空中交通管制员的眼动行为与疲劳关系

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2017.721525

流体力学与飞行力学

本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索

前一篇 | 后一篇

空中交通管制员的眼动行为与疲劳关系

卜建, 刘银鑫, 王艳军

南京航空航天大学民航学院国家空管飞行流量管理技术重点实验室, 南京 211106

收稿日期:2017-05-25 修回日期:2017-07-07 出版日期:2017-11-30 发布日期:2017-07-07
通讯作者: 王艳军 E-mail:ywang@nuaa.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金（61304190）；江苏省自然科学基金（BK20130818）

Relationship between air traffic controllers' eye movement and fatigue

BU Jian, LIU Yinxin, WANG Yanjun

National Key Laboratory of Air Traffic Flow Management, College of Civil Aviation, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 211106, China

Received:2017-05-25 Revised:2017-07-07 Online:2017-11-30 Published:2017-07-07
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China (61304190); Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (BK20130818)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

在空中交通管制工作中，管制疲劳程度度量是一项需要长期研究的重要课题。实时测量管制员的疲劳程度，对航空运输系统的安全运行有重要意义。提出以眼动行为特征指标作为反映管制员疲劳程度的依据，利用faceLAB 5.0系统记录了管制员在正常状态和疲劳状态下进行管制模拟实验的眼动数据和绩效数据，分析了管制员的绩效数据与眨眼频率和瞳孔直径两种眼动指标在不同状态下的变化规律。研究发现与正常状态相比，管制员在疲劳状态下的眨眼频率增加，瞳孔直径减小。随着任务时间的增加，被试的绩效变差，眨眼频率增加，瞳孔直径减小，表明被试的工作状态从正常状态转为疲劳状态。统计分析结果说明，眨眼频率和瞳孔直径能够有效地检测管制员的疲劳状态，充分刻画不同工作时段管制员工作状态的变化，为开发实用的疲劳监测系统提供理论基础。

关键词: 空中交通管制, 管制疲劳, 眼动特征, 瞳孔直径, 眨眼频率

Abstract:

The assessment of air traffic controllers' fatigue is an important research topic which needs sustainable efforts. The real-time measurement of controller's fatigue has important implications for the safe operation of air transport system. This paper proposes to use eye movements to measure air traffic controllers fatigue, in which the eye movement data in normal and fatigue states are collected using faceLAB5.0 system. The performance data, eye blink frequency, and pupil diameter of the controllers are compared and analyzed. The experiment results show that compared with normal state when controller felt fatigue (i) blink frequency is increased; (ii) the pupil diameter is reduced. With the increase of task time, the performance of the subjects deteriorate, the blink frequency increase, and the pupil diameter decrease, indicating the changing of working state from normal state to fatigue state. The study shows that blink frequency and pupil diameter can effectively indicate fatigue state of the controller and can fully depict the influence of different working periods on the working status of the controller, and thus provides a theoretical basis for developing a practical fatigue monitoring system.

Key words: air traffic control, control fatigue, eye movements, pupil diameter, blink frequency

中图分类号:

V355

卜建, 刘银鑫, 王艳军. 空中交通管制员的眼动行为与疲劳关系[J]. 航空学报, 2017, 38(S1): 721525-721525.

BU Jian, LIU Yinxin, WANG Yanjun. Relationship between air traffic controllers' eye movement and fatigue[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2017, 38(S1): 721525-721525.

