面向增强下游高速进气道流量捕获的涡流发生器调控机理及设计(25-32238重投)

  • 孙士珺 ,
  • 解潇 ,
  • 马凯夫 ,
  • 申丽辉
展开
  • 1. 北京理工大学
    2. 中国科学院力学研究所
    3. 北京机电工程总体设计部

收稿日期: 2025-07-16

  修回日期: 2025-09-23

  网络出版日期: 2025-10-09

Vortex generator control mechanism and design for enhancing downstream high-speed inlet flow capture(25-32238重投)

  • SUN Shi-Jun ,
  • JIE Xiao ,
  • MA Kai-Fu ,
  • SHEN Li-Hui
Expand

Received date: 2025-07-16

  Revised date: 2025-09-23

  Online published: 2025-10-09

摘要

高速进气道捕获流量因上游边界层增厚而下降,这将制约组合式动力的性能。以飞发一体化飞行器进气道上游部分为研究对象,采用数值仿真方法,开展了涡流发生器(Vortex Generator,VG)调控横截面密流分布的涡动力学机理研究,提出了以最大化进气道捕获流量为目的的对置型VG结构。结果表明,来流马赫数Ma=8时,该VG可使进气道捕获流量提升173%。VG通过诱导一对旋向相反的流向涡实现流量调控。在流向涡上洗侧,边界层内低能流体被卷入主流,速度剖面亏损,密流下降;在下洗侧,高能主流被输运至边界层,速度剖面饱满,边界层变薄,密流上升。若下洗强于上洗作用,流向涡整体表现为对流量捕获的增益。当流向涡在下洗侧相切时,其相互作用将强化下洗流动,增强高能主流向边界层的输运,提升流量捕获。相反,若在上洗侧相切,则上洗效应增强,不利于流量捕获。对置型VG,通过强化反向流向涡对下洗效应,提升输运主流至边界层的能力,从而增强下游进气道流量捕获。

本文引用格式

孙士珺 , 解潇 , 马凯夫 , 申丽辉 . 面向增强下游高速进气道流量捕获的涡流发生器调控机理及设计(25-32238重投)[J]. 航空学报, 0 : 1 -0 . DOI: 10.7527/S1000-6893.2025.32575

Abstract

High-speed inlet capture mass flow decreases when the upstream boundary layer thickens, which limits combined-cycle propulsion performance. Focusing on the upstream part of the inlet of the integrated flight engine aircraft, numerical simulation methods were used to study the vortex dynamics mechanism of the vortex generator (VG) regulating the cross-sectional velocity density distribu-tion. An opposed VG structure was proposed with the aim of maximizing the inlet capture mass flow rate. The results indicate that when the incoming Mach number Ma=8, the VG can increase the inlet capture mass flow by 173%. VG achieves flow control by inducing a pair of vortices with opposite directions of rotation. On the up-wash side of the streamwise vortex, low-energy fluid in the boundary layer is swept into the mainstream, resulting in a loss of velocity profile and a decrease in velocity density; On the down-wash side, high-energy mainstream is transported to the boundary layer, with a full velocity profile, thinning of the boundary layer, and rising of velocity density. If the down-wash effect is stronger than the up-wash effect, the overall performance of the streamwise vortex is a gain in mass flow capture. When the streamwise vortex is tangent to the down-wash side, its interaction will strengthen the down-wash flow, enhance the transport of high-energy mainstream to the boundary layer, and improve mass flow capture. On the contrary, if the up-wash side is tangent, the up-wash effect is enhanced, which is not conducive to mass flow capture. Opposed VG enhances the ability to transport mainstream to the boundary layer by strengthening the down-wash effect of stream-wise vortices, thereby increasing downstream inlet mass flow capture.

