材料工程与机械制造

热障涂层界面脱粘缺陷的脉冲红外热成像检测

  • 董丽虹 ,
  • 郭伟 ,
  • 王海斗 ,
  • 邢志国 ,
  • 冯辅周 ,
  • 王博正 ,
  • 高治峰
展开
  • 1. 陆军装甲兵学院 装备再制造技术国防科技重点实验室, 北京 100072;
    2. 陆军装甲兵学院 车辆工程系, 北京 100072;
    3. 中国地质大学 工程技术学院, 北京 100083;
    4. 西安理工大学 材料科学与工程学院, 西安 710048

收稿日期: 2019-01-03

  修回日期: 2019-02-14

  网络出版日期: 2019-04-19

基金资助

国家自然科学基金(51675532,51535011,51875576)

Inspection of interface debonding in thermal barrier coatings using pulsed thermography

  • DONG Lihong ,
  • GUO Wei ,
  • WANG Haidou ,
  • XING Zhiguo ,
  • FENG Fuzhou ,
  • WANG Bozheng ,
  • GAO Zhifeng
Expand
  • 1. Science and Technology on Remanufacturing Laboratory, Army Academy of Armored Forces, Beijing 100072, China;
    2. Department of Vehicle Engineering, Army Academy of Armored Forces, Beijing 100072, China;
    3. School of Engineering and Technology, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China;
    4. School of Material Science and Engineering, Xi'an University of Technology, Xi'an 710048, China

Received date: 2019-01-03

  Revised date: 2019-02-14

  Online published: 2019-04-19

Supported by

National Natural Science Foundation of China (51675532, 51535011, 51875576)

摘要

针对热障涂层界面脱粘缺陷的无损检测问题,首先制备了一种导热过程更加接近真实缺陷,且尺寸可控的人工模拟脱粘缺陷试样;在此基础上,采用脉冲红外热成像检测技术对人工脱粘缺陷进行检测,分析了涂层界面脱粘区和非脱粘区的表面温度瞬态响应过程;以图像标准差(SD)和归一化对比度(NC)作为评价标准,定量对比了脉冲相位法、主成分分析和表面热信号重构3种典型的热图重构方法在脱粘缺陷识别中的作用。结果表明,对400 μm厚的YSZ热障涂层,原始热图中可识别最小直径为4 mm的脱粘缺陷,而3种重构热图中均可识别最小直径为2 mm的界面脱粘缺陷,3种重构算法均显著提高了界面脱粘缺陷的识别能力,其中以表面热信号重构算法对图像的噪声抑制能力最强。

本文引用格式

董丽虹 , 郭伟 , 王海斗 , 邢志国 , 冯辅周 , 王博正 , 高治峰 . 热障涂层界面脱粘缺陷的脉冲红外热成像检测[J]. 航空学报, 2019 , 40(8) : 422895 -422895 . DOI: 10.7527/S1000-6893.2019.22895

Abstract

This paper aims at soloving the nondestructive testing problem of interface debonding defect of thermal barrier coatings. Firstly, a preparing method for specimen with artificial debonding defects is proposed, providing more realistic thermal conduction process and controllable defect size. On this basis, pulsed thermography is employed to detect the coating specimen with artificial debonding defect, and the transient response process of the surface temperatures in debonding region and sound region of coating interface is analyzed. Standard Deviation (SD) and Normalized Contrast (NC) are used as evaluation criteria to quantitatively compare the effects of three typical thermal image reconstruction methods, which are PPT, PCA, and TSR, in the identification of debonding defects. The results indicate that, for YSZ thermal barrier coatings with a thickness of 400 μm, the debonding defects with a minimum diameter of 4 mm can be identified in raw thermal image sequency, while the debonding defects with a minimum diameter of 2 mm can be identified in all three reconstructed image sequences. The identificating ability of debonding defects have significantly improved by three reconstruction algorithms, among which the TSR reconstruction algorithm provided the best noise suppression ability for thermal image sequence.

参考文献

[1] PAWLOWSKI L. The science and engineering of thermal spray coatings[M]. 2nd ed. New York:John Wiley & Sons, 1994:401-407.
[2] 刘纯波, 林锋, 蒋显亮. 热障涂层的研究现状与发展趋势[J]. 中国有色金属学报, 2007, 17(1):1-13. LIU C B, LIN F, JIANG X L. Current state and future development of thermal barrier coating[J]. The Chinese Journal of Nonferrous Metals, 2007, 17(1):1-13(in Chinese).
[3] 魏铮, 胡捷. 热障涂层失效机制和寿命预测研究概述[J]. 装备机械, 2013(4):2-6. WEI Z, HU J. Overview of research on failure mechanism and life prediction of thermal barrier coatings[J]. Equipment Machinery, 2013(4):2-6(in Chinese).
[4] 韩赞东, 李永杰, 陈以方. 陶瓷涂层结合质量的超声斜入射检测[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 57(5):454-458. HAN Z D, LI Y J, CHEN Y F. Oblique-incidence ultrasonic testing for the adhesion quality of ceramic coatings[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University (Science & Technology), 2017, 57(5):454-458(in Chinese).
[5] LI Y, CHEN Z M, MAO Y, et al. Quantitative evaluation of thermal barrier coating based on eddy current technique[J]. NDT & E International, 2012, 50:29-35.
[6] 唐庆菊. SiC涂层缺陷的脉冲红外热波无损检测关键技术研究[D]. 哈尔滨:哈尔滨工业大学, 2014. TANG Q J. Research on the key technology of SiC coating defects detection using pulsed infrared thermal wave non-destructive testing method[D]. Harbin:Harbin Institute of Technology, 2014(in Chinese).
[7] IBARRACASTANDDO C, TARPANI J R, MALDAGUE X P. Nondestructive testing with thermography[J]. European Journal of Physics, 2013, 34(6):S91-S109.
[8] VAVILOV V P, BURLEIGH D D. Review of pulsed thermal NDT:Physical principles, theory and data processing[J]. NDT & E International, 2015, 73(1):28-52.
[9] QUEK S, ALMOND D P. Defect detection capability of pulsed transient thermography[J]. Insight-Non-Destructive Testing and Condition Monitoring, 2005, 47(4):212-215.
[10] CONNOLLY M P. A review of factors influencing defect detection in infrared thermography:Applications to coated materials[J]. Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation, 1991, 10(3):89-96.
[11] LÍPEZ F, IBARRA-CASTANEDO C, NICOLAU V, et al. Pulsed thermography signal processing techniques based on the 1D solution of the heat equation applied to the inspection of laminated composites[J]. Materials Evaluation, 2014, 72(1):91-102.
[12] ALMOND D P, PICKERING S G. An analytical study of the pulsed thermography defect detection limit[J]. Journal of Applied Physics, 2012, 111(9):093510.
[13] BENDADA A, SFARRA S, GENEST M, et al. How to reveal subsurface defects in Kevlar (R) composite materials after an impact loading using infrared vision and optical NDT techniques[J]. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2013, 108:195-208.
[14] HOLLAND S D, RENSHAW J. Physics-based image enhancement for infrared thermography[J]. NDT & E International, 2010, 43(5):440-445.
[15] QUEK S, ALMOND D P. Defect detection capability of pulsed transient thermography[J]. Insight-Non-Destructive Testing and Condition Monitoring, 2005, 47(4):212-215.
[16] BURGHOLZER P. Thermodynamic limits of spatial resolution in active thermography[J]. International Journal of Thermophysics, 2015, 36(9):2328-2341.
[17] 郭伟, 董丽虹, 王海斗, 等. 再制造喷涂层界面结合性能脉冲红外热像评估技术[J]. 中国表面工程, 2018, 31(3):168-176. GUO W, DONG L H, WANG H D, et al. Interfacial adhesion performance assessment of remanufacturing spraying coatings by pulsed thermography[J]. China Surface Engineering, 2018, 31(3):168-176(in Chinese).
[18] BAI L, GAO B, TIAN S, et al. A comparative study of principal component analysis and independent component analysis in eddy current pulsed thermography data processing[J]. Review of Scientific Instruments, 2013, 84(10):104901.
[19] SHEPARD S M, AHMED T, RUBADEUX B A, et al. Synthetic processing of pulsed thermographic data for inspection of turbine components[J]. Insight, 2001, 43(9):587-589.
[20] TAO N, ZENG Z, FENG L, et al. The application of pulsed thermography in the inspection of wind turbine blades[C]//International Symposium on Photoelectronic Detection and Imaging. International Society for Optics and Photonics, 2011:9879-9891.
[21] BALAGEAS D L, ROCHE J M, LEROY F H. Comparison and ranking procedure for an objective assessment of thermographic NDE methods[C]//International Conference on Quantitative Infrared Thermography, 2016.
[22] PTASZEK G, CAWLEY P, ALMOND D P, et al. Artificial disbonds for calibration of transient thermography inspection of thermal barrier coating systems[J]. NDT & E International, 2012, 45:71-78.
[23] 唐庆菊, 刘元林, 梅晨, 等. 一种热障涂层结构模拟脱粘缺陷试件及其制备方法:CN106124270A[P]. 2016. TANG Q J, LIU Y L, MEI C, et al. A specimen of thermal barrier coating structure with simulated debonding defect and preparation method:CN106124270A[P]. 2016(in Chinese).
[24] SHEPARD S M, LHOTA J R, RUBADEUX B A, et al. Reconstruction and enhancement of active thermographic image sequences[J]. Optical Engineering, 2003, 42(5):1337-1343.
[25] KOSHTI A M. Infrared contrast data analysis method for quantitative measurement and monitoring in flash infrared thermography[C]//Structural Health Monitoring and Inspection of Advanced Materials, Aerospace, and Civil Infrastructure 2015, 2015:94370.
文章导航

/