基于DCRSM的HPT叶尖径向运行间隙可靠性分析
收稿日期: 2012-10-08
修回日期: 2012-12-25
网络出版日期: 2012-12-27
基金资助
国家自然科学基金(51175017);北京航空航天大学博士生创新基金;高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金
Reliability Analysis for HPT Blade-tip Radial Running Clearance Based on DCRSM
Received date: 2012-10-08
Revised date: 2012-12-25
Online published: 2012-12-27
Supported by
National Natural Science Foundation of China (51175017);Innovation Foundation of BUAA for Ph.D.Graduates;Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education
为了有效地进行航空发动机高压涡轮(HPT)叶尖径向运行间隙(BTRRC)设计,从概率的角度进行BTRRC的可靠性分析。根据BTRRC的结构特点,提出了高精度、高效率可靠性分析的分布式协同响应面法(DCRSM),以二次响应面函数为基础建立了DCRSM数学模型,并将DCRSM应用到航空发动机HPT BTRRC的可靠性分析中加以验证。结果显示:当稳态叶尖间隙δ=1.86 mm时,BTRRC的可靠度为0.996 8,综合考虑发动机效率和可靠性,基本上满足BTRRC的设计和工程需要。通过方法比较显示了DCRSM在BTRRC可靠性分析中,不但能解决难以分析的问题,还能在保证计算精度的前提下提高计算速度和计算效率;充分验证了DCRSM在BTRRC可靠性分析中的有效性和可行性,为复杂机械可靠性分析和优化提供了有效依据。
费成巍 , 白广忱 . 基于DCRSM的HPT叶尖径向运行间隙可靠性分析[J]. 航空学报, 2013 , 34(9) : 2141 -2149 . DOI: 10.7527/S1000-6893.2013.0342
In order to design more effectively aeroengine high pressure turbine (HPT) blade-tip radial running clearance (BTRRC), a BTRRC reliability analysis is accomplished from a probabilistic perspective in this paper. Distributed collaborative response surface method (DCRSM) with high accuracy and high efficiency is proposed for reliability analysis according to the structural features of BTRRC. The mathematical model of DCRSM is established based on the quadratic response surface function. The DCRSM is applied to the reliability analysis of an aeroengine HPT BTRRC to verify the advantages. The reliability analysis results show that the reliability of BTRRC is 0.996 8 when the static blade-tip clearance δ=1.86 mm, which is appropriate in the BTRRC and aeroengine design for satisfying engineering requirements while considering synthetically the efficiency and reliability of an aeroengine. As demonstrated in the comparison of methods, the DCRSM can not only make a difficult problem easy to resolve, but also improve greatly computation speed, save computing time and ameliorate computational efficiency while keeping calculation accuracy. Therefore, DCRSM is fully verified to be feasible and effective in BTRRC reliability analysis. Meanwhile, the present study provides some useful insight into designing and optimizing more effectively complex machinery reliability schemes in general.
[1] Lattime S B, Steinetz B M. High pressure turbine engine clearance control systems: current practices and future directions. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 2004, 20(2): 302-311.
[2] Hennecke D K, Trappmann K. Turbine tip clearance control in gas turbine engines. NASA, N83-229254, 1983.
[3] Lee S, Yi C. Statistical tolerance and clearance analysis for assembly. Proceedings of the 1996 IEEE/RSJ International Conference, 1996: 688-695.
[4] Pilidis P, Maccallum N R L. Models for predicting tip clearance changes in gas turbines. NASA, N83-229258, 1983.
[5] NSSA Glenn Research Center. HTP clearance control. NASA, CR-2005-213970, 2005.
[6] Lattime S B, Steinetz B M, Robbie M G. Test rig for evaluating active turbine blade tip clearance control concepts. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 2005, 21(3): 552-563.
[7] Jia B H, Zhang X D. Study on effect of rotor vibration on tip clearance variation and fast active control of tip clearance. Advanced Material Research, 2010, 139-141(1): 2469-2472.
[8] Annette E N, Christoph W M, Stephan S. Modeling and validation of the thermal effects on gas turbine transients. Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, 2005, 127(3): 564-572.
[9] Forssell L S. Flight clearance analysis using global nonlinear optimisation-based search algorithms. Proceedings of the AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference, 2003: 1-8.
[10] Kypuros J A, Melcher K J. A reduced model for prediction of thermal and rotational effects on turbine tip clearance. NASA-TM-2003-212226, 2003.
