以典型三联旅客座椅为研究对象，建立了经试验验证的航空座椅有限元模型，研究了安全带固定点位置、安全带刚度和安全带形式等参数的变化对座椅系统动态响应的影响。在水平冲击下，安全带固定点位置对乘员运动轨迹和椅腿受载的影响显著，后左椅腿和前左椅腿Z向受载均随着安全带角度的增加而减小。安全带固定点位置对安全带载荷的影响较小。安全带刚度对乘员运动轨迹、安全带载荷和椅腿载荷的影响均显著。随安全带刚度增大，其自身承受的载荷增加，乘员前移距离和椅腿受载均减小；此外，与两点式安全带相比，Y型安全带对乘员的约束效果更好，可减小头部X向峰值位移63 mm，头排座椅中可以考虑安装Y型安全带以减少座椅与隔板的安装距离。
冯振宇
,
刘旭
,
林岚辉
,
杨永攀
,
解江
,
石霄鹏
,
肖培
,
李磊子
,
易朋飞
,
刘小川
,
白春玉
. 安全带对航空座椅及乘员冲击响应的影响[J]. 航空学报, 2022
, 43(1)
: 224808
-224808
.
DOI: 10.7527/S1000-6893.2020.24808
A finite element model for the aviation seat/seat belt is established and validated based on typical triple passenger seats, and the influence of seat belt parameters such as seat belt anchor position, seat belt stiffness and seat belt type on the dynamic response of the seat system is invistigated. Under horizontal impact loading, the position of belt’s anchor has significant effect on the occupant’s motion trajectory and loads on seat legs. The load on the rear left leg and front left leg in the Z direction decreases with the increase of the seat belt angle. Meanwhile, the position of the belt’s anchor has small influence on the seat belt load. Seat belt stiffness has significant effect on the occupant’s motion trajectory, seat belt load and seat leg load. As the stiffness increases, the seat belt load increases, while the occupant's forward movements and seat leg load decrease. Besides, compared with the two-point seat belt, the Y-belt restraint the occupant better, and can reduce the maximum displacement of the head by 63 mm in the X direction. Y-belts can be installed in the front seats to decrease the front row seat setback distance.
[1] Boeing Commercial Airplanes. Statistical summary of commercial jet airplane accidents: Worldwide operations|1959-2017: 31429410/2018[R]. Seattle: Aviation Safety, 2018.
[2] Federal Aviation Administration. National aerospace standards, specification-aircraft seats and berths: NAS 809[S]. Washington, D.C.: Federal Aviation Administration, 1991.
[3] 中国民用航空局. 中国民用航空规章: 第25部运输类飞机适航标准: CCAR-25-R4[S]. 北京: 中国民用航空局, 2011. Civil Aviation Administration of China. China civil aviation regulations: Part 25 airworthiness standards for transport aircraft: CCAR-25-R4[S]. Beijing: Civil Aviation Administration of China, 2011(in Chinese).
[4] Society of Automotive Engineering Aerospace. Performance standard for seats in civil rotorcraft, transport aircraft, and general aviation aircraft: SAE AS 8049B-2005[S].Warrendale: SAE Aerospace, 2005.
[5] 中国民用航空局. 中国民用航空技术标准规定: 旋翼航空器、运输类飞机、正常类和实用类飞机座椅系统: CTSO-C127b[S]. 北京: 中国民用航空局,2003. Civil Aviation Administration of China. China civil aviation technical standard order: Rotorcraft, transport airplane, and small airplane seating systems: CTSO-C127b[S]. Beijing: Civil Aviation Administration of China, 2003(in Chinese).
[6] ROBINSON L, ATKIN J, PAYNE T, et al. SEBED-seat belt degradation: EASA.2010.C21/EASA.E2.2011.C11[R]. Brussels: European Aviation Safety Agency, 2012.
[7] Federal Aviation Administration. Evaluation of aerospace 2-point lap belts under dynamic test conditions: DOT/FAA/TC-15/29[R]. Washington, D.C.: Federal Aviation Administration, 2015.
[8] Federal Aviation Administration. Methodology for dynamic seat certification by analysis for use in Parts 23, 25, 27, and 29 airplanes and rotorcraft: AC 20-146[S]. Washington,D.C.: Federal Aviation Administration, 2003.
[9] Society of Automotive Engineering International. Analytical methods for aircraft seat design and evaluation: SAE ARP5765-2012[S]. Warrendale: SAE International, 2012.
[10] PRABHU G. Parametric study of head paths and hic data for aircraft seat and cabin interior certification[D]. Wichita: Wichita State University, 2006: 24-39.
[11] 林诗远. 飞机侧向座椅乘员损伤与防护方法研究[D]. 长沙: 湖南大学, 2017: 25-31. LIN S Y. Theinjury prevention of occupant seated in aircraft side-facing seats[D]. Changsha: Hunan University, 2017: 25-31(in Chinese).
[12] LAMANNA G, VANACORE A, GUIDA M, et al. Development of ahead injury criteria-compliant aircraft seat by design of experiments[J]. Aerospace, 2019, 6(9): 95.
[13] 解江, 马士成, 贺永龙, 等. 水平冲击下头排乘员损伤及保护姿势研究[J]. 航空学报, 2020, 41(5): 223489. XIE J, MA S C, HE Y L, et al.Research on injury and brace position for front-row occupant under horizontal impact[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2020, 41(5): 223489(in Chinese).
[14] U.S. Government Printing Office. Title 49 code of federal regulations, hybrid III test dummy: 49 CFR Part 572 Subpart E[S]. Washington, D. C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1986.
[15] Society of Automotive Engineering International. Instrumentation for Impact Test-Part 1: Electronic instrumentation: SAE J211-1[S]. Warrendale: SAE International, 2014.
[16] Society of Automotive Engineering International. Instrumentation for impact test-Part 2: Photographic instrumentation: SAE J211-2[S]. Warrendale: SAE International, 2014.
[17] GOWDY V, DEWEESE R, BEEBE M S, et al. A lumbar spine modification to the hybrid iii atd for aircraft seat tests[R]. Warrendale: SAE International, 1999.
[18] International Organization for Standardization. Flexible cellular polymeric materials-determination of compression set: ISO 1856:2018[S]. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization, 2018.
[19] Livermore Software Technology Corporation. LS-DYNA keyword user’ manual[M]. Livermore: Livermore Software Technology Corporation, 2007: 310-314.
[20] Society of Automotive Engineering International. Analytical methods for aircraft seat design and evaluation: SAE ARP 5765A[S]. Warrendale: SAE International, 2015.
[21] Federal Aviation Administration. Methodology for dynamic seat certification by analysis for use in Parts 23, 25, 27, and 29 airplanes and rotorcraft: AC 20-146A[S]. Washington, D.C.: Federal Aviation Administration, 2018.
[22] Society of Automotive Engineering International. Performance standard for seats in civil rotorcraft, transport aircraft, and general aviation aircraft: SAE AS 8049C[S]. Warrendale: SAE International, 2015.
CJA