参考文献

[1] 易仕和, 丁浩林. 适用高超声速飞行环境的超声速气膜冷却光学窗口研究进展[J]. 空天防御, 2021, 4(04): 1-13.
YI S H, DING H L. Research Progress of Optical Aper-ture with Supersonic Film Cooling Under Hypersonic Flight Environment[J]. Air & Space Defense, 2021, 4(04): 1-13 (in Chinese).
[2] 罗飞腾, 渠镇铭, 李海涛, 等. 高超声速进气道预喷注技术研究进展与关键问题分析[J/OL]. 航空学报, (2024-10-25) [2025-5-8]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.1929.V.20241025.1002.004.html.
LUO F T, QIU Z M, Li H T, et al. Research pro-gress and key issues analysis of inlet pre-injection at hypersonic condition[J/OL]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, (2024-10-25) [2024-10-25]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.1929.V.20241025.1002.004.html.
[3] 李俊红, 靳旭红, 刘春风. 临近空间高速飞行器微量气动力试验及计算[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(06): 102-112.
LI J H, JIN X H, LIU C F. Microaerodynamic experi-ment and computation of near space high speed vehi-cles[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2023, 44(06): 102-112 (in Chinese).
[4] 屈峰, 王青, 程少文. 基于气动/轨迹/控制耦合的飞/发一体高超声速飞机气动外形优化设计[J]. 航空学报, 2025, 46(04): 56-72.
QU F, WANG Q, CHENG S W, et al. Aerodynamic shape optimization design of airframe/propulsion inte-grated hypersonic aircraft with aerodynam-ics/trajectory/control coupling[J]. Acta Aeronautica et As-tronautica Sinica, 2025, 46(04): 56-72 (in Chinese).
[5] CHEN L, ZHANG Y, ZHANG H, et al. Unsteady flow characteristics in an over-under TBCC inlet during mode transition under unthrottled and throttled conditions[J]. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2024, 37(12): 275-295.
[6] RAMETTE P, CORDE J C. Aircraft engine integration for the M88-RAFALE couple[J]. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 1992, 92: 403.
[7] FRICK C W, DAVIS W F, Randall L M. An Experi-mental investigation of NACA submerged-duct entranc-es[J]. Technical Report Archive & Image Library, 1945: 1-57.
[8] PEAKE D, HENRY F, PEARCEY H. Viscous flow control with air-jet vortex generators[C] //17th Applied Aerodynamics Conference. 1999: 3175.
[9] ANDERSON B H, TINAPPLE J, SURBER L. Optimal control of shock wave turbulent boundary layer interac-tions using micro-array actuation[C] //3rd AIAA Flow Control Conference. 2006: 3197.
[10] ANDERSON B H. Design of supersonic inlets by a computer program incorporating the method of character-istics[R]. 1969.
[11] PECKHAM D H, ATKINSON S A. Preliminary results of low speed wind tunnel tests on a gothic wing of aspect ratio 10[C] //Aeronautical Research Council.1957.
[12] 王梦格, 何小明, 王娟娟. 基于振荡式涡流发生器的激波/边界层干扰控制方法[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(20): 204-219.
WANG M G, HE X M, WANG J J, et al. Shock wave/boundary layer interaction control method based on oscillating vortex generator[J]. Acta Aeronautica et As-tronautica Sinica, 2023, 44(20): 204-219 (in Chinese).
[13] PITT FORD C, BABINSKY H. Micro-ramp control for oblique shock wave/boundary layer interactions[C] //37th AIAA. 2007: 4115.
[14] PAUL A R, JOSHI S, JINDAL A, et al. Experimental studies of active and passive flow control techniques ap-plied in a twin air-intake[J]. The Scientific World Journal, 2013(1): 523759.
[15] 李子亮, 于洋, 刘登丰. 基于SST k-ω的超声速气膜冷却湍流模型温度修正[J]. 载人航天, 2020, 26(1): 14-18.
LI Z L, YU Y, LIU D F. Temperature modification of su-personic film cooling turbulence model based on SST k-ω[J]. Manned Spaceflight, 2020, 26(1): 14-18 (in Chi-nese).
[16] GAO Z, JIANG C, PAN S. Combustion Heat-Release Effects on Supersonic Compressible Turbulent Boundary Layers[J]. Aiaa Journal, 2015, 53(7): 1949-1968.
[17] HUANG W, LIU W D, LI S B. Influences of the turbu-lence model and the slot width on the transverse slot in-jection flow field in supersonic flows[J]. Acta Astro-nautica, 2012, 73(5): 1-9.
[18] PENG W, SUN X K, JIANG P X, et al. Effect of con-tinuous or discrete shock wave generators on supersonic film cooling[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2017, 108: 770-783.
[19] SMART M K, HASS N E, PAULL A. Flight data analy-sis of the HyShot 2 scramjet flight experiment[J]. AIAA Journal, 2006, 44(10): 2366-75..
[20] ODDO R, HILL J L, REEDER M F, et al. Effect of surface cooling on second-mode dominated hypersonic boundary layer transition[J]. Experiments in Fluids, 2021, 62(7): 144.
[21] ]李辰, 孙东, 刘朋欣, 等. 等离子体激励超声速湍流边界层的直接数值模拟[J/OL]. 航空学报, [2025-07-15].http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/dtail/11.1929.V.20250519.1710.022.html.
LI C, SUN D, LIU P X, et al. Direct Numerical Simulation of Supersonic Turbulent Boundary Layer with Plasma Actuation [J/OL]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, [2025-07-15].http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/dtail/11.1929.V.20250519.1710.022.html.
[22] LI X, YANG K, WANG X. Experimental and numerical analysis of the effect of vortex generator height on vortex characteristics and airfoil aerodynamic performance[J]. Energies, 2019, 12(5): 959.
文章导航

/