中国飞机强度研究所建所 60 周年专刊

运输类飞机全机着陆地面载荷及影响因素

  • 刘小川 ,
  • 刘水不腐 ,
  • 惠旭龙 ,
  • 白春玉 ,
  • 李肖成
展开
  • 1.中国飞机强度研究所 强度与结构完整性全国重点实验室,西安 710065
    2.结构冲击动力学航空科技重点实验室,西安 710065
    3.陕西省飞行器振动冲击与噪声重点实验室,西安 710065
.E-mail: liuxiaochuan@cae.ac.cn

收稿日期: 2025-07-07

  修回日期: 2025-08-18

  录用日期: 2025-08-20

  网络出版日期: 2025-08-28

Full-aircraft landing ground load and influencing factors for transport aircraft

  • Xiaochuan LIU ,
  • Shuibufu LIU ,
  • Xulong XI ,
  • Chunyu BAI ,
  • Xiaocheng LI
Expand
  • 1.National Key Laboratory of Strength and Structural Integrity,Aircraft Strength Research Institute of China,Xi’an 710065,China
    2.Key Laboratory of Aviation Science and Technology on Structures Impact Dynamics,Xi’an 710065,China
    3.Shaanxi Province Key Laboratory of Aircraft Vibration,Impact and Noise,Xi’an 710065,China

Received date: 2025-07-07

  Revised date: 2025-08-18

  Accepted date: 2025-08-20

  Online published: 2025-08-28

摘要

全机着陆地面载荷是运输类飞机设计与性能优化的基本输入之一,为研究运输类飞机全机着陆的地面载荷特征及其影响因素,以典型单通道飞机简化模型实验件为对象,设计全机着陆实验方案,建立考虑机体柔性的全机着陆仿真分析模型,通过实验和仿真讨论着陆条件、机体质量以及机体柔性等因素对其地面载荷的影响规律。结果表明:通过全机着陆实验获得的飞机地面载荷可以有效考虑机体柔性的影响;全机着陆仿真模型具有较好的预测精度,与地面载荷实验结果的曲线峰值误差均在5%以内,相关系数均大于0.967;下沉速度对飞机着陆载荷影响最显著,敏感度系数为1.084;而俯仰角的影响最弱,敏感度系数仅为0.030。随着着陆质量的增大,地面载荷及缓冲器吸收功量显著增大,缓冲效率逐渐降低,地面载荷峰值、缓冲器吸收功量、缓冲器效率对着陆质量的敏感度分别为0.918、1.131和0.086;随着机体刚度的降低,机体柔性效应显著增强,地面载荷峰值、缓冲器吸收功量、缓冲器效率逐渐降低,机体柔性对运输类飞机着陆载荷的影响不可忽略。

本文引用格式

刘小川 , 刘水不腐 , 惠旭龙 , 白春玉 , 李肖成 . 运输类飞机全机着陆地面载荷及影响因素[J]. 航空学报, 2025 , 46(21) : 532521 -532521 . DOI: 10.7527/S1000-6893.2025.32521

Abstract

The full-aircraft landing ground load is one of the basic inputs for transport aircraft design and performance optimization. In order to study the characteristics of the ground load and its influencing factors during the full-aircraft landing, we take the typical single-channel simplified aircraft test piece as the object, designs the full-aircraft landing test scheme, and establishes the full-aircraft landing simulation analysis model which considers the flexibility of the fuselage. Through experimental and simulation analysis, the influence laws of landing conditions, fuselage weight, and fuselage flexibility on its ground load are discussed. The results show that the aircraft ground load obtained from the full-aircraft landing experiment can effectively consider influence of fuselage flexibility. The full-aircraft landing simulation model has a good prediction accuracy, the error between the curve peak and the ground load experimental result is within 5%, and the correlation coefficient is greater than 0.967. The landing velocity has the most significant effect on the aircraft landing load, and the sensitivity coefficient is 1.084. The effect of the pitch angle is the weakest, and the sensitivity coefficient is only 0.030. With the increase of landing weight, the ground load and the energy absorption amount of the buffer increase significantly, the buffer efficiency gradually decreases, and the sensitivity of the ground load peak, the buffer absorption energy, and buffer efficiency to the landing weight are 0.918, 1.131, and 0.086, respectively. With the decrease of the stiffness of the fuselage, the flexibility effect of the fuselage is significantly enhanced, and the ground load peak, the buffer absorption energy, and the efficiency gradually decrease. The influence of the fuselage flexibility on the transport aircraft landing load cannot be ignored.