参考文献

[1] GUZZETT J B. FAA's controller scheduling practices can impact human fatigue, controller performance, & agency costs[R]. Washington, D.C.: FAA, 2013.
[2] PAPE A M, WIEGMANN D A, SHAPPELL S. Air traffic control (ATC) related accidents and incidents: A human factors analysis[C]//Proceeding of 11th International Symposium on Aviation Psychology, 2001: 1-4.
[3] GANDER P. Fatigue management in air traffic control: The New Zealand approach[J]. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 2001, 4(1): 49-62.
[4] 牛清宁, 周志强, 金立生. 基于眼动特征的疲劳驾驶检测方法[J]. 哈尔滨工程大学学报, 2015, 36(3): 394-398. NIU Q N, ZHOU Z Q, JIN L S. Detection of driver fatigue based on eye movements[J]. Journal of Harbin Engineering University, 2015, 36(3): 394-398(in Chinese).
[5] KECKLUND G, AKERSTEDT T. Sleepiness in long distance truck driving: An ambulatory EEG study of night driving[J]. Ergonomics, 1993, 36(9): 1007-1017.
[6] LAL S, CRAIG A. Physiological indicators of driver fatigue[C]//Road Safely Research, Policing and Education Conference, 2000: 489-494.
[7] 杨渝书, 姚振强, 李增勇. 心电图时频域指标在驾驶疲劳评价中的有效性研究[J]. 机械设计与制造,2002(5): 94-95. YANG Y S, YAO Z Q, LI Z Y. Investigation on correlation between ECG indexes and driving fatigue[J]. Machinery Design & Manufacture, 2002(5): 94-95(in Chinese).
[8] 毛科俊, 赵晓华, 刘小明. 基于脑电分析的驾驶疲劳预报研究[J]. 人类工效学, 2009, 15(4): 25-29. MAO K J, ZHAO X H, LIU X M. The study of driver fatigue prediction based on the EGG analysis[J]. Ergonomics, 2009, 15(4): 25-29(in Chinese).
[9] STERN J A, BOYER D,SCHROEDER D. Blink rate: A possible measure of fatigue[J]. Huma Factors, 1994, 36(2): 285-297.
[10] SCHLEICHER R, GALLEY N, BRIEST S, et al. Blinks and saccades as indicators of fatigue in sleepiness warnings: Looking tired?[J]. Ergonomics, 2008, 51(7): 982-1010.
[11] IQBAL S T, BAILEY B P. Using eye gaze patterns to identify user tasks [C]//The Grace Hopper Celebration of Women in Computing, 2004: 1-6.
[12] HAISONG G, QIANG J. An automated face reader for fatigue detection[C]//2004 Proceedings Sixth IEEE International Conference on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE Press, 2004: 111-116.
[13] DI S L, MCCAMY M B, CATENA A, et al. Microsaccade and drift dynamics reflect mental fatigue[J]. European Journal of Neuroscience, 2013, 38(3): 2389-2398.
[14] VAN ORDEN K F, JUNG T P, MAKEIG S. Combined eye activity measures accurately estimate changes in sustained visual task performance[J]. Biological Psychology, 2000, 52(3): 221-240.
[15] 汪磊, 孙瑞山. 基于面部特征识别的管制员疲劳监测方法研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2012, 22(7): 66-71. WANG L, SUN R S. Study on face feature recognition-based fatigue monitoring method for air traffic controller[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2012, 22(7): 66-71(in Chinese).

E-mail：hkxb@buaa.edu.cn

关于我们

期刊社服务

专业学科

封面文章

友情链接

主管单位：中国科学技术协会主办单位：中国航空学会北京航空航天大学

空中交通管制员的眼动行为与疲劳关系

Relationship between air traffic controllers' eye movement and fatigue

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	刘继新, 江灏, 董欣放, 兰思洁, 王浩哲. 基于空中交通密度的进场航班动态协同排序方法[J]. 航空学报, 2020, 41(7): 323717-323717.
[2]	贺强, 谭德强, 程林. 民机复合材料目视检查中的眼动与疲劳检测[J]. 航空学报, 2020, 41(5): 223532-223532.
[3]	武喜萍, 杨红雨, 韩松臣. 基于复杂网络的空中交通特征与延误传播分析[J]. 航空学报, 2017, 38(S1): 721473-721473.
[4]	马园园, 胡明华, 张洪海, 尹嘉男, 吴凡. 多机场终端区进场航班协同排序方法[J]. 航空学报, 2015, 36(7): 2279-2290.
[5]	尹嘉男, 胡明华, 张洪海, 马园园, 吴凡. 独立离场模式下多跑道时空资源优化调度方法[J]. 航空学报, 2015, 36(5): 1574-1584.
[6]	尹嘉男, 胡明华, 张洪海, 马园园. 多跑道协同运行模式优化方法[J]. 航空学报, 2014, 35(3): 795-806.
[7]	尹嘉男, 胡明华, 彭瑛, 唐勇, 马园园. 相关进近模式下多跑道时空资源优化调度方法[J]. 航空学报, 2014, 35(11): 3064-3073.
[8]	王洪, 刘昌忠, 汪学刚, 吴宏刚. 一种多点定位的目标位置精确解算方法[J]. 航空学报, 2011, 32(7): 1269-1274.
[9]	刘方勤, 胡明华, 张颖. 基于航路耦合容量的协同多航路资源分配[J]. 航空学报, 2011, 32(4): 672-684.
[10]	白松浩, 兰洪亮, 郑娜, 夏正洪, 周臣. 基于贡献度模型方法对空中交通管制中心系统的效能评估[J]. 航空学报, 2011, 32(3): 438-447.
[11]	周琨, 夏洪山. 基于协同多任务分配的飞机排班模型与算法[J]. 航空学报, 2011, 32(12): 2293-2302.
[12]	徐肖豪;赵鸿盛;王振宇. 尾流间隔缩减技术综述[J]. 航空学报, 2010, 31(4): 655-662.
[13]	李雄;徐肖豪;赵嶷飞;卫东选. 散点状分布危险天气区域下的航班改航路径规划[J]. 航空学报, 2009, 30(12): 2342-2347.
[14]	刘伟;黄智刚;张军;罗喜伶. 星基ADS与雷达误差校准算法的研究[J]. 航空学报, 2006, 27(1): 120-124.
[15]	韩松臣;徐肖豪;贺利强. 航班在机场终端区时延解析计算的新方法[J]. 航空学报, 2000, 21(6): 528-531.