材料工程与机械制造

固化残余应力和变形对钛合金损伤构件CFRP单面贴补结构拉伸性能的影响

  • 范春浩 ,
  • 胡俊山 ,
  • 杨智勇 ,
  • 侯富森 ,
  • 陈培林 ,
  • 田威
展开
  • 1.南京航空航天大学 机电学院,南京 210016
    2.航天材料及工艺研究所,北京 100076
.E-mail: hujunshan@nuaa.edu.cn

收稿日期: 2025-03-19

  修回日期: 2025-04-25

  录用日期: 2025-06-10

  网络出版日期: 2025-06-13

基金资助

国家自然科学基金(52475160);江苏省自然科学基金(BK20231444);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金(NT2024013)

Effects of curing residual stress and deformation on tensile performance of CFRP single-sided patch-repaired titanium alloy damaged components

  • Chunhao FAN ,
  • Junshan HU ,
  • Zhiyong YANG ,
  • Fusen HOU ,
  • Peilin CHEN ,
  • Wei TIAN
Expand
  • 1.College of Mechanical and Electronic Engineering,Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics,Nanjing 210016,China
    2.Aerospace Research Institute of Materials & Technology,Beijing 100076,China

Received date: 2025-03-19

  Revised date: 2025-04-25

  Accepted date: 2025-06-10

  Online published: 2025-06-13

Supported by

National Natural Science Foundation of China(52475160);Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province(BK20231444);The Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities(NT2024013)

摘要

碳纤维复合材料(CFRP)由于力学性能优异、工艺实施性强等特点,常用来修复受损的航空金属构件,然而由于金属、胶层、补片的物理化学性质差异,成型后在贴补区域往往会引发固化残余应力并产生变形,对贴补结构承载性能造成影响。针对残余应力、固化变形的影响开展研究,设计了钛合金损伤构件CFRP单面贴补修复的拉伸试验,同时建立了从共固化胶接到准静态拉伸的多阶段数值分析方法。通过试验与仿真结果的综合分析,厘清了固化阶段胶层应变演化行为,对比了拉伸阶段应力-应变曲线、损伤失效形式,探究了固化工艺对拉伸性能的影响规律。结果发现,固化过程胶层应变可分为5个阶段,且仿真与试验误差不超过20%;拉伸过程考虑残余应力、固化变形的多阶段模拟方法,与试验所得应力-应变曲线更吻合,极限拉伸应力误差仅为1.39%,且仿真反映的各材料破坏形式与试验相同;在固化工艺方面,减缓升温速率、延长保温时间,有助于补片、胶层固化度提高、模量增大,并且使得承载方向上钛合金母板的拉应力减小、压应力增大,最终令结构表现出更优异的拉伸性能。

本文引用格式

范春浩 , 胡俊山 , 杨智勇 , 侯富森 , 陈培林 , 田威 . 固化残余应力和变形对钛合金损伤构件CFRP单面贴补结构拉伸性能的影响[J]. 航空学报, 2026 , 47(3) : 431997 -431997 . DOI: 10.7527/S1000-6893.2025.31997

Abstract

Due to its excellent mechanical properties and strong process feasibility, CFRP is commonly used to repair damaged aerospace metal components. However, the differences in physicochemical properties among the metal, adhesive layer, and patch often induce curing residual stresses and deformation in the bonded area after forming, which can affect the load-bearing performance of the repaired structure. This study investigates the effects of residual stress and curing deformation. Tensile tests were designed for single-sided CFRP patch repairs on damaged titanium alloy components, and a multi-stage numerical analysis method was established, covering the process from co-curing bonding to quasi-static tensile loading. Through comprehensive analysis of experimental and simulation results, the strain evolution behavior of the adhesive layer during the curing stage was clarified, the stress-strain curves and damage failure modes during the tensile stage were compared, and the influence of curing processes on tensile performance was explored. The results show that the strain in the adhesive layer during curing can be divided into five stages, with a simulation error of less than 20% compared to experimental data. The multi-stage simulation method, which accounts for residual stress and curing deformation, yields stress-strain curves that align more closely with experimental results, achieving an error of only 1.39% in ultimate tensile stress. Additionally, the failure modes of different materials observed in the simulation matched those in the experiments. Regarding curing processes, reducing the heating rate and extending the dwell time improved the curing degree and modulus of the patch and adhesive layer. This also reduced tensile stress and increased compressive stress in the titanium alloy substrate along the loading direction, ultimately enhancing the overall tensile performance of the structure.