参考文献

[1] 中国人民解放军总装备部. 军用飞机结构强度规范, 第4部分: 地面载荷: [S]. 北京: 总装备部军标出版发行部, 2008.
  General Armaments Department of the PLA. Military aircraft structural strength specification Part 4: Ground loads: [S]. Beijing: The General Armaments Department Published the Distribution Department, 2008 (in Chinese) .
[2] 航空航天工业部科学技术委员会. 飞机起落架强度设计指南[M]. 成都: 四川科学技术出版社, 1989.
  Science and Technology Committee of the Ministry of Aerospace Industry. Guide for strength design of aircraft landing gear[M]. Chengdu: Sichuan Scientific & Technical Publishers, 1989 (in Chinese).
[3] MICHAEL F. Theoretical and experiment principles of landing gear research and development[R]. Berlin: Luftfahrtforschung, 1937.
[4] SCHLAEFKE K. Buffer and unbuffered impact on landing gear[R]. Berlin: Telegraph Bureau, 1943.
[5] SCHLAEFKE K. On reciprocal effects between shock strut and tire in landing impact of airplane undercarriages[R]. Berlin: Telegraph Bureau, 1943.
[6] SCHLAEFKE K. On force deflection diagrams of shock struts[R]. Berlin: Telegraph Bureau, 1944.
[7] KOCHANWSKY W. Landing and taxing: Impacts on oleo shock-struts[R]. Berlin: Luftfahrtforschung, 1944.
[8] MARQUARD E, MEYER C W. Approximate calculation of the force between landing gear and fuselage of a landing aircraft[R]. Berlin: Luftfahrtforschung, 1943.
[9] MILWITZKY B, COOK F E. Analysis of' landing gear behavior: NACA TN 2755[R]. Washington, D.C.: NASA, 1953.
[10] FLUGGE W. Landing-gear-impact: NACA TN 2743[R]. Washington, D.C.: NASA, 1952.
[11] FLUGGE W. The influence of wheel spin upon landing gear impact: NACA TN 3217[R]. Washington, D.C.: NASA, 1954.
[12] 孟宪锋, 罗萌, 江辉, 等. 飞机着陆数值仿真及机场道面动载特性研究[J]. 振动与冲击202443(1): 308-318.
  MENG X F, LUO M, JIANG H, et al. Numerical simulation of aircraft landing and dynamic load characteristics of airport pavement[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock202443(1): 308-318 (in Chinese).
[13] 陈熠, 崔荣耀, 巨荣博, 等. 考虑机体动力特性的前起落架摆振分析[J]. 西北工业大学学报201836(2): 388-395.
  CHEN Y, CUI R Y, JU R B, et al. Simulation of nose landing gear shimmy with flexible airframe considered[J]. Journal of Northwestern Polytechnical University201836(2): 388-395 (in Chinese).
[14] 中国民用航空局. 运输类飞机适航标准: CCAR-25-R4 [S]. 北京: 中国民用航空局, 2011.
  CAAC. Transport aircraft airworthiness standards: CCAR-25-R4 [S]. Beijing: CAAC, 2011 (in Chinese).
[15] MAYO W L. Hydrodynamic impact of a system with a single elastic mode Ⅰ—The theory and generalized solution with an application to an elastic airframe: NASA R-1047 [R]. Washington, D.C.: NASA, 1952.
[16] COOK F E, MILWITZKY B. Effect of interaction on landing-gear behavior and dynamic loads in a flexible airplane structure: NACA 1278[R]. Washington, D.C.: NACA, 1955.
[17] 牟让科, 罗俊杰. 飞机结构弹性对起落架缓冲性能的影响[J]. 航空学报199516(2): 205-208.
  MU R K, LUO J J. Effect of aircraft structure flexibility on the shock-absorber behavior of landing gears[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica199516(2): 205-208 (in Chinese).
[18] 史友进. 大柔性飞机起落架缓冲器设计研究[D]. 南京: 南京航空航天大学, 2006.
  SHI Y J. Research on the design of landing gear buffer for large flexible aircraft[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2006 (in Chinese).
[19] 史友进, 张曾錩. 大柔性飞机着陆响应弹性机体模型[J]. 东南大学学报(自然科学版)200535(4): 549-552.
  SHI Y J, ZHANG Z C. Elastic model for flexible airplane landing impact analysis[J]. Journal of Southeast University (Natural Science Edition)200535(4): 549-552 (in Chinese).
[20] 史友进, 张曾錩. 大柔性飞机着陆撞击多质量块等效模型[J]. 航空学报200627(4): 635-640.
  SHI Y J, ZHANG Z C. An equivalent multi-mass system of a flexible airplane[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica200627(4): 635-640 (in Chinese).
[21] 张明, 卫夕阳, 杨子民, 等. 六轮小车式起落架地面载荷分析研究[J]. 西北工业大学学报202240(5): 1090-1099.
  ZHANG M, WEI X Y, YANG Z M, et al. Six-wheel trolley type landing gear ground load analysis study[J]. Journal of Northwestern Polytechnical University202240(5): 1090-1099 (in Chinese).
文章导航

/