复杂环境下舰载机人工进近着舰模型
收稿日期: 2025-01-13
修回日期: 2025-02-10
录用日期: 2025-03-11
网络出版日期: 2025-03-19
Manual approach and landing model of carrier-based aircraft in complex environments
Received date: 2025-01-13
Revised date: 2025-02-10
Accepted date: 2025-03-11
Online published: 2025-03-19
针对夜间环境建立了舰载机人工进近着舰模型,模型包括了舰载机、甲板运动、舰尾流、着舰指挥员、飞行员模型,飞行员模型基于MPC(Model Predictive Control)方法建立,能够描述飞行员在控制输入、速率约束下的控制策略,且在约束边界内与LQG(Linear Quadratic Gaussian)飞行员模型等效,经仿真验证,建立的飞行员模型在频域0.1~10.0 rad/s内符合人类特性。基于建立的模型完成了夜间环境的飞行仿真,仿真结果表明:夜间环境影响飞行员对角度、角速度、横纵偏差的观测精度,相比日间环境飞行员的纵向航迹偏差散布增大,横向航迹偏差散布略微增大,且在靠近舰船时有躲避舰尾的趋势;通过重复仿真实验验证舰机人环大系统的合理性,结果表明在1/2、1/4、1/8 mi (1 mi=1.61 km)及舰尾处的着舰散布趋势与美军实验一致,夜间复飞率为28%,日间为12%,符合实际经验,验证了建立的人工着舰模型可以用于分析复杂环境下的舰载机着舰安全。
许鑫泽 , 洪冠新 , 杜亮 , 刘刚 . 复杂环境下舰载机人工进近着舰模型[J]. 航空学报, 2025 , 46(13) : 531802 -531802 . DOI: 10.7527/S1000-6893.2024.31802
A carrier-based aircraft model, including models for the carrier-based aircraft, deck motion, ship wake, landing signal officer, and pilot, was established for night-time environments. The pilot model was developed based on the MPC (Model Predictive Control) method, capable of describing the pilot's control strategy under control input and rate constraints. The pilot model established within the boundary constraints is equivalent to the Linear Quadratic Gaussian (LQG) pilot model. Through simulation verification, the established pilot model exhibits human-like characteristics within the frequency range of 0.1 rad/s to 10.0 rad/s. Based on the established pilot model, flight simulations in night-time environments were conducted. The simulation results indicate that the night-time environment affects the pilot's observation accuracy of angles, angular velocities, and lateral and longitudinal deviations. Compared to daytime conditions, the pilot's longitudinal trajectory deviation dispersion increases, while the lateral trajectory deviation dispersion slightly increases. Additionally, as the aircraft approaches the vessel, there is also a tendency to avoid the ship’s wake. Through repeated simulation experiments, the rationality of the carrier-aircraft-human system was validated. The results show that the landing dispersion trends at 1/2, 1/4, 1/8 mi (1 mi=1.61 km), and ramp are consistent with U.S. military experiments. The night-time go-around rate is 28%, while the daytime rate is 12%, aligning with practical experience. This validates that the established artificial landing model can be used to analyze carrier-based aircraft landing safety in complex environments.
| [1] | BRICTSON C A. Measures of pilot performance: Comparative analysis of day and night carrier recoveries[D]. Los Angeles: University of Southern California, 1966:1-3. |
| [2] | XU S T, TAN W Q, EFREMOV A V, et al. Review of control models for human pilot behavior[J]. Annual Reviews in Control, 2017, 44: 274-291. |
| [3] | LONE M M, RUSENO N, COOKE A K. Towards understanding effects of non-linear flight control system elements on inexperienced pilots[J]. The Aeronautical Journal, 2012, 116(1185): 1201-1206. |
| [4] | HESS R A. Analysis of the aircraft carrier landing task, pilot+augmentation/automation[J]. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 2019, 51(34): 359-365. |
| [5] | HESS R A. Simplified approach for modelling pilot pursuit control behaviour in multi-loop flight control tasks[J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 2006, 220(2): 85-102. |
| [6] | HESS R A. Structural model of the adaptive human pilot[J]. Journal of Guidance and Control, 1980, 3(5): 416-423. |
| [7] | MCRUER D T, JEX H R. A review of quasi-linear pilot models[J]. IEEE Transactions on Human Factors in Electronics, 1967, HFE-8(3): 231-249. |
| [8] | 屈香菊, 崔海亮. 舰载机进舰任务中的驾驶员变策略控制模型[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2003, 29(11): 993-997. |
