通用飞行器气动优化设计数字化集成平台-DIPasda（气动优化专栏）

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2019.123348

Abstract

Abstract: With the growth in computing power and the advances in computational techniques, the growing competitiveness in air-craft industry calls for an accurate, efficient, and robust tools for advanced aircraft shape design. The development of the future aviation industry needs to solve the key problems of multidisciplinary integrated design and provide a powerful de-sign method and tools for the design of new high-performance aircraft. This paper presents an automated digitalized inte-grated platform for aerodynamics synthetic design and assessment (DIPasda) for complex shape. Our goal is to present a new general-purpose robust and efficient optimization platform which is aimed at real-life constrained designs where the conventional design approaches complicated and time-consuming. The DIPasda system contains a collection of func-tional modules for performing design and optimization studies by means of numerical optimization schemes, geometry parameterization techniques, surrogate models, high-fidelity computational analysis tools for different disciplines and so on. By introducing the system architecture of the platform in detail, the main functional modules and the multi-objective optimization process, the flexibility of the system architecture design and the completeness of the functional modules are demonstrated. At last optimization tests is presented to show the system’s design optimization capability.

Key words: Aerodynamics Design, Platform, System Architecture, Multi-objective optimization, Multidiscipline optimization

CLC Number:

V211.3
O355

References

[1] MOHAMMD A Z, BREZILLON J. Shape optimization usingthe aerostructural coupled adjoint approach for viscous flow[C] //Proceedings of Evolutionary and Deterministic for Design, Optimization and Con-trol, 2011.
[2] LEOVIRIYAKIT K, JAMESON A. Case studies in aerostructural wing planform and section optimization. AIAA-200405372[R]. Reston, VA:AIAA 2004.
[3] MELVIN R G, HUFFMAN WP. Recent progress in aerodynamic design optimization[J]. Int J Number Meth Fluids, 1999, 30(2):205-216.
[4] 周铸，黄江涛，高正红等．民用飞机气动外形数值优化设计面临的挑战与展望[J]. 航空学报, 2019, 40(1):522370-522370.
ZHOU Z, HUANG J T, GAO Z H, et al. Challenges and prospects of numerical optimization design for laorge civil aircraft aerodynamic shape[J]. Acta Aero-nautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2019, 40(1):522370-522370 (in chinese). Doi:10.7527/s1000-6839. 2018. 22370.
[5] STEPHEN T, LEDOUX, WILLIAM W. et al. MDOPT-a multidisciplinary design optimization system using higher order analysis codes[C]. AIAA Paper 98-4757, August 2004, 10th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference.
[6] GRAY J, MOOREY K T, NAYLOR B A. OpenMDAO: An open source framework for multidisciplinary analysis and Optimization[C]. Proceedings of 13th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis Optimiza-tion Conference. 2010, Fort Worth, Texas, USA: AIAA.
[7] JAMESON J, PIERCE N A., MARTINELLI L. Opti-mum aerodynamics design using the Navier-Stokes equations: AIAA-97-0101[R]. Reston, VA:AIAA, 1997.
[8] NIELSEN E J, ANDERSON W K. Recent improve-ments in aerodynamic design optimization on un-structured meshes: AIAA-2001-0596, 2000[R]. Reston, VA:AIAA.
[9] 黄江涛, 周铸, 刘刚, 等．飞行器气动／结构多学科延迟耦合伴随系统数值研究[J]. 航空学报, 2018, 39(5):121731-121731..
HUANG J T, ZHOU Z, LIU G, et al. Numerical study of aero-structural multidisciplinary lagged coupled adjoint system for aircraft[J]. Acta Aeronautica et As-tronautica Sinica, 2018, 39(5):121731-121731 (in chinese). Doi:10.7527/S1000-6893．2017．21731.
[10] COELLO COELLO CA, VAN VELDUIZEN DA, LAMONT GB. Evolutionary algorithms for solving multi-Objective problems[M]. Kluwer Academic Pub-lishers, New York, May 2002.
[11] 郑传宇, 黄江涛, 周铸, 等. 飞翼翼型高维多目标空间多学科综合优化设计[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2017, 35(4):587-597. Doi:10.7638/kqdlxxb-2017.0079.
ZHENG C Y, HUANG J T, ZHOU Z, et al. Multidisci-plinary optimization design of high dimensional target space for flying wing airfoil[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2017, 35(4):587-597.
[12] Sobieszczanski-Sobieski J. Sensitivity analysis and multidisciplinary optimization for aircraft design: re-cent advance and results[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 1990,27(12):993-1001.
[13] LES PIEGL, WAYNE TILLER. The NURBS Book[M], Springer, 1997.
[14] BRENDA MKULFAN. Recent extensions and appli-cations of the “CST” universal parametric geometry representation method[C]: AIAA-2007-7709[R]. Reston, VA:AIAA, 2007.
[15] SEDERBERG T W, PARRY S R. Freeform deforming of solid geometric models[J]. Computer Graphics, 1986, 22(4):151-160.
[16] J A SAMAREH. Aerodynamic shape optimization based on Free-Form Deformation[C]: AIAA-2004-4630,[R]. Reston, VA:AIAA, 2004.
[17] PANG Y F, ZHANG S J, SUN J F. An adaptive grid rebuilding method for multi-zone structured grid[C]. 6th Asia Workshop on Computational Fluid Dynamics, 2006.
[18] 肖涵山, 陈作斌, 刘刚, 江雄. 基于Euler方程的三维自适应笛卡尔网格应用研究[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2003, 21(2):202-210.
XIAO H S, CHEN Z B, LIU G, et al. Applications of 3-D adaptive Cartesian grid algorithm based on the Euler equations[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2003, 21(3):202-210.
[19] 牟斌, 肖中云, 周铸, 等. 多重网格技术在复杂粘性流场计算中的应用及研究[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2006, 24(1):51-54.
MOU B, XIAO Z Y, ,ZHOU Z, et al. Application and investigation of multi-block multi-grid method in complicated viscous flow fields calculation[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2006, 24(1):51-54 .
[20] M D MCKAY, W J CONOVER, R J BECKMAN. A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a com-puter code[J]. Technometrics, 1979, 21(3): 239–245.
[21] 方开泰,马长兴. 正交与均匀试验设计[M]. 北京: 科学与试验出版社,1980.
FANG K T, MA C X. Orthogonal and uniform exper-imental design[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 1980 (in Chinese).
[22] SHINKYU JEONG, MITSUHIRO MURAYMA. Efficient optimization design method using Kriging model. Journal of Aircraft , 2005,42(2):413-420.
[23] 黄江涛, 高正红, 余婧, 等. 大型民用飞机气动外形典型综合设计方法[J]. 航空学报, 2019, 40(2):522369-522369.
HUANG J T, GAO Z H , YU J, et al. A typical inte-grated design method design method for aerodynam-ics shape optimization of large civil aircraft[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2019, 40(2):522369-522369 ( in chinese).
[24] 黄江涛, 周铸, 余婧, 等. 考虑飞行器动力系统进排气效应的设计参数灵敏度分析研究[J]. 推进技术, 2019, 40(2):250-258.
HUANG J T, ZHOU Z, YU J, et al. Sensitivity analy-sis of design variables considering intake and exhaust effects[J]. Journal of propulsion technology, 2019,40(2): 250-258 (in chinese).

