离线学习与在线修正的运载火箭气动参数辨识
收稿日期: 2025-06-11
修回日期: 2025-06-17
录用日期: 2025-07-07
网络出版日期: 2025-07-25
基金资助
国防科技基础加强计划
Aerodynamic parameter identification of launch vehicle based on offline learning and online correction
Received date: 2025-06-11
Revised date: 2025-06-17
Accepted date: 2025-07-07
Online published: 2025-07-25
Supported by
National Defense Science and Technology Foundation Strengthening Program
基于模型的经典气动参数辨识方法无法解决运载火箭飞行过程中动压、攻角等关键参数难以在线获取和计算效率较低的问题,而基于数据驱动的智能辨识方法又过于依赖离线学习的数据质量,难以保证在线辨识精度。针对以上问题,提出了一种“离线学习+在线修正”的运载火箭气动参数在线辨识方法。在离线学习环节,利用长短期记忆神经网络(LSTM)从速度、位置和视加速度中学习并提取时序依赖关系,并将训练好的网络模型用于在线输出轴向力系数、法向力系数梯度、风向角和风速;在在线修正环节,基于网络模型的输出值,采用递推最小二乘(RLS)在线辨识气动参数误差增量,然后将误差增量与网络输出值叠加以得到气动参数辨识值。在仿真验证中,通过离线引入风场不确定性从而生成足量的训练数据以完成LSTM神经网络的离线学习,然后采用RLS在线修正气动参数,仿真结果表明:相比直接利用神经网络模型辨识气动参数,本文提出的“离线学习+在线修正”的辨识方法能够显著提高辨识精度,同时具备较高的计算效率。
胡碧宸 , 胡亮亮 , 刘玉玺 , 谭述君 . 离线学习与在线修正的运载火箭气动参数辨识[J]. 航空学报, 2025 , 46(S1) : 732407 -732407 . DOI: 10.7527/S1000-6893.2025.32407
Classical model-based aerodynamic parameter methods cannot solve the key problems in launch vehicle flight, such as the difficulty of obtaining dynamic pressure and angle of attack online, and low computational efficiency. To address the above problems, this paper proposes an online aerodynamic parameter identification method for launch vehicles based on an “offline learning + online correction” framework. In the offline learning process, the Long Short-Term Memory neural network (LSTM) is used to learn and extract the time series features from velocity, position and apparent acceleration, and the trained network model is used to output the axial force coefficient, normal force coefficient gradient, wind direction angle and wind speed. In the online correction part, based on the output value of the network model, the Recursive Least Squares (RLS) is used to identify the error increment of the aerodynamic parameters online, and then the error increment is superimposed with the network output value to obtain the online identification value of the aerodynamic parameters. In the simulation verification, the wind field uncertainty is introduced offline to generate sufficient training data for the LSTM neural network, and then the aerodynamic parameters are corrected online in combination with the RLS. The simulation results show that compared with using the neural network model alone, the identification method of'offline learning + online correction'proposed in this paper can significantly improve the identification accuracy while maintaining high computational efficiency.
| [1] | TAI S, BU C, WANG Y L, et al. Identification of lateral-directional aerodynamic parameters via an online correction wind tunnel virtual flight test[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2025, 157: 109788. |
| [2] | 臧剑文, 刘君, 苏红星, 等. 基于非结构动网格的导弹动导数智能补偿辨识算法[J/OL]. 航空动力学报, (2024-11-25)[2025-06-11]. . |
| ZANG J W, LIU J, SU H X, et al. Intelligent compensation identification algorithm of missile dynamic derivative based on unstructured dynamic grid[J/OL]. Journal of Aerospace Power, (2024-11-25)[2025-06-11]. . | |
| [3] | WANG L X, ZHAO R, ZHANG Y, et al. Angular acceleration estimation and aerodynamic parameter identification based on angular velocity equivalent model[J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 2024, 238(10): 959-973. |
| [4] | WANG S Y, CHEN Y L, CAI P C. The impact of sensor positions on aerodynamic parameter identification[J]. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2025, 2955(1): 012001. |
| [5] | 安帅斌. 高机动飞机气动参数在线辨识与自适应控制[D]. 大连: 大连理工大学, 2022: 22-41. |
| AN S B. Online identification of aerodynamic parameters and adaptive attitude control of high maneuver air-craft[D]. Dalian: Dalian University of Technology, 2022: 22-41 (in Chinese). | |
| [6] | 徐若洋. 基于风洞飞行试验的非线性气动力在线建模方法研究[D]. 成都: 电子科技大学, 2023: 40-52. |
| XU R Y. Study on the nonlinear aerodynamic online modeling method based on wind tunnel flight test[D]. Chengdu: University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, 2023: 40-52 (in Chinese). | |
| [7] | 耿宏, 段振亚. 基于改进SPBO优化算法的飞机气动参数辨识[J]. 兵器装备工程学报, 2021, 42(10): 176-181. |
| GENG H, DUAN Z Y. Aerodynamic parameter identification of aircraft based on improved SPBO[J]. Journal of Ordnance Equipment Engineering, 2021, 42(10): 176-181 (in Chinese). | |
| [8] | BAI W Y, JIA R Z, YU P, et al. On extended state Kalman filter-based identification algorithm for aerodynamic parameters[J]. Control Theory and Technology, 2024, 22(2): 235-243. |
| [9] | KWASNIOK F. Estimation of noise parameters in dynamical system identification with Kalman filters[J]. Physical Review E, 2012, 86(3): 036214. |
| [10] | 朱豪坤, 鱼小军, 罗艳伟, 等. 基于方程误差最小二乘的制导航空炸弹高空气动参数辨识[J]. 弹箭与制导学报, 2023, 43(5): 63-67. |
| ZHU H K, YU X J, LUO Y W, et al. Aerodynamic parameters identification of aerial guided bomb based on equation error least square in high altitude environment[J]. Journal of Projectiles, Rockets, Missiles and Guidance, 2023, 43(5): 63-67 (in Chinese). | |
| [11] | 崔乃刚, 卢宝刚, 傅瑜, 等. 基于卡尔曼滤波的再入飞行器气动参数辨识[J]. 中国惯性技术学报, 2014, 22(6): 755-758. |
| CUI N G, LU B G, FU Y, et al. Aerodynamic parameter identification of a reentry vehicle based on Kalman filter method[J]. Journal of Chinese Inertial Technology, 2014, 22(6): 755-758 (in Chinese). | |
| [12] | 余舜京, 程艳青, 钱炜祺. 跨声速气动参数在线辨识方法研究[J]. 宇航学报, 2011, 32(6): 1211-1216. |
| YU S J, CHENG Y Q, QIAN W Q. Research on transonic aerodynamic parameter online identification[J]. Journal of Astronautics, 2011, 32(6): 1211-1216 (in Chinese). | |
| [13] | GARCIA-VELO J, WALKER B K. Aerodynamic parameter estimation for high-performance aircraft using extended Kalman filtering[J]. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 1997, 20(6): 1257-1260. |
| [14] | CHOWDHARY G, JATEGAONKAR R. Aerodynamic parameter estimation from flight data applying extended and unscented Kalman filter[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2010, 14(2): 106-117. |
| [15] | MOHAMAD A, KARIMI J, NADERI A. Dynamic aerodynamic parameter estimation using a dynamic particle swarm optimization algorithm for rolling airframes[J]. Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering, 2020, 42(11): 579. |
| [16] | 康其庄, 王康健, 易文俊, 等. 有控弹箭气动参数辨识技术[J]. 兵器装备工程学报, 2024, 45(5): 209-214. |
| KANG Q Z, WANG K J, YI W J, et al. Research on aerodynamic parameter identification technology of controlled projectile[J]. Journal of Ordnance Equipment Engineering, 2024, 45(5): 209-214 (in Chinese). | |
| [17] | 杨广慧, 杜立夫, 李辉, 等. 基于BP神经网络的飞行器参数辨识与自适应控制[J]. 航天控制, 2021, 39(5): 3-7. |
| YANG G H, DU L F, LI H, et al. Parameter identification and adaptive control of aircraft based on BP neural network[J]. Aerospace Control, 2021, 39(5): 3-7 (in Chinese). | |
| [18] | 付军泉, 钟伯文, 钟运琴, 等. 基于物理信息神经网络的飞机气动参数辨识方法[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2023, 41(9): 30-37. |
| FU J Q, ZHONG B W, ZHONG Y Q, et al. A physics informed neural network based method for aircraft aerodynamic parameter identification[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2023, 41(9): 30-37 (in Chinese). | |
| [19] | 吕吉星. 高超声速飞行器气动参数在线辨识及自适应抗扰控制[D]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工业大学, 2021: 24-50. |
| Lü/LV/LU/LYU) J X. Online aerodynamic parameter estimation and adaptive disturbance rejection control for hypersonic vehicle[D]. Harbin: Harbin Institute of Technology, 2021: 24-50 (in Chinese). | |
| [20] | 魏晓良, 潮群, 陶建峰, 等. 基于LSTM和CNN的高速柱塞泵故障诊断[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(3): 423876. |
| WEI X L, CHAO Q, TAO J F, et al. Cavitation fault diagnosis method for high-speed plunger pumps based on LSTM and CNN[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2021, 42(3): 423876 (in Chinese). | |
| [21] | 陈谦, 冯源, 陈嘉雯, 等. 基于Bi-LSTM网络的时变综合负荷模型参数辨识[J]. 电力电子技术, 2024, 58(11): 67-71. |
| CHEN Q, FENG Y, CHEN J W, et al. Bi-LSTM-based time varying parameter identification for composite load modeling[J]. Power Electronics, 2024, 58(11): 67-71 (in Chinese). | |
| [22] | 初未萌, 杨今朝, 邬树楠, 等. 基于LSTM的空间机器人系统惯性张量在轨辨识[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(11): 524615. |
| CHU W M, YANG J Z, WU S N, et al. LSTM-based on-orbit identification of inertia tensor for space robot system[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2021, 42(11): 524615 (in Chinese). |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |