流体力学与飞行力学

大厚度穿孔板声阻抗试验

  • 刘传洋 ,
  • 王晓宇 ,
  • 张光宇 ,
  • 孙晓峰
展开
  • 1.北京航空航天大学 航空发动机研究院,北京 102206
    2.北京航空航天大学 能源与动力工程学院,北京 102206

收稿日期: 2024-11-04

  修回日期: 2024-12-23

  录用日期: 2025-02-07

  网络出版日期: 2025-02-12

基金资助

航空发动机及燃气轮机基础科学中心项目(P2022-B-Ⅱ-013-001);国家自然科学基金(52476024);太行实验室资助项目(A2053)

Experiment on acoustic impedance of large-thickness perforated plate

  • Chuanyang LIU ,
  • Xiaoyu WANG ,
  • Guangyu ZHANG ,
  • Xiaofeng SUN
Expand
  • 1.Research Institute of Aero-Engine,Beihang University,Beijing 102206,China
    2.School of Energy and Power Engineering,Beihang University,Beijing 102206,China

Received date: 2024-11-04

  Revised date: 2024-12-23

  Accepted date: 2025-02-07

  Online published: 2025-02-12

Supported by

Aero Engine and Gas Turbine Basic Science Center Project (P2022-B-Ⅱ-013-001);National Natural Science Foundation of China(52476024);Taihang Laboratory Funding Project (A2053)

摘要

叶顶声衬和软静子作为新型的降噪手段受到了广泛关注,大厚度穿孔板是实现这2种降噪手段的可行的结构形式。因此,对大厚度穿孔板的声阻抗特性展开了研究。基于阻抗管和流管试验平台,通过试验研究了大厚度穿孔板在无切向流条件和存在切向流条件下的声阻抗特性,并探讨了北航模型对大厚度穿孔板声阻抗预测的适用情况。在无切向流条件下,厚度为8 mm的实心穿孔板的试验声阻抗表现出了良好的线性特征,北航模型能够准确预测大厚度穿孔板的声阻抗。针对静子叶片为中空结构的情况,提出了蜂窝腔夹层穿孔板结构。测量结果表明,该结构的声阻抗主要由两侧的穿孔板提供,中间的蜂窝腔仅提供少部分的声抗。在存在切向流条件下,从声阻抗预测准确性和传递损失这2个方面研究了北航模型对大厚度穿孔板声阻抗预测的适用情况。当切向流流速为10 m/s和20 m/s时,北航模型仍然能够较准确地预测大厚度穿孔板的声阻抗。随着切向流流速的增加,板厚对小孔内涡脱落的影响开始变得明显。当切向流流速为40 m/s和60 m/s时,基于薄板涡脱落强度拟合而来的北航模型对大厚度穿孔板声阻抗的预测误差开始变大。但从传递损失方面来看,北航模型预测声阻抗的传递损失曲线与试验测得的传递损失曲线表现出了相似的趋势。可见,北航模型对大厚度穿孔板的工程应用仍然具有一定的指导作用。

本文引用格式

刘传洋 , 王晓宇 , 张光宇 , 孙晓峰 . 大厚度穿孔板声阻抗试验[J]. 航空学报, 2025 , 46(14) : 331486 -331486 . DOI: 10.7527/S1000-6893.2025.31486

Abstract

Over-the-rotor liner and soft vans have received much attention as new noise reduction means, and large-thickness perforated plate is a feasible structural form for realizing these two noise reduction means. Therefore, the acoustic impedance characteristics of large-thickness perforated plates are investigated. Based on the impedance tube and flow tube test platforms, the acoustic impedance characteristics of large-thickness perforated plates are experimentally investigated in the absence and presence of grazing flow, and the applicability of the Beihang model to the prediction of acoustic impedance for large thickness perforated plates is explored. Under no grazing flow conditions, the test acoustic impedance of a solid perforated plate with a thickness of 8 mm shows good linear characteristics, and the Beihang model is able to accurately predict the acoustic impedance of the large-thickness perforated plate. Meanwhile, a honeycomb-cavity sandwich perforated plate structure is proposed for the case where the static blade has a hollow structure. Measurement results show that the acoustic impedance of this structure is mainly provided by the perforated plates on both sides, while the honeycomb-cavity in the middle provides only a small portion of the acoustic impedance. Under grazing flow conditions, the applicability of the Beihang model to the prediction of acoustic impedance for large-thickness perforated plates is investigated in terms of both acoustic impedance prediction accuracy and transmission loss. When the grazing flow velocities are 10 m/s and 20 m/s, the Beihang model can still accurately predict the acoustic impedance of large-thickness perforated plates. As the grazing flow velocity increases, the effect of plate thickness on vortex shedding in small holes begins to become apparent. When the grazing flow velocities reach 40 m/s and 60 m/s, the prediction error of the Beihang model based on the fitting of vortex shedding strength of the thin plate on the acoustic impedance of the large-thickness perforated plate starts to increase. However, in terms of the transmission loss, the transmission loss curves predicted by the Beihang model show a similar trend with that of the experimentally measured transmission loss curve. It can be seen that the Beihang model still provides valuable guiding for the engineering application of large-thickness perforated plates.

