基于双动态饱和机制的空天MEMS传感器时/空耦合误差智能检测与校正-信息融合大会会议增刊

  • 耿航 ,
  • 孙玉 ,
  • 苟轩 ,
  • 蒋景飞 ,
  • 陈凯 ,
  • 顾杰
展开
  • 1. 电子科技大学
    2. 复旦大学
    3. 中国电子科技集团第二十九研究所

收稿日期: 2025-12-01

  修回日期: 2026-01-16

  网络出版日期: 2026-01-21

Intelligent Detection and Correction of Time/Space Coupling Error for Space-Air MEMS Sensors Based on Dual Dynamic Saturation Mechanism

  • GENG Hang ,
  • SUN Yu ,
  • GOU Xuan ,
  • JIANG Jing-Fei ,
  • CHEN Kai ,
  • GU Jie
Expand

Received date: 2025-12-01

  Revised date: 2026-01-16

  Online published: 2026-01-21

摘要

微机械系统(Microelectro mechanical systems, MEMS)传感器作为空天信息采集的最重要工具之一,对其时/空耦合误差的实时快速检测与校正是保障传感器信息安全和数据处理可靠的关键。现有传感器误差检测与校正算法中,基于传统卡尔曼滤波(Kalman filtering, KF)的方法实时性好、计算成本低,但在非线性、非高斯噪声及强信号干扰下鲁棒性不足;基于深度学习的方法虽对误差检测与校正效果较好,但存在计算成本高、实时性差等问题。为解决这些问题,本文将上述两类方法进行创新结合,提出一种基于双重动态饱和机制的空天MEMS传感器时/空耦合误差智能检测与校正算法。首先,借助KF 滤波思想,设计了新息饱和的误差检测算法,完成对误差的动态检测;其次,引入遗传算法对确定动态饱和阈值的核心公式中的非线性参数进行自适应寻优,扩展算法在不同数据集上的泛化性能;接着,针对遗传算法寻优效率低、迭代次数多的问题,提出一种全新的双重动态饱和机制,以降低非线性参数间的时/空耦合关系,从而提高参数寻优效率,加快收敛。最后,搭建实验平台采集MEMS传感器数据,基于实测数据的算法验证表明:相较于传统的KF 检测框架和神经网络检测框架,本文提出的误差智能检测与校正算法,在检测校正效率与精度等指标上均有明显的性能提升。

本文引用格式

耿航 , 孙玉 , 苟轩 , 蒋景飞 , 陈凯 , 顾杰 . 基于双动态饱和机制的空天MEMS传感器时/空耦合误差智能检测与校正-信息融合大会会议增刊[J]. 航空学报, 0 : 1 -0 . DOI: 10.7527/S1000-6893.2026.33170

Abstract

As one of the most important tools for space and aerial information collection, microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) sensors require real-time and rapid detection and correction of their time/space coupling errors to ensure the security of sensor information and the reliability of data processing. Among the existing sensor error detection and correction algorithms, the methods based on traditional Kalman filtering (KF) have good real-time performance and low computational cost, but lack robustness in the presence of nonlinearity, non-Gaussian noise, and strong signal interference. Although the methods based on deep learning have better error detection and correction effects, they suffer from high computational cost and poor real-time performance. To address these issues, this paper innovatively combines the above two types of methods and proposes an intelligent detection and correction algorithm for time/space coupling errors of space and aerial MEMS sensors based on a dual dynamic saturation mechanism. Firstly, by leveraging the idea of KF filtering, an innovation saturation-based error detection algorithm is designed to dynamically detect errors. Secondly, a genetic algorithm is introduced to adaptively optimize the nonlinear parameters in the core formula for determining the dynamic saturation threshold, thereby enhancing the algorithm's generalization performance across different datasets. Then, to address the low optimization efficiency and high number of iterations of the genetic algorithm, a novel dual dynamic saturation mechanism is proposed to reduce the time/space coupling relationship between nonlinear parameters, thereby improving the parameter optimization efficiency and accelerating convergence. Finally, an experimental platform is built to collect MEMS sensor data. The algorithm verification based on the measured data shows that, compared with the traditional KF detection framework and neural network detection framework, the proposed intelligent error detection and correction algorithm has significant performance improvements in terms of detection and correction efficiency and accuracy.

