基于分层插值的翼型CFD压力系数修正方法研究

  • 张旭 ,
  • 瓮哲 ,
  • 赵卓林 ,
  • 陈佳宁 ,
  • 赵梓斌 ,
  • 孙岩
展开
  • 1. 中国空气动力研究与发展中心计算空气动力研究所
    2. 沈阳飞机设计研究所
    3. 空天飞行空气动力科学与技术全国重点实验室
    4. 中国空气动力研究与发展中心 计算空气动力研究所
    5. 中国空气动力研究与发展中心

收稿日期: 2025-09-16

  修回日期: 2025-11-07

  网络出版日期: 2025-11-10

基金资助

国家数值风洞工程气动/结构耦合分析软件;空天飞行空气动力科学与技术全国重点实验室基金

Research on airfoil CFD pressure coefficient modification method based on layered interpolation

  • ZHANG Xu ,
  • WENG Zhe ,
  • ZHAO Zhuo-Lin ,
  • CHEN Jia-Ning ,
  • ZHAO Zi-Bin ,
  • SUN Yan
Expand

Received date: 2025-09-16

  Revised date: 2025-11-07

  Online published: 2025-11-10

摘要

由于计算网格分辨率、数值离散误差、湍流模型适配性等因素的影响,CFD预测的压力数据和试验压力数据之间会出现明显的偏差,直接使用CFD预测压力数据开展结构强度或气动弹性分析面临着一定的使用风险。针对传统单一插值方法在处理吸力峰和激波位置非连续变化压力系数修正时存在的精度不足和误差偏大问题,本文发展了一种基于分层插值的翼型CFD压力数据修正方法,用于获取高准确度、高分辨率的翼型压力分布数据。首先采用线性插值计算试验点位置试验压力分布数据与CFD预测压力分布数据的差量,然后利用拉普拉斯光顺方法将差量分解为连续光滑部分和非连续光滑部分,对压力差量连续光滑部分采用高阶插值、非连续光滑部分采用线性插值进行处理。插值后激波位置附近区域压力数据如仍存在局部跳跃现象,将采用激波位置检测和局部位置线性插值对翘曲部分进行光顺。使用RAE2822翼型的试验和CFD计算压力数据对方法进行了测试,并应用于DLR-F6翼身组合体和HIRENASD机翼的计算压力系数修正。测试和应用数据结果表明分层压力数据修正方法具有良好的精度,在较少的压力试验测量点情况下也可以获得比较准确的修正结果。

本文引用格式

张旭 , 瓮哲 , 赵卓林 , 陈佳宁 , 赵梓斌 , 孙岩 . 基于分层插值的翼型CFD压力系数修正方法研究[J]. 航空学报, 0 : 1 -0 . DOI: 10.7527/S1000-6893.2025.32788

Abstract

Due to the influence of calculation grid resolution, numerical discretization error, turbulence model adaptability and other factors, there will be obvious deviation between CFD predicted pressure data and experimental pressure data, so it is risky to directly use CFD predicted pressure data to carry out structural strength or aeroelastic analysis. In or-der to solve the problem of insufficient precision and large error of traditional single interpolation method when dealing with the pressure coefficient modified of discontinuous changes of suction peak and shock wave position, this paper develops a method for correcting airfoil CFD pressure data based on hierarchical interpolation, which is used to obtain airfoil pressure distribution data with high accuracy and high resolution. Firstly, the difference between the pressure distribution data at the test point and the pressure distribution data predicted by CFD is calculated by linear interpola-tion, and then the difference is decomposed into continuous smooth part and discontinuous part by Laplace smoothing method. The continuous smooth part of pressure difference is processed by high-order interpolation, and the discon-tinuous smooth part is processed by linear interpolation. If there is still warpage in the pressure data near the shock wave position after interpolation,the warped part will be smoothed by shock position detection and local position linear interpolation. The method is tested using the RAE2822 airfoil test and CFD computed pressure data, and applied to the DLR-F6 wing-body assembly and HIRENASD wing computed pressure coefficient modified. The results of test and application show that the delamination pressure data modified method has good accuracy, and can obtain more accurate modified results even under the condition of less pressure test measurement points.