[11] Gole N, Kumar A, Narasimhan V. Health risk assessment and prognosis of gas turbine blades by simulation and statistical methods. Proceedings of the Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering, 2008: 1087-1092.
[12] Qi W K, Chen W. Tip clearance numerical analysis of aeroengine HPT. Journal of Nanjing University of Aeronautics & Astronautics, 2003, 35 (1): 63-67. (in Chinese) 漆文凯, 陈伟. 某型航空发动机高压涡轮叶尖间隙数值分析. 南京航空航天大学学报, 2003, 35(1): 63-67.
[13] Guo S F, Xu B. Effect of temperature and rotational speed on radial clearance of turbine blade tip. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2004, 21(4): 51-53. (in Chinese) 郭淑芬, 徐波. 温度与转速对涡轮叶尖径向间隙的影响. 推进技术, 2004, 21(4): 51-53.
[14] Qi X M, Piao Y, Zhu J H, et al. 3-D numerical analysis of the tip clearance of an aero-engine high pressure turbine. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2008, 23(5): 904-908. (in Chinese) 岂兴明, 朴英, 祝剑虹, 等. 某型航空发动机高压涡轮叶顶间隙三维数值分析. 航空动力学报, 2008, 23(5): 904-908.
[15] Gurvich M R, Pipes R B. Probabilistic strength analysis of four-directional laminated composites. Composites Science and Technology, 1996, 56(6): 649-656.
[16] Pugh C E, Bass B R, Dickson T L. Role of probabilistic analysis in integrity assessments of reactor pressure vessels exposed to pressurized thermal-shock conditions. Engineering Failure Analysis, 2007, 14(3): 501-517.
[17] Lu Q, Low B K. Probabilistic analysis of underground rock excavations using response surface method and SORM. Computers and Geotechnics, 2011, 38(8): 1008-1021.
[18] Kartal M E, Basaga H B, Bayraktar A. Probabilistic nonlinear analysis of CFR dams by MCS using response surface method. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 2011, 35(6): 2752-2770.
[19] Liu Z Q. Probability design method of margins of safety for reliability characteristic parameters of space mechanical products. Chinese Space Science and Technology, 2007(4): 34-43. (in Chinese) 刘志全. 航天器机械可靠性特征量裕度的概率设计方法. 中国空间科学技术, 2007(4): 34-43.
[20] Fitzpatrick C K, Baldwin M A, Rullkoetter P J, et al. Combined probabilistic and principal component analysis approach for multivariate sensitivity evaluation and application to implanted patellofemoral mechanics. Journal of Biomechanics, 2011, 44(1): 13-21.
[21] Alessandro Z, Michele B, Andrea D A, et al. Probabilistic analysis for design assessment of continuous steel-concrete composite girders. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2010, 66(7): 897-905.
[22] Nakamura T, Fujii K. Probabilistic transient thermal analysis of an atmospheric reentry vehicle structure. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2006, 10(4): 346-354.
[23] Tan X H, Bi W H, Hou X L, et al. Reliability analysis using radial basis function networks and support vector machines. Computers and Geotechnics, 2011, 38(2): 178-186.
[24] Cho S E. Probabilistic stability analyses of slopes using the ANN-based response surface. Computers and Geotechnics, 2009, 36(5): 787-797.
[25] Eom Y S, Yoo K S, Park J Y, et al. Reliability-based topology optimization using a standard response surface method for three-dimensional structures. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2011, 43(2): 287-295.
[26] Li C, Han X. Analysis of reliability sensitivity for gear engagement based on response surface method. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2011, 26(3): 711-715. (in Chinese) 李昌, 韩兴. 基于响应面法齿轮啮合传动可靠性灵敏度分析. 航空动力学报, 2011, 26(3): 711-715.
[27] Huang Z J, Wang C G, Chen J, et al. Optimal design of aeroengine turbine disc based on kriging surrogate models. Computers & Structures, 2011, 89(1-2): 27-37.
[28] Cardoso J B, Almeida J R, Dias J M, et al. Structure reliability analysis using Monte Carlo simulation and neural networks. Advances in Engineering Software, 2008, 39(6): 505-513.
[29] Deng J, Gu D S, Li X B, et al. Structural reliability analysis for implicit performance functions using artificial neural network. Structural Safety, 2005, 27(1): 25-48.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
CJA