SMA鼓包迟滞建模与控制策略

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2020.24652

固体力学与飞行器总体设计

本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索

前一篇 | 后一篇

SMA鼓包迟滞建模与控制策略

陈旭亮, 张琛, 季宏丽, 裘进浩

南京航空航天大学航空学院机械结构力学及控制国家重点实验室, 南京 210016

收稿日期:2020-08-18 修回日期:2020-11-11 发布日期:2020-12-08
通讯作者: 季宏丽 E-mail:jihongli@nuaa.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金（11532006&51775267）；江苏省自然科学基金（BK20181286）；装备预研基金（61402100103）；江苏高校优势学科建设工程资助项目

SMA bump hysteresis modeling and control strategy

CHEN Xuliang, ZHANG Chen, JI Hongli, QIU Jinhao

State Key Laboratory of Mechanics and Control of Mechanical Structures, College of Aerospace Engineering, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 210016, China

Received:2020-08-18 Revised:2020-11-11 Published:2020-12-08
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China (11532006 & 51775267); Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (BK20181286); Equipment Pre-Research Foundation (61402100103); A Project Funded by the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 激波控制鼓包SCB是一种减小激波阻力的流动控制技术。为了解决固定挠度鼓包工作范围较窄的问题，提出了一种具有双向记忆效应的形状记忆合金SMA鼓包，通过控制SMA鼓包的温度来改变其挠度。SMA鼓包最大可回复位移为6.1 mm，为鼓包变形区域的2.65%。针对迟滞现象对鼓包挠度控制的影响，基于（Krasnosel'skii-Pokrovskii，KP）模型对SMA鼓包的温度/挠度迟滞特性进行了建模研究。采用粒子群算法来辨识模型参数，辨识得到的迟滞模型最大误差为0.107 mm。设计了2种基于KP模型的PID控制方案，一种为无迟滞补偿的单目标PID控制，一种为迟滞逆模型前馈补偿的双目标PID控制。仿真与实验结果表明，迟滞逆模型前馈补偿的双目标PID控制时域性能优于无迟滞补偿的单目标PID控制。

关键词: 形状记忆合金, 迟滞建模, Krasnosel'skii-Pokrovskii(KP)模型, 激波控制鼓包, PID控制

Abstract: Shock Control Bump (SCB) is a flow control method for shock drag reduction. To solve the problem of the narrow working range of the fixed deflection bump, we propose a Shape Memory Alloy (SMA) bump with two-way memory effect to change deflection by controlling the temperature. The maximum recoverable displacement of the SMA bump is 6.1 mm, which is 2.65% of the deformation area of the bump. To reduce the influence of the hysteresis when controlling the deflection, we use the Krasnosel'skii-Pokrovskii (KP) model to model the temperature/deflection hysteresis of the SMA bump. The particle swarm algorithm is adopted to identify the parameters of the hysteresis model. The maximum error of the identified hysteresis model is 0.107 mm. Two PID control schemes based on the KP model are designed, one being single-target PID control without hysteresis compensation, and the other being dual-target PID control with the hysteresis inverse model feedforward compensation. Simulation and experimental results show that the time-domain performance of the dual-target PID control with the hysteresis inverse model feedforward compensation is better than the single-target PID control without hysteresis compensation.

Key words: shape memory alloy, hysteresis modeling, Krasnosel'skii-Pokrovskii (KP) model, shock control bump, PID control

中图分类号:

V224⁺.4

陈旭亮, 张琛, 季宏丽, 裘进浩. SMA鼓包迟滞建模与控制策略[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(9): 224652-224652.

CHEN Xuliang, ZHANG Chen, JI Hongli, QIU Jinhao. SMA bump hysteresis modeling and control strategy[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2021, 42(9): 224652-224652.

