固体力学与飞行器总体设计

飞行器体系优化设计问题

  • 周健 ,
  • 龚春林 ,
  • 粟华 ,
  • 张孝南 ,
  • 李波 ,
  • 谷良贤
展开
  • 1. 西北工业大学 航天学院 陕西省空天飞行器设计重点实验室, 西安 710072;
    2. 中国兵器工业第203研究所, 西安 710065;
    3. 洛阳光电设备研究所, 洛阳 471023;
    4. 四川航天系统工程研究所, 成都 610100

收稿日期: 2018-04-18

  修回日期: 2018-05-07

  网络出版日期: 2018-06-15

基金资助

国防基础预研项目(JCKY2016208C001,JCKY2016204B102);上海航天科技创新基金(SAST2015010)

Optimal design problem of system of systems of flight vehicle

  • ZHOU Jian ,
  • GONG Chunlin ,
  • SU Hua ,
  • ZHANG Xiaonan ,
  • LI Bo ,
  • GU Liangxian
Expand
  • 1. Shaanxi Aerospace Flight Vehicle Design Key Laboratory, College of Astronautics, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an 710072, China;
    2. No.203 Research Institute of China Ordnance Industries, Xi'an 710065, China;
    3. Luoyang Institute of Electrooptical Devices, Luoyang 471023, China;
    4. Research Institute of Sichuan Aerospace System Engineering, Chengdu 610100, China

Received date: 2018-04-18

  Revised date: 2018-05-07

  Online published: 2018-06-15

Supported by

The Defense Basic Research Program (JCKY2016208C001, JCKY2016204B102); Shanghai Aerospace Science and Technology Innovation Foundation (SAST2015010)

摘要

针对传统的飞行器设计与体系(SOS)设计相互独立造成的飞行器实际作战效能不足的问题,对同时考虑飞行器与体系耦合设计的飞行器体系优化设计问题展开研究。首先,根据体系工程(SOSE)原理给出了耦合飞行器设计与体系结构设计的飞行器体系优化设计问题的基本概念与通用数学定义;其次,基于多层体系架构,构建了飞行器体系设计优化模型,提出了包含问题定义、体系架构建模、学科建模、优化求解4个步骤的通用建模求解流程;最后,以巡飞/精确打击武器协同作战为例,构建了面向任务成本最低、时间最短的协同作战体系最优化问题并对其进行优化求解。与先设计飞行器后设计体系结构的解耦设计结果对比表明,解耦优化设计忽略了体系结构与飞行器的强耦合特征,无法最优化体系效能;耦合优化设计能够获得体系效能最大化的飞行器设计方案。

本文引用格式

周健 , 龚春林 , 粟华 , 张孝南 , 李波 , 谷良贤 . 飞行器体系优化设计问题[J]. 航空学报, 2018 , 39(11) : 222223 -222235 . DOI: 10.7527/S1000-6893.2018.22223

Abstract

To address the insufficient actual operational effectiveness of the flight vehicle caused by the independence between the traditional flight vehicle design and the System of Systems (SOS) design, and the defects of manual iteration, the optimal coupling design of flight vehicle and system of systems is studied in this paper. First, based on the principle of System of Systems Engineering (SOSE), this paper presents the basic concept and general mathematical definition of the optimal design of the flight vehicle system of systems combined SOS architeclure design and flight vehicle design. Then, based on the multi-level system of systems architecture, a model for the optimal design of the flight vehicle system of systems is built, and a general modeling and solving process for such a problem is proposed, which includes the definition of the problem, its architecture modeling, its discipline modeling, and its optimization of problem solving. Finally, taking LAM/PAM cooperative weapon system combat application case as an example, an optimization task of pursing the shortest attacking time and the lowest cost is built and solved. Calculation results show that the design result of the decoupling design mode, which designs the flight vehicle first and then the system of systems, cannot meet the demand of combat operations, but the design result of the coupling design method can complete the combat mission much better and produce flight vehicle conceptual design schemes that can maximize the effectiveness of the system of systems.