参考文献

[1] LI R, ZHANG Y, CHEN H. Knowledge discovery with computational fluid dynamics: Supercritical air-foil database and drag divergence prediction[J]. Phys-ics of Fluids, 2023, 35(1).
[2] ZHOU H, XIE F, JI T, et al. Fast transonic flow pre-diction enables efficient aerodynamic design[J]. 2023, 35(2).
[3] YANG H, CHEN S, GAO Z, et al. Reynolds number effect correction of multi-fidelity aerodynamic distri-butions from wind tunnel and simulation dat[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2023, 35(10).
[4] WANG Z, ZHANG W, WANG X, et al. High precision aerodynamic heat prediction method based on data augmentation and transfer learning[J]. Aerospace Sci-ence and Technology, 2024, 155: 109663.
[5] 樊云翔,艾化楠,王明振,等. 基于深度学习的水上飞机非定常水载荷重构[J]. 航空学报,2024,45(20):129882.
FAN Y X,AI H N,WANG M Z,et al. Unsteady hydrodynamic load reconstruction of seaplane based on deep learning[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2024,45(20):129882 (in Chinese).
[6] ZHAO X, Deng Z C, Zhang W. Sparse reconstruction of surface pressure coefficient based on compressed sensing[J]. Experiments in Fluids, 2022, 63(10):156.
[7] 罗长童, 胡宗民, 刘云峰, 等. 高超声速风洞气动力/热试验数据天地相关性研究进展[J]. 实验流体力学, 2020, 34(3): 78-89.
LUO C T, HU Z M, LIU Y F, et al. Research progress on the correlation between heaven and earth of aero-dynamic/thermal test data in hypersonic wind tunnel [J]. Experimental Fluid Mechanics, 2020, 34 (3): 78-89 (in Chinese).
[8] DOWELL E H. Eigenmode analysis in unsteady aero-dynamics-Reduced-order models[J]. AIAA Journal, 1996, 34(8):1578-1583.
[9] 邓 晨,陈 功,王文正, 等. 基于飞行试验和风洞试验数据的融合算法研究[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2022, 40(6): 45-50.
DENG C, CHEN G, WANG W Z, et al. Research on the data fusion algorithm based on flight test data and wind tunnel test data[J]. ActaAerodynamica Sinica, 2022, 40(6): 45-50 (in Chinese).
[10] LI S, GAO Z, GAO C, et al. A Successive Gappy Proper Orthogonal Decomposition Approach and Its Application to Inverse Airfoil Design[C]//55th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting. 2017:0709.
[11] JIANG C, SOH Y C, Li H. Sensor and CFD data fu-sion for airflow field estimation[J]. applthermaleng, 2016, 78:149-161.
[12] MOHAMED A, WOOD D. Deep learning predictions of unsteady aerodynamic loads on an airfoil model pitched over the entire operating range[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2023, 35(5).
[13] LEI R, BAI J, WANG H, et al. Deep learning based multistage method for inverse design of supercritical airfoil[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2021, 119: 107101.
[14] LI K, KOU J, ZHANG W. Learning for Multifidelity Aerodynamic Distribution Modeling from Experi-mental and Simulation Data[J]. AIAA Journal, 2022, 60(7):4413-4427.
[15] KOU J, NING C, ZHANG W. Transfer Learning for Flow Reconstruction Based on Multifidelity Data[J]. AIAA Journal, 2022, 60(10):5821-5842.
[16] WANG X, KOU J, ZHANG W. Unsteady aerodynamic prediction for iced airfoil based on multi-task learn-ing[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2022, 34(8).
[17] YU J, HESTHAVEN J S.Flowfield reconstruction method using artificial neural network[J]. AIAA Journal, 2019, 57(2):482-498.
[18] LIU X, FENG Z, CHEN Y, et al. Multiple optimized support vector regression for multi-sensor data fusion of weigh-in-motion system[J]. Proceedings of the In-stitution of Mechnical Engineers. Part D: Journal of Automobile Engineering, 2020, 234(12):2807-2821.
[19] 孙岩,邓小刚,张征宇,等. 跨声速风洞模型变形测量实验中标记点影响研究[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2013, 31(6) :769-755.
SUN Y, DENG X G, ZHANG Z Y, et al. Targetinflu-ence on video model deformation experiments in transonic wind tunnel[J]. ACTA Aerodynamica Sinica, 2013, 31(6):769-755 (in Chinese).
[20] 孙岩, 江盟, 孟德虹, 等. 交互式棱柱网格生成中翘曲现象形成机制及消除算法[J] . 航空学报, 2021 , 42(6) : 124443.
SUN Y, JIANG M, MENG D H, et al. Formation mechanism and elimination algorithm of warpingin-interactive prismatic grid generation[J] . Acta Aero-nautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2021 , 42 (6) : 124443 (in Chinese).
[21] Rendall T C S, Allen C B. Unified fluid-structure interpolation and mesh motion using radial basis functions[J]. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2008, 74(10):1519-1559.
[22] RENDALL T C S , ALLEN C B. Multi-dimensional aircraft surface pressure interpolation using radial ba-sis functions[J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Me-chanical Engineers, Part G: Journal of Aerosapce En-gineering. 2008, 222(4):483-495.
[23] 孙岩,孟德虹,王运涛,等.基于径向基函数与混合背景网格的动态网格变形方法[J].航空学报,2016,37[05]:1462-1472.
SUN Y, MENG D H, WANG Y T, et al. Dynamic grid deformation method based on radial basis function and hybirid background grid[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2016,37[05]:1462-1472.
[24] BALLMANN J, DAFNIS A, KORSCH H, et al. Ex-perimental analysis of high Reynolds number aero-structural dynamics in ETW[R]. AIAA-2008-841, 2008 (in Chinese).
[25] 郭秋亭,孙岩,郭正,等.风洞试验雷诺数/静气动弹性效应分离方法[J].航空学报,2022,43(11):52631.
GUO Q T, SUN Y, GUO Z, et al. Separation method for Reynolds number/static aeroelastic coupling effect in wind tunnel test[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronauti-ca Sinica, 2022, 43(11):52631 (in Chinese).
文章导航

/