脉冲直流等离子体激励抑制流动分离的实验研究

  • 杨天宇 ,
  • 苏志 ,
  • 梁华 ,
  • 宗豪华 ,
  • 吴云
展开
  • 1. 空军工程大学
    2. 西安交通大学
    3. 空军工程大学工程学院一系

收稿日期: 2025-12-03

  修回日期: 2026-03-18

  网络出版日期: 2026-03-19

基金资助

苏;宗;宗;吴;陕西省科技创新团队项目;学科拔尖人才项目

Experimental Investigation of Flow Separation Control Utilizing Pulsed-DC Plasma Actuation

  • YANG Tian-Yu ,
  • SU Zhi ,
  • LIANG Hua ,
  • ZONG Hao-Hua ,
  • WU Yun
Expand

Received date: 2025-12-03

  Revised date: 2026-03-18

  Online published: 2026-03-19

Supported by

This research is sponsored by the·National.Natural·Science Foundation of.China;This research is sponsored by the·National.Natural·Science Foundation of.China;This research is sponsored by the·National.Natural·Science Foundation of.China;This research is sponsored by the·National.Natural·Science Foundation of.China;the Shaanxi Provincial-Innovation CapabilitySupport-Program-Technology:InnovationTeam Project;the Discipline-leading Talent Program

摘要

增升减阻是航空领域的重要课题,其关键在于降低机翼小迎角巡航状态下的摩擦阻力,以及抑制大迎角下的流动分离。脉冲直流介质阻挡放电(DBD)等离子体激励是一种新型的流动控制方法,其能基于有限的能耗实现显著的湍流摩擦减阻效果,同时具有系统结构简单、响应快、频带宽等优势。面向机翼大迎角流动分离控制的需求,采用脉冲直流激励方法进行了实验研究。首先,对脉冲直流DBD的放电波形、诱导体积力以及冲击波特性进行了综合测试;在此基础上,在基于NACA 0015翼型的平直翼模型上,开展了风洞实验,探究激励电压、激励频率、激励位置及来流速度等关键参数对流动分离控制效果的影响规律。结果表明,脉冲直流DBD能够同时产生体积力和冲击效应,有效抑制机翼大迎角下的流动分离,使模型最大升力系数提高7.17%,失速迎角增大2°,并使失速后的升力系数变化更为平缓。激励电压越高、来流速度越小,激励相对于流场的强度越大,流动控制效果越好;存在最佳激励频率100Hz,与分离剪切层的脱落频率相吻合,流动控制效果最好;激励位置应布置于机翼前缘,避免其造成的扰动被分离区淹没,以提高流动控制效果,实现对流动分离的有效抑制。

本文引用格式

杨天宇 , 苏志 , 梁华 , 宗豪华 , 吴云 . 脉冲直流等离子体激励抑制流动分离的实验研究[J]. 航空学报, 0 : 1 -0 . DOI: 10.7527/S1000-6893.2026.33178

Abstract

Lift enhancement and drag reduction are critical objectives in aeronautics, focusing particularly on minimizing skin-friction drag at low angles of attack during cruise and suppressing flow separation at high angles of attack. Pulsed direct current dielectric barrier discharge (Pulsed-DC DBD) plasma actuation emerges as a novel flow control technique. It achieves significant turbulent friction drag reduction with limited energy consumption, while offering advantages such as simple system architecture, rapid response, and a wide frequency bandwidth. Targeting the control of airfoil flow separation at high angles of attack, an experimental investigation was conducted using the pulsed DC excitation method. Initially, comprehensive measurements of the discharge waveform, induced body force, and shock wave characteristics of the Pulsed-DC DBD were performed. Building on this, wind tunnel experiments were carried out on a straight wing model based on the NACA 0015 airfoil to investigate the influence of key parameters—including excitation voltage, pulse frequency, actuator placement, and free-stream velocity—on the effectiveness of flow separation control. Results indicate that the Pulsed-DC DBD simultaneously generates both a body force and a shock wave effect, which effectively suppresses flow separation at high angles of attack. This leads to a 7.17% increase in the maximum lift coefficient, a 2° extension of the stall angle, and a more gradual decline in the lift coefficient post-stall. Higher excitation voltages and lower free-stream velocities enhance the relative strength of the actuation compared to the flow field, resulting in improved control effectiveness. An optimal excitation frequency of 100 Hz was identified, which coincides with the shedding frequency of the separated shear layer and yields the best control performance. The actuator should be positioned at the leading edge to prevent its induced perturbations from being overwhelmed by the separation zone, thereby maximizing flow control effectiveness and achieving robust suppression of flow separation.

