固体力学与飞行器总体设计

基于RBF增强直接概率积分法的板壳结构随机屈曲分析

  • 王超凡 ,
  • 周焕林 ,
  • 王选
展开
  • 1.合肥工业大学 工程力学系,合肥 230009
    2.大连理工大学 工业装备结构分析优化与CAE软件全国重点实验室,大连 116024
.E-mail: xuanwang@hfut.edu.cn

收稿日期: 2025-05-08

  修回日期: 2025-08-11

  录用日期: 2025-09-08

  网络出版日期: 2025-09-18

基金资助

国家自然科学基金(12202129);工业装备结构分析优化与CAE软件全国重点实验室开放课题(GZ23105)

RBF-enhanced direct probability integral method for stochastic buckling analysis of plate and shell structures

  • Chaofan WANG ,
  • Huanlin ZHOU ,
  • Xuan WANG
Expand
  • 1.Department of Engineering Mechanics,Hefei University of Technology,Hefei 230009,China
    2.State Key Laboratory of Structural Analysis,Optimization and CAE Software for Industrial Equipment,Dalian University of Technology,Dalian 116024,China

Received date: 2025-05-08

  Revised date: 2025-08-11

  Accepted date: 2025-09-08

  Online published: 2025-09-18

Supported by

National Natural Science Foundation of China(12202129);Open Project of State Key Laboratory of Structural Analysis, Optimization and CAE Software for Industrial Equipment(GZ23105)

摘要

板壳结构作为航空航天、船舶、建筑等工程领域的关键承载组件,其屈曲稳定性直接决定整体结构的安全性与可靠性。然而,材料属性离散性等因素显著影响屈曲临界载荷的分布特性,传统确定性分析方法难以准确量化此类随机影响。为此,提出一种径向基函数(RBF)增强的直接概率积分法(DPIM),用于高效求解板壳结构在多重随机变量作用下的屈曲临界载荷概率特性,为随机屈曲不确定性量化评估提供理论依据。通过RBF构建屈曲临界载荷与随机变量之间的高精度显式代理模型,有效减少原始直接概率积分法中实施耗时的屈曲有限元分析的计算代价。数值算例中将径向基函数增强的直接概率积分法与原始直接概率积分法、蒙特卡洛模拟方法进行对比,结果表明提出的方法在保持精度损失可控的同时,能显著提升计算效率。

本文引用格式

王超凡 , 周焕林 , 王选 . 基于RBF增强直接概率积分法的板壳结构随机屈曲分析[J]. 航空学报, 2026 , 47(3) : 232214 -232214 . DOI: 10.7527/S1000-6893.2025.32214

Abstract

As critical load-bearing components in aerospace, marine, and construction engineering fields, the buckling stability of plate and shell structures directly determines the safety and reliability of entire systems. However, factors such as material property variability significantly influence the distribution characteristics of critical buckling loads, the traditional deterministic analysis methods are hard to quantify the stochastic influence. The Radial Basis Function (RBF)-enhanced Direct Probability Integral Method (DPIM) is proposed to efficiently determine the probabilistic characteristics of buckling critical loads in plate and shell structures under multiple random variables, which provides theoretical foundations for stochastic buckling uncertainty quantification. By constructing a high-precision explicit surrogate model between critical buckling loads and random variables using RBF, this method effectively reduces the computational cost for implementing the time-consuming buckling finite element analysis in the original direct probability integral method. Comparative analyses with traditional DPIM and Monte Carlo simulation methods in numerical examples demonstrate that the proposed RBF-enhanced DPIM achieves remarkable computational efficiency improvements while maintaining controlled accuracy loss.