参考文献

[1] Hawkins D.M. Identification of outliers[C].Monographs on Applied Probability and Statistics, 1980, .
[2] TingJ.-A, TheodorouE, SchaalS.Akalmanfilterforrobustoutlier detection[C]. 2007 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, 2007, 1514-1519.
[3]Zhang Y, Meratnia N, Havinga P.Outlier detection techniques for wireless sensor networks: Asurvey[J].IEEE Communications Surveys Tutorials, 2010, 12(2):159-170
[4]HaileM.A,Riddick JC,Assefa A. H. Robust particle filters for fatigue crack growth estimation in rotorcraft structures[J].IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 2016, 65(3):1438-1448
[5]SinopoliB, SchenatoL, FranceschettiM, etal.Kalmanfilteringwithintermittent observations[J].IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 2004, 49(9):1453-1464
[6]Jia B, Xin M.Vision-based spacecraft relative navigation using sparse-grid quadrature filter[J].IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 2013, 21(5):1595-1606
[7]Li Y, Shi L, Chen T.Detection against linear deception attacks on multi-sensor remote state estimation[J].IEEE Transactions on Control of Network Systems, 2018, 5(3):846-856
[8]赵海燕.基于少样本深度学习的误差检测方法:综述与展望[J].小型微型计算机系统, 2024, 45(10):2514-2521
[9] Kim S, Choi K, Choi H.-S, et al. Towards a rigorous evaluation of time-series anomaly detection[C]. AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2021, .
[10]Masreliez C.Approximate non-gaussian filtering with linear state and observation relations[J].IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 1975, 20(1):107-110
[11]Sorenson H, Alspach D.Recursive bayesian estimation using gaussian sums[J].Automatica, 1971, 7(4):465-479
[12]ChangG.Kalmanfilter with both adaptivity and robustness[J].Journal of Process Control, 2014, 24(3):81-87
[13] Agamennoni G, Nieto J.I, Nebot E. M. An outlier-robust kalman filter[C]. 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2011, 1551-1558.
[14]Gandhi M.A,Mili LRobust kalman filter based on a generalized maximum-likelihood-type estimator[J].IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 2010, 58(5):2509-2520
[15]Palma D.D,Indiveri GOutput outlier robust state estimation[J].Int. J. Adapt. Control Signal Process., 2017, 31(4):581-607
[16]Keller J, Darouach M.Optimal two-stage kalman filter in the presence of random bias[J].Automatica, 1997, 33(9):1745-1748
[17]Hsieh C.S. Robust two-stage kalman filters for systems with unknown inputs[J].IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 2000, 45(12):2374-2378
[18]Gillijns S, De MoorB.Unbiased minimum-variance input and state estimation for linear discretetime systems[J].Automatica, 2007, 43(1):111-116
[19]Fang H, Shi Y, Yi J.On stable simultaneous input and state estimation for discrete-time linear systems[J].International Journal of Adaptive Control and Signal Processing, 2011, 25(8):671-686
[20]Yong S. Z, Zhu M, Frazzoli E.A unified filter for simultaneous input and state estimation of linear discrete-time stochastic systems[J].Automatica, 2016, 63(无):321-329
[21]Shi D, Chen T, Darouach M.Event-based state estimation of linear dynamic systems with unknown exogenous inputs[J].Automatica, 2016, 69(无):275-288
[22] Fang H, Haile M.A, Wang Y. Robustifying the kalman filter against measurement outliers: An innovation saturation mechanism[C]. 2018 IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC), 2018, 6390-6395.
[23] 曹慧亮.硅微机械陀螺仪静电补偿与控制技术研究和实验 [D]:[博士学位论文]. 南京: 东南大学, 2014.
[24]Fang H, Haile M.A,Wang YRobust extended kalman filtering for systems with measurement outliers[J].IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 2022, 30(2):795-802
文章导航

/