流体力学与飞行力学

直升机发动机失效后旋翼转速自主恢复与稳定控制

  • 韦康瑞 ,
  • 周旭 ,
  • 徐尤松 ,
  • 曹宸恺 ,
  • 招启军
展开
  • 南京航空航天大学 直升机动力学全国重点实验室/直升机研究院,南京 210016
.E-mail: xuyousong@nuaa.edu.cn

收稿日期: 2025-11-19

  修回日期: 2025-12-04

  录用日期: 2026-03-17

  网络出版日期: 2026-03-23

基金资助

国家自然科学基金(U25B2092);江苏省研究生科研与实践创新计划项目(KYCX25_0564)

Autonomous rotor speed restoration and stabilization after helicopter engine failure

  • Kangrui WEI ,
  • Xu ZHOU ,
  • Yousong XU ,
  • Chenkai CAO ,
  • Qijun ZHAO
Expand
  • National Key Laboratory of Helicopter Aeromechanics/Helicopter Research Institute,Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics,Nanjing 210016,China

Received date: 2025-11-19

  Revised date: 2025-12-04

  Accepted date: 2026-03-17

  Online published: 2026-03-23

Supported by

National Natural Science Foundation of China(U25B2092);Postgraduate Research & Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province(KYCX25_0564)

摘要

直升机遭遇发动机失效后,需迅速恢复旋翼转速,并将其维持在转速稳定的稳态自转状态。为实现该过程的自主控制,首先基于轻型直升机稳态自转状态的扫频试飞数据,分析了总距通道的操纵特性,发现了旋翼转速响应对于总距操纵输入的显著滞后现象,证明了传统转速反馈的总距控制策略存在诱发系统振荡风险。其次,基于叶素理论分析,指出了传统转速反馈策略存在没有对气流迎角进行显式调控的问题,在此基础上提出了垂向速度反馈策略及内环垂向速度反馈-外环转速反馈的复合控制架构,并从传递函数的角度证明了上述复合架构的有效性。随后,基于桨盘平面法及动态入流建立了适用于发动机失效情况的UH-1H直升机飞行力学模型,并对稳态自转状态的总距操纵响应进行了仿真分析,验证了对象直升机旋翼转速的反向初始响应特性及相位滞后特性。最后,基于所建立的飞行动力学模型,开展了稳态自转进入与抗扰动仿真,对比分析了开环放总距、传统转速反馈、提出的垂向速度反馈、内外环反馈4种策略的性能。仿真结果表明,提出的内外环反馈策略克服了转速反馈易振荡的固有局限性,相比于单一的垂向速度反馈显著加速了旋翼动能恢复,且具备开环控制所欠缺的抗扰动能力。本研究为自转下滑自主控制器设计与稳态自转的可靠建立提供了新思路。

本文引用格式

韦康瑞 , 周旭 , 徐尤松 , 曹宸恺 , 招启军 . 直升机发动机失效后旋翼转速自主恢复与稳定控制[J]. 航空学报, 2026 , 47(16) : 133109 -133109 . DOI: 10.7527/S1000-6893.2026.33109

Abstract

Following helicopter engine failure, rapid rotor speed recovery and maintenance of a stable steady-state autorotation condition are essential. To achieve autonomous control of this process, this study first analyzed the collective pitch control characteristics based on sweep-frequency flight test data from a light helicopter in steady-state autorotation. The results revealed a significant phase lag in the rotor speed response to collective pitch inputs, demonstrating that conventional rotor speed feedback strategies carry an inherent risk of inducing system oscillations. Second, based on blade element theory analysis, it was identified that conventional rotor speed feedback strategies lack explicit regulation of the airflow angle of attack. Building on this insight, a vertical velocity feedback strategy was proposed, along with a composite control architecture integrating inner-loop vertical velocity feedback and outer-loop rotor speed feedback. The effectiveness of this composite architecture was further verified from a transfer function perspective. Subsequently, a flight dynamics model applicable to engine failure scenarios was established for the UH-1H helicopter, incorporating rotor disk modeling and dynamic inflow theory. Simulation analysis of the collective pitch response in steady-state autorotation validated the characteristic reverse initial response and phase lag of the rotor speed for the studied helicopter. Finally, simulations for steady-state autorotation entry and disturbance rejection were conducted based on the developed model, comparing the performance of four control strategies: open-loop collective reduction, conventional rotor speed feedback, the proposed vertical velocity feedback, and the dual-loop feedback strategy. The results indicate that the proposed dual-loop feedback strategy overcomes the inherent oscillatory limitations of rotor speed feedback, significantly accelerates rotor kinetic energy recovery compared to single-loop vertical velocity feedback, and provides disturbance rejection capability absent in open-loop control. This study offers new insights for the design of autonomous controllers in autorotation descent and the reliable establishment of steady-state autorotation.

