流体力学与飞行力学

地效状态旋翼-机翼气动干扰特性及尾迹演化

  • 曾聪 ,
  • 曾揚洋 ,
  • 井思梦 ,
  • 赵国庆 ,
  • 招启军
展开
  • 南京航空航天大学 直升机动力学全国重点实验室,南京 210016
.E-mail: zhaoqijun@nuaa.edu.cn

收稿日期: 2025-07-24

  修回日期: 2025-08-23

  录用日期: 2025-12-04

  网络出版日期: 2025-12-15

基金资助

国家自然科学基金(12032012)

Aerodynamic interference characteristics and wake evolution of rotor-wing in ground effect

  • Cong ZENG ,
  • Yangyang ZENG ,
  • Simeng JING ,
  • Guoqing ZHAO ,
  • Qijun ZHAO
Expand
  • National Key Laboratory of Helicopter Aeromechanics,Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics,Nanjing 210016,China

Received date: 2025-07-24

  Revised date: 2025-08-23

  Accepted date: 2025-12-04

  Online published: 2025-12-15

Supported by

National Natural Science Foundation of China(12032012)

摘要

为研究倾转旋翼机近地状态下旋翼-机翼的气动干扰特性,基于嵌套网格技术、三阶MUSCL/CD格式和RANS/LES混合方法建立了一套高分辨率流场模拟框架,重点探讨不同离地高度下旋翼-机翼气动特性的变化。结果表明:地面和机翼的存在阻滞了旋翼下洗流发展,显著改变了旋翼尾迹的演化过程,桨尖涡径向位置整体呈现出先收缩后扩张的趋势,而轴向位置迁移速率减慢,同时桨尖涡在螺旋运动中还伴随着破裂、配对和融合等物理现象;旋翼拉力随离地高度减小而增大,机翼下洗载荷随离地高度减小而减小,相较于无地效状态,旋翼拉力最大提升6.20%,悬停效率最大提升8.40%,机翼所受下洗载荷下降幅度达59.05%。针对近地流场涡系结构演化过程,采用四阶龙格-库塔时间推进方法和四阶中心差分格式构建了拉格朗日拟序结构(LCS)计算方法,通过计算不同时刻有限时间李雅普诺夫指数场阐明了地面效应下旋翼-机翼流场中涡结构的时空演化过程,揭示了回流结构通过流体微团的持续输运维持其稳定性的物理机制以及对桨尖区域产生的下洗作用导致气动力减小的流动机理。

本文引用格式

曾聪 , 曾揚洋 , 井思梦 , 赵国庆 , 招启军 . 地效状态旋翼-机翼气动干扰特性及尾迹演化[J]. 航空学报, 2026 , 47(8) : 132620 -132620 . DOI: 10.7527/S1000-6893.2025.32620

Abstract

To investigate the aerodynamic interference characteristics between rotor and wing of the tiltrotor aircraft in ground effect, a high-resolution flow field simulation framework was established based on the overset grid technique, third-order MUSCL/CD scheme and RANS/LES(Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes/Large Eddy Simulation) hybrid method. This study focuses on the variations in aerodynamic characteristics of the rotor-wing with different heights above the ground. Results demonstrate that the presence of the ground and wing inhibits the development of rotor downwash, significantly altering the wake evolution process. The radial position of tip vortices exhibits an initial contraction followed by expansion, while the axial migration rate decreases. Furthermore, the helical motion of the blade tip vortices is characterized by phenomena including breakup, pairing and merging. Rotor thrust increases and wing downwash load decreases as ground height decreases. In comparison with the condition without ground effect, rotor thrust and figure of merit increase by up to 6.20% and 8.40% respectively, while wing downwash load drops by 59.05%. A computational method for Lagrangian Coherent Structures (LCS) was developed based on the fourth-order Runge-Kutta time integration method and the fourth-order central difference scheme to investigate the evolution of vortical structures in near-ground flow fields. By computing finite-time Lyapunov exponent fields at different instants, the spatiotemporal evolution of the vortex structures in the rotor-wing flow field under the ground effect was clarified. This revealed the physical mechanism by which recirculating structures maintain stability through continuous transport of fluid parcels, as well as the flow mechanism leading to reduced aerodynamic forces in the blade tip region due to downwash effects.

