ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA >
Qualitative theory for engineering system and its application to flight control
Received date: 2024-10-30
Revised date: 2024-11-18
Accepted date: 2024-11-29
Online published: 2024-12-10
Supported by
National Natural Science Foundation of China(61933010)
In engineering systems, challenges such as constrained system inputs, model uncertainties, environmental disturbance inputs, system mutations, or system failures often arise, making traditional qualitative theories like state controllability and observability difficult to apply. This paper describes the issues of traditional system state controllability and reachability through the analysis of model uncertainties. By modeling scenarios such as input constraints in aircraft actuators, additional inputs from environmental disturbances like gusts, system mutations during heavy airdrop or aerospace vehicle separation, and system failures, the paper investigates the controllability and stability determination for systems under these different conditions. On this basis, the paper proposes definitions and determination methods for the engineering consistent controllability of system states and outputs within the same system, and also provides a definition for the engineering consistent observability of system states and outputs. These conclusions are able to unify traditional judgments on system controllability, reachability, and stability, and are analogous to the rapidity and accuracy determinations in classic control. For the development of high-performance aircraft, the paper outlines the analysis and verification requirements for design, wind tunnel, and flight tests. An explanation of engineering consistent controllability is provided through the design results of an actual longitudinal flight.
Zhongke SHI . Qualitative theory for engineering system and its application to flight control[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2025 , 46(6) : 531463 -531463 . DOI: 10.7527/S1000-6893.2024.31463
1 | KALMAN R E. On the general theory of control[J]. IFAC Proceedings Volumes. 1960, 1(1): 491-502. |
2 | CHEN C, DESOER C, NIEDERLINSKI A, et al. Simplified conditions for controllability and observability of linear time-invariant systems[J]. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 1966, 11(3): 613-614. |
3 | ZU C X, LI T, RAO B P. Sufficiency of Kalman’s rank condition for the approximate boundary controllability on a spherical domain[J]. Mathematical Methods in the Applied Sciences, 2021, 44(17): 13509-13525. |
4 | CHAURASIA A, TRIPATHIS K, SHUKLA A, et al. Complete controllability of nonlinear neural network control systems[J]. Journal of Applied Nonlinear Dynamics, 2024, 13(3): 583-590. |
5 | AYDIN M, MAHMUDOV N I. Relative controllability of nonlinear delayed multi-agent systems[J]. International Journal of Control, 2024, 97(2): 348-357. |
6 | YANG Z X, WANG X F, WANG L.Controllabilityof networked sampled-data systems[J]. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 2024, 69(8): 5081-5093. |
7 | DANHANE B, LOHéAC J, JUNGERS M. Conditions for uniform ensemble output controllability, and obstruction to uniform ensemble controllability[J]. Mathematical Control and Related Fields, 2024, 14(3): 1128-1175. |
8 | TOLSTYKH V K. Controllability of distributed parameter systems[J]. Computational Mathematics and Mathematical Physics, 2024, 64(6): 1211-1223. |
9 | SAID A, AHMAD O U, ABBAS W, et al. Network controllability perspectives on graph representation[J]. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 2024, 36(8): 4116-4128. |
10 | MALIK M, KUMAR B. Controllability results for singular switched system on time scales[J]. Journal of Control and Decision, 2024, 11(2): 180-189. |
11 | 史忠科. 高性能飞机发展对控制理论的挑战[J]. 航空学报, 2015, 36(8): 2717-2734. |
SHI Z K. Challenge of control theory in the presence of high performance aircraft development[J]. Acta Aeronauticaet Astronautica Sinica, 2015, 36(8): 2717-2734 (in Chinese). | |
12 | SHI Z K, WUF X. Robust identification method for nonlinear model structures and its application to high-performance aircraft[J]. International Journal of Systems Science, 2013, 44(6): 1040-1051. |