参考文献

[1] LIANG J Q, ZHAO F, WU D, et al. A numerical method for predicting bursting strength of composite rocket motor case considering filament winding process-induced stress[J]. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics202538(2): 103340.
[2] PRUSTY B G, SATSANGI S K. Analysis of stiffened shell for ships and ocean structures by finite element method[J]. Ocean Engineering200128(6): 621-638.
[3] KYU L, HWAN H. Probabilistic undrained resistance of subsea buried pipelines against upheaval buckling[J]. Ocean Engineering2025316: 119981.
[4] GAO Y, LI Z B, WEI X Y, et al. Advanced lightweight composite shells: anufacturing, mechanical characterizations and applications[J]. Thin-Walled Structures2024204: 112286.
[5] 孟亮, 杨金沅, 杨智威, 等. 典型飞机壁板结构的抗屈曲优化设计与试验验证[J]. 航空学报202445(5): 529679.
  MENG L, YANG J Y, YANG Z W, et al. Buckling-resisting optimization design of typical aircraft panel and test validation[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica202445(5): 529679 (in Chinese).
[6] KUMAR P, SRINIVASA C V. On buckling and free vibration studies of sandwich plates and cylindrical shells: A review[J]. Journal of Thermoplastic Composite Materials202033(5): 673-724.
[7] 苏少普, 常文魁, 陈先民. 飞机典型壁板结构剪切屈曲疲劳试验与分析方法[J]. 航空学报202243(5): 225219.
  SU S P, CHANG W K, CHEN X M. Fatigue buckling test and analytical approach of aircraft typical panel structures[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica202243(5): 225219 (in Chinese).
[8] MUSA A E S, AL-AINIEH M M K, AL-OSTA M A. Buckling of circular cylindrical shells under external pressures-A critical review[J]. Journal of Constructional Steel Research2025228: 109439.
[9] 陈志平, 焦鹏, 马赫, 等. 基于初始缺陷敏感性的轴压薄壁圆柱壳屈曲分析研究进展[J]. 机械工程学报202157(22): 114-129.
  CHEN Z P, JIAO P, MA H, et al. Advances in buckling analysis of axial compression loaded thin-walled cylindrical shells based on initial imperfection sensitivity[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering202157(22): 114-129 (in Chinese).
[10] 王博, 田阔, 郑岩冰, 等. 超大直径网格加筋筒壳快速屈曲分析方法[J]. 航空学报201738(2): 220387.
  WANG B, TIAN K, ZHENG Y B, et al. A rapid buckling analysis method for large-scale grid-stiffened cylindrical shells[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica201738(2): 220387 (in Chinese).
[11] XU X, CARRERA E, YANG H, et al. Evaluation of stiffeners effects on buckling and post-buckling of laminated panels[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology2022123: 107431.
[12] 黄艳, 王喆, 陈普会. 含缺陷变刚度层合板屈曲性能的数值分析方法[J]. 航空学报202344(24): 428576.
  HUANG Y, WANG Z, CHEN P H. Numerical analysis method for buckling behavior of variable stiffness laminates with defects[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica202344(24): 428576 (in Chinese).
[13] KIM H. Monte Carlo statistical methods[J]. Technometrics200042(4): 430-431.
[14] STEFANOU G. The stochastic finite element method: Past, present and future[J]. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering2009198(9/12): 1031-1051.
[15] WIENER N. The homogeneous chaos[J]. American Journal of Mathematics193860(4): 897.
[16] XIU D B, EM K. The Wiener: Askey polynomial chaos for stochastic differential equations[J]. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing200224(2): 619-644.
[17] CAUGHEY T K. Derivation and application of the Fokker-Planck equation to discrete nonlinear dynamic systems subjected to white random excitation[J]. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America196335(11): 1683-1692.
[18] KAMI?SKI M. The stochastic perturbation method for computational mechanics[M]. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2013.
[19] 李杰, 陈建兵. 随机结构动力反应分析的概率密度演化方法[J]. 力学学报200335(4): 437-442.
  LI J, CHEN J B. Probability density evolution method for analysis of stochastic structural dynamic response[J]. Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics200335(4): 437-442 (in Chinese).
[20] LI J, CHEN J B. Probability density evolution method for dynamic response analysis of structures with uncertain parameters[J]. Computational Mechanics200434(5): 400-409.
[21] CHEN G H, YANG D X. Direct probability integral method for stochastic response analysis of static and dynamic structural systems[J]. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering2019357: 112612.
[22] ZHANG X L, ZHANG K J, YANG X, et al. Transfer learning and direct probability integral method based reliability analysis for offshore wind turbine blades under multi-physics coupling[J]. Renewable Energy2023206: 552-565.
[23] WANG T F, ZHOU J S, SUN W J, et al. A DPIM-based probability analysis framework to obtain railway vehicle vibration characteristics considering the randomness of OOR wheel[J]. Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics202475: 103587.
[24] CHEN G H, GAO P F, LI H, et al. Fatigue reliability assessment of turbine blade via direct probability integral method[J]. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics202538(4): 103328.
[25] YANG D X, LIU J L, YU R F, et al. Unified framework for stochastic dynamic responses and system reliability analysis of long-span cable-stayed bridges under near-fault ground motions[J]. Engineering Structures2025322: 119061.
[26] REDDY J N. Theory and analysis of elastic plates and shells[M]. 2nd ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2006.
[27] BRUSH D O, ALMROTH B O, HUTCHINSON J W. Buckling of bars, plates, and shells[J]. Journal of Applied Mechanics197542(4): 911.
[28] TIMOSHENKO S P, WOINOWSKY-KRIEGER S. Theory of plates and shells[M]. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1959.
[29] ZIENKIEWICZ O C, TAYLOR R L, ZHU J Z. The finite element method: its basis and fundamentals[M]. 7th ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2013.
[30] POWELL M J D. Radial basis functions for multivariable interpolation: A review[C]∥1987 IMA Conference on Algorithms for the Approximation of Functions Ans Data. London: RMCS, 1987: 143-167.
[31] JIN R, CHEN W, SIMPSON T W. Comparative studies of metamodelling techniques under multiple modelling criteria[J]. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization200123(1): 1-13.
[32] FORRESTER D A I J, SóBESTER D A, KEANE P A J. Engineering design via surrogate modelling: A practical guide[M]. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2008.
[33] GOODFELLOW I, BENGIO Y, COURVILLE A. Deep learning[M]. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2016.
文章导航

/