参考文献

[1] 邓景辉. 高速直升机关键技术与发展[J]. 航空学报202445(9): 529085.
  DENG J H. Key technologies and development for high-speed helicopters[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica202445(9): 529085 (in Chinese).
[2] MOUSHEGIAN A M, SMITH M J. Physics and accuracy of dual-solver simulations of rotors in ground effect[J]. Journal of the American Helicopter Society202368(1): 1-16.
[3] SUGIURA M, TANABE Y, SUGAWARA H, et al. Numerical simulations and measurements of the helicopter wake in ground effect[J]. Journal of Aircraft201754(1): 209-219.
[4] FLACHSBART O. Theorie der Hubschraube[J]. Zeitschrift für Flugtechnik und Motorluftschiffahrt192819(8): 177-183 [German].
[5] LIGHT J S. Tip vortex geometry of a hovering helicopter rotor in ground effect[J]. Journal of the American Helicopter Society199338(2): 34-42.
[6] SAIJO T, GANESH B, HUANG A, et al. Development of unsteadiness in a rotor wake in ground effect[C]∥21st AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference. Reston: AIAA, 2003.
[7] LEE T E, LEISHMAN J G, RAMASAMY M. Fluid dynamics of interacting blade tip vortices with a ground plane[J]. Journal of the American Helicopter Society201055(2): 22005-2200516.
[8] NATHAN N D. The rotor wake in ground effect and its investigation in a wind tunnel[D]. Glasgow: University of Glasgow, 2010.
[9] FEJTEK I, ROBERTS L. Navier-Stokes computation of wing/rotor interaction for a tilt rotor in hover[J]. AIAA Journal199230(11): 2595-2603.
[10] MEAKIN R. Moving body overset grid methods for complete aircraft tiltrotor simulations[C]∥11th Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference. Reston: AIAA, 1993.
[11] 朱秋娴, 招启军, 林永峰, 等. 倾转旋翼机多部件对机翼气动干扰的分析及优化[J]. 航空动力学报201732(6): 1505-1514.
  ZHU Q X, ZHAO Q J, LIN Y F, et al. Analysis and optimizations on aerodynamic interaction of tiltrotor aircraft multi-components on its wing[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power201732(6): 1505-1514 (in Chinese).
[12] LESTARI A, NIAZI S, RAJAGOPALAN R. Preliminary numerical analysis of a quad tilt rotor flowfield and performance [C]∥Tiltrotor Independent Aircraft Technology and Applications Specialists’ Meeting of the American Helicopter Society. 2001: 20-22.
[13] NARDUCCI R P, LIU J, WELLS A J, et al. CFD simulations of a hovering tiltrotor in ground effect[C]∥ AIAA Scitech 2024 Forum. Reston: AIAA, 2024.
[14] 王军杰, 陈仁良, 俞志明, 等. 倾转四旋翼飞行器地面效应和水面效应数值模拟[J]. 航空动力学报202439(12): 66-77.
  WANG J J, CHEN R L, YU Z M, et al. Numerical simulation of ground effect and water surface effect of quad tilt rotor aircraft[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power202439(12): 66-77 (in Chinese).
[15] 李鹏, 招启军. 悬停状态倾转旋翼/机翼干扰流场及气动力的CFD计算[J]. 航空学报201435(2): 361-371.
  LI P, ZHAO Q J. CFD calculations on the interaction flowfield and aerodynamic force of tiltrotor/wing in hover[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica201435(2): 361-371 (in Chinese).
[16] 王娜, 叶靓, 戚姝妮. 基于DES方法的倾转旋翼悬停计算研究[J]. 空气动力学学报201836(1): 57-63.
  WANG N, YE L, QI S N. Numerical study for tilt rotor in hover with detached eddy simulations[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica201836(1): 57-63 (in Chinese).
[17] 叶靓, 招启军, 徐国华. 基于非结构嵌套网格方法的旋翼地面效应数值模拟[J]. 航空学报200930(5): 780-786.
  YE L, ZHAO Q J, XU G H. Numerical simulation on flowfield of rotor in ground effect based on unstructured embedded grid method[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica200930(5): 780-786 (in Chinese).