参考文献

[1] 周悦, 蒋维安, 魏麟, 等. 2012—2018年NTSB北美直升机事故情况分析[J]. 民航学报, 2024, 8(2): 25-30, 139.
  ZHOU Y, JIANG W A, WEI L, et al. Analysis of North America helicopter accidents 2012-2018 based on NTSB data[J]. Journal of Civil Aviation, 2024, 8(2): 25-30, 139 (in Chinese).
[2] BETZINA M D. Tiltrotor descent aerodynamics: A small-scale experimental investigation of Vortex Ring State[C]∥American Helicopter Society 57th Annual Forum. 2001.
[3] 王焕瑾, 高正. 自转旋翼的气动优势和稳定转速[J]. 航空学报, 2001, 22(4): 337-339.
  WANG H J, GAO Z. Aerodynamic virtue and steady rotary speed of autorotating rotor[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2001, 22(4): 337-339 (in Chinese).
[4] 张宇杭, 韩东, 万浩云. 桨叶分段线性扭转对旋翼性能的提升[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(5): 225264.
  ZHANG Y H, HAN D, WAN H Y. Rotor performance improvement by blade piecewise linear twist[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2022, 43(5): 225264 (in Chinese).
[5] 王铁军. 直升机自转下滑瞬时增距特性分析[D]. 北京: 北京航空航天大学, 2001.
  WANG T J. Analysis of instantaneous range increase characteristics of helicopter’s autorotation and glide[D]. Beijing: Beihang University, 2001 (in Chinese).
[6] 严长凯. 自旋进入/退出过程直/发综合建模与控制技术研究[D]. 南京: 南京航空航天大学, 2014.
  YAN C K. Research on modeling and control for integrated helicopter/turboshaft engine system in helicopter autorotation decent/recovery process[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2014 (in Chinese).
[7] 王道明, 袁罗庚, 刘建礼, 等. 某多发直升机自转着陆试飞方法[J]. 直升机技术, 2022(2): 58-63.
  WANG D M, YUAN L G, LIU J L, et al. Autorotation landing flight test method of a multiple-engine helicopter[J]. Helicopter Technique, 2022(2): 58-63 (in Chinese).
[8] 冯德林. 直升机稳定自转和减速拉平研究[D]. 北京: 北京航空航天大学, 2001.
  FENG D L. Research on stable autorotation and deceleration recovery in helicopter[D]. Beijing: Beihang University, 2001 (in Chinese).
[9] JOHNSON W. Helicopter optimal descent and landing after power loss: NASA TM-73244[R]. Washington, D. C.: NASA, 1977.
[10] LEE A Y, BRYSON A E, HINDSON W S. Optimal landing of a helicopter in autorotation[J]. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 1988, 11(1): 7-12.
[11] BIBIK P, NARKIEWICZ J. Helicopter optimal control after power failure using comprehensive dynamic model[J]. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2012, 35(4): 1354-1362.
[12] MENG W L, CHEN R L. Study of helicopter autorotation landing following engine failure based on a six-degree-of-freedom rigid-body dynamic model[J]. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2013, 26(6): 1380-1388.
[13] DALAMAGKIDIS K, VALAVANIS K P, PIEGL L A. Autonomous autorotation of unmanned rotorcraft using nonlinear model predictive control[J]. Journal of Intelligent and Robotic Systems, 2010, 57(1): 351-369.
[14] DALAMAGKIDIS K, VALAVANIS K P, PIEGL L A. Nonlinear model predictive control with neural network optimization for autonomous autorotation of small unmanned helicopters[J]. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 2011, 19(4): 818-831.
[15] ABBEEL P, COATES A, HUNTER T, et al. Autonomous autorotation of an RC helicopter[M]∥Experimental Robotics. Berlin: Springer, 2009: 385-394.
[16] LEE D J, BANG H, BAEK K. Autorotation of an unmanned helicopter by a reinforcement learning algorithm[C]∥AIAA Guidance, Navigation and Control Conference and Exhibit. Reston: AIAA, 2008.
[17] LEE D J, BANG H. Autonomous autorotation of an unmanned helicopter using a reinforcement learning algorithm[J]. Journal of Aerospace Information Systems, 2013, 10(2): 98-104.
