Reviews

Research advances in aircraft predictive maintenance

  • Jianzhong SUN ,
  • Zhuojian WANG ,
  • Hongsheng YAN ,
  • Zhe LI ,
  • Sizheng DUAN ,
  • Hanchun HU ,
  • Hongfu ZUO
Expand
  • 1.College of Civil Aviation,Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics,Nanjing 210016,China
    2.College of Aeronautic Engineering,Air Force Engineering University,Xi’an 710051,China
    3.College of Aeronautic Engineering,Nanjing Vocational University of Industry Technology,Nanjing 210023,China

Received date: 2024-06-20

  Revised date: 2024-07-12

  Accepted date: 2024-11-04

  Online published: 2024-11-14

Supported by

National Natural Science Foundation of China(U2233204);National Key Research and Development Plan(2023YFB4302400)

Abstract

The maintenance and support model of modern aircraft is evolving from reliability-centered scheduled maintenance to condition-based predictive maintenance. Implementing predictive maintenance is a systematic project that requires integration and application of various applicable technologies, processes, and capabilities, involving management policies, standard specifications, business processes, new technologies, etc. throughout the design, operation, and support stages of the life cycle. This article reviews the research progress of aviation predictive maintenance from the perspectives of key technologies and applications. The research on health monitoring, fault diagnosis, failure prediction, and predictive maintenance decision technology is analyzed. Applications of predictive maintenance in military and civilian aviation are summarized, including government policies, industry standards, industry practices, and user experience. The technical and application challenges currently faced by aviation predictive maintenance are also analyzed, and the areas that need to be focused on in the future are discussed.

Cite this article

Jianzhong SUN , Zhuojian WANG , Hongsheng YAN , Zhe LI , Sizheng DUAN , Hanchun HU , Hongfu ZUO . Research advances in aircraft predictive maintenance[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2025 , 46(7) : 30852 -030852 . DOI: 10.7527/S1000-6893.2024.30852

