ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA >
Multi-UAV cooperative path planning based on multi-index dynamic priority
Received date: 2023-04-04
Revised date: 2023-05-05
Accepted date: 2023-09-06
Online published: 2023-09-13
Supported by
National Natural Science Foundation of China(61903033);The Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities(2020MS116)
To save operation costs and increase efficiency for collaborative inspection, distribution, and other tasks of multiple Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) in complex urban environments, a cooperative path planning method is proposed based on multi-index dynamic priority. A dynamic priority model is constructed through a comprehensive consideration of the indices such as collision risk, total distance, and waiting time. Under the priority-based unilateral collision avoidance mechanism, a combined avoidance strategy is customized to handle local conflicts, so as to balance the planning efficiency and route quality. For individual path planning, a congestion weighted map is introduced into the Lazy Theta* algorithm to guide UAV to avoid congested areas and reduce the conflict possibility. Comparative simulation experiments show that the proposed individual planning algorithm can reduce congestion areas and congestion duration, and the proposed multi-index dynamic priority cooperative planning algorithm can improve planning efficiency and route optimality compared to the flight-time driven dynamic priority.
Zhu WANG , Mengtong ZHANG , Zhenpeng ZHANG , Guangtong XU . Multi-UAV cooperative path planning based on multi-index dynamic priority[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2024 , 45(4) : 328816 -328816 . DOI: 10.7527/S1000-6893.2023.28816
1 | LI S, ZHANG H H, LI Z L, et al. An air route network planning model of logistics UAV terminal distribution in urban low altitude airspace[J]. Sustainability, 2021, 13(23): 13079. |
2 | LI K, NI W, TOVAR E, et al. On-board deep Q-network for UAV-assisted online power transfer and data collection[J]. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 2019, 68(12): 12215-12226. |
3 | 杨旭, 王锐, 张涛. 面向无人机集群路径规划的智能优化算法综述[J]. 控制理论与应用, 2020, 37(11): 2291-2302. |
YANG X, WANG R, ZHANG T. Review of unmanned aerial vehicle swarm path planning based on intelligent optimization[J]. Control Theory & Applications, 2020, 37(11): 2291-2302 (in Chinese). | |
4 | XU C, XU M, YIN C J. Optimized multi-UAV cooperative path planning under the complex confrontation environment[J]. Computer Communications, 2020, 162: 196-203. |
5 | XU L, CAO X B, DU W B, et al. Cooperative path planning optimization for multiple UAVs with communication constraints[J]. Knowledge-Based Systems, 2023, 260: 110164. |
6 | MOHANAN M G, SALGOANKAR A. A survey of robotic motion planning in dynamic environments[J]. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 2018, 100: 171-185. |
7 | CHUNG S J, PARANJAPE A A, DAMES P, et al. A survey on aerial swarm robotics[J]. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 2018, 34(4): 837-855. |
8 | XU G T, CAO Y, SUN J L, et al. Real-time path generation for UAV swarms using receding planning framework and priority decoupling mechanism[C]∥ 2021 33rd Chinese Control and Decision Conference (CCDC). Piscataway: IEEE Press, 2021: 4338-4343. |
9 | 徐广通, 王祝, 曹严, 等. 动态优先级解耦的无人机集群轨迹分布式序列凸规划[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(2): 325059. |
XU G T, WANG Z, CAO Y, et al. Dynamic-priority-decoupled UAV swarm trajectory planning using distributed sequential convex programming[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2022, 43(2): 325059 (in Chinese). | |
10 | VELAGAPUDI P, SYCARA K, SCERRI P. Decentralized prioritized planning in large multirobot teams[C]∥ 2010 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Piscataway: IEEE Press, 2010: 4603-4609. |
11 | ERDMANN M, LOZANO-PéREZ T. On multiple moving objects[J]. Algorithmica, 1987, 2(1-4): 477-521. |
12 | DU L Z, KE S F, WANG Z, et al. Research on multi-load AGV path planning of weaving workshop based on time priority[J]. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2019, 16(4): 2277-2292. |
13 | ZHANG Y, WANG F L, FU F K, et al. Multi-AGV path planning for indoor factory by using prioritized planning and improved ant algorithm[J]. Journal of Engineering and Technological Sciences, 2018, 50(4): 534-547. |
14 | TAI R C, WANG J C, CHEN W D. A priori tized planning algorithm of trajectory coordination based on time windows for multiple AGVs with delay disturbance[J]. Assembly Automation, 2019, 39(05): 753-768. |
15 | GUNEY M ALI, RAPTIS I A. Dynamic prioritized motion coordination of multi-AGV systems[J]. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 2021, 139: 103534. |
16 | LI H, LONG T, XU G T, et al. Coupling-degree-based heuristic prioritized planning method for UAV swarm path generation[C]∥ 2019 Chinese Automation Congress (CAC). Piscataway: IEEE Press, 2020: 3636-3641. |
17 | DANIEL K, NASH A, KOENIG S, et al. Theta*: Any-angle path planning on grids[J]. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 2010, 39: 533-579. |
18 | NASH A, KOENIG S, TOVEY C. Lazy theta*: Any-angle path planning and path length analysis in 3D[J]. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2010, 24(1): 147-154. |
19 | FARIA M, MARíN R, POPOVI? M, et al. Efficient lazy theta* path planning over a sparse grid to explore large 3D volumes with a multirotor UAV[J]. Sensors, 2019, 19(1): 174. |
20 | FARIA M, MAZA I, VIGURIA A. Applying frontier cells based exploration and lazy theta* path planning over single grid-based world representation for autonomous inspection of large 3D structures with an UAS[J]. Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems, 2019, 93(1): 113-133. |
21 | 徐鹏飞, 丁延旭, 曹清波. 基于环境优化的无人艇全局路径规划研究[J]. 中国造船, 2022, 63(5): 206-220. |
XU P F, DING Y X, CAO Q B. Research on global path planning of unmanned surface vehicle based on environmental optimization[J]. Shipbuilding of China, 2022, 63(5): 206-220 (in Chinese). | |
22 | 张耀天, 张旭成, 贾明顺, 等. 基于层次分析法的自适应决策评价方法[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2016, 42(5): 1065-1070. |
ZHANG Y T, ZHANG X C, JIA M S, et al. Adaptive evaluation method based on analytic hierarchy process[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2016, 42(5): 1065-1070 (in Chinese). | |
23 | KIM C, KIM Y, YI H. Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process-based mobile robot path planning[J]. Electronics, 2020, 9(2): 290. |
/
〈 |
|
〉 |