Strong vortex gusts are one of the key factors causing aircraft control instability. To investigate the underlying mechanism, this paper employs direct numerical simulation and impulse theory to systematically analyze the unsteady flow characteristics and aerodynamic performance of a vortex dipole impinging on a NACA0012 airfoil at zero angle of attack. The study finds that the centerline height of the vortex dipole is the core parameter determining the airfoil's force and moment characteristics: the drag reaches its maximum when it is level with the leading edge; the lift, moment, and thrust peak when it is slightly above the leading edge; as the height increases further, the vortex-body interaction decays, and the aerodynamic disturbances approach zero. The physical mechanisms differ significantly across heights: 1) Level case: The vortex dipole splits, and the induced secondary vortices combine with it to form a new dipole. This new structure interacts with the airfoil again through self-induced motion, generating oscillatory drag. 2) Slightly high case: The negative-signed primary vortex interacts directly with the airfoil, causing its deformation, weakening, and trajectory deviation. This process leads the thrust to change from a peak to a trough, while the lift and moment undergo an asymmetric evolution from small negative values to large positive values. 3) High-spacing case: The dipole's motion path is almost unaffected by the presence of the airfoil. Analysis based on impulse theory further reveals the intrinsic relationship between aerodynamic forces and vortex motion: during collision, the change in the primary vortex's impulse dominates the force generation; in non-collision cases, the primary vortex impulse remains nearly constant, and the rate of change of impulse from the induced secondary vortices determines the airfoil's forces. Quasi-3D simulations with spanwise periodic boundary conditions reveal that an over-limit spanwise computational domain triggers strong 3D flow effects, causing remarkable attenuation of peak aerodynamic force and moment coefficients.
[1]FUKAMI K, TAIRA K.Grasping extreme aerodynamics on a low-dimensional manifold [J].[J].Nature Communication, 2023, 14(6480):1-10
[2]GALWAY D, ETELE J, FUSINA G.Development and implementation of an urban wind field database for aircraft flight simulation [J].[J].Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2012, 103(-):73-85
[3]KHOULI F, AFAGH F F, LANGLOIS R G.Design,simu-lation,and experimental results for flexible rotors in a ship airwake[J].Journal of Aircraft, 2016, 53(1):262-275
[4]SPALART P.Airplane trailing vortices[J].Annual Re-view of Fluid Mechanics, 1998, 30(1):107-138
[5]ROCKWELL D.Vortex-body interaction [J].[J].Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 1998, 30(-):199-229
[6]JONE A R, CETINER O.Overview of unsteady aerody-namic response of rigid wings in gust encounters [J][J].AIAA Journal, 2021, 59(2):1-5
[7]ZHONG Y, AMIRI-MARGAVI A, BABAEE H et al.Optimally time-dependent modes of vortex gust–airfoil interactions[J].Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2025, 1006(A18):1-26
[8]ZHANG Z, WANG Z, CURSUL I.Lift enhancement of a stationary wing in a wake[J].AIAA Journal, 2020, 58(11):4613-4619
[9]LEFEBVRE J N, JONES A R.Experimental investigation of airfoil performance in the wake of a circular cylin-der[J].AIAA Journal, 2019, 57(7):2808-2818
[10]TURHAN B, WANG Z J, GURSUL I.Interaction of vortex streets with a downstream wing [J][J].Physical Review Fluids, 2022, 7(094701):1-27
[11]SEARS W R.Some aspects of non-stationary airfoil theory and its practical application[J].Journal of the Aeronautical Sciences, 1941, 8(3):104-108
[12]KUSSNER H G.Zusammenfassender bericht über den Instation?ren auftrieb von flügeln[J].Luftfahrtforschung, 1935, 13(12):410-424
[13]MILES J W.The aerodynamic force on an airfoil in a moving gust[J].Journal of the Aeronautical Sciences, 1956, 23(11):1044-1050
[14]HUFSTEDLER E.Experimental Generation and Modeling of Vortical Gusts and their Interactions with an Airfoil[J].Ph.D. Thesis, California Inst. of Technolo-gy, Pasadena, 2017, :-
[15] HUFSTEDLER E A L, MCKEON B J.Vortical Gusts: Experimental Generation and Interaction with Wing [J], AIAA Journal 2019 57:3, 921-931
[16] GOLUBEV V, HOLLENSHADE T, NGUYEN L, et al.High accuracy low-Re simulations of airfoil-gust and airfoil-vortex interactions. 40th AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference and Exhibit, 2010, 2010-4868.
[17] GOLUBEV V, NGUYEN L, VISBAL M.High-fidelity simulations of transitional airfoil interacting with up-stream vortical structure. 49th AIAA Aerospace Sci-ences Meeting Including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, 2011, 2011-394.
[18] GORDNIER R, VISBAL M.Impact of a vortical gust on the aerodynamics of a finite aspect-ratio wing. 45th AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference, 2015, 2015-3072.
