民机客舱下部吸能结构分析与试验相关性研究

固体力学与飞行器总体设计

本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索

前一篇 | 后一篇

民机客舱下部吸能结构分析与试验相关性研究

刘小川¹, 周苏枫², 马君峰², 孙侠生^1,2, 牟让科²

1. 西北工业大学航空学院, 陕西西安 710072;
2. 中国飞机强度研究所, 陕西西安 710065

收稿日期:2011-12-30 修回日期:2012-02-14 出版日期:2012-12-25 发布日期:2012-12-24
通讯作者: 孙侠生 E-mail:sunxs623@yahoo.com.cn
作者简介:刘小川男, 博士研究生, 工程师。主要研究方向: 飞机结构动力学。Tel: 029-88268229 E-mail: dd1882@hotmail.com

Correlation Study of Crash Analysis and Test of Civil Airplane Sub-cabin Energy Absorption Structure

LIU Xiaochuan¹, ZHOU Sufeng², MA Junfeng², SUN Xiasheng^1,2, MU Rangke²

1. School of Aeronautics, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an 710072, China;
2. Aircraft Strength Research Institute, Xi’an 710065, China

Received:2011-12-30 Revised:2012-02-14 Online:2012-12-25 Published:2012-12-24

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

以民机典型机身段客舱下部结构为研究对象,建立了结构坠撞有限元模型,利用LS-Dyna软件进行了结构能量吸收特性分析。基于吸能结构思想,以降低传递到客舱地板的加速度载荷为设计目标,提出了一种民用飞机客舱地板下部结构吸能设计方法。设计制造了全尺寸的吸能结构试件,并进行了垂直坠撞试验。为评估坠撞分析与试验的相关性,提出了一种基于能量的能量吸收特性评估方法。首先对预试验分析结果与试验结果进行了相关性分析,根据相关性分析结果对分析模型进行了修正。修正后坠撞分析结果与试验结果的相关性表明,乘员质心处的平均加速度响应峰值误差为16.44%,最大平均反弹速度误差为10.53%,修正后模型的总体刚度与实际结构一致,分析获得的结构总体变形模式与试验结果基本一致。但能量吸收时间和加速度峰值出现的时间与试验结果相比误差较大,表明结构连接失效等结构建模细节对计算结果有显著的影响。

关键词: 民用飞机, 吸能设计, 吸能结构, 坠撞试验, 适坠性

Abstract:

A finite element crash model of a typical civil airplane sub-cabin structure is developed and then a structural energy absorption analysis is conducted with the LS-Dyna code. An energy absorption design method is introduced based on energy absorption structure concept to minimize the cabin floor acceleration response. Then a full-scale test article is designed and manufactured, and a drop test is conducted to verify the design features and the modeling method. A correlation evaluation method based on energy is introduced, and the finite element model is updated after the correlation analysis between the pre-test analysis results and the test results. The updated analysis results show good agreement with the test results. The error of the average peak acceleration response at the centroid of the simulated occupant is 16.44%, and the error of the average maximum rebound velocity of the model is 10.53%. The global deformation modes of the test and simulation also fit well. But the error of the energy absorption duration and time when the peak acceleration appears are fairly large, which indicates that certain structural modeling features, such as the structural joint dynamic failure mode, have significant impact on the computational results.

Key words: civil airplane, energy absorption design, energy absorption structure, drop test, crashworthiness

中图分类号:

V271.1

刘小川, 周苏枫, 马君峰, 孙侠生, 牟让科. 民机客舱下部吸能结构分析与试验相关性研究[J]. 航空学报, 2012, 33(12): 2202-2210.

LIU Xiaochuan, ZHOU Sufeng, MA Junfeng, SUN Xiasheng, MU Rangke. Correlation Study of Crash Analysis and Test of Civil Airplane Sub-cabin Energy Absorption Structure[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2012, 33(12): 2202-2210.

参考文献

[1] Al-khalil M. Overview of aircraft accidents in the last 10 years. CRAHVI Workshop: Crash and Impact Modeling of Structures, 2002.

[2] European Transport Safety Council. Increasing the survival rate in aircraft accidents: impact protection, fire survivability and evacuation. Brussels: European Transport Safety Council, 1996.

[3] Fasanella E L, Jackson K E, Jones Y T, et al. Crash simulation of a Boeing 737 fuselage section vertical drop test. Proceedings of the Third KRASH User’s Conference, 2001.

[4] Byar A. A crashworthiness study of a Boeing 737 fuselage section. Philadelphia, PA: Drexel University, 2003.

[5] Fasanella E L, Widmayer E, Robinson M P. Structural analysis of the controlled impact demonstration of a jet transport airplane. Journal of Aircraft, 1987, 24(4): 274-280.

[6] Lepage F. Results of the airliner sub-passenger floor structure drop test. CRASURV, CEAT Test Report S98/4449000 part5, 2000.

[7] Jackson K E. Analytical crash simulation of three composite fuselage concepts and experimental correlation. Journal of the American Helicopter Society, 1997, 42(2): 116-125.

