ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA >
Fault diagnosis method of rotor system based on federated graph network
Received date: 2024-04-24
Revised date: 2024-05-20
Accepted date: 2024-06-03
Online published: 2024-06-07
Supported by
National Natural Science Foundation of China(12172290);Shenzhen Science and Technology Program(JCYJ20220530161801003)
Considerable harsh operating environments of rotor systems, combined with the difficulty in fusing monitoring data from multiple sources and a tendency to form data islands, present substantial challenges to the health monitoring of rotor systems. This paper proposes a rotor system fault diagnosis method utilizing Federated Graph Convolutional neural Networks (FGCN) based on a genetic evolutionary composition. First, a federated migration learning framework, employing federated learning and graph neural networks, is established. The global model is derived by training local models on individual clients and aggregating them via a federated weighted average algorithm. This method facilitates data localization while securing the privacy and integrity of model parameters. Furthermore, to address the challenge of inadequate adaptive integration of multi-source sensor data, a genetic evolution composition method is introduced. This method dynamically adjusts the connectivity and weights among graph nodes during training, emulating the mechanisms of natural selection and genetic variation found in biological evolution. This approach significantly enhances the adaptability and flexibility of the multi-source sensor composition, thereby improving the accuracy of fault diagnosis. In conclusion, experimental validation on the rotor failure testbed dataset demonstrates that the proposed method effectively utilizes limited target domain data, achieving over 95% accuracy in fault diagnosis scenarios where the clients contain different number of faults classes.
Hui LI , Yinchao CHEN , Shaoshan SUN , Zhaoxin LIANG , Gang MAO , Bin QIAO , Yongbo LI . Fault diagnosis method of rotor system based on federated graph network[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2024 , 45(17) : 530611 -530611 . DOI: 10.7527/S1000-6893.2024.30611
1 | LIAO W L, YANG D C, WANG Y S, et al. Fault diagnosis of power transformers using graph convolutional network[J]. CSEE Journal of Power and Energy Systems, 2021, 7(2): 241-249. |
2 | ZHANG D C, STEWART E, ENTEZAMI M, et al. Intelligent acoustic-based fault diagnosis of roller bearings using a deep graph convolutional network[J]. Measurement, 2020, 156: 107585. |
3 | WANG T, LIU Z, LU G L, et al. Temporal-spatio graph based spectrum analysis for bearing fault detection and diagnosis[J]. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 2021, 68(3): 2598-2607. |
4 | ZHOU K B, YANG C Y, LIU J, et al. Dynamic graph-based feature learning with few edges considering noisy samples for rotating machinery fault diagnosis[J]. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 2022, 69(10): 10595-10604. |
5 | XU J M, KE H B, CHEN Z W, et al. Oversmoothing relief graph convolutional network-based fault diagnosis method with application to the rectifier of high-speed trains[J]. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 2023, 19(1): 771-779. |
6 | CHEN Z W, XU J M, PENG T, et al. Graph convolutional network-based method for fault diagnosis using a hybrid of measurement and prior knowledge[J]. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, 2022, 52(9): 9157-9169. |
7 | YANG C Y, ZHOU K B, LIU J. SuperGraph: Spatial-temporal graph-based feature extraction for rotating machinery diagnosis[J]. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 2022, 69(4): 4167-4176. |
8 | LI T F, ZHOU Z, LI S N, et al. The emerging graph neural networks for intelligent fault diagnostics and prognostics: A guideline and a benchmark study[J]. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2022, 168: 108653. |
9 | KONE?NY J, MCMAHAN H B, YU F X, et al. Federated learning: Strategies for improving communication efficiency[EB/OL]. 2016: arXiv: 1610.05492. |
10 | 邵海东, 肖一鸣, 闵志闪, 等. 区块链和边缘计算赋能的联邦学习故障诊断框架[J]. 机械工程学报,2023,59(21):283-292. |
SHAO H D, XIAO Y M, MIN Z S,et al. Blockchain and edge computing enabled federated learning fault diagnosis framework[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering,2023,59(21):283-292 (in Chinese). | |
11 | ZHANG W, LI X, MA H, et al. Federated learning for machinery fault diagnosis with dynamic validation and self-supervision[J]. Knowledge-Based Systems, 2021, 213: 106679. |
12 | ZHANG W, LI X. Data privacy preserving federated transfer learning in machinery fault diagnostics using prior distributions[J]. Structural Health Monitoring, 2022, 21(4): 1329-1344. |
13 | ZHANG W, LI X. Federated transfer learning for intelligent fault diagnostics using deep adversarial networks with data privacy[J]. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 2022, 27(1): 430-439. |
14 | SUN S L, HUANG H D, PENG T Y, et al. A data privacy protection diagnosis framework for multiple machines vibration signals based on a swarm learning algorithm[J]. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 2023, 72: 3501309. |
15 | ZHANG W, WANG Z W, LI X. Blockchain-based decentralized federated transfer learning methodology for collaborative machinery fault diagnosis[J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2023, 229: 108885. |
16 | CHEN J, TANG J H, LI W H. Industrial edge intelligence: Federated-meta learning framework for few-shot fault diagnosis[J]. IEEE Transactions on Network Science and Engineering, 2023, 10(6): 3561-3573. |
17 | DU N H, LONG N H, HA K N, et al. Trans-Lighter: A light-weight federated learning-based architecture for remaining useful lifetime prediction[J]. Computers in Industry, 2023, 148: 103888. |
18 | ANGLES R, GUTIERREZ C. Survey of graph database models[J]. ACM Computing Surveys, 2008, 40(1): 1-39. |
19 | ZUMSTEIN P. Comparison of spectral methods through the adjacency matrix and the Laplacian of a graph[D]. Zurich: ETH Zürich, 2005. |
20 | XIE Z L, CHEN J L, FENG Y, et al. Semi-supervised multi-scale attention-aware graph convolution network for intelligent fault diagnosis of machine under extremely-limited labeled samples[J]. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 2022, 64: 561-577. |
21 | YANG C Y, LIU J, ZHOU K B, et al. A node-level PathGraph-based bearing remaining useful life prediction method[J]. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 2022, 71: 3517610. |
22 | LI C Y, MO L F, YAN R Q. Rolling bearing fault diagnosis based on horizontal visibility graph and graph neural networks[C]∥ 2020 International Conference on Sensing, Measurement & Data Analytics in the era of Artificial Intelligence (ICSMD). Piscataway: IEEE Press, 2020: 275-279. |
23 | DYER R J, NASON J D. Population graphs: The graph theoretic shape of genetic structure[J]. Molecular Ecology, 2004, 13(7): 1713-1727. |
24 | 贾思祥, 孙丁一, 毛刚, 等. 基于对抗熵的转子系统跨工况故障诊断方法[J]. 机械工程学报, 2023, 59(15): 110-120. |
JIA S X, SUN D Y, MAO G, et al. Adversarial entropy based fault diagnosis method for rotor system across different working conditions[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2023, 59(15): 110-120 (in Chinese). |
/
〈 |
|
〉 |