References

1 United States Government Accountability Office. Weapon system sustainment: Aircraft mission capable goals were generally not met and sustainment costs varied by aircraft:GAO-23-106217[R]. Washington,D.C.:Government Accountability Office, 2022.
2 PIOTROWSKI D, ROACH D, MELTON A, et al. Implementation of structural health monitoring (SHM) into an airline maintenance program?[C]?∥Structural Health Monitoring 2015. Destech Publications, 2015.
3 SUN J Z, CHEN D, LI C Y, et al. Integration of scheduled structural health monitoring with airline maintenance program based on risk analysis[J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part O: Journal of Risk and Reliability2018232(1): 92-104.
4 SMITH M, SULCS P F, WALTHALL R, et al.Design and implementation of aircraft system health management (ASHM) utilizing existing data feeds?[C]?∥Condition-Based Maintenance in Aviation: The History, the Business and the Technology. Warrendale: SAE International, 2015.
5 左洪福, 孙见忠, 李鑫, 等. 民用飞机预测维修建模方法及应用[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2020: 332-334.
  ZUO H F, SUN J Z, LI X, et al. Predictive maintenance modeling and application for commercial aircraft[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2020: 332-334 (in Chinese).
6 STANTON I, MUNIR K, IKRAM A, et al. Predictive maintenance analytics and implementation for aircraft: Challenges and opportunities?[J]. Systems Engineering202326(2): 216-237.
7 TEUBERT C, POHYA A A, GOROSPE G. An analysis of barriers preventing the widespread adoption of predictive and prescriptive maintenance in aviation:NASA/TM-20230000841?[R]. Washington, D.C.: NASA, 2023.
8 United States Government Accountability Office. Military readiness actions needed to further implement predictive maintenance on weapon systems[R]. Washington, D.C.: Government Accountability Office, 2022.
9 左洪福, 蔡景, 吴昊, 等. 航空维修工程学[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2011: 1-5.
  ZUO H F, CAI J, WU H, et al. Aviation maintenance engineering?[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2011: 1-5 (in Chinese).
10 国家市场监督管理总局, 国家标准化管理委员会. 智能服务 预测性维护 通用要求: [S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2021.
  State Administration for Market Regulation, Standardization Administration of the People’s Republic of China. Intelligent service-Predictive maintenance-General requirements: [S]. Beijing: Standards Press of China, 2021 (in Chinese).
11 GAO Z W, DAI X W, BREIKIN T, et al. Novel parameter identification by using a high-gain observer with application to a gas turbine engine[J]. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics20084(4): 271-279.
12 ODENDAAL H M, JONES T. Actuator fault detection and isolation: An optimised parity space approach?[J]. Control Engineering Practice201426: 222-232.
13 HWANG W, HUH K. Fault detection and estimation for electromechanical brake systems using parity space approach[J]. Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control2015137(1): 014504.
14 LALL P, LOWE R, GOEBEL K. Prognostics health management of electronic systems under mechanical shock and vibration using Kalman filter models and metrics?[J]. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics201259(11): 4301-4314.
15 D?HLER M, MEVEL L. Subspace-based fault detection robust to changes in the noise covariances[J]. Automatica201349(9): 2734-2743.
16 ZHAO F, KOUTSOUKOS X, HAUSSECKER H, et al. Monitoring and fault diagnosis of hybrid systems[J]. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics), 200535(6): 1225-1240.
17 MIR-HAIDARI S E, BEHDINAN K. Structural health monitoring of aeroengines using transmissibility and bond graph methodology[M]. New York: Wiley, 2021.
18 XUE Y, WILLIAMS D P, QIU H, et al. Classification with imperfect labels for fault prediction?[C]?∥Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Data Mining for Service and Maintenance. New York: ACM, 2011: 12-16.
19 GERDES M, GALAR D, SCHOLZ D. Genetic algorithms and decision trees for condition monitoring and prognosis of A320 aircraft air conditioning[J]. Insight - Non-Destructive Testing and Condition Monitoring201759(8): 424-433.
20 YU J B. A nonlinear probabilistic method and contribution analysis for machine condition monitoring?[J]. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing201337(1-2): 293-314.
21 NING S G, SUN J Z, LIU C, et al. Applications of deep learning in big data analytics for aircraft complex system anomaly detection[J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part O: Journal of Risk and Reliability2021235(5): 923-940.
22 张鹏, 田子都, 王浩. 基于改进生成对抗网络的飞参数据异常检测方法[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版)202256(10): 1967-1976, 1986.
  ZHANG P, TIAN Z D, WANG H. Flight parameter data anomaly detection method based on improved generative adversarial network[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University (Engineering Science)202256(10): 1967-1976, 1986 (in Chinese).
23 CORA?A E M, FERREIRA J V, NóBREGA E G O. An unsupervised structural health monitoring framework based on Variational Autoencoders and Hidden Markov Models?[J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety2023231: 109025.
24 李泱, 李德文, 蔡景, 等. 基于SFA-LOF-LDD的航空发动机异常检测方法研究[J]. 机床与液压202351(13): 189-197, 205.
  LI Y, LI D W, CAI J, et al. Research on abnormal detection method of aero engine based on SFA-LOF-LDD[J]. Machine Tool & Hydraulics202351(13): 189-197, 205 (in Chinese).
25 赵剑, 齐凯, 高振兴. 基于QAR数据聚类分析的航班异常检测研究[J]. 航空计算技术201848(2): 52-56.
  ZHAO J, QI K, GAO Z X. Study of flight abnormal detection based on QAR data cluster analysis[J]. Aeronautical Computing Technique201848(2): 52-56 (in Chinese).
26 HRúZ M, PECHO P, SOCHA V, et al. Use of the principal component analysis for classification of aircraft components failure conditions using vibrodiagnostics?[J]. Transportation Research Procedia202159: 166-173.
27 BASORA L, BRY P, OLIVE X, et al. Aircraft fleet health monitoring with anomaly detection techniques[J]. Aerospace20218(4): 103.
28 SUN J Z, LI C Y, LIU C, et al. A data-driven health indicator extraction method for aircraft air conditioning system health monitoring[J]. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics201932(2): 409-416.
29 LIU C, SUN J Z, LIU H, et al. Complex engineered system health indexes extraction using low frequency raw time-series data based on deep learning methods[J]. Measurement2020161: 107890.
30 ZHU X Y, SUN J Z, HU H C, et al. A semi-supervised Siamese network for complex aircraft system fault detection with limited labeled fault samples[J]. Eksploatacja i Niezawodno???-Maintenance and Reliability202325(4): 174382.
31 GUO Y H, MA C B, DONG X, et al. A novel health indicator based on hysteresis loop for health prediction of flight control systems?[J]. Measurement2021186: 110076.
32 ZOLGHADRI A. The challenge of advanced model-based FDIR for real-world flight-critical applications[J]. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence201868: 249-259.
33 BERRI P C, DALLA VEDOVA M D L, MAININI L. Computational framework for real-time diagnostics and prognostics of aircraft actuation systems[J]. Computers in Industry2021132: 103523.
34 HAIDER S. Overview of prognostics and health management for landing gear maintenance?[C]∥2019 Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium (RAMS). Piscataway: IEEE Press, 2019: 1-7.
35 YAN H S, SUN J Z, ZUO H F. Anomaly detection based on multivariate data for the aircraft hydraulic system[J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part Ⅰ: Journal of Systems and Control Engineering, 2021235(5): 593-605.
36 SKLIROS C, ALI F, JENNIONS I. Fault simulations and diagnostics for a boeing 747 auxiliary power unit[J]. Expert Systems with Applications2021184: 115504.
37 WANG F Y, SUN J Z, LIU X C, et al. Aircraft auxiliary power unit performance assessment and remaining useful life evaluation for predictive maintenance[J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part A: Journal of Power and Energy2020234(6): 804-816.
38 BOULFANI F, GENDRE X, RUIZ-GAZEN A, et al. Anomaly detection for aircraft electrical generator using machine learning in a functional data framework?[C]?∥2020 Global Congress on Electrical Engineering (GC-ElecEng). Piscataway: IEEE Press, 2020: 27-32.
39 GERDES M, GROSS K, WANG G C. Electronic prognostics innovations for applications to aerospace systems[C]?∥2023 IEEE Aerospace Conference. Piscataway: IEEE Press, 2023: 1-9.
40 SUN J Z, ZUO H F, LIANG K, et al. Bayesian network-based multiple sources information fusion mechanism for gas path analysis[J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power201632(3): 611-619.
41 BASTARD G, LACAILLE J, COUPARD J, et al. Engine health management in safran aircraft engines?[C]?∥Annual Conference of the PHM Society, 2016.
42 孙见忠, 解志峰, 闫洪胜, 等. 民机PHM预测维修模式在空调系统的应用[J]. 南京航空航天大学学报202153(6): 952-964.
  SUN J Z, XIE Z F, YAN H S, et al. Application of PHM predictive maintenance on aircraft air conditioning system[J]. Journal of Nanjing University of Aeronautics & Astronautics202153(6): 952-964 (in Chinese).
43 VRABI? R, KOZJEK D, BUTALA P. Knowledge elicitation for fault diagnostics in plastic injection moulding: A case for machine-to-machine communication[J]. CIRP Annals201766(1): 433-436.
44 TRAN T, LUNDGREN J. Drill fault diagnosis based on the scalogram and mel spectrogram of sound signals using artificial intelligence?[J]. IEEE Access20208: 203655-203666.
45 AMRUTHNATH N, GUPTA T. Fault class prediction in unsupervised learning using model-based clustering approach?[C]?∥2018 International Conference on Information and Computer Technologies (ICICT). Piscataway: IEEE Press, 2018: 5-12.
46 WANG H C, DU W L. Fast spectral correlation based on sparse representation self-learning dictionary and its application in fault diagnosis of rotating machinery?[J]. Complexity20202020: 9857839.
47 LUO B, WANG H T, LIU H Q, et al. Early fault detection of machine tools based on deep learning and dynamic identification?[J]. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics201966(1): 509-518.
48 XU Y, SUN Y M, LIU X L, et al. A digital-twin-assisted fault diagnosis using deep transfer learning?[J]. IEEE Access20197: 19990-19999.
49 CHOWDHURY S H, ALI F, JENNIONS I K. A methodology for the experimental validation of an aircraft ECS digital twin targeting system level diagnostics[C]∥Annual Conference of the PHM Society, 2019.
50 PALMER K A, BOLLAS G M. Analysis of transient data in test designs for active fault detection and identification?[J]. Computers & Chemical Engineering2019122: 93-104.
51 LI Y H, HU H T, LEI R. Performance simulation and diagnosis of faulty states in air-cycle refrigeration systems in civil aircrafts[J]. International Journal of Refrigeration2023156: 232-242.
52 LIU C, SUN J Z, WANG F Y, et al. Bayesian network method for fault diagnosis of civil aircraft environment control system[J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part Ⅰ: Journal of Systems and Control Engineering, 2020234(5): 662-674.
53 EZHILARASU C M, SKAF Z, JENNIONS I K. A generalised methodology for the diagnosis of aircraft systems[J]. IEEE Access20219: 11437-11454.
54 KULKARNI C S, CORBETTA M, ROBINSON E. Enhancing fault isolation for health monitoring of electric aircraft propulsion by embedding failure mode and effect analysis into Bayesian networks?[C]∥Annual Conference of the PHM Society, 2020.
55 DUTTA A, NIEMIEC R, GANDHI F, et al. Time-series assisted machine learning framework for probabilistic rotor fault diagnosis on multicopters under varying operating conditions?[C]?∥AIAA SCITECH 2022 Forum. Reston: AIAA, 2022.
56 WHITE A, KARIMODDINI A. Event-based diagnosis of flight maneuvers of a fixed-wing aircraft[J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety2020193: 106609.
57 JIA Z, LIU Z B, CAI Y Y. A novel fault diagnosis method for aircraft actuator based on ensemble model[J]. Measurement2021176: 109235.
58 NESCI A, DE MARTIN A, JACAZIO G, et al. Detection and prognosis of propagating faults in flight control actuators for helicopters[J]. Aerospace20207(3): 20.
