外并联型进气道模态转换过程中低速通道再起动特性研究

  • 张悦 ,
  • 杨刚 ,
  • 谭慧俊 ,
  • 张晗天 ,
  • 庞明池 ,
  • 张龙芝 ,
  • 高夏豪
展开
  • 南京航空航天大学

收稿日期: 2025-09-28

  修回日期: 2025-11-12

  网络出版日期: 2025-11-20

基金资助

国家自然科学基金;航天液体动力全国重点实验室基金

Restart characteristics of the low-speed duct during mode transition in an over-under inlet

  • ZHANG Yue ,
  • YANG Gang ,
  • TAN Hui-Jun ,
  • ZHANG Han-Tian ,
  • PANG Ming-Chi ,
  • ZHANG Long-Zhi ,
  • GAO Xia-Hao
Expand

Received date: 2025-09-28

  Revised date: 2025-11-12

  Online published: 2025-11-20

摘要

本文针对TBCC发动机由冲压动力向涡轮动力转换过程中进气道内非定常流动特征展开研究,通过试验与数值仿真相结合的方法分析了进气道整体波系变化过程以及沿程不同位置的压力变化规律,获得了进气道模态切换过程中低速通道再起动过程动态特性以及分流板转速对其的影响。结果表明:在考虑涡轮动力起动影响下进气道低速通道逐渐开启过程中低速通道会经历6个典型阶段:阶段1,分流板开启边界层气流进入通道,通道压力小幅下降;阶段2,超声速主流进入通道,通道压力大幅上升;阶段3,通道内流量积聚压力上升,激波串前传,随后越过放气腔,泄流压力下降,激波后移;阶段4,低速通道分离包不断膨胀与收缩,引起激波振荡;阶段5,分离包吐出通道,发生喘振;阶段6,下游节流度TR减小,喘振结束,低速通道恢复起动。在低速通道再起动过程中,分流板的转速会影响流道内压力振荡频率以及幅值,并且分流板转速越小,压力振荡频率越低幅值越大。此外,低速通道再起动过程中,分流板转速也会影响到喘振发生的时机,分流转速越小,越易引发进气道低速通道喘振。本文的研究可为组合动力发动机平稳模态转换提供理论支持。

本文引用格式

张悦 , 杨刚 , 谭慧俊 , 张晗天 , 庞明池 , 张龙芝 , 高夏豪 . 外并联型进气道模态转换过程中低速通道再起动特性研究[J]. 航空学报, 0 : 1 -0 . DOI: 10.7527/S1000-6893.2025.32842

Abstract

This paper investigates the unsteady flow characteristics within the inlet during the ram-to-turbo transition of a Turbine-Based Combined Cycle (TBCC) engine, through a combined approach of wind tunnel testing and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations analyzing the evolution of the inlet shock system and the static pressure variation patterns along critical flowpath stations, acquiring the dynamic restart characteristics of the low-speed duct during inlet mode transition and the influence of flow splitter rotational speed on this process. The results indicate that during the progressive opening of the low-speed duct under turbine-mode startup conditions, six distinct phases occur: in phase 1 flow splitter deployment initiates boundary layer ingestion into the duct, causing minor static pressure drop; in phase 2 supersonic core flow enters the duct, triggering significant static pressure rise; in phase 3 flow accumulation induces pressure buildup and shock train forward propagation, followed by shock traversal past the bleed cavity, with subsequent cavity depressurization causing shock recession; in phase 4 cyclic expansion/contraction of the low-speed duct separation bubble induces shock oscillation; in phase 5 shock expulsion along the separation bubble triggers inlet buzz; in phase 6 reduction in downstream Throttling Ratio (TR) terminates buzz, enabling low-speed duct restart. During the low-speed duct restart process, the rotational speed of the flow splitter vanes influences both the frequency and amplitude of pressure oscillations within the flowpath, with lower rotational speeds resulting in reduced oscillation frequencies and increased amplitudes. Moreover, during low-speed duct restart, the rotational speed also affects the onset timing of buzz, where lower speeds more readily trigger inlet buzz in the low-speed duct. This study provides a theoretical foundation for achieving smooth mode transition in combined-cycle engines.