参考文献

[1]郁程.流动分离及其控制的机理研究[D]. 上海: 上海交通大学, 2011. [2]李斌斌.合成射流激励器及在主动流动控制中的应用[D]. 南京: 南京航空航天大学, 2008. [3]李国强, 常智强, 张鑫, 等.翼型动态失速等离子体流动控制试验[J].航空学报, 2018, 39(8):122111-122111 [4]展宗贞, 李学敏, 李文超, 等.叶尖小翼形状对轴流风机性能的影响[J].农业装备与车辆工程, 2020, 58(12):10-14 [5]谢海卫, 张冬冬, 王堋人, 等.超声速条件下涡流发生器增强混合研究进展[J].航空兵器, 2025, 32(1):51-62 [6]Brooke J W, Hanratty T J.Origin of turbulence-producing eddies in a channel flow[J].Physics of Fluids A: Fluid Dynamics, 1993, 5(4):1011-1022 [7]Greenblatt D, Wygnanski I J.The control of flow separation by periodic excitation[J].Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 2000, 36(7):487-545 [8]张富垚, 梁华, 刘诗敏, 等.等离子体合成射流改善弯进气道气动性能的实验研究[J].推进技术, 2025, 46(1):47-54 [9]吴云, 李应红.等离子体流动控制研究进展与展望[J].航空学报, 2014, 36(2):381-405 [10]苏志, 宗豪华, 梁华, 等.等离子体湍流摩擦减阻研究进展与展望[J].空气动力学学报, 2023, 41(9):1-19 [11]Roth J, Sherman D, Wilkinson S.Boundary layer flow control with a one atmosphere uniform glow discharge surface plasma[C]//36th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit. Reno, NV, U.S.A.: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 1998. [12]Benard N, Moreau E.EHD force and electric wind produced by plasma actuators used for airflow control[C]//6th AIAA Flow Control Conference. New Orleans, Louisiana: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2012. [13]Benard N, Moreau E.Electrical and mechanical characteristics of surface AC dielectric barrier discharge plasma actuators applied to airflow control[J].Experiments in Fluids, 2014, 55(11):1846- [14]Wu Y.Nanosecond pulsed discharge plasma actuation: Characteristics and flow control performance[C]//45th AIAA Plasmadynamics and Lasers Conference. Atlanta, GA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2014. [15]Zheng J, Cui Y D, Zhao Z, et al.Flow separation control over a NACA 0015 airfoil using nanosecond-pulsed plasma actuator[J].AIAA Journal, 2018, 56(6):2220-2234 [16]Likhanskii A, Shneider M, Opaits D, et al.Limitations of the DBD effects on the external flow[C]//48th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition. Orlando, Florida: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2010. [17]Su Z, Li J, Liang H, et al.UAV flight test of plasma slats and ailerons with microsecond dielectric barrier discharge[J].Chinese Physics B, 2018, 27(10):105205- [18]Roupassov D V, Nikipelov A A, Nudnova M M, et al.Flow separation control by plasma actuator with nanosecond pulsed-periodic discharge[J].AIAA Journal, 2009, 47(1):168-185 [19]McGowen R, Corke T C, Matlis E H, et al.Pulsed-DC plasma actuator characteristics and application in compressor stall control[C]//54th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting. San Diego, California, USA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2016. [20]Thomas F O, Corke T C, Duong A, et al.Turbulent drag reduction using pulsed-DC plasma actuation[J].Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, 2019, 52(43):434001- [21]Su Z, Zong H, Liang H, et al.Characteristics of a dielectric barrier discharge plasma actuator driven by pulsed-DC high voltage[J].Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, 2022, 55(7):75203- [22]Baker R J, Johnson B P.Stacking power MOSFETs for use in high speed instrumentation[J].Review of Scientific Instruments, 1992, 63(12):5799-5801 [23]Kim K, Sung H J.Effects of periodic blowing from spanwise slot on a turbulent boundary layer[J].AIAA Journal, 2003, 41(10):1916-1924 [24]Schuele C Y, Corke T C, Matlis E.Control of stationary cross-flow modes in a mach 3.5 boundary layer using patterned passive and active roughness[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2013, 718: 5-38.[J].Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2013, 718:5-38[J].Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2013, 718:5-38 [25]Choi K S.Near-wall structure of turbulent boundary layer with spanwise-wall oscillation[J].Physics of Fluids, 2002, 14(7):2530-2542 [26]Benard N, Zouzou N, Claverie A, et al.Optical visualization and electrical characterization of fast-rising pulsed dielectric barrier discharge for airflow control applications[J].Journal of Applied Physics, 2012, 111(3):33303- [27]Yang P, Zhang X, Pan C.The spatial-temporal evolution process of flow field generated by a pulsed-DC plasma actuator in quiescent airAerospace Science and Technology,2021,118: 107071.[J].Aerospace Science and Technology, 2021, 118(1):107071-107082 [28]Whalley R D, Choi K S.The starting vortex in quiescent air induced by dielectric-barrier-discharge plasma[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2012, 703: 192-203.[J].Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2012, 703:192-203[J].Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2013, 703:192-203 [29]Little J, Takashima K, Nishihara M, et al.High lift airfoil leading edge separation control with nanosecond pulse DBD plasma actuators[C]//5th Flow Control Conference. Chicago, Illinois: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2010. [30]赵光银.翼型/三角翼等离子体冲击流动控制机理研究[D]. 西安: 空军工程大学, 2015.
文章导航

/