| QU X J, CUI H L. Variable strategy pilot model of carrier landing approach[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2003, 29(11): 993-997 (in Chinese). | |
| [9] | BARON S, KLEINMAN D L, LEVISON W H. An optimal control model of human response part Ⅱ: Prediction of human performance in a complex task[J]. Automatica, 1970, 6(3): 371-383. |
| [10] | KLEINMAN D L, BARON S, LEVISON W H. An optimal control model of human response part Ⅰ: Theory and validation[J]. Automatica, 1970, 6(3): 357-369. |
| [11] | ROIG R W. A comparison between human operator and optimum linear controller RMS-error performance[J]. IRE Transactions on Human Factors in Electronics, 1962, HFE-3(1): 18-21. |
| [12] | TOWN J, MORRISON Z, KAMALAPURKAR R. Pilot performance modeling via observer-based inverse reinforcement learning[J]. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 2024, 32(6): 2444-2451. |
| [13] | 谭文倩, 屈香菊. 人机系统与飞行品质[M]. 北京: 北京航空航天大学出版社, 2020. |
| TAN W Q, QU X J. Man-machine system and flying quality[M]. Beijing: Beijing University of Aeronautics & Astronautics Press, 2020 (in Chinese). | |
| [14] | DAVIDSON J B, SCHMIDT D K. Modified optimal control pilot model for computer-aided design and analysis:NASA-TM-4384[R]. Hampton: NASA Langley Research Center, 1992. |
| [15] | 刘嘉, 向锦武, 张颖, 等. 自适应飞机驾驶员最优控制模型研究及应用[J]. 航空学报, 2016, 37(4): 1127-1138. |
| LIU J, XIANG J W, ZHANG Y, et al. Research and application of adaptive optimal control pilot model[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2016, 37(4): 1127-1138 (in Chinese). | |
| [16] | CHEN C, TAN W Q, QU X J, et al. A fuzzy human pilot model of longitudinal control for a carrier landing task[J]. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 2018, 54(1): 453-466. |
| [17] | WANG L P, JIANG X L, ZHANG Z, et al. Lateral automatic landing guidance law based on risk-state model predictive control[J]. ISA Transactions, 2022, 128: 611-623. |
| [18] | XU S T, WU Y. Modeling multi-loop intelligent pilot control behavior for aircraft-pilot couplings analysis[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2021, 112: 106651. |
| [19] | 王立鹏. 舰载机着舰风险分析与控制策略研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工程大学, 2017. |
| WANG L P. Risk analysis and control strategy of carrier-based aircraft landing[D]. Harbin: Harbin Engineering University, 2017 (in Chinese). | |
| [20] | 陈晨, 屈香菊. 光学助降系统引导下舰载机着舰人机系统建模[J]. 飞行力学, 2018, 36(4): 11-15. |
| CHEN C, QU X J. Modeling of man-aircraft system for carrier landing with FLOLS[J]. Flight Dynamics, 2018, 36(4): 11-15 (in Chinese). | |
| [21] | ZADEH L A. Fuzzy logic = computing with words[J]. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 4(2): 103-111. |
| [22] | HOSSEINI S M, GHAZI G, BOTEZ R M. Design of a nonlinear adaptive fuzzy logic system for cessna citation X speed control[C]∥AIAA Scitech 2024 Forum. Reston: AIAA, 2024. |
| [23] | MOALI O, MEZGHANI D, MAMI A, et al. UAV trajectory tracking using proportional-integral-derivative-type-2 fuzzy logic controller with genetic algorithm parameter tuning[J]. Sensors, 2024, 24(20): 6678. |
| [24] | MOHMAD ROUYAN N. Model simulation suitable for an aircraft at high angle of attack[D]. Cranfield; Cranfield University, 2016: 93-138. |
| [25] | 周大鹏, 曲晓雷. 基于知识引导智能鸽群优化的舰载机着舰控制[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(S1): 730801. |
| ZHOU D P, QU X L. Knowledge-based intelligent pigeon-inspired optimization of carrier-based aircraft landing control[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2024, 45(S1): 730801 (in Chinese). | |
| [26] | MCCABE M. NATOPS landing signal officer manual: NAVAIR 00-80T-104[R]. Patuxent River, Maryland: Department of the Navy, 2001. |
| [27] | MCCAULEY M E, BORDEN G J. Computer based landing signal officer carrier aircraft recovery model:NAVTRAEQUIPCEN 77-C-0110-1[R]. Orlando: Naval Training Equipment Center, 1983. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |