中国飞机强度研究所建所 60 周年专刊

飞翼布局飞行器体自由度颤振地面试验

  • 王彬文 ,
  • 宋巧治 ,
  • 陈浩宇
展开
  • 中国飞机强度研究所 强度与结构完整性全国重点实验室,西安 710065
.E-mail: asriwbw@vip.163.com

收稿日期: 2025-09-08

  修回日期: 2025-09-19

  录用日期: 2025-10-09

  网络出版日期: 2025-10-17

基金资助

陕西省科学技术协会青年人才托举计划(20240450)

Body freedom flutter ground test of flying wing aircraft

  • Binwen WANG ,
  • Qiaozhi SONG ,
  • Haoyu CHEN
Expand
  • National Key Laboratory of Strength and Structural Integrity,Aircraft Strength Research Institute of China,Xi’an 710065,China

Received date: 2025-09-08

  Revised date: 2025-09-19

  Accepted date: 2025-10-09

  Online published: 2025-10-17

Supported by

Young Talent Fund of Association for Science and Technology in Shanxi Province(20240450)

摘要

飞翼布局飞行器由于短周期模态频率较高,容易与结构的低阶弹性模态耦合从而引发体自由度颤振问题。针对当前体自由度颤振试验手段存在的不足,提出飞翼构型地面颤振试验方法,通过多激振器协同激励模拟结构刚体与弹性模态非定常气动力,实现体自由度颤振地面测试,建立基于计算流体力学(CFD)与面元法混合建模的刚弹耦合非定常气动力影响系数矩阵重构方法,可考虑机体厚度等效应影响,同时模型计算效率与常规面元法相当,满足体自由度颤振仿真分析及地面试验的要求,搭建了试验系统并针对飞行试验模型开展了地面试验,地面试验结果与飞行试验结果对比,颤振边界及颤振形态均吻合良好,证明了该技术在刚弹耦合气动弹性领域应用的可行性。

本文引用格式

王彬文 , 宋巧治 , 陈浩宇 . 飞翼布局飞行器体自由度颤振地面试验[J]. 航空学报, 2025 , 46(21) : 532758 -532758 . DOI: 10.7527/S1000-6893.2025.32758

Abstract

The flying-wing aircraft has a high short-period modal frequency, which is prone to coupling with the low-order elastic modes of the structure, thereby causing the body freedom flutter. In response to the shortcomings of the current body freedom flutter test methods, a ground flutter test method for the flying-wing aircraft is proposed. Through the coordinated excitation of multiple vibration exciter to simulate the unsteady aerodynamic forces of the rigid body and elastic modes of the structure, the ground test for the body freedom flutter is realized. A reconstruction method for the unsteady aerodynamic influence coefficient matrix of the rigid-elastic coupling based on the hybrid modeling of Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) and panel method is established, which can consider the effects of the aircraft thickness and other factors. In addition, this method’s calculation efficiency is comparable to that of the panel method, meeting the requirements of body freedom flutter analysis and ground tests. The ground test system was built and tests were carried out for the airplane model. The comparison of the ground test results with the flight test results shows that the flutter boundary and flutter modality are in good agreement, proving the feasibility of this technology in the field of rigid-elastic coupled aeroelasticity.