参考文献

[1] 单忠德, 周征西, 孙正, 等. 航空航天先进复合材料三维预制体成形技术与装备研究[J]. 机械工程学报202359(20): 64-79.
  SHAN Z D, ZHOU Z X, SUN Z, et al. Research of 3D advanced aerospace composite preforms forming technology and equipment[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering202359(20): 64-79 (in Chinese).
[2] 谢金标, 孙运刚, 符彬. 复合材料胶接修复飞机金属结构关键技术及应用[J]. 航空维修与工程2023(2): 14-18.
  XIE J B, SUN Y G, FU B. Key technologies and application of bonded composite repair on metallic aircraft structure[J]. Aviation Maintenance & Engineering2023(2): 14-18 (in Chinese).
[3] HU J S, LI C Y, FANG J R, et al. Comparison of repair methods for cracked titanium alloy aircraft structures with single-sided adhesively bonded composite patches[J]. Materials202316(19): 6361.
[4] ERRAHMANE M A, BENYETTOU M, MADANI K, et al. Numerical and experimental analysis of the performance of the metal patch compared to the composite patch under aging conditions in water immersion[J]. International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives2025138: 103943.
[5] LIAN J Y, XU Z B, RUAN X D. Analysis and control of cured deformation of fiber-reinforced thermosetting composites: A review[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University: Science A201920(5): 311-333.
[6] NEGARESH M, NAZOCKDAST H, KATBAB A A. The impact of various curing methods on the curing process of polymer-fiber composites analyzed using analytical approach[J]. Results in Engineering202423: 102861.
[7] DEI SOMMI A, BUCCOLIERO G, LIONETTO F, et al. A finite element model for the prediction of porosity in autoclave cured composites[J]. Composites Part B: Engineering2023264: 110882.
[8] BLACKWELL C, SIMACEK P, CRANE R, et al. A model for the autoclave consolidation of prepregs during manufacturing of complex curvature parts[J]. International Journal of Material Forming202316(6): 61.
[9] YUAN Z Y, WANG Y J, YANG G G, et al. Evolution of curing residual stresses in composite using multi-scale method[J]. Composites Part B: Engineering2018155: 49-61.
[10] DING A X, LI S X, WANG J H, et al. A new path-dependent constitutive model predicting cure-induced distortions in composite structures[J]. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing201795: 183-196.
[11] 李冬娜. 树脂基复合材料固化行为的多尺度仿真研究[D]. 兰州: 兰州理工大学, 2018.
  LI D N. Multiscale simulation investigation of curing behavior in resin matrix composites[D]. Lanzhou: Lanzhou University of Technology, 2018 (in Chinese).
[12] KRAVCHENKO O G, KRAVCHENKO S G, PIPES R B. Cure history dependence of residual deformation in a thermosetting laminate[J]. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing201799: 186-197.
[13] SORRENTINO L, BELLINI C. Compaction influence on spring-in of thin composite parts: Experimental and numerical results[J]. Journal of Composite Materials201549(17): 2149-2158.
[14] FAN S J, ZHANG J M, WANG B, et al. A deep learning method for fast predicting curing process-induced deformation of aeronautical composite structures[J]. Composites Science and Technology2023232: 109844.
[15] TAKAGAKI K, MINAKUCHI S, TAKEDA N. Process-induced strain and distortion in curved composites. Part Ⅰ: Development of fiber-optic strain monitoring technique and analytical methods[J]. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing2017103: 236-251.
[16] CHEN C, NESBITT S, REINER J, et al. Cure path dependency of static and dynamic mode II interlaminar fracture toughness of interlayer toughened composite laminates[J]. Composites Science and Technology2020200: 108444.
[17] 彭益丰. 工艺参数对层间混杂复材制件固化残余应力及性能的影响[D]. 长沙: 中南大学, 2022.