参考文献

[1] BRUCE P J K, COLLISS S P. Review of research into shock control bumps[J]. Shock Waves, 2015, 25(5):451-471.
[2] STANEWSKY E, DÉLERY J, FULKER J, et al. Assessment of shock control-A summary[M]//Notes on Numerical Fluid Mechanics (NNFM). Wiesbaden:Vieweg+Teubner Verlag, 1997:76-77.
[3] STANEWSKY E, DÉLERY J, FULKER J, et al. Drag reduction by shock and boundary layer control[M]. Berlin:Springer Berlin Heidelberg,2002.
[4] 李沛峰, 张彬乾, 陈迎春, 等. 减小翼型激波阻力的鼓包流动控制技术[J]. 航空学报, 2011, 32(6):971-977. LI P F, ZHANG B Q, CHEN Y C, et al. Wave drag reduction of airfoil with shock control bump[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2011, 32(6):971-977(in Chinese).
[5] JINKS E R, BRUCE P J, SANTER M J. Adaptive shock control bumps[C]//52nd Aerospace Sciences Meeting. Reston:AIAA, 2014:0945.
[6] LAGOUDAS D C. Shape memory alloys:Modeling and engineering applications[M]. Berlin:Springer, 2008.
[7] LESTER B T, BAXEVANIS T, CHEMISKY Y, et al. Review and perspectives:Shape memory alloy composite systems[J]. Acta Mechanica, 2015, 226(12):3907-3960.
[8] MOHD J J, LEARY M, SUBIC A, et al. A review of shape memory alloy research, applications and opportunities[J]. Materials & Design (1980-2015), 2014, 56:1078-1113.
[9] 聂瑞, 裘进浩, 季宏丽, 等. 自适应鼓包气动构型优化与结构概念设计[J]. 工程热物理学报, 2017, 38(9):1896-1905. NIE R, QIU J H, JI H L, et al. Aerodynamic configuration optimization and structural concept design of adaptive bump[J]. Journal of EngineeringThermophysics, 2017, 38(9):1896-1905(in Chinese).
[10] PREISACH F.Vber die magnetische nachwirkung[J]. Zeitschrift Für Physik, 1935, 94(5-6):277-302.
[11] SU C Y, WANG Q Q, CHEN X K, et al. Adaptive variable structure control of a class of nonlinear systems with unknown Prandtl-Ishlinskii hysteresis[J]. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 2005, 50(12):2069-2074.
[12] WEBB G V, LAGOUDAS D C, KURDILA A J. Hysteresis modeling of SMA actuators for control applications[J]. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, 1998, 9(6):432-448.
[13] LIU Y H, FENG Y, DU J, et al. Adaptive dynamicsurface control of a class of nonlinear systems with unknown duhem hysteresis[C]//Intelligent Robotics and Applications, 2012.
[14] NGUYEN B K, AHN K K. Feedforward control of shape memory alloy actuators using fuzzy-based inverse preisach model[J]. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 2009, 17(2):434-441.
[15] FENG Y, RABBATH C A, HONG H, et al. Inverse hysteresis control for shape memory alloy micro-actuators based flap positioning system[C]//49th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC). Piscataway:IEEE Press, 2010:3662-3667.
[16] LIU Y H, FENG Y, CHEN X K. Robust adaptive dynamic surface control for a class of nonlinear dynamical systems with unknown hysteresis[J]. Abstract and Applied Analysis, 2014, 2014:1-10.
[17] MAI H H, SONG G B, LIAO X F. Adaptive online inverse control of a shape memory alloy wire actuator using a dynamic neural network[J]. Smart Materials and Structures, 2012, 22(1):015001.
[18] 郝林. 形状记忆合金鼓包力学特性研究[D]. 南京:南京航空航天大学, 2018. HAO L. Research on mechanical properties of shape memory alloy bump[D]. Nanjing:Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2018(in Chinese).
[19] KENNEDY J, EBERHART R. Particle swarm optimization[C]//Proceedings of ICNN'95-International Conference on Neural Networks,2002.
[20] 刘金琨. 先进PID控制MATLAB仿真[M]. 2版. 北京:电子工业出版社, 2004. LIU J K.MATLAB simulation of advanced PID control[M].2nd ed. Beijing:Publishing House of Electronics Industry, 2004(in Chinese).

E-mail：hkxb@buaa.edu.cn

关于我们

期刊社服务

专业学科

封面文章

友情链接

主管单位：中国科学技术协会主办单位：中国航空学会北京航空航天大学

SMA鼓包迟滞建模与控制策略

SMA bump hysteresis modeling and control strategy

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	章胜华, 邓枫, 覃宁, 刘学强. 激波控制鼓包对跨声速抖振影响的数值研究[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(11): 526806-526806.
[2]	向乾, 张晓辉, 王正平, 刘莉. 适用无人机的小型燃料电池控制方法[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(3): 623960-623960.
[3]	任明波, 王娟, 李荣军, 党亚. 大型飞机座舱温度控制系统控制律设计[J]. 航空学报, 2017, 38(S1): 721501-721501.
[4]	陈琦, 郭勇颜, 谢昱飞, 陈坚强, 袁先旭. PID控制器与CFD的耦合模拟技术研究及应用[J]. 航空学报, 2016, 37(8): 2507-2516.
[5]	黄宇, 阎超, 席柯, 王文. 基于数值虚拟飞行技术的飞行器动态特性分析[J]. 航空学报, 2016, 37(8): 2525-2538.
[6]	杨鑫, 洪杰, 马艳红, 张大义. SMA智能梁结构振动控制试验研究[J]. 航空学报, 2015, 36(7): 2251-2259.
[7]	王健康, 张海波, 黄向华, 陆波. 基于直升机/涡轴发动机综合仿真平台的发动机非线性模型预测控制[J]. 航空学报, 2012, (3): 402-411.
[8]	胡宁, 刘福顺. TiNiFeNb形状记忆合金的组织结构及相变特性[J]. 航空学报, 2011, 32(5): 948-952.
[9]	李岩, 肖莉, 宋晓云. 热轧对Ti₅₀Ni_50-xAl_x(x=1,2,4)形状记忆合金微观组织、相变和力学性能的影响[J]. 航空学报, 2011, 32(3): 531-537.
[10]	张萍, 金栋平. 计及弯折波的舰载机拦阻过程控制[J]. 航空学报, 2011, 32(11): 2008-2015.
[11]	崔旭利;陈怀海;贺旭东;游伟倩. 多输入多输出随机振动试验变参数PID控制[J]. 航空学报, 2010, 31(9): 1776-1780.
[12]	杨波;王俊奎. 基于改进的CMAC的电动加载系统复合控制[J]. 航空学报, 2008, 29(5): 1314-1318.
[13]	柴亮;李岩. 轧制NiMnFeGa高温形状记忆合金的微观结构及拉伸力学性能[J]. 航空学报, 2007, 28(5): 1268-1271.
[14]	王军;郦正能. SMA智能复合材料结构的有限元分析与实验研究[J]. 航空学报, 2006, 27(4): 610-613.
[15]	韩冬;刘福顺;李岩;徐惠彬. 不同壁厚的TiNiFe形状记忆合金管接头紧固力的模拟计算[J]. 航空学报, 2006, 27(4): 703-707.