水上飞机缩比模型带滑流影响的吹气控制试验研究-流动控制与热管理专栏

  • 刘景飞 ,
  • 黄龙太 ,
  • 鞠安然 ,
  • 和润生 ,
  • 徐传宝 ,
  • 王子卓
展开
  • 1. 中国航空工业空气动力研究院
    2. 中国特种飞行器研究所

收稿日期: 2025-11-21

  修回日期: 2026-03-08

  网络出版日期: 2026-03-16

Experimental study on blowing flow control of seaplane scaled models with slipstream effects

  • LIU Jing-Fei ,
  • HUANG Long-Tai ,
  • JU An-Ran ,
  • HE Run-Sheng ,
  • XU Chuan-Bao ,
  • WANG Zi-Zhuo
Expand

Received date: 2025-11-21

  Revised date: 2026-03-08

  Online published: 2026-03-16

摘要

依托中国航空工业空气动力研究院FL-8低速风洞,围绕常规和翼身融合布局水上飞机带滑流影响的吹气流动控制效能和机理开展风洞试验研究,试验采用小尺寸半模模型和外式空气桥天平,通过小体积大功率直流电机驱动螺旋桨模拟滑流动力影响,通过外接高压气源和多级流量控制模块进行舵面吹气系统流量的精确控制。试验验证了相关试验方法和设备的可靠性,获得了螺旋桨滑流、吹气流动控制以及两者耦合后对水上飞机升力特性的综合影响,通过流动显示方法研究了滑流、吹气以及两者耦合影响的流动机理。试验结果表明:常规布局和翼身融合布局机械增升效果有限,单独附加襟翼吹气控制后增升效果明显改善,当Cμ=0.12时Cymax相比机械增升构型最大增加45%;单独滑流动力影响可以大幅提升飞行器的升力,当Tc=0.45时Cymax相比机械增升构型最大增加137%;当滑流影响和吹气控制耦合作用后,Cymax相比机械增升构型最大增加176%,其中常规布局耦合效果小于单项叠加之和,翼身融合布局耦合效果大于单项叠加之和。

本文引用格式

刘景飞 , 黄龙太 , 鞠安然 , 和润生 , 徐传宝 , 王子卓 . 水上飞机缩比模型带滑流影响的吹气控制试验研究-流动控制与热管理专栏[J]. 航空学报, 0 : 1 -0 . DOI: 10.7527/S1000-6893.2026.33120

Abstract

Relying on the FL-8 low-speed wind tunnel of Aerodynamics Research Institute of Aviation Industry Corporation of China, wind tunnel experimental research was conducted on the control efficiency and mechanism of blowing flow control with slipstream influence around conventional and blended wing-body layout seaplanes. The experiment utilized a small-scale half-model and an external air bridge balance. A small-volume high-power DC motor was used to drive a propeller to simulate the influence of slipstream, and an external high-pressure air source and a multi-stage flow control module were used to precisely control the flow of the flap surface air blowing system. The experiment verified the reliability of the relevant experimental methods and equipment, and obtained the comprehensive impact of propeller slipstream, blown air flow control, and their coupling on the lift characteristics of seaplanes. The flow mechanism of slipstream, blown air, and their coupling effects was studied through flow visualization methods. The experimental results indicate that the mechanical lift enhancement effects of the two layouts are limited. The lift enhancement effect is significantly improved after the addition of flap blowing control alone. When Cμ=0.12, Cymax increases by a maximum of 45% compared to the mechanical lift enhancement configuration. The influence of slipstream power alone can greatly enhance the lift of the aircraft. When Tc=0.45, Cymax increases by a maximum of 137% compared to the mechanical lift enhancement configuration. When the slipstream influence and blowing control are coupled, Cymax increases by a maximum of 176% compared to the mechanical lift enhancement. The coupling effect of conventional layout lift enhancement is less than the sum of individual effects, the coupling effect of blended wing-body layout lift enhancement is greater than the sum of individual effects.

参考文献

[1]KELLER D, RUDNIK R.Numerical investigation of the dynamic behavior of a high-lift configuration with circulation control[C]//33rd AIAA Applied aero-dynamics conference. Dallas: AIAA Aviation,2015: 2015-2571.
[2]NILS B, ROLF R, CARSTEN L, et al.Aerodynamic effects of propeller slipstream on a wing with circula-tion control[J].Journal of Aircraft, 2015, 52(5):1422-1436
[3]MICHAEL M, WOLFGANG M.Towards the indus-trial application application of active flow control in civil aircraft-an active highlift flap [C]//AIAA Applied aerodynamics conference. Atlanta: AIAA,2014: 1508-1520.
[4]GREENBLATT D, WYGNANSKI I J.The control of flow separation by periodic excitation[J].Progress in aerospace sciences, 2000, 36(7):487-545
[5]SOMMERWERK K, HAUPT M C.Design analysis and sizing of a circulation controlled cfrp wing with coanda flaps via cfd-csm coupling[J].CEAS aeronau-tical journal, 2014, 5(1):95-108
[6]BURNAZZI M, RADESPIEL R.Synergies between suction and blowing for active high-lift flaps[J].Ceas Aeronautical Journal, 2015, 6(2):305-318
[7]RADESPIEL R, BURNAZZ M.Fundamentals in coanda flap design[J].Notes on numerical fluid me-chanics & multidiplinary design, 2015, 127(1):101-114
[8]ABZALILOV D.Maximizing the lift coefficient of a jet-blown contour[J].Doklady Physics, 2007, 52(1):63-66
[9]JABBAL M, LIDDLE S C, CROWTHER W J.Active flow control systems architectures for civil transport aircraft[J].Journal of Aircraft, 2010, 47(6):1966-1981
[10]焦予秦, 陆岩.多段翼型吹气流动分离控制研究[J].应用力学学报, 2015, 32(02):215-220
[11]朱自强, 吴宗成.环量控制技术研究[J].航空学报, 2016, 37(2):411-428
[12]周涛, 李亚林, 党铁红.民用飞机增升装置中的流动控制技术[J].Civil Aircraft Design & Research, 2013, 28(4):17-24
[13]孙卫平, 杨康智, 秦何军.大型水陆两栖飞机吹气襟翼设计与分析验证[J].航空动力学报, 2016, 31(4):903-909
[14]郝璇, 刘芳, 王斌.基于襟缝翼吹气技术的短距起降飞行器增升策略的数值模拟研究[J].航空工程进展, 2016, 7(4):408-419
[15]李志强, 杜曼丽.模型用于吹气环量控制翼型的研究[J].航空动力学报, 2009, 24(6):1326-1331
[16]王妙香, 孙卫平, 秦何军.水陆两栖飞机内吹式襟翼优化设计[J].航空学报, 2016, 37(01):300-309
[17]刘睿, 白俊强, 邱亚松, 等.内吹式襟翼几何参数影响研究与优化设计[J].西北工业大学学报, 2020, 38(01):58-67
[18]赵光银, 姜裕标, 王万波, 等.螺旋桨滑流对简单襟翼吹气控制的影响[J].航空动力学报, 2021, 36(3):530-542
[19]温庆, 程志航, 邱亚松, 等.吹气襟翼的螺旋桨滑流影响模拟[J].航空动力学报, 2023, 38(5):1123-1132
[20]温庆, 程志航, 邱亚松, 等.采用吹气襟翼的机翼外侧前缘缝翼研究[J].气动研究与试验, 2023, 1(03):88-96
[21]温庆, 杨康智, 彭新春, 等.内吹式襟翼边界层控制技术研究[J].气动研究与试验, 2024, 2(05):52-57
[22]HE Runsheng, LIU Jingfei, JU Anran, et al.Wind tunnel test verification method for effects of propeller slipstream and blown flaps on lift[C]. APISAT2023. Hai Nan, 2023.
[23]战慧强, 秦凤波, 魏艳, 等.吹气翼面喷流压比控制软件设计与实现[C]. 国家工业软件大会. 上海, 2024: 430-434.
文章导航

/