  PENG Y F. Effects of process parameters on curing residual stress and properties of interlaminar hybrid composites[D]. Changsha: Central South University, 2022 (in Chinese).
[18] HUI X Y, XU Y J, ZHANG W H. An integrated modeling of the curing process and transverse tensile damage of unidirectional CFRP composites[J]. Composite Structures2021263: 113681.
[19] 刘振东, 郑锡涛, 范雯静, 等. 固化残余应力对无人机复合材料机翼强度的影响[J]. 航空学报202243(6): 526117.
  LIU Z D, ZHENG X T, FAN W J, et al. Effect of process-induced residual stress on strength of UAV composite wing[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica202243(6): 526117 (in Chinese).
[20] BAKER A A. Repair of cracked or defective metallic aircraft components with advanced fibre composites: an overview of Australian work[J]. Composite Structures19842(2): 153-181.
[21] AABID A, ROSLI M N S BIN, HRAIRI M, et al. Enhancing repair of cracked plate using fiber-reinforced composite patch: Experimental and simulation analysis[J]. Forces in Mechanics202518: 100302.
[22] PRADHAN S S, MISHRA U, BISWAL S K. Experimental study on mechanical performance of cracked aluminium alloy repaired with composite patch[J]. Materials Today: Proceedings202026: 2676-2680.
[23] WANG J, BAKER A, CHANG P. Hybrid approaches for aircraft primary structure repairs[J]. Composite Structures2019207: 190-203.
[24] AABID A, IBRAHIM Y E, HRAIRI M, et al. Optimization of structural damage repair with single and double-sided composite patches through the finite element analysis and taguchi method[J]. Materials202316(4): 1581.
[25] FERNANDES P H E, BAUMERT M, DIECKHOFF S, et al. Adhesively bonded composite patch repair in load-bearing applications for the aviation industry: manufacturing, design, and simulation[J]. Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures202548(4): 1447-1460.
[26] HU J S, KANG R H, FANG J R, et al. An experimental and parametrical study on repair of cracked titanium airframe structures with single-side bonded carbon fiber-reinforced polymer prepreg patches[J]. Composite Structures2024338: 118102.
[27] 方金荣, 胡俊山, 陈培林, 等. 航空钛合金损伤构件CFRP单面贴补修复界面I型断裂力学特性[J]. 复合材料学报202542(5): 2514-2527.
  FANG J R, HU J S, CHEN P L, et al. Mechanical characterization of mode I fracture at the interface of CFRP single-sided patch repair of damaged aerospace titanium alloy components[J]. Acta Materiae Compositae Sinica202542(5): 2514-2527 (in Chinese).
[28] KIM H S, YOO S H, CHANG S H. In situ monitoring of the strain evolution and curing reaction of composite laminates to reduce the thermal residual stress using FBG sensor and dielectrometry[J]. Composites Part B: Engineering201344(1): 446-452.
[29] 陈诗展, 胡俊山, 张霖, 等. 航空金属构件损伤复合材料单面贴补修复力学性能[J]. 复合材料学报202340(10): 5918-5931.
  CHEN S Z, HU J S, ZHANG L, et al. Repair performance of damaged aircraft metal structure with one-sided composite patch[J]. Acta Materiae Compositae Sinica202340(10): 5918-5931 (in Chinese).
[30] 国家质量监督检验检疫总局、中国国家标准化管理委员会. 纤维增强塑料拉伸性能试验方法: [S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2005.
  Standardization Administration of the People’s Republic of China. Fiber-reinforced plastics composites—Determination of tensile properties: [S]. Beijing: Standards Press of China, 2005. (in Chinese)
[31] 姜峰, 赵玉卿, 黄争鸣. 时效对7901环氧树脂力学性能的影响[J]. 工程塑料应用201947(3): 81-84, 91.
  JIANG F, ZHAO Y Q, HUANG Z M. Aging effect on mechanical properties of 7901 epoxy resin[J]. Engineering Plastics Application201947(3): 81-84, 91 (in Chinese).
[32] 刘真航. SY-24中温固化胶接体系[J]. 中国胶粘剂200211(1): 1-5.
  LIU Z H. SY-24 Moderate temperature cured adhesive system[J]. China Adhesives200211(1): 1-5 (in Chinese).
[33] 甘建业, 胡伟叶, 张艺澄, 等. 变厚度树脂基复合材料构件固化变形数值模拟与影响因素分析[J]. 复合材料学报202340(7): 4195-4209.