Digital integrated platform for universal aircraft multidisciplinary design optimization - DIPasda

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	PAN Chengsheng, XING Guixuan, QI Yaowen, YANG Li. Topological generation and optimization method in multi-state space information network [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2020, 41(4): 323546-323546.
[2]	MA Dongli, ZHANG Liang, YANG Muqing, XIA Xinglu, WANG Shaoqi. Review of key technologies of ultra-long-endurance solar powered unmanned aerial vehicle [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2020, 41(3): 623418-623447.
[3]	GU Wenting, ZHAO Zhenshan, ZHOU Hanwei, FENG Jian, TAN Zhaoguang, LI Dong. Powered-on nacelle design on blended-wing-body configuration with podded engines [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2019, 40(9): 623047-623047.
[4]	ZHENG Fengying, LIU Longwu, CHENG Yuehua, CHEN Zhiming, CHENG Fengna. Multi-objective control allocation strategy of compound rotorcraft [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2019, 40(6): 322727-322727.
[5]	ZHANG Xinshuai, LIU Jun, LUO Shibin. An improved multi-objective cuckoo search algorithm for airfoil aerodynamic optimization design [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2019, 40(6): 122550-122550.
[6]	HUANG Jiangtao, GAO Zhenghong, YU Jing, ZHENG Chuanyu, ZHOU Zhu. A typical integrated design method for aerodynamic shape optimization of large civil aircraft [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2019, 40(2): 522369-522369.
[7]	XUE Bangmeng, ZHANG Wensheng, SUN Xuewei, WU Yuang. Multi-objective wing shape optimization for a wide-body civil aircraft in wing-body-pylon-powered nacelle configuration [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2019, 40(2): 522381-522381.
[8]	ZHOU Zhu, HUANG Jiangtao, GAO Zhenghong, HUANG Yong, CHEN Zuobin, YU Jing. Challenges and prospects of numerical optimization design for large civil aircraft aerodynamic shape [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2019, 40(1): 522370-522370.
[9]	CHEN Yingchun, ZHANG Meihong, ZHANG Miao, MAO Jun, MAO Kun, WANG Qimin. Review of large civil aircraft aerodynamic design [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2019, 40(1): 522759-522759.
[10]	WANG Kelei, ZHOU Zhou, ZHU Xiaoping, XU Xiaoping. Multi-propeller/wing coupled aerodynamic design at low Reynolds number [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2018, 39(8): 121918-121918.
[11]	HUANG Jiangtao, ZHOU Zhu, LIU Gang, GAO Zhenghong, HUANG Yong, WANG Yuntao. Numerical study of aero-structural multidisciplinary lagged coupled adjoint system for aircraft [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2018, 39(5): 121731-121731.
[12]	ZHOU Jian, GONG Chunlin, SU Hua, ZHANG Xiaonan, LI Bo, GU Liangxian. Optimal design problem of system of systems of flight vehicle [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2018, 39(11): 222223-222235.
[13]	ZHOU Zhu, HUANG Jiangtao, HUANG Yong, LIU Gang, CHEN Zuobin, WANG Yuntao, JIANG Xiong. CFD technology in aeronautic engineering field: Applications, challenges and development [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2017, 38(3): 20891-020891.
[14]	MA Yuanyuan, HU Minghua, YIN Jia'nan, TIAN Wen. Collaborative sequencing and scheduling method for arrival and departure traffic flow in multi-airport terminal area [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2017, 38(2): 320222-320234.
[15]	WU Gaofeng, GAO Xiaoguang, FU Xiaowei. Modeling and optimization method of relay node placement using multi-UAV [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2017, 38(11): 321195-321195.