参考文献

[1]向先宏, 钱战森, 张铁军.进气道模态转换气动技术研究综述[J].航空科学技术, 2017, 28(01):10-18
[2]罗金玲, 李超, 徐锦.高超声速飞行器机体推进一体化设计的启示[J].航空学报, 2015, 36(01):39-48
[3]贺进, 薛伟鹏, 张维涛, 等.航空发动机涡轮部件技术特征分析与发展预测[J].燃气涡轮试验与研究, 2025, 38(02):20-32
[4]Curran E T, Murthy S N B. Progress in astronautics and aeronautics[J]. Scramjet propulsion, 2001, 189.
[5]Canan J W.BREATHING NEW HOPE INTO HY-PERSONICS-Interest in hypersonics gains momentum following successful ground tests of the X-51A scramjet engine[J].Aerospace America, 2007, 45(11):26-
[6]Zhang H J, Guo R W, Li B.Research status of TBCC inlet and its key technologies[J].Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2010, 28(5):613-620
[7]王子运, 于航, 张悦, 等.空天飞行器可调进气系统关键问题研究进展[J].航空学报, 2024, 45(11):21-57
[8]陈树生, 贾苜梁, 刘衍旭, 等.变体飞行器变形方式及气动布局设计关键技术研究进展[J].航空学报, 2024, 45(06):7-53
[9] Thomas S R.TBCC discipline overview. Hypersonics project[C]//2011 Technical Conference. 2011 (E-17800).
[10]乐嘉陵, 胡欲立, 刘陵.双模态超燃冲压发动机研究进展[J].实验流体力学, 2000, 14(1):1-12
[11] Wat A Y, Miyagi H, Sekido T.Conceptual design study on combined cycle engine for hypersonic transport[J]. Paper No. ISABE93, 1993, 7066.
[12]陈大光.高超声速飞行与 方案简介[J].航空发动机, 2006, 32(3):10-13
[13] Albertson C, Emami S, Trexler C.Mach 4 test results of a dual-flowpath, turbine based combined cycle in-let[C]//14th AIAA/AHI Space Planes and Hypersonic Systems and Technologies Conference. 2006: 8138.
[14] Xianhong X, Yuan L, Zhansen Q.Aerodynamic design and numerical simulation of over-under turbine-based combined-cycle (TBCC) inlet mode transition[J]. Pro-cedia Engineering, 2015, 99: 129-136.
[15]李圣黄, 孙波, 唐琳, 等.攻角对 进气道模态转换起动特性影响研究[J].兵器装备工程学报, 2022, 43(7):171-179
[16] Li N, Chang J, Jiang C, et al.Unstart/restart hysteresis characteristics analysis of an over–under TBCC inlet caused by backpressure and splitter[J]. Aerospace Sci-ence and Technology, 2018, 72: 418-425.
[17]Yu H, Zhang Y, Chen L, et al.Characteristics of com-bined-cycle inlet during mode transition in off-design state[J].AIAA Journal, 2023, 61(6):2601-2611
[18]Liang C, Zhang Y, Zhang H, et al.Unsteady flow characteristics in an over-under TBCC inlet during mode transition under unthrottled and throttled condi-tions[J].Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2024, 37(12):275-295
[19] 肖玲斐, 申涛, 黄向华, 等.涡轮基组合循环发动机控制问题概述[J]. 燃气涡轮试验与研究, 2010 (3): 59-62.
[20]袁永青, 徐腾宏, 叶巍.三维内并联进气道模态转换过程气动特性研究[J].燃气涡轮试验与研究, 2023, 36(05):1-10
[21]王德鑫, 褚佑彪, 刘难生, 等.高背压进气道中内外流耦合作用的大涡模拟[J].航空学报, 2021, 42(09):270-283
文章导航

/