[18] SUNBERG Z, ROGERS J. A fuzzy logic-based controller for helicopter autorotation[C]∥51st AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition. Reston: AIAA, 2013.
[19] SUNBERG Z N, MILLER N R, ROGERS J D. A real-time expert control system for helicopter autorotation[J]. Journal of the American Helicopter Society, 2015, 60(2): 1-15.
[20] EBERLE B F, ROGERS J D. Real-time trajectory generation and reachability determination in autorotative flare[J]. Journal of the American Helicopter Society, 2020, 65(3): 1-17.
[21] 屈天祥, 滕飞, 傅春啸, 等. 小型无人直升机自转建模与控制策略研究[J]. 机械与电子, 2022, 40(2): 45-49.
  QU T X, TENG F, FU C X, et al. Autorotation modeling of small unmanned helicopter and control strategy research[J]. Machinery & Electronics, 2022, 40(2): 45-49 (in Chinese).
[22] LOPEZ C A, WELLS V L. Dynamics and stability of an autorotating rotor/wing unmanned aircraft[J]. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2004, 27(2): 258-270.
[23] PROUTY R W. Helicopter performance, stability, and control[M]. Malabar: Krieger Publishing Company, 1995.
[24] PETERS D A, HAQUANG N. Technical note: Dynamic inflow for practical applications[J]. Journal of the American Helicopter Society, 1988, 33(4): 64-68.
[25] PETERS D A, BOYD D D, HE C J. Finite-state induced-flow model for rotors in hover and forward flight[J]. Journal of the American Helicopter Society, 1989, 34(4): 5-17.
[26] MURAKAMI Y, HOUSTON S S. Dynamic inflow modelling for autorotatingrotors[J]. The Aeronautical Journal, 2008, 112(1127): 47-53.
[27] TALBOT P D, TINLING B E, DECKER W A, et al. A mathematical model of a single main rotor helicopter for piloted simulation: NASA-TM-84281 [R]. Washington, D.C.: NASA, 1982.
[28] 严旭飞. 倾转旋翼机倾转过渡操纵策略研究[D]. 南京: 南京航空航天大学, 2019.
  YAN X F. Research on control strategy for tilt-rotor aircraft conversion procedure[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2019 (in Chinese).
[29] TALBOT P D, CORLISS L D. A mathematical force and moment model of a UH-1H helicopter for flight dynamics simulations: NASA-TM-73254[R]. Washington, D.C.: NASA, 1977.
[30] 张辽, 张允昌, 李威, 等. 直升机旋翼自转状态飞行仿真建模研究[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2013, 25(): 17-20.
  ZHANG L, ZHANG Y C, LI W, et al. Study on simulation modeling for flight process of helicopter with rotor autorotation[J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2013, 25(S1): 17-20 (in Chinese).
[31] AHMAD S, THOMSON D. Validation of rotor-disc model for light autogyro in steady-state flight mode[C]∥Proceedings of International Conference of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering 2019. Singapore: Springer, 2020: 481-492.
[32] Headquarters, Department of the Army. Bell UH-1H Iroquois flight manual: TM 55-1520-210-10[R]. Washington, D.C.: NASA, 1988.
[33] YOMCHINDA T. Real-time path planning and autonomous control for helicopter autorotation[D]. State College: The Pennsylvania State University, 2013.
[34] 蔡华. 直升机控制律设计及仿真研究[D]. 西安: 西北工业大学, 2007.
  CAI H. Design and simulation research helicopter control law[D]. Xi’an: Northwestern Polytechnical University, 2007 (in Chinese).
[35] 中华人民共和国交通运输部. 正常类旋翼航空器适航规定[EB/OL]. (2025-11-27)[2025-11-30]. .
  Ministry of Transportation and Communications of the People’s Republic of China. Airworthiness regulations for normal class rotorcraft. (2025-11-27)[2025-11-30]. (in Chinese).
文章导航

/

〈 〉