参考文献

[1] WU Z G, YANG C. Flight loads and dynamics of flexible air vehicles[J]. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics200417(1): 17-22.
[2] SU W H, CESNIK C E S. Nonlinear aeroelasticity of a very flexible blended-wing-body aircraft[J]. Journal of Aircraft201047(5): 1539-1553.
[3] 王立波, 唐矗, 杨超. 大展弦比飞翼刚弹耦合运动稳定性分析[J]. 西北工业大学学报201735(6): 1096-1104.
  WANG L B, TANG C, YANG C. Dynamic stability analysis of a flying wing considering the rigid-elastic coupling effects[J]. Journal of Northwestern Polytechnical University201735(6): 1096-1104 (in Chinese).
[4] 陈洋, 王正杰, 郭士钧. 柔性翼飞行器刚柔耦合动态特性研究[J]. 北京理工大学学报201737(10): 1061-1066.
  CHEN Y, WANG Z J, GUO S J. Analysis of rigid-flexible coupling dynamic characteristics of flexible wing aircraft[J]. Transactions of Beijing Institute of Technology201737(10): 1061-1066 (in Chinese).
[5] SALTARI F, RISO C, DE MATTEIS G, et al. Finite-element-based modeling for flight dynamics and aeroelasticity of flexible aircraft[J]. Journal of Aircraft201754(6): 2350-2366.
[6] RICHARDS P W, YAO Y, HERD R A, et al. Effect of inertial and constitutive properties on body-freedom flutter for flying wings[J]. Journal of Aircraft201653(3): 756-767.
[7] 岑飞, 聂博文, 刘志涛, 等. 低速风洞带动力模型自由飞试验[J]. 航空学报201738(10): 121214.
  CEN F, NIE B W, LIU Z T, et al. Free flight test with dynamic model in low speed wind tunnel[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica201738(10): 121214 (in Chinese).
[8] PENNING K, LOVE M, ZINK P, et al. GLA and flutter suppression for a SensorCraft class concept using system identification[C]∥26th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference. Reston: AIAA, 2008.
[9] 麻越垠, 陈万华, 王元兴, 等. 风洞模型支撑系统振动主动控制试验研究[J]. 机械强度201537(2): 232-236.
  MA Y Y, CHEN W H, WANG Y X, et al. Active vibration control experimental investigation on wind tunnel model support system[J]. Journal of Mechanical Strength201537(2): 232-236 (in Chinese).
[10] 刘基海, 谷迎松, 杨智春. 支撑刚度对飞翼模型固有模态和体自由度颤振特性的影响[J]. 振动工程学报201831(5): 727-733.
  LIU J H, GU Y S, YANG Z C. Influence of support stiffness on natural mode and body freedom flutter characteristics of a flying wing model[J]. Journal of Vibration Engineering201831(5): 727-733 (in Chinese).
[11] REGAN C D, TAYLOR B R. mAEWing1: Design, build, test-invited[C]∥AIAA Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference. Reston: AIAA, 2016.
[12] REGAN C D. mAEWing2: Conceptual design and system test[C]∥AIAA Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference. Reston AIAA, 2017.
[13] BERANEK J, NICOLAI L, BUONANNO M, et al. Conceptual design of a multi-utility aeroelastic demonstrator[C]∥13th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis Optimization Conference. Reston: AIAA, 2010.
[14] BURNETT E, ATKINSON C, BERANEK J, et al. NDOF simulation model for flight control development with flight test correlation[C]∥AIAA Modeling and Simulation Technologies Conference. Reston: AIAA, 2010.
[15] 石鹏涛. 翼身融合飞翼的体自由度颤振飞行试验研究[D]. 西安: 西北工业大学, 2020.
  SHI P T. Body freedom flutter flight test study of BWB flying wing[D]. Xi’an: Northwestern Polytechnical University, 2020 (in Chinese).
[16] 张桂玮, 刘召庆, 朱镭, 等. 地面颤振模拟试验技术研究进展[J]. 航空学报202445(10): 029229.
  ZHANG G W, LIU Z Q, ZHU L, et al. Research progress of ground flutter simulation test technology[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica202445(10): 029229 (in Chinese).
[17] 宋巧治. 基于鲁棒控制的多点激励力控制系统设计[D]. 西安: 西北工业大学, 2014.
  SONG Q Z. Multipoint exciting force control system design based on robust control[D]. Xi’an: Northwestern Polytechnical University, 2014 (in Chinese).
[18] WANG B W, FAN X L. Ground flutter simulation test based on reduced order modeling of aerodynamics by CFD/CSD coupling method[J]. International Journal of Applied Mechanics201911(1): 1950008.
[19] 李秋彦, 李刚, 魏洋天, 等. 先进战斗机气动弹性设计综述[J]. 航空学报202041(6): 523430.
  LI Q Y, LI G, WEI Y T, et al. Review of aeroelasticity design for advanced fighter[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica202041(6): 523430 (in Chinese).
[20] 许云涛, 吴志刚, 杨超. 地面颤振模拟试验中的非定常气动力模拟[J]. 航空学报201233(11): 1947-1957.
  XU Y T, WU Z G, YANG C. Simulation of the unsteady aerodynamic forces for ground flutter simulation test[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica201233(11): 1947-1957 (in Chinese).
[21] 贺顺, 杨智春, 谷迎松. 机翼跨音速颤振特性的频域分析[J]. 中国科学: 物理学 力学 天文学201444(3): 285-292.
  HE S, YANG Z C, GU Y S. Frequency domain analysis for wing transonic flutter[J]. Scientia Sinica (Physica, Mechanica & Astronomica), 201444(3): 285-292 (in Chinese).
[22] 宋巧治, 王彬文, 李晓东. 基于CFD的地面颤振模拟试验非定常气动力重构方法研究[J]. 振动与冲击202241(10): 40-46.
  SONG Q Z, WANG B W, LI X D. Unsteady aerodynamic model reproduction method for ground flutter simulation test based on CFD[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock202241(10): 40-46 (in Chinese).
文章导航

/