制定民用飞机结构维修大纲的核心内容之一是确定结构维修间隔，现有的分析模型普遍没有综合考虑民机利用率对维修间隔各指标的影响。以民机在环境损伤下的金属结构维修间隔为研究背景，综合考虑利用率对确定结构维修间隔各个指标的影响，应用K-means算法和AHP （Analytic Hierarchy Process）-熵值法，建立了一种某型国产民机低利用率下金属结构环境损伤维修间隔的确定模型，并通过选取相似机型的典型结构进行了实例验证。分析结果表明：所建模型与飞机利用率匹配关系良好，符合工程实际，在一定程度上解决了国产民机制定维修大纲的过程中，由于缺少运营数据和维修数据而导致维修间隔的确定偏于主观的问题。
One of the significant contents of the structural maintenance program is to determine the maintenance interval of the aircraft structure. However, the influence of the utilization ratio on the constraint condition of maintenance intervals are not comprehensively analyzed in the present guidelines on determining the intervals. A mathematical model for determining the maintenance intervals of the metallic structure with environmental damage of certain domestic civil aircraft with the low utilization is studied in this paper, based on the K-means algorithm and Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP)-entropy method. The influence of the utilization ratio on the constraint condition for determining the maintenance intervals are fully considered in this mathematical model, and validity of the model are demonstrated by examples. The analysis results indicate that the model proposed is very effective and well matches the engineering practice, and can well solve the problem of lack of usage parameters and service data, significantly reducing the influence of subjective determination by human beings.
[1] JIA B H, TONG S, XUE J, et al. Determination of detectable fatigue crack length by improved AHP method for civil aircraft structures[C]//International Conference on Mechatronics, Control and Electronic Engineering, 2014:462-466.[2] 王海涛, 蒋经凯. 飞机结构环境损伤的模糊综合评定方法研究[J]. 西北工业大学学报, 2011, 29(6):883-886. WANG H T, JIANG J K. Exploring fuzzy synthetic evaluation method for environmental deterioration of aircraft[J]. Journal of Northwestern Polytechnical University, 2011, 29(6):883-886(in Chinese).[3] 冯子寒.空客A320系列飞机低利用率维修方案浅析[J]. 航空维修与工程, 2015, 7:85-86. FENG Z H. Research on the low utilization maintenance program of A320 aircraft[J]. Aviation Maintenance & Engineering, 2015, 7:85-86(in Chinese).[4] 丁跃, 马贺琴. 民航飞机利用率统计方法刍议[J]. 中国统计, 1992, 4:13, 20-21. DING Y,MA H Q. Discussion on the statistical method of civil aircraft utilization[J]. China Statistics, 1992, 4:13, 20-21(in Chinese).[5] HOSSAM A G, HIROYUKI Y, KAZUHIKO S, et al. Computer-aided RCM based plant maintenance management system[J]. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 2003, 19(5):449-458.[6] 柏文华, 左洪福, 吴静敏,等. 一种民用飞机结构维修大纲的制定方法[J]. 飞机设计, 2011, 31(5):46-50. BAI W H, ZUO H F, WU J M, et al. Study on making method of civil aircraft's maintenance review board report based on CBR[J]. Aircraft Design, 2011, 31(5):46-50(in Chinese).[7] 柏文华, 左洪福, 吕德峰, 等. 基于延迟时间模型的民机部件维修优化方法[J]. 南京航空航天大学学报, 2015, 47(6):890-896. BAI W H, ZUO H F,LV D F, et al. Maintenance optimization method of civil aircraft based on delay time mode[J]. Journal of Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2015, 47(6):890-896(in Chinese).[8] 吴昊, 左洪福, 孙伟. 基于改进AHP的民机结构偶然损伤检查间隔的研究[J]. 飞机设计, 2008, 28(3):57-61. WU H, ZUO H F, SUN W. A study on the accidental damage inspection intervals for civil aircraft structure based on the improved AHP[J]. Aircraft Design, 2008, 28(3):57-61(in Chinese).[9] 袁锴, 曾照洋, 周扬, 等. 民用飞机结构件维修间隔计算方法研究[J].飞机设计, 2016, 36(3):34-38, 42. YUAN K, ZENG Z Y, ZHOU Y, et al. Research on calculation methods of maintenance intervals for civil aircraft structural components[J]. Aircraft Design, 2016, 36(3):34-38, 42(in Chinese).[10] 李玫, 史珂. 新舟600飞机高利用率和低利用率维修大纲对比分析[J]. 装备制造技术, 2014(9):198-199. LI M, SHI K. Comparative analysis of high and low utilization maintenance program for MA600[J]. Equipment Manufacturing Technology, 2014(9):198-199(in Chinese).[11] SAMBASIVAM S, THEODOSOPOULOS N. Advanced data clustering methods of mining web documents[J]. Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology, 2006(3):563-579.[12] KAPAGERIDIS I K. Variable lag variography using K-means clustering[J]. Computers & Geoscience, 2015, 85(PB):49-63.[13] AMRINA E, VILSI A L. Key performance indicators for sustainable manufacturing evaluation in cement industry[J]. Procedia CIRP, 2015, 26:19-23.[14] CHADAWADA R, SARFARAZ A. Integration of AHP-QFD for selecting facility location[J]. Benchmarking An International Journal, 2015, 22(3):411-425.[15] 崔建国, 林泽力, 吕瑞, 等. 基于模糊灰色聚类和组合赋权法的飞机健康状态综合评价方法[J]. 航空学报, 2014, 35(3):764-772. CUI J G, LIN Z L, LV R, et al. Comprehensive assessment method of aircraft health status based on fuzzy gray clustering and combination weighting[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2014, 35(3):764-772(in Chinese).[16] CHENG T, ZHANG C X. Application of fuzzy AHP based on entropy weight to selection of solid sanitary landfill[J]. Environmental and Sanitary Engineering, 2003, 12(2):64-67.[17] 陈海峰. 基于AHP-熵值法的税源风险评估研究[D]. 厦门:厦门大学, 2014:20-21. CHEN H F. Study on tax sources risk assessment based on AHP-Entropy method[D]. Xiamen:Xiamen University, 2014:20-21(in Chinese).[18] Industry Ateering Committee. A380 maintenance program development policy and procedures handbook[M]. Toulouse:Airbus Company, 2006:6.[19] Industry Steering Committee. B787 maintenance program development policy and procedures handbook[M]. Chicago:Boeing Company, 2007:11.[20] Maintenance Program Engineering, Commercial Aviation Services, Boeing Commercial Airplane Group. B737-600/700/800/900 maintenance review board report[R]. Chicago:Boeing Company, 2007:3.[21] Industry Steering Committee. A318/A319/A320/A321 maintenance program[M]. Toulouse:Airbus company, 2002:9.[22] 杨洪源, 刘文珽. 民机结构外露关键部位涂层加速腐蚀环境谱研究[J]. 航空学报, 2007, 28(1):90-93. YANG H Y, LIU W T.Accelerated corrosion environmental spectra of surface coating of civil aircraft structure[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2007, 28(1):90-93(in Chinese).
CJA