参考文献

[1] SPROLES N. Formulating measures of effectiveness[J]. Systems Engineering, 2002, 5(4): 253-263.
[2] ENDER T R. A top-down, hierarchical, system-of-systems approach to the design of an air defense weapon[D]. Atlanta, GA: Georgia Institute of Technology, 2006: 113-242.
[3] BILTGEN P T. A methodology for capability-based technology evaluation for systems-of-systems[D]. Atlanta, GA: Georgia Institute of Technology, 2007: 79-308.
[4] TALLEY D N. Methodology for the conceptual design of a robust and opportunistic system-of-systems[D]. Atlanta, GA: Georgia Institute of Technology, 2008: 284-342.
[5] 田艺枫. 面向飞行器体系化设计的建模与优化方法研究[D]. 北京: 北京航空航天大学, 2016: 20-98. TIAN Y F. Research on modeling and optimization methods of aircraft system-of-systems-oriented design[D]. Beijing: Beihang University, 2016: 20-98 (in Chinese).
[6] CROSSLEY W, MANE M, NUSAWARDHANA A. Variable resource allocation using multidisciplinary optimization: Initial investigations for system of systems[C]//10th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference. Reston, VA: AIAA, 2004.
[7] KIM H, HIDALGO I J. System of systems optimization by pseudo-hierarchical multistage model[C]//AIAA/MAO Conference. Reston, VA: AIAA, 2006.
[8] MANE M, CROSSLEY W A, NUSAWARDHANA A.System-of-systems inspired aircraft sizing and airline resource allocation via decomposition[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2007, 44(4): 1222-1235.
[9] MANE M. Concurrent aircraft design and trip assignment under uncertainty as a system of systems problem[D]. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University, 2008: 47-97.
[10] MANE M, CROSSLEY W. Concurrent aircraft design and resource allocation under uncertainty for on-demand air transportation[C]//The 26th Congress of ICAS and 8th AIAA ATIO. Reston, VA: AIAA, 2008.
[11] MARWAHA G, KOKKOLARAS M. System-of-systems approach to air transportation design using nested optimization and direct search[J]. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2015, 51(4): 885-901.
[12] FROMMER J B. System of systems design: Evaluating aircraft in a fleet context using reliability and non-deterministic approaches[D].West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University, 2008: 41-94.
[13] JANSEN P W, PEREZ R E. Coupled optimization of aircraft families and fleet allocation for multiple markets[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2016, 53(5): 1485-1504.
[14] GOVINDARAJU P, DAVENDRALINGAM N, CROSSLEY W A. A concurrent aircraft design and fleet assignment approach to mitigate environmental impact through fuel burn reduction under operational uncertainty[J]. Journal of Aerospace Operations, 2017, 4(4): 1-22.
[15] TAYLOR C P. Integrated transportation system design optimization[D].Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2007: 35-136.
[16] 吴炜琦, 张育林. 远程精确打击天基信息支持系统体系优化[J]. 装备学院学报, 2006, 17(3): 37-39. WU W Q, ZHANG Y L.Space information system optimization for long range precision attack[J]. Journal of the Academy of Equipment Command & Technology, 2006, 17(3): 37-39 (in Chinese).
[17] SOBIESZCZANSKI-SOBIESKI J. Integrated system-of-systems synthesis[J]. AIAA Journal, 2008, 46(5): 1072-1080.
[18] SOBIESZCZANSKISOBIESKI J, ALTUS T D, PHILLIPS M, et al. Bilevel integrated system synthesis for concurrent and distributed processing[J]. AIAA Journal, 2012, 41(10): 1996-2003.
[19] KIM H M, MICHELENA N F, PAPALAMBROS P Y, et al. Target cascading in optimal system design[J]. Journal of Mechanical Design, 2003, 125(3): 474-480.
[20] AYYALASOMAYAJULA S, FRY D, DELAURENTIS D.A framework for formulating design problems in a system-of-systems context[C]//12th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference. Reston, VA: AIAA, 2008.
[21] LIU H, TIAN Y, GAO Y,et al. System of systems oriented flight vehicle conceptual design: Perspectives and progresses[J]. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2015, 28(3): 617-635.
[22] 王振国, 陈小前, 罗文彬. 飞行器多学科设计优化理论与应用研究[M]. 北京: 国防工业出版社, 2006: 27-71. WANG Z G, CHEN X Q, LUO W B.Research on the theory and application of multidisciplinary design optimization of flight vehicles[M]. Beijing: National Defense Industry Press, 2006: 27-71 (in Chinese).
[23] 赵青松, 杨克巍, 陈英武. 体系工程与体系结构建模方法与技术[M]. 北京: 国防工业出版社, 2013: 166-184. ZHAO Q S, YANG K W, CHEN Y W. System of systems engineering and system of systems modeling[M]. Beijing: National Defense Industry Press, 2013: 166-184 (in Chinese).
[24] 阳东升, 张维明, 张英朝, 等. 体系工程原理与技术[M]. 北京: 国防工业出版社, 2013: 30-75. YANG D S, ZHANG W M, ZHANG Y C, et al. System engineering principles and technology[M]. Beijing: National Defense Industry Press, 2013: 30-75 (in Chinese).
[25] 张维明, 修保新. 体系工程问题研究[J]. 中国电子科学研究院学报, 2011(5): 451-456. ZHANG W M, XIU B X. Study on system of systems engineering[J]. Journal of CAEIT, 2011(5): 451-456 (in Chinese).
[26] MO J. Systems of systems engineering: Principles and applications[M]. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2013: 37-71.
[27] DENNIS J E, ARROYO S F, CRAMER E J, et al. Problem formulations for systems of systems[C]//IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE Press, 2006: 64-71.
[28] LAMBE A B, MARTINS J R R A. Extensions to the design structure matrix for the description of multidisciplinary design, analysis, and optimization processes[J]. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2012, 46(2): 273-284.
文章导航

/