参考文献

[1] SUTLIFF D L, BOZAK R F, JONES M G, et al. Investigations of three over-the-rotor liner concepts at various technology readiness levels[J]. International Journal of Aeroacoustics202120(5/6/7): 826-866.
[2] HUGHES C, GAZZANIGA J. Effect of two advanced noise reduction technologies on the aerodynamic performance of an ultra high bypass ratio fan: AIAA-2009-3139[R]. Reston: AIAA, 2009.
[3] JONES M G, HOWERTON B M. Evaluation of novel liner concepts for fan and airframe noise reduction: AIAA-2016-2787[R]. Reston: AIAA, 2016.
[4] SUN Y, WANG X Y, DU L, et al. On the flow-acoustic coupling of fan blades with over-the-rotor liner[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics2022941: A67.
[5] ELLIOTT D, WOODWARD R, PODBOY G. Acoustic performance of novel fan noise reduction technologies for a high bypass model turbofan at simulated flight conditions: AIAA-2009-3140[R]. Reston: AIAA, 2009.
[6] GAZELLA M, TAKAKURA T, SUTLIFF D L, et al. Evaluating the acoustic benefits of over-the-rotor acoustic treatments installed on the advanced noise control fan: AIAA-2017-3872[R]. Reston: AIAA, 2017.
[7] SHEN Z H, WANG X Y, SUN Y, et al. Three-dimensional effects of cascade perforations on rotor-stator interaction noise[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics2022952: A7.
[8] GUESS A W. Calculation of perforated plate liner parameters from specified acoustic resistance and reactance[J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration197540(1): 119-137.
[9] CUMMINGS A. The effects of grazing turbulent pipe-flow on the impedance of an orifice?[J]. Acta Acustica United with Acustica198661(4): 233-242.
[10] 辛博. 切向流对声衬声阻抗的影响及声衬表面非稳定波机理的研究[D]. 北京: 北京航空航天大学, 2019: 79-81.
  XIN B. Investigation of grazing flow effects on the acoustic liner impedance and the mechanism of hydrodynamic instability over a liner[D]. Beijing: Beihang University, 2019: 79-81 (in Chinese).
[11] TEMIZ M A, LOPEZ ARTEAGA I, EFRAIMSSON G, et al. The influence of edge geometry on end-correction coefficients in micro perforated plates[J]. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America2015138(6): 3668-3677.
[12] TESTUD P, MOUSSOU P, HIRSCHBERG A, et al. Noise generated by cavitating single-hole and multi-hole orifices in a water pipe[J]. Journal of Fluids and Structures200723(2): 163-189.
[13] SEYBERT A F. Two-sensor methods for the measurement of sound intensity and acoustic properties in ducts[J]. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America198883(6): 2233-2239.
[14] 廖峻锋, 景晓东, 邱祥海, 等. 新型航空金属丝网声衬掠流特性实验研究[J]. 航空学报202344(21): 528537.
  LIAO J F, JING X D, QIU X H, et al. Experimental study on grazing flow characteristics of a new aeronautical wire mesh acoustic liner[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica202344(21): 528537 (in Chinese).
[15] INGARD U. Influence of fluid motion past a plane boundary on sound reflection, absorption, and transmission[J]. Acoustical Society of America Journal195931(7): 1035-1036.
[16] MYERS M K. On the acoustic boundary condition in the presence of flow?[J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration198071(3): 429-434.
[17] JING X D, PENG S, SUN X F. A straightforward method for wall impedance eduction in a flow duct?[J]. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America2008124(1): 227-234.
[18] QIU X H, XIN B, JING X D. Straightforward impedance eduction method for non-grazing incidence wave with multiple modes[J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration2018432: 1-16.
[19] DAI W, WANG X L, WANG X Y, et al. Acoustic scattering mechanism and noise attenuation of circumferentially non-uniform liner with spectral-wave guide method[J]. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics202336(9): 63-78.
[20] MORFEY C L. Sound transmission and generation in ducts with flow?[J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration197114(1): 37-55.
[21] 杜功焕, 朱哲民, 龚秀芬. 声学基础[M]. 3版. 南京: 南京大学出版社, 2012: 166-167.
  DU G H, ZHU Z M, GONG X F. Fundamentals of acoustic[M]. 3rd ed. Nanjing: Nanjing University Press, 2012: 166-167 (in Chinese).
[22] KUBO G, ISHII T, NAGAI K, et al. Evaluation of nonlinear impedance models for acoustic liners under the normal incident sound wave: AIAA-2024-3367[R]. Reston: AIAA, 2024.
[23] 石炜昊. 针对声衬切向流和高声强效应的声阻抗提取实验方法研究[D]. 北京: 北京航空航天大学, 2024: 75-112.
  SHI W H. An investigation of impedance eduction technique for measuring acoustic liners subjected to grazing flow and high-intensity sound[D]. Beijing: Beihang University, 2024: 75-112 (in Chinese).
[24] SHI W H, JING X D. An uncertainty investigation for liner impedance eduction methods[J]. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics202437(3): 49-59.
文章导航

/