电子电气工程与控制

数据-知识双驱动的编队目标意图识别方法

  • 刘祥雨 ,
  • 王刚 ,
  • 王思远 ,
  • 陈卓文
展开
  • 1.空军工程大学 防空反导学院,西安 710051
    2.空军工程大学 航空工程学院,西安 710051
.E-mail: 982268878@qq.com

收稿日期: 2025-04-27

  修回日期: 2025-05-15

  录用日期: 2025-06-12

  网络出版日期: 2025-06-27

基金资助

国家自然科学基金(62402521)

A data-knowledge dual-driven method for formation target intention recognition

  • Xiangyu LIU ,
  • Gang WANG ,
  • Siyuan WANG ,
  • Zhuowen CHEN
Expand
  • 1.Air and Missile Defense College,Air Force Engineering University,Xi’an 710051,China
    2.Aeronautical Engineering College,Air Force Engineering University,Xi’an 710051,China
E-mail: 982268878@qq.com

Received date: 2025-04-27

  Revised date: 2025-05-15

  Accepted date: 2025-06-12

  Online published: 2025-06-27

Supported by

National Natural Science Foundation of China(62402521)

摘要

复杂对抗下的防空作战中,如何对战场目标的意图进行识别成为防空作战态势认知的关键,针对编队目标意图识别过程中的状态变化灵活、意图规律性强等特点,提出了数据-知识双驱动的编队目标意图识别方法,首先设计了数据-知识双驱动的意图识别总体框架,采取串联结合方式解决单一方法的局限性。其次基于该框架设计数据驱动的基于双向长短时记忆网络和条件生成对抗网络的目标状态预测(BC-TSP)方法,解决知识驱动全局搜索能力不足的问题。而后提出了知识驱动的基于模糊决策树的意图推理方法,解决数据驱动解空间爆炸、可解释性低的问题。最后分别进行实验验证,结果分析表明本方法既有着优秀的时序特征数据学习能力,能准确预测编队目标未来的状态信息,又可以根据实际情况高效利用不完备的先验知识,通过可解释性强的推理方式获得编队目标的最终意图,满足防空作战指挥员的态势认知需求,辅助其更好地进行决策。

本文引用格式

刘祥雨 , 王刚 , 王思远 , 陈卓文 . 数据-知识双驱动的编队目标意图识别方法[J]. 航空学报, 2026 , 47(2) : 332170 -332170 . DOI: 10.7527/S1000-6893.2025.32170

Abstract

In complex adversarial air defense operations, the identification of battlefield target intent has become crucial for situational awareness. To address the characteristics of flexible state variations and strong regularity in the intent of formation targets, this paper proposes a data-knowledge dual-driven method for formation target intent recognition. First, a hybrid framework of data-knowledge dual-driven intent recognition is designed to address the limitations of using either approach alone. Subsequently, based on this framework, a data-driven Target State Prediction (BC-TSP) method is proposed to solve the problem of insufficient knowledge-driven global search capability, combining Bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory (BiLSTM) and Conditional Generative Adversarial Network (CGAN). Furthermore, a knowledge-driven intent inference method based on fuzzy decision trees is introduced to solve the problem of data-driven solution space explosion and low interpretability. Comprehensive experimental validation demonstrates that the proposed method not only exhibits strong temporal feature learning capability, enabling accurate prediction of future formation target states, but also efficiently leverages incomplete prior knowledge through a highly interpretable reasoning process to determine the final intent of formation targets. This approach satisfies the situational awareness needs of air defense commanders, assisting them in making better-informed tactical decisions.

参考文献

[1] 张会霞, 梁彦, 马超雄,等. 数据和知识驱动的空战目标集群类型综合识别[J]. 航空学报 202344(8): 327266.
  ZHANG H X, LIANG Y, MA C X, et al. Data- and knowledge-driven comprehensive identification of air combat target cluster types[J]. Journal of Aeronautics: 202344(8): 327266 (in Chinese).
[2] 饶佳人, 孙世庆, 李婷婷. 基于规则的空中作战编队识别[J]. 指挥信息系统与技术202112(3): 19-22, 29.
  RAO J R, SUN S Q, LI T T. Rule-based air combat formation recognition[J]. Command Information Systems and Technology202112(3): 19-22, 29 (in Chinese).
[3] 乔殿峰, 梁彦, 马超雄, 等. 多域作战下的群目标意图识别与预测[J]. 系统工程与电子技术202244(11): 3403-3412.
  QIAO D F, LIANG Y, MA C X, et al. Group target intent recognition and prediction under multi-domain operations[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics202244(11): 3403-3412 (in Chinese).
[4] 杨雨田, 杨杰, 李建国. 基于EMEBN的空中目标战术意图识别方法[J]. 火力与指挥控制202247(5): 163-170.
  YANG Y T, YANG J, LI J G. Tactical intent recognition method for air targets based on EMEBN[J]. Firepower and Command and Control202247(5): 163-170 (in Chinese).
[5] MENG G L, ZHAO R N, WANG B, et al.Target tactical intention recognition in multiaircraft cooperative air combat[J].International Journal of Aerospace Engineering2021(5): 1-18.
[6] 马钰棠, 孙鹏, 张杰勇, 等. 样本不平衡下的空中群组意图识别方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术202244(12): 3747-3755.
  MA Y T, SUN P, ZHANG J Yet al. An airborne cluster intent recognition method under sample imbalance[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics202244(12): 3747-3755 (in Chinese).
[7] 苟先太, 吴南方. 基于GRU-Attention神经网络的空中群组态势识别方法[J]. 计算机与现代化2019(10): 11-16, 33.
  GOU X T, WU N F. An airborne swarm posture recognition method based on GRU-Attention neural network[J]. Computer and Modernization2019(10): 11-16, 33 (in Chinese).
[8] 蒲志强, 易建强, 刘振 等. 知识和数据协同驱动的群体智能决策方法研究综述[J]. 自动化学报202248(3): 627-643.
  PU Z Q, YI J Q, LIU Zet al. A review of research on group intelligent decision-making methods driven by knowledge and data synergy[J]. Journal of Automation202248(3): 627-643 (in Chinese).
[9] 李洋军, 黄琦龙, 杨力, 等. 数据和知识双驱动的空中集群目标作战意图识别[J]. 兵工学报202546(2): 135-144.
  LI Y J, HUANG Q L, YANG L, et al. Data- and knowledge-driven combat intent recognition of airborne cluster targets[J]. Journal of Military Engineering2025, Vol. 46(2): 135-144 (in Chinese).
[10] 刘建伟, 谢浩杰, 罗雄麟. 生成对抗网络在各领域应用研究进展[J]. 自动化学报202046(12): 2500-2536.
  LIU J W, XIE H J, LO X L. Research progress of generative adversarial networks applied in various fields[J]. Journal of Automation202046(12): 2500-2536 (in Chinese).
[11] RADFORD A, METZ L, CHINTALA S. Unsupervised representation learning with deep convolutional generative adversarial networks[DB/OL]. arXiv preprint: 1511.06434, 2015.
[12] ARJOVSKY M, BOTTOU L. Towards principled methods for training generative adversarial networks[DB/OL]. arXiv preprint: 1701.04862, 2017.
[13] HOCHREITER S, SCHMIDHUBER J. Long short-term memory[J]. Neural computation19979(8): 1735-1780.
[14] 刘钻东, 陈谋, 吴庆宪 等. 非完备信息下无人机空战目标意图预测[J]. 中国科学: 信息科学202050(5): 704-717.
  LIU Z D, CHEN M, WU Q Xet al. Prediction of target intent for unmanned aerial combat under incomplete information[J]. Science in China: Information Science202050(5): 704-717 (in Chinese).
[15] MIRZA M, OSINDERO S. Conditional generative adversarial nets[J]. Computer Science2014: 2672-2680.
[16] ZHOU T, CHEN M, WANG Y, et al. Information entropy-based intention prediction of aerial targets under uncertain and incomplete information[J]. Entropy202022(3): 279.
[17] WANG L, LI S. Tactical intention recognition of aerial target based on XGBoost decision tree[J]. Journal of Measurement Science and Instrumentation20189(2): 148-152.
[18] 刘敏, 郎荣玲, 曹永斌. 随机森林中树的数量[J]. 计算机工程与应用201551(5): 126-131.
  LIU M, LANG R L, CAO Y B. The number of trees in random forest[J]. Computer Engineering and Applications201551(5): 126-131 (in Chinese).
[19] 陈浩, 任卿龙, 滑艺 等. 基于模糊神经网络的海面目标战术意图识别[J]. 系统工程与电子技术201638(8): 1847-1853.
  CHEN H, REN Q L, GUA Y et al. Fuzzy neural network-based tactical intent recognition of sea surface targets[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics Technology201638(8): 1847-1853 (in Chinese).
[20] 施伟, 冯旸赫, 程光权 等. 基于深度强化学习的多机协同空战方法研究[J]. 自动化学报202147(7): 1610-1623.
  SHI W, FENG Y H, CHENG G Qet al. Deep reinforcement learning based multi-aircraft cooperative air combat method[J]. Journal of Automation202147(7): 1610-1623 (in Chinese).
[21] 强立, 杨凡德, 施令. 空间态势认知产品生成及关键技术研究[J]. 指挥控制与仿真201840(3): 5-9, 13.
  QIANG L, YANG D F, SHI L. Research on spatial situational awareness product generation and key technologies[J]. Command Control and Simulation201840(03): 5-9, 13 (in Chinese).
文章导航

/