[19] BARNES C J, VISBAL M R.Effects of vertical position and orientation on a vortical-gust/airfoil interaction at a transitional Reynolds number. 47th AIAA Fluid Dy-namics Conference, 2017, 2017-3320.
[20]NGUYEN L, GOLUBEV V V, VISBAL M R.Numerical study of transitional SD7003 airfoil interacting with canonical upstream flow disturbances[J].AIAA Journal, 2018, 56(1):158-181
[21] BARNES C J, VISBAL M R.Gust response of rigid and elastically mounted airfoils at a transitional Reynolds number. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2018, 74: 112–119.
[22] BARNES C J, VISBAL M R.Further investigations of vortical-gust/airfoil interactions at a transitional Reyn-olds Number. 2018 AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, 2018, 2018-0823.
[23]BARNES C J, VISBAL M R.Counterclockwise vorti-cal-gustairfoil interactions at a transitional Reynolds number[J].AIAA Journal, 2018, 56(7):2540-2552
[24] GARMANN D J, VISBAL M R.Unsteady interactions of a wandering streamwise-oriented vortex with a wing. 32nd AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, 2014, 2014-2105.
[25] BARNES C J, VISBAL M R, HUANG P G.On the ef-fects of vertical offset and core structure in streamwise-oriented vortex–wing interactions. Journal of Fluid Mechanics. 2016, 799: 128-158.
[26] FUNG Y.An introduction to the theory of aeroelasticity. Courier Corporation, 2002, 381–417.
[27]WAGNER H.ber die Entstehung des dynamischen Auftriebes von Tragflügeln[J].Zeitschrift für Angewandte Mathematik und Mechanik, 1925, 5(1):17-35
[28] THEODORSEN T.General theory of aerodynamic in-stability and the mechanism of flutter. NACA Annual Report, 1935, 20.
[29]KUSSNER H.Zusammenfassender Bericht über den instation?ren Auftrieb von Flügeln[J].Luftfahrtforschung, 1936, 13(12):410-424
[30]VON KARMAN T, SEARS W.Airfoil theory for non-uniform motion[J].Journal of the Aeronautical Sci-ences, 1938, 5(10):379-390
[31]TCHIEU A, LEONARD A.A discrete-vortex model for the arbitrary motion of a thin airfoil with fluidic con-trol[J].Journal of Fluids and Structures, 2011, 27(5):680-693
[32] WU J C.Theory for aerodynamic force and moment in viscous flows [J]. AIAA Journal, 1981, 19: 432–441.
[33] WU J Z, MA H Y, ZHOU M D.Vortical Flows. Springer, Berlin, 2015.
[34] KANG L L, LIU L Q, SU W D et al.Minimum-domain impulse theory for unsteady aerodynamic force [J]. Physics of Fluids, 2018, 30, 016107.
[35] MOXEY D, CANTWELL C D, BAO Y et al.Nektar++: enhancing the capability and application of high-fidelity spectral/HP element methods [J]. Computer Physics Communications, 2020, 249:107110.
[36] KARNIADAKIS G E, ISRAELI M, ORSZAG S A.High-order splitting methods for the incompressible Navier–Stokes equations [J]. Journal of Computer Physics, 1991, 97 (2), 414–443.
[37] CANTWELL C D, MOXEY D, COMERFORD A et al.Nektar++: an open-source spectral/HP element frame-work [J]. Computer Physics Communications, 192, 205–219.
[38] KARNIADAKIS G E, ISRAELI M, ORSZAG S A.High-order splitting methods for the incompressible Navier–Stokes equations. Journal of Computational Physics, 1991, 97 (2), 414–443.
[39] MOURA R C, AMAN M, PEIRO J, SHERWIN S J.Spa-tial eigenanalysis of spectral/hp continuous Ga-lerkinschemes and their stabilisation via DG-mimicking spectralvanishing viscosity for high Reyn-olds number flows. Journal of Computational Physics, 2020, 406, 109112.
[40]ORSZAG S A, ISRAELI M, DEVILLE M O.Boundary conditions for incompressible flows[J].Journal of Sci-entific Computing, 1986, 1(1):75-111
[41] DONG S, KARNIADAKIS, G E, CHRYSSOSTOMIDIS C.A robust and accurate outflow boundary condition for incompressible flow simulations on severely-truncated unbounded domains [J]. Journal of Computa-tional Physics, 2014, 261: 83–105.
[42] MOURA R C, AMAN M, PEIRó J et al.Spatial eigena-nalysis of spectral/HP continuous Galerkin schemes and their stabilisation via DG-mimicking spectral van-ishing viscosity for high Reynolds number flows [J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2020, 406, 109112.
[43] HOME J, LUCAS M, ROCKWELL D.Interaction of impulsively generated vortex pairs with bodies [J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1988, 197: 571-594.
[44] GAO A-K, ZOU S-F, SHI Y et al.Passing-over leading-edge vortex: the thrust booster in heaving airfoil. AIP Advance, 2019, 9 (3), 035314.
CJA