13 | 史忠科. 飞行器三维运动故障诊断和容错控制方法: ZL201310095792.0[P]. 2015-04-08. |
SHI Z K. Aircraft fault diagnosis and tolerant control based on three-dimensional motion model:ZL201310095792.0[P]. 2015-04-08 (in Chinese). | |
14 | SHI Z K, FAN L. Bifurcation analysis of polynomial models for longitudinal motion at high angle of attack[J]. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2013, 26(1): 151-160. |
15 | PLUMER J A, FISHER F A, WALKO LC. Lightning effects on the NASA F-8 digital fly-by-wire airplane[R].Washington, D.C.: NASA, 1975. |
16 | DEYST J J, DECKERT J C. Application of likelihood ratio methods to failure detection and identification in the NASA F-8 DFBW aircraft[C]∥1975 IEEE Conference on Decision and Control including the 14th Symposium on Adaptive Processes. Piscataway: IEEE Press, 1975. |
17 | DEYST J, DECKERT J, DESAI M, et al.Development and testing of advanced redundancy management mathods for the F-8 DFBW aircraft[C]∥1977 IEEE Conference on Decision and Control including the 16th Symposium on Adaptive Processes and A Special Symposium on Fuzzy Set Theory and Applications. Piscataway: IEEE Press, 1977. |
18 | BRYSON A.Guest editorial: Mini-issue in NASA’s advanced control law program for the F-8 DFBW aircraft[J]. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 1977, 22(5): 752. |
19 | ELLIOTT J. NASA’s advanced control law program for the F-8 digital fly-by-wire aircraft[J]. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 1977, 22(5): 753-757. |
20 | STEIN G, HARTMANN G, HENDRICK R. Adaptive control laws for F-8 flight test[J]. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 1977, 22(5): 758-767. |
21 | DUNN H, MONTGOMERY R. A moving window parameter adaptive control system for the F8-DFBW aircraft[J]. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 1977, 22(5): 788-795. |
22 | GARRARD W L, JORDAN J M. Design of nonlinear automatic flight control systems[J]. Automatica, 1977, 13(5): 497-505. |
23 | DECKERT J, DESAI M, DEYST J, etal. F-8 DFBW sensor failure identification using analytic redundancy[J]. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 1977, 22(5): 795-803. |
24 | MARTIN-SANCHEZ J M, Implementation of an adaptive autopilot scheme for the F-8 aircraft using the adaptive-predictive control system [C]∥Asilomar Conference on Circuits, Systems & Computers. Piscataway: IEEE Press, 1980. |
25 | BERRY D, POWERS B, SZALAI K, etal. Asummer of an in-flight evaluation of control system pure time delays during landing using the F-8 DFBW airplane:AIAA-1980-1626[R]. Reston: AIAA, 1980. |
26 | DECKERT J. Flight test results for the F-8 digital fly-by-wire aircraft control sensor analytic redundancy management technique:AIAA-1981-1796[R]. Reston: AIAA, 1981. |
27 | ENNSD F, BUGAJSKID J, KLEPL M J. Flight control for the F-8 oblique wing research aircraft[J]. IEEE Control Systems Magazine, 1988, 8(2): 81-86. |
28 | SADHUKHAN D, FETEIH S. F8 neurocontroller based on dynamic inversion[J]. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 1996, 19(1): 150-156. |
29 | SURESH S, OMKARSN, MANI V, et al. Direct adaptive neural flight controller for F-8 fighter aircraft[J]. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2006, 29(2): 454-464. |
30 | XIN Q, SHI Z K. Bifurcation analysis and stability design for aircraft longitudinal motion with high angle of attack[J]. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2015, 28(1): 250-259. |
31 | MANURUNG A, KRISTIANA L, SYAFITRI N, et al. Revisiting the F-8 aircraft control problem with dynamic programming[C]∥2022 13th Asian Control Conference (ASCC). Piscataway: IEEE Press, 2022. |
32 | BISWAS B, IGNATYEV D, ZOLOTAS A, et al. Design of controller with enlarged region of attraction using union theorem in sum-of-squares optimization for the F-8 aircraft:AIAA-2024-1018[R]. Reston: AIAA, 2024. |
33 | SHI Z K. Interval criterion of robust stability for nonlinear system and its application to flight control[J]. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2004, 17(2): 99-105. |
/
〈 |
|
〉 |