  GAN J Y, HU W Y, ZHANG Y C, et al. Numerical simulation and influence factors analysis of cure-induced distortions in resin matrix composites with variable thickness[J]. Acta Materiae Compositae Sinica202340(7): 4195-4209 (in Chinese).
[34] 牛晓坤. 热固性树脂基复合材料固化变形分析[D]. 沈阳: 沈阳航空航天大学, 2018.
  NIU X K. Analysis of curing deformation of thermosetting resin matrix composites[D]. Shenyang: Shenyang Aerospace University, 2018 (in Chinese).
[35] JOHNSTON A, VAZIRI R, POURSARTIP A. A plane strain model for process-induced deformation of laminated composite structures[J]. Journal of Composite Materials200135(16): 1435-1469.
[36] MAGNUS SVANBERG J, ANDERS HOLMBERG J. Prediction of shape distortions Part Ⅰ. FE-implementation of a path dependent constitutive model[J]. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing200435(6): 711-721.
[37] 陶雷, 闵伟, 戚亮亮, 等. 增韧改性环氧树脂固化动力学研究及TTT图绘制[J]. 复合材料科学与工程2020(10): 21-29.
  TAO L, MIN W, QI L L, et al. Study on curing kinetics of toughened modified epoxy resin and drawing of ttt diagram[J]. Composites Science and Engineering2020(10): 21-29 (in Chinese).
[38] STRUZZIERO G, TEUWEN J J E. A fully coupled thermo-mechanical analysis for the minimisation of spring-in and process time in ultra-thick components for wind turbine blades[J]. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing2020139: 106105.
[39] 岳广全. 整体化复合材料壁板结构固化变形模拟及控制方法研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工业大学, 2010.
  YUE G Q. Study on simulation and control method of cure-induced deformation for integrated composite panel[D]. Harbin: Harbin Institute of Technology, 2010 (in Chinese).
[40] 吴神刚. 一种低收缩率环氧树脂固化剂的合成及性能研究[D]. 武汉: 武汉工程大学, 2015.
  WU S G. Synthesis and properties of a low shrinkage epoxy curing agent[D]. Wuhan: Wuhan Institute of Technology, 2015 (in Chinese).
[41] ??NAR K, ?ZTüRK U E, ERSOY N, et al. Modelling manufacturing deformations in corner sections made of composite materials[J]. Journal of Composite Materials201448(7): 799-813.
[42] 张胜男, 许英杰, 张卫红. 考虑固化残余应力影响的Z-pin增韧复材压缩性能预测方法[J]. 航空学报202445(20): 429966.
  ZHANG S N, XU Y J, ZHANG W H. Numerical study on curing residual stresses in compression of Z-pinned composites[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica202445(20): 429966 (in Chinese).
[43] 张曈. T300/7901碳纤维复合材料层合板修复性能研究[D]. 天津: 天津理工大学, 2023.
  ZHANG T. Research on repair performance of T300/7901 carbon fiber composite laminate[D]. Tianjin: Tianjin University of Technology, 2023 (in Chinese).
[44] 沈超. 3238树脂及其改性[J]. 航空学报200829(3): 752-756.
  SHEN C. Resin 3238 and its modification[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica200829(3): 752-756 (in Chinese).
[45] 邓云飞, 张永, 安静丹, 等. TC4钛合金力学性能测试及其本构关系研究[J]. 振动与冲击202039(18): 70-77.
  DENG Y F, ZHANG Y, AN J D, et al. Mechanical properties and constitutive relationship of TC4 titanium alloy[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock202039(18): 70-77 (in Chinese).
[46] 张辰, 饶云飞, 李倩倩, 等. 碳纤维-玻璃纤维混杂增强环氧树脂复合材料低速冲击性能及其模拟[J]. 复合材料学报202138(1): 165-176.
  ZHANG C, RAO Y F, LI Q Q, et al. Low-velocity impact behavior and numerical simulation of carbon fiber-glass fiber hybrid reinforced epoxy composites[J]. Acta Materiae Compositae Sinica202138(1): 165-176 (in Chinese).
[47] LINDE P, DE BOER H. Modelling of inter-rivet buckling of hybrid composites[J]. Composite Structures200673(2): 221-228.
[48] GARSTKA T, ERSOY N, POTTER K D, et al. In situ measurements of through-the-thickness strains during processing of AS4/8552 composite[J]. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing200738(12): 2517-2526.
文章导航

/