[8] Jackson K E, Fasanella E L. Crashworthy evaluation of a 1/5-scale model composite fuselage concept. NASA/TM-1999-209132, 1999.

[9] Gou Z Q, Sun X S, Song B F. Research on crashworthiness simulation optimization of an agriculture and forestry aircraft fuselage frame. Journal of Mechanics Strength, 2008, 30(3): 396-399. (in Chinese) 苟仲秋, 孙侠生, 宋笔锋. 农林飞机简化框体模型坠撞仿真及优化. 机械强度, 2008, 30(3): 396-399.

[10] Ren Y R, Xiang J W, Luo Z P, et al. Effect of cabin floor oblique strut on crashworthiness of typical civil aircraft fuselage section. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2010, 31(2): 271-276. (in Chinese) 任毅如, 向锦武, 罗漳平, 等. 客舱地板斜撑杆对民机典型机身段耐撞性能的影响. 航空学报, 2010, 31(2): 271-276.

[11] Liu X C, Zhou S F, Sun X S, et al. Energy absorption optimization of civil airplane sub-floor structure. Mechanical Science and Technology for Aerospace Engineering, 2011, 30(11): 1968-1972. (in Chinese) 刘小川, 周苏枫, 孙侠生, 等. 民用飞机客舱地板下部结构吸能优化.机械科学与技术, 2011, 30(11): 1968-1972.

[12] SAE J211-1. Instrumentation for impact test—Part 1— electronic instrumentation. Safety Test Instrumentation Standards Committee, 2007.

[13] Fasanella E L, Jackson K E. Best practices of crash modeling and simulation. NASA/TM-2002-211944, 2002.

[14] Fasanella E L. Impact testing and simulation of a crashworthy composite fuselage section with energy absorbing seats and dummies. NASA/TM-2002-211731, 2002.

[15] Lyle K H, Bark L W, Jackson K E. Evaluation of test/analysis correlation methods for crash applications. Proceedings of the 57th American Helicopter Society Annual Forum, 2001.

E-mail：hkxb@buaa.edu.cn

关于我们

期刊社服务

专业学科

封面文章

友情链接

主管单位：中国科学技术协会主办单位：中国航空学会北京航空航天大学

民机客舱下部吸能结构分析与试验相关性研究

Correlation Study of Crash Analysis and Test of Civil Airplane Sub-cabin Energy Absorption Structure

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	张欣玥, 惠旭龙, 刘小川, 白春玉. 典型金属民机机身结构坠撞特性试验[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(6): 526234-526234.
[2]	杨志刚, 张炯, 李博, 曾锐, 毛研勋. 民用飞机智能飞行技术综述[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(4): 525198-525198.
[3]	孙霄剑, 罗明强, 张驰, 关若曦, 刘虎. 民用飞机预研论证权威真相源构建技术[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(2): 224222-224222.
[4]	张明辉, 陈真利, 顾文婷, 李栋, 张帅, 袁昌盛, 王龙, 张彬乾. 翼身融合布局民机高低速协调设计[J]. 航空学报, 2019, 40(9): 623052-623052.
[5]	何志全, 刘杨, 李泽江. 大型民用飞机缝翼全尺寸静力试验载荷设计[J]. 航空学报, 2019, 40(2): 522197-522197.
[6]	刘毓迪, 孙学德, 张存, 南国鹏. 民用飞机个人通风送风温度对人体舒适性的影响[J]. 航空学报, 2019, 40(2): 522363-522363.
[7]	陈名乾. 民用飞机商载航程图解析方程的建立及应用[J]. 航空学报, 2019, 40(2): 522407-522407.
[8]	冯振宇, 解江, 李恒晖, 程坤, 马骢瑶, 牟浩蕾. 大飞机货舱地板下部结构有限元建模与适坠性分析[J]. 航空学报, 2019, 40(2): 522394-522394.
[9]	许健, 吴磊, 褚江萍, 何珂. 民用飞机信息重构技术性能分析[J]. 航空学报, 2019, 40(2): 522442-522442.
[10]	刘玮, 滕青, 刘冰. 基于地板结构的机身双层双向加载技术[J]. 航空学报, 2018, 39(5): 221712-221712.
[11]	陈俊平, 王立新. 低能量状态对飞行安全的危害及改出方法[J]. 航空学报, 2017, 38(8): 121077-121077.
[12]	郭媛媛, 孙有朝, 李龙彪. 基于蒙特卡罗方法的民用飞机故障风险评估方法[J]. 航空学报, 2017, 38(10): 221126-221126.
[13]	周虹, 陈志雄. 面向民用飞机排故的增强型符号有向图[J]. 航空学报, 2016, 37(12): 3821-3831.
[14]	马超, 吴大卫, 俞金海, 陈迎春. 基于参数化模型的大型民用飞机设计航程研究[J]. 航空学报, 2016, 37(1): 112-121.
[15]	张帅, 夏明, 钟伯文. 民用飞机气动布局发展演变及其技术影响因素[J]. 航空学报, 2016, 37(1): 30-44.