-AHMADABADI M, HA M Y.Machine learning-accelerated aerodynamic inverse design[J].Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics, 2023, 71(1):2237611-
[211]CHEN S, QIU J, YANG H, et al.Deep learning for inverse design of low?boom supersonic configurations[J]. Advances in Aerodynamics, 2023, 5: 13.
[212]GLAWS A, KING R N, VIJAYAKUMAR G, et al.Invertible neural networks for airfoil design[J].AIAA Journal, 2022, 60(5):3035-3047
[213]LU L, PESTOURIE R, YAO W, et al.Physics-informed neural networks with hard constraints for inverse design[J].SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 2021, 43(6):B1105-B1132
[214]张贤, 胡春, 崔永赫, 等.基于低阶导数物理信息神经网络的流动和传热反演问题研究[J].空气动力学学报, 2025, 43(1):34-43
[215]ZHANG X, HU C, CUI Y, et al.Study on inverse problems of flow and heat transfer using low-order derivative physics-informed neural network[J].Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2025, 43(1):34-43
[216]CAO W, SONG J, ZHANG W.Solving high-dimensional parametric engineering problems for inviscid flow around airfoils based on physics-informed neural networks[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2024, 516: 113285.
[217]SUN Y, SENGUPTA U, JUNIPER M.Physics-informed deep learning for simultaneous surrogate modeling and PDE-constrained optimization of an airfoil geometry[J]. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2023, 411: 116042.
[218]GLAWS A, KING R, SPRAGUE M.Deep learning for in situ data compression of large turbulent flow simulations[J].Physical Review Fluids, 2020, 5(11):114602-
[219]MOMENIFAR M, DIAO E, TAROKH V, et al.A physics-informed vector quantized autoencoder for data compression of turbulent flow[C]//Data Compression Conference (DCC). IEEE, 2022.
[220]DOHERTY K, SIMPSON C, BECKER S, et al.QuadConv: Quadrature-based convolutions with applications to non-uniform PDE data compression[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2024, 498: 112636.
[221]STENGEL K, GLAWS A, HETTINGER D, et al.Adversarial super-resolution of climatological wind and solar data[J].PNAS, 2020, 117(29):16805-16815
[222]KIM H, KIM J, WON S, et al.Unsupervised deep learning for super-resolution reconstruction of turbulence[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2021, 910: A29.
[223]SHEN L, DENG L, LIU X, et al.A generative adversarial network based on an efficient transformer for high-fidelity flow field reconstruction[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2024, 36: 075184.
[224]MIN K, SUN Z, DAI C, et al.A wavelet-enhanced generative model for scramjet inlet flow field reconstruction[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2026, 168: 110861.
[225]BAO K, ZHANG X, PENG W, et al.Deep learning method for super?resolution reconstruction of the spatio?temporal flow field[J]. Advances in Aerodynamics, 2023, 5: 19.
[226]SHU D, LI Z, FARIMANI A B.A physics-informed diffusion model for high-fidelity flow field reconstruction[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2023, 478: 111972.
[227]HUANG Q, ZHU W, MA F, et al.Sparse learning model with embedded RIP conditions for turbulence super-resolution reconstruction[J]. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2024, 425: 116965.
[228]DENG X, GUO M, TIAN Y, et al.Reconstructing the self-luminous image of a flame in a supersonic combustor based on residual network reconstruction algorithm[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2025, 35: 025129.
[229]DENG L, WANG Y, LIU Y, et al.A CNN-based vortex identification method[J]. Journal of Visualization, 2019, 22: 65-78.
[230]DENG L, BAO W, WANG Y, et al.Vortex-U-Net: An efficient and effective vortex detection approach based on U-Net structure[J]. Applied Soft Computing, 2022, 115: 108229.
[231]WANG Y, DENG L, YANG Z, et al.A rapid vortex identification method using fully convolutional segmentation network[J]. The Visual Computer, 2021, 37: 261-273.
[232]KASHIR B, RAGONE M, RAMASUBRAMANIAN A, et al.Application of fully convolutional neural networks for feature extraction in fluid flow[J]. Journal of Visualization, 2021, 24: 771-785.
[233]LIU Y, LU Y, WANG Y, et al.A CNN-based shock detection method in flow visualization[J]. Computers and Fluids, 2019, 184: 1-9.
[234]MICHEL C, WU J long, XIAO H.Data-driven,physics-based feature extraction from fluid flow fields using convolutional neural networks[J].Communications in Computational Physics, 2019, 25(3):625-650
[235]LI B, YANG Z, ZHANG X, et al.Using machine learning to detect the turbulent region in flow past a circular cylinder[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2020, 905: A10.
[236]CHANG S, LIU J, CUI K.A cluster analysis-based shock wave pattern recognition method for two-dimensional inviscid compressible flows[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2024, 506: 112946.
[237]CREMADES A, HOYAS S, VINUESA R.Classically studied coherent structures only paint a partial picture of wall-bounded turbulence[J]. Nature Communications, 2025, 16: 10189.
[238]DONG Z, LU Z, YANG Y.Fine-tuning a large language model for automating computational fluid dynamics simulations[J]. Theoretical and Applied Mechanics Letters, 2025, 15: 100594.
[239]XU Z, WANG L, WANG C, et al.CFDAgent: A language-guided, zero-shot multi-agent system for complex flow simulation[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2025, 37: 117124.
[240]FAN E, HU K, WU Z, et al.ChatCFD: An LLM-driven agent for end-to-end CFD automation with domain-specific structured reasoning[J]. Advanced Intelligent Discovery, 2026.
[241]CHEN Y, ZHU X, ZHOU H, et al.MetaOpenFOAM: an LLM-based multi-agent framework for CFD[DB/OL]. arXiv preprint: 2407.21320, 2024.
[242]WANG W, XU R, FENG J, et al.A status quo investigation of large language models towards cost-effective CFD automation with OpenFOAMGPT: ChatGPT vs. Qwen vs. Deepseek[DB/OL]. arXiv preprint: 2504.02888, 2025.
[243]YUE L, XU P, ZHANG T, et al.FoamGPT: Fine-tuning large language model for agentic automation of CFD simulations with OpenFOAM[C]//Machine Learning and the Physical Sciences Workshop, 39th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. 2025.
[244]YUXUAN C, LONG Z, XU Z, et al.Large language model-assisted sensitivity analysis and parameter optimization in computational fluid dynamics[J]. Theoretical and Applied Mechanics Letters, 2026.
[245]FAN Y, ZHAN H, ZHANG M, et al.AirfoilAgent: Airfoil aerodynamics optimization design via large language model multi-agent collaborations[J]. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 2026, 71: 104246.
CJA