59 CARTOCCI N, CROCETTI F, COSTANTE G, et al. Data-driven sensor fault diagnosis based on nonlinear additive models and local fault sensitivity?[C]?∥2021 20th International Conference on Advanced Robotics (ICAR). Piscataway: IEEE Press, 2021: 750-756.
60 CASCIANELLI S, CROCETTI F, COSTANTE G, et al. Data-based design of robust fault isolation residuals using LASSO optimization?[C]?∥2019 International Conference on Control, Automation and Diagnosis (ICCAD). Piscataway: IEEE Press, 2019: 1-6.
61 CARTOCCI N, COSTANTE G, NAPOLITANO M R, et al. PCA methods and evidence based filtering for robust aircraft sensor fault diagnosis?[C]?∥2020 28th Mediterranean Conference on Control and Automation (MED). Piscataway: IEEE Press, 2020: 550-555.
62 CARTOCCI N, NAPOLITANO M R, COSTANTE G, et al. A robust data-driven fault diagnosis scheme based on recursive dempster-shafer combination rule[C]?∥2021 29th Mediterranean Conference on Control and Automation (MED). Piscataway: IEEE Press, 2021: 1070-1075.
63 CARTOCCI N, NAPOLITANO M R, COSTANTE G, et al. A comprehensive case study of data-driven methods for robust aircraft sensor fault isolation[J]. Sensors202121(5): 1645.
64 CARTOCCI N, NAPOLITANO M R, COSTANTE G, et al. Aircraft robust data-driven multiple sensor fault diagnosis based on optimality criteria[J]. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing2022170: 108668.
65 SLOBODA A, PI?A J, SLOBODA O, et al. Vibrodiagnostic of aircraft hydraulic emergency hydrogenerator NP 27T?[J]. Engineering Failure Analysis2022138: 106337.
66 CHEN J, XU Q S, GUO Y C, et al. Aircraft landing gear retraction/extension system fault diagnosis with 1-D dilated convolutional neural network[J]. Sensors202222(4): 1367.
67 TANG J, LIU Q, HU J W, et al. Leakage fault diagnosis method of aircraft landing gear hydraulic cylinder based on wavelet packet[J]. The Journal of Engineering2019, 2019(13): 427-431.
68 DUAN S X, LI Y J, CAO Y Y, et al. Health assessment of landing gear retraction/extension hydraulic system based on improved risk coefficient and FCE model[J]. Applied Sciences202212(11): 5409.
69 PECHT M G. Prognostics and health management of electronics[M]. New Jersey: Wiley, 2008.
70 WANG W B, CARR M, XU W J, et al. A model for residual life prediction based on Brownian motion with an adaptive drift[J]. Microelectronics Reliability201151(2): 285-293.
71 SUN J Z, ZUO H F, WANG W B, et al. Prognostics uncertainty reduction by fusing on-line monitoring data based on a state-space-based degradation model[J]. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing201445(2): 396-407.
72 WANG W. A model to determine the optimal critical level and the monitoring intervals in condition-based maintenance?[J]. International Journal of Production Research200038(6): 1425-1436.
73 BAE S J, KVAM P H. A nonlinear random-coefficients model for degradation testing?[J]. Technometrics200446(4): 460-469.
74 BAE S J, KUO W, KVAM P H. Degradation models and implied lifetime distributions?[J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety200792(5): 601-608.
75 LOUTAS T H, ROULIAS D, GEORGOULAS G. Remaining useful life estimation in rolling bearings utilizing data-driven probabilistic E-support vectors regression[J]. IEEE Transactions on Reliability201362(4): 821-832.
76 ZAIDAN M A, HARRISON R F, MILLS A R, et al. Bayesian Hierarchical Models for aerospace gas turbine engine prognostics[J]. Expert Systems with Applications201542(1): 539-553.
77 LIU R X, SONG J Z, LUO P J, et al. Analysis and prediction of temperature of an assembly frame for aircraft based on BP neural network[J]. International Journal of Computational Materials Science and Engineering202312(3): 2350006.
78 ORCHARD M E, VACHTSEVANOS G J. A particle-filtering approach for on-line fault diagnosis and failure prognosis[J]. Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control200931(3-4): 221-246.
79 SUN J Z, ZUO H F, WANG W B, et al. Application of a state space modeling technique to system prognostics based on a health index for condition-based maintenance[J]. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing201228: 585-596.
80 WANG W B. A two-stage prognosis model in condition based maintenance[J]. European Journal of Operational Research2007182(3): 1177-1187.
81 GAO S H, XIONG X, ZHOU Y F, et al. Bearing remaining useful life prediction based on a scaled health indicator and a LSTM model with attention mechanism[J]. Machines20219(10): 238.
82 王付广, 李伟, 郑近德, 等. 基于多频率尺度模糊熵和ELM的滚动轴承剩余寿命预测[J]. 噪声与振动控制201838(1): 188-192.
  WANG F G, LI W, ZHENG J D, et al. Prediction of remaining life of rolling bearings based on multi-frequency scale fuzzy entropy and ELM?[J]. Noise and Vibration Control201838(1): 188-192 (in Chinese).
83 HONG S, WANG B Q, LI G Q, et al. Performance degradation assessment for bearing based on ensemble empirical mode decomposition and Gaussian mixture model[J]. Journal of Vibration and Acoustics2014136(6): 061006.
84 WANG X, WANG T Y, MING A B, et al. Deep spatiotemporal convolutional-neural-network-based remaining useful life estimation of bearings[J]. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering202134(1): 62.
85 GIESECKE D, WEHKING M, FRIEDRICHS J, et al. A method for forecasting the condition of several HPT parts by using Bayesian belief networks?[C]?∥ASME Turbo Expo 2015: Turbine Technical Conference and Exposition. New York: ASME, 2015.
86 VAN ENKHUIZEN M J, DRESBACH C, REH S, et al. Efficient lifetime prediction of high pressure turbine blades in real life conditions?[C]?∥?ASME Turbo Expo 2017: Turbomachinery Technical Conference and Exposition. New York: ASME, 2017.
87 李春华, 孙见忠, 陆纪龙. 面向运维的HPT叶片寿命数字孪生建模方法[J]. 航空学报202445(21): 629385.
  LI C H, SUN J Z, LU J L. Maintenance-oriented approach for HPT blade life digital twin modeling[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica202445(21): 629385 (in Chinese)
88 CAO Y Y, WANG J, YU Y P, et al. Failure prognosis for electro-mechanical actuators based on improved SMO-SVR method?[C]∥2016 IEEE Chinese Guidance, Navigation and Control Conference (CGNCC). Piscataway: IEEE Press, 2016: 1180-1185.
89 BODDEN D S, CLEMENTS N S, SCHLEY B, et al. Seeded failure testing and analysis of an electro-mechanical actuator[C]∥2007 IEEE Aerospace Conference. Piscataway: IEEE Press, 2007: 1-8.
90 ISMAIL M A, SAWALHI N, PHAM T. Quantifying bearing fault severity using time synchronous averaging jerk energy[C]∥ICSV22. 2015: 12-16.
91 BYINGTON C S, WATSON M, EDWARDS D, et al. A model-based approach to prognostics and health management for flight control actuators?[C]?∥2004 IEEE Aerospace Conference Proceedings. Piscataway: IEEE Press, 2004: 3551-3562.
92 DALLA VEDOVA M D L, MAGGIORE P, PACE L, et al. Evaluation of the correlation coefficient as a prognostic indicator for electromechanical servomechanism failures?[J]. International Journal of Prognostics and Health Management20156(1): 11-13.
93 ZHANG Y J, PENG X Y, PENG Y, et al. Weighted bagging gaussion process regression to predict remaining useful life of electro-mechanical actuator?[C]∥2016 Prognostics and System Health Management Conference (PHM-Chengdu). Piscataway: IEEE Press, 2016: 1-6.
94 PENG Y, ZHANG Y J, LIU D T, et al. Degradation estimation using feature increment stepwise linear regression for PWM inverter of electro-mechanical actuator[J]. Microelectronics Reliability201888: 514-518.
95 WANG B W, SUN J Z, CHEN D, et al. A cumulative exposure model for remaining useful life prediction of pitot tube based on dynamic operating data[J]. Quality and Reliability Engineering International202339(4): 1518-1531.
96 KHORASGANI H, BISWAS G, SANKARARAMAN S. Methodologies for system-level remaining useful life prediction?[J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety2016154: 8-18.
97 SUN J Z, WANG F Y, NING S G. Aircraft air conditioning system health state estimation and prediction for predictive maintenance?[J]. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics202033(3): 947-955.
98 ARIAS CHAO M, KULKARNI C, GOEBEL K, et al. Fusing physics-based and deep learning models for prognostics?[J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety2022217: 107961.
99 SUN J Z, YAN Z C, HAN Y, et al. Deep learning framework for gas turbine performance digital twin and degradation prognostics from airline operator perspective[J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety2023238: 109404.
100 CHEN J, MA C B, SONG D. Multiple failure prognosis of landing gear retraction/extension system based on H filtering[J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering2015229(8): 1543-1555.
101 BALABAN E, SAXENA A, GOEBEL K, et al. Experimental data collection and modeling for nominal and fault conditions on electro-mechanical actuators[C]∥Annual Conference of the PHM Society, 2009.
102 SENTURK C, KAVSAOGLU M S, NIKBAY M. Optimization of aircraft utilization by reducing scheduled maintenance downtime?[C]?∥10th AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations (ATIO) Conference. Reston: AIAA, 2010.
103 ANDRADE P, SILVA C, RIBEIRO B, et al. Aircraft maintenance check scheduling using reinforcement learning[J]. Aerospace20218(4): 113.
104 CLARE J, KOUROUSIS K I. Learning from incidents in aircraft maintenance and continuing airworthiness management: A systematic review?[J]. Journal of Advanced Transportation20212021(1): 8852932.
105 SRIRAM C, HAGHANI A. An optimization model for aircraft maintenance scheduling and re-assignment?[J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice200337(1): 29-48.
106 MOUDANI W EL, MORA-CAMINO F. A dynamic approach for aircraft assignment and maintenance scheduling by airlines?[J]. Journal of Air Transport Management20006(4): 233-237.
107 MATTILA V, VIRTANEN K. A simulation-based optimization model to schedule periodic maintenance of a fleet of aircraft[C]∥2005 European Simulation and Modelling Conference, 2005.
108 KOZANIDIS G. Flight and maintenance planning of military aircraft for maximum fleet availability[J]. Military Operations Research201015(1): 1-11.
109 BA?DERE M, BILGE ü. Operational aircraft maintenance routing problem with remaining time consideration[J]. European Journal of Operational Research2014235(1): 315-328.
110 FUKUNAGA A S, KORF R E. Bin completion algorithms for multicontainer packing, knapsack, and covering problems[J]. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research200728(1): 393-429.
111 BOHLIN M. A Study of combinatorial optimization problems in industrial computer systems?[D]. Vasteras: M?rlardalen University, 2010.
112 DENG Q C, SANTOS B F, CURRAN R. A practical dynamic programming based methodology for aircraft maintenance check scheduling optimization[J]. European Journal of Operational Research2020281(2): 256-273.
113 DENG Q C, SANTOS B F, VERHAGEN W J C. A novel decision support system for optimizing aircraft maintenance check schedule and task allocation[J]. Decision Support Systems2021146: 113545.
114 DAENENS S. Assessing the impact of condition-based maintenance on airline maintenance operations?[D]. Delft : Delft University of Technology, 2021.
115 ALASWAD S, XIANG Y S. A review on condition-based maintenance optimization models for stochastically deteriorating system?[J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety2017157: 54-63.
116 WALTER G, FLAPPER S D. Condition-based maintenance for complex systems based on current component status and Bayesian updating of component reliability[J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety2017168: 227-239.
117 H?LZEL N, SCHR?DER C, SCHILLING T, et al. A maintenance packaging and scheduling optimization method for future aircraft[C]∥Air Transport & Operations Symposium, 2012.
118 DENG Q, SANTOS B E. A stochastic aircraft maintenance and crew scheduling problem with multiple check types and aircraft availability constraints?[J]. European Journal of Operational Research2022299(2): 814-833.
119 TSEREMOGLOU I, VAN KESSEL P J, SANTOS B F. A comparative study of optimization models for condition-based maintenance scheduling of an aircraft fleet[J]. Aerospace202310(2): 120.
120 VAN KESSEL P J, FREEMAN F C, SANTOS B F. Airline maintenance task rescheduling in a disruptive environment?[J]. European Journal of Operational Research2023308(2): 605-621.
121 TSEREMOGLOU I, SANTOS B F. Condition-based maintenance scheduling of an aircraft fleet under partial observability: A deep reinforcement learning approach[J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety2024241: 109582.
122 DE PATER I, REIJNS A, MITICI M. Alarm-based predictive maintenance scheduling for aircraft engines with imperfect remaining useful life prognostics[J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety2022221: 108341.
123 闫洪胜. 基于运行数据的民机维修优化方法及关键技术研究[D]. 南京: 南京航空航天大学, 2021.
  YAN H S. Research on maintenance optimization methods and key technologies of civil aircraft based on operation data?[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2021 (in Chinese).
124 TSEREMOGLOU I, BIEBER M, SANTOS B F, et al. The impact of prognostic uncertainty on condition-based maintenance scheduling: An integrated approach?[C]?∥AIAA AVIATION 2022 Forum. Reston: AIAA, 2022.
125 ReMAP. Multi-stage maintenance management decision support tool?[R]. European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Program, 2021.
126 THOMPSON N, BLOND K, CLARK A, et al. MBSE applications to optimize predictive maintenance scheduling in military aviation?[C]∥2023 IEEE Aerospace Conference. Piscataway: IEEE Press, 2023: 1-9.
127 BLOND K, HIMSCHOOT A, KLEIN E, et al. Adapting commercial best practices to U.S. air force maintenance scheduling[J]. Aerospace202310(1): 61.
128 IATA. From aircraft health monitoring to aircraft health management white paper on AHM[EB/OL]. (2022-01-01). .
129 International Maintenance Review Board Policy Board. IP92: Definition of Structural Health Monitoring (SHM)/Addition to MSG-3[EB/OL]. (2007-01-01), .
130 International Maintenance Review Board Policy Board. IP 180: Aircraft Health Monitoring (AHM) integration in MSG-3[EB/OL]. (2018-01-01). , 2018.
131 International SAE. Guidelines for implementation of structural health monitoring on fixed wing aircraft: SAE ARP 6461-2013 (SAE ARP6461-2013)? [S]. Warrendale: SAE International, 2013
132 International SAE. Structural health monitoring considerations and guidance specific to rotorcraft: SAE AIR6892 [S]. Warrendale: SAE International, 2020
133 HARRISON M. Big data: The race is on! But what is the end goal?[C]?∥?14th Maintenance Cost Conference, 2018.
134 Boeing. Predictive maintenance-Insight accelerator |Boeing Services [EB/OL]. (2023-11-28). .
135 BERNARD W, HOFFMANN A. SKYWISE-Big data platform as a foundation of airlines predictive and health monitoring?[C]?∥PHM Society Asia-Pacific Conference,2023.
136 Lufthansa Industry Solutions. Advancing the future of predictive maintenance [EB/OL]. (2023-12-12). .
137 李磊, 李明宇, 赵昶升, 等. 飞机健康管理系统告警等级调整方法研究[J]. 航空维修与工程2019(11): 50-53.
  LI L, LI M Y, ZHAO C S, et al. Research on alert grade adjustment method of aircraft health management system?[J]. Aviation Maintenance & Engineering2019(11): 50-53 (in Chinese).
138 李欣. 南方航空飞机健康管理系统发展策略研究[J]. 航空维修与工程2022(9): 20-23.
  LI X. Research on development strategy of aircraft health management system of China southern airlines[J]. Aviation Maintenance & Engineering2022(9): 20-23 (in Chinese).
139 REGNIER E, HUDGENS B. Condition-based maintenance implementation and potential in USMC ground transport: NPS-DDS-23-001[R]. Monterey: Department of Defense Management Naval Postgraduate School, 2022.
140 Inspector General of U.S. Department of Defense. Audit of the Department of Defense’s implementation of predictive maintenance strategies to support weapon system sustainment [S]. Arlington: Inspector General, Department of Defense, 2022.
141 TEUBERT C, POHYA A A, GOROSPE G. An analysis of barriers preventing the widespread adoption of predictive and prescriptive maintenance in aviation?[R]. Washington, D.C.: NASA,2023.
Outlines

/