[18] 王伟琪, 陈希, 招启军. 地效环境下悬停状态直升机旋翼桨/涡干扰噪声特性[J]. 航空学报202445(12): 129196.
  WANG W Q, CHEN X, ZHAO Q J. Hovering helicopter rotor blade/vortex interaction noise characteristics in ground effect environment[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica202445(12): 129196 (in Chinese).
[19] 雷鹏飞, 张家忠, 王琢璞, 等. 非定常瞬态流动过程中的Lagrangian拟序结构与物质输运作用[J]. 物理学报201463(8): 084702.
  LEI P F, ZHANG J Z, WANG Z P, et al. Lagrangian coherent structure and transp ort in unsteady transient flow[J]. Acta Physica Sinica201463(8): 084702 (in Chinese).
[20] 李高华, 王福新. 高雷诺数双螺旋涡尾迹演化特性分析[J]. 物理学报201867(5): 054701.
  LI G H, WANG F X. Evolution characteristic analysis of double-helical vortex wake of high Reynolds number flow[J]. Acta Physica Sinica201867(5): 054701 (in Chinese).
[21] HALLER G. An objective definition of a vortex[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics2005525: 1-26.
[22] HALLER G. Lagrangian coherent structures[J]. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics201547: 137-162.
[23] CARAENI M, WEST A, CARAENI D. Turbulent jet noise simulation and propagation using a 3rd order MUSCL/CD scheme on unstructured grid and Ffowcs-Williams Hawkings[C]∥Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Jets, Wakes and Separated Flows (ICJWSF2015). Cham: Springer, 2016: 389-397.
[24] DUFFAL V, DE LAAGE DE MEUX B, MANCEAU R. Development and validation of a hybrid RANS-LES approach based on temporal filtering[C]∥ASME-JSME-KSME 2019 8th Joint Fluids Engineering Conference. 2019.
[25] MAYS M D, LARDEAU S, LAIZET S. Capturing the drag crisis in the flow around a smooth cylinder using a hybrid RANS-LES model on coarse meshes[J]. International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow2023103: 109203.
[26] NELSON D A, JACOBS G B. DG-FTLE: Lagrangian coherent structures with high-order discontinuous-Galerkin methods[J]. Journal of Computational Physics2015295: 65-86.
[27] WANG W, CAO S L, DANG N N, et al. Study on dynamics of vortices in dynamic stall of a pitching airfoil using Lagrangian coherent structures[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology2021113: 106706.
[28] HALLER G. Lagrangian coherent structures from approximate velocity data[J]. Physics of Fluids200214(6): 1851-1861.
[29] 韩帅斌, 罗勇, 张树海. 空腔流动的拉格朗日涡动力学分析[J]. 航空工程进展201910(5): 691-697, 734.
  HAN S B, LUO Y, ZHANG S H. Lagrangian vortex dynamics in the open cavity flow[J]. Advances in Aeronautical Science and Engineering201910(5): 691-697, 734 (in Chinese).
[30] 曹小群, 宋君强, 任开军, 等. 有限时间Lyapunov指数的高精度计算新方法[J]. 物理学报201463(18): 180504.
  CAO X Q, SONG J Q, REN K J, et al. Highly accurate computation of finite-time Lyapunov exponent[J]. Acta Physica Sinica201463(18): 180504 (in Chinese).
[31] STEIJL R, BARAKOS G, BADCOCK K. A CFD framework for analysis of helicopter rotors[C]∥17th AIAA Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference. Reston: AIAA, 2005.
[32] GAWLIK E S, MARSDEN J E, DU TOIT P C, et al. Lagrangian coherent structures in the planar elliptic restricted three-body problem[J]. Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy2009103(3): 227-249.
[33] ABDELMOULA A, RAULEDER J. Aerodynamic performance of morphed camber rotor airfoils[C]∥AIAA Scitech 2019 Forum. Reston: